Some of my darkest predictions about the new health care law are coming true. With businesses again clamoring for corporate tax reduction, the go-to in Pay-Go-obsessed Washington are the affordability subsidies for people who will be using the new health care exchanges.
|By: Jon Walker Wednesday March 9, 2011 4:07 pm|
|By: Jon Walker Tuesday November 2, 2010 7:40 am|
With all the entries in Firedoglake’s Election Projection Challenge now in, I decided to see if the aggregate projections of the FDL community can outperform the professional political prognosticators.
|By: Jane Hamsher Friday October 29, 2010 9:30 am|
According to the latest WSJ/NBC poll, the health care bill is “particularly unpopular in the districts that matter most in the Republicans’ effort to retake the House”: According to the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, 52% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who wanted to give the [...]
|By: Elliott Tuesday January 19, 2010 5:21 pm|
Jane, Matt, and Nate talk with Dylan this afternoon about big business and big government, catering to special interests, secret deals, lack of trust, and voter anger.
|By: Jane Hamsher Friday January 15, 2010 8:01 pm|
We hoped Snyder would decide that he should insist on pulling the mandate out of this bill in exchange for his vote. Now that he’s leaving the seat, he’ll most certainly be a “yes” vote, so that actually does nothing to “kill the bill” for those paying close attention.
If Vic Snyder is getting hammered, it isn’t because of a poll. The fault lies much deeper than that. The corrupt PhRMA deal, the insurance company giveaways, their exemption from anti-trust laws — people understand what’s going on, and Democrats across the country are paying a price for it. You’d have to be in serious denial to pretend anything else.
|By: David Dayen Wednesday January 6, 2010 2:02 pm|
Over the past month, the health care debate has increasingly become a debate on the left over the relative merits of the bill. Most everyone has weighed in on this, often multiple times, with substantive critiques of the reform package and reasons for the urgency of its passage. But until now, the debates have had [...]
|By: emptywheel Thursday December 31, 2009 8:45 am|
Improving on the affordability of a national health care reform plan requires thorough discussion of the details, not dismissal of discussion as semantics.
|By: emptywheel Tuesday December 29, 2009 1:45 pm|
I appreciate having a discussion based in facts and details. . . the point I’m trying to make is that this plan does not solve the health care debt problem middle class families are experiencing now–and will still experience under the Senate plan. This plan is not affordable for the middle class. And since we’re talking about mandating these costs, we ought to be having a discussion about what is affordable.
|By: Jon Walker Monday December 21, 2009 8:30 am|
I also understand people think any expansion of coverage is a step forward, but it is only a step forward if it proves popular. If this health care expansion proves too expensive and unpopular, it can serve to discredit progressive efforts to later reform. I would happily work for a smaller house with a truly strong foundation. I don’t think a bill that enriches, empowers, and entrenches the enemies of reform is a good foundation.
|By: Jon Walker Wednesday December 16, 2009 5:30 pm|
My goal has always been reconciliation, the use of the nuclear option, or the White House using its influence to back down conservative Democrats — something that hasn’t happened yet. I think this question is misleading because that is not the actual choice on the table. It is bad bill with regular order, a better bill with 50 votes in the Senate, or no bill.