It seems Republican Senator Lamar Alexander is incredibly upset that policy decisions will ultimately be made by voters.
|By: Jon Walker Monday November 25, 2013 8:50 am|
|By: cocktailhag Thursday November 21, 2013 8:00 pm|
Harry Reid’s belated decision to eliminate (sorta) the filibuster today has rendered the lefty blogosphere and progressive talk radio all aflutter about how his move was so brave and wonderful, which is undoubtedly true as far as it goes. But as Jon Walker aptly pointed out here earlier today, the swiftness and ease with which this supposedly “historic” move was made can only remind us that it was four years too late.
|By: Jon Walker Thursday November 21, 2013 10:04 am|
History was just made in the United States’ Senate. Democrats used the so-called nuclear option to stop a filibuster on a judicial nominee. It was in response to Republicans declaring they would filibuster any Obama nominee to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals regardless of merit, so its conservative leanings would never change. The change was supported 52-48.
|By: Jon Walker Thursday July 18, 2013 8:50 am|
The idea that the minority party has power over routine issues in the Senate is total nonsense. The minority only has power because the majority has maintained a tradition of needlessly giving the minority non-constitutional veto. As soon as the majority decides to end this silly practice, the minority loses all leverage.
|By: Jon Walker Wednesday July 17, 2013 1:05 pm|
Yesterday’s Senate deal to avoid the nuclear option was a short term win for President Obama. After a long delay he will finally get seven people he wanted confirmed to seven executive branch position, which should make it easier to govern. Long term though it is another loss for effective and non-corrupt government.
|By: Jon Walker Monday March 25, 2013 11:15 am|
I would like to make a simple suggestion to vastly improve the quality of reporting in Washington. Whenever a reporter writes “Republicans filibuster” they should instead replace it with the far more accurate phrase, “Senate Democrats allow Republicans to filibuster.”
|By: Jon Walker Friday January 25, 2013 10:10 am|
One of the most painful things about following Congress is that it is often hard to tell if a member is being an idiot or engaged in a cynical attempt at deception to hide their true position.
|By: David Dayen Tuesday October 11, 2011 2:00 pm|
Harry Reid’s op-ed giving the inside story about the non-nuclear option he accomplished last week is good for the way it shows how Senate Republicans have worked to decay the functioning of the chamber. But he hasn’t gone far enough in fixing the Senate’s rules.
|By: Jane Hamsher Tuesday June 14, 2011 5:30 am|
For any LGBT group, the bottom line should have been that when LGTB rights were pitted against corporate rights, Coronado was willing to give a group of people with seriously homophobic judicial histories enormous power to determine the future of lives of people within the LGTB community
|By: Jon Walker Friday June 25, 2010 2:20 pm|
Several left-leaning writers like Greg Sargent have all noted the basic game theory 101 involved. Voters will blame Democrats, and vote for Republicans, if the economy stays bad. So, Republicans have a huge incentive to block Democrats from passing legislation that would improve the economy, and Senate Republicans have the tool to do that with the filibuster.
My question is: If Democratic Senators like Stabenow actually believe Republicans are trying to destroy the lives of millions of Americans and our economy, why on Earth are Senate Democrats letting Republicans do it?