The most important rebuttal against a defendant’s accusation of entrapment, especially when government agents have, over time and through multiple meetings, provided the means and methods of the charged crime, is the first conversation with the accused. As long as the defendant willfully expresses in his first conversation with government agents his clear intent to commit the crime that is later developed with their assistance, the agents are usually secure in their statements that they did not entrapment an otherwise innocent person with no intent to commit the eventual crime.
FBI’s “Portland Bomb Plot”: Plot Bombs Over Dead Batteries |
| By: Teddy Partridge Saturday April 9, 2011 6:40 pm |
Arrest in Actual Bomb Plot in Spokane: Will This Story Break Wide? |
| By: Teddy Partridge Wednesday March 9, 2011 5:50 pm |
My major question about today’s arrest in the actual bomb placement at the Spokane, Washington, Martin Luther King Day parade is this: how will America’s media cover the arrest of a non-Muslim motivated by white supremacy who actually placed an operational bomb in a clear hate crime?


61 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake