Given his steady support of Mitch McConnell, it’s a fair guess that Lamar Alexander truly believes that democrats and the people they claim to represent are not entitled to govern. Or, as Corey Robin puts it: “Submission is their first duty, agency, the prerogative of the elite.”
Republican Reactionaries and the Strange Change in Lamar Alexander |
| By: masaccio Sunday January 8, 2012 10:30 am |
The Party Line – August 5, 2011: Japan Worries About More Radiation, US Officials Worry About Red Tape |
| By: Gregg Levine Friday August 5, 2011 3:17 pm |
News this week out of Japan that workers at the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant have detected extremely high levels of radiation in and around reactor 1. The first incident, on August 1, pinned the Geiger counter at 10 sieverts (1000 rem)—yes, that’s as high as the device could measure, so that number is a minimum—and was taken at the base of a ventilation stack. The second reading, the following day, clocked in at five sieverts per hour inside the reactor building.
I have yet to read an explanation for the discovery of the second reading, but the initial, sky-high measurement on Monday has me and many others scratching heads. A thousand rem is not some little ho-hum number. A half-hour of exposure at that level is fatal in a matter of days, I am told. Where did that radiation come from?
Senate Rules Changes Slipping Away As Media Dissembles |
| By: David Dayen Monday January 24, 2011 6:05 am |
Paul Kane has a piece in Sunday’s Washington Post that seems to be the kind of take on the Senate rules reform fight you’d expect someone who hasn’t been following it at all and gets most of his information from lobbyists. He accepts the contributions of senior Senate aides that the effort led by some Democrats to change the Senate rules will fail because “party leaders want to protect the right of the Senate’s minority party to sometimes force a supermajority of 60 votes to approve legislation.” But of course, the rules changes on the table would still allow that right. This confusion may indeed sink the Merkley/Harkin/Udall effort, but it’s a willful confusion.
With Some Dems Nervous About Any Changes, Senate Rules Reform to Be Tweaked |
| By: David Dayen Wednesday January 19, 2011 8:40 am |
Sen. Jeff Merkley acknowledged that one component of the consensus plan on Senate rules reform put together by him, Tom Udall and Tom Harkin would probably get tweaked, and that the biggest concern for skittish Democratic lawmakers was changing the rules at all, lest they be changed on them when Republicans take over. Which is kind of an amazing commentary on the state of the Democratic Party, when you think about it.
Bob Schieffer: Reporter or Russert-Like Sphinx? |
| By: Teddy Partridge Sunday May 9, 2010 5:00 pm |
Bob Schieffer is sitting on a scoop he needs to share with the world, unless his rules for ‘off-the-record’ are the same as the late Tim Russert: everything is always off-the-record unless the newsmaker specifically grants ‘permission to use.’
Tennessee Senators Block FAA Funding to Save FedEx From Unionization |
| By: David Dayen Monday March 8, 2010 1:32 pm |
Tennessee’s Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker are going to bat for a major business in Tennessee while blocking employees from unionizing.
If Republicans Talk Nonsense about Senate Procedure and the American People Don’t Care Does It Affect Legislation? |
| By: Jon Walker Monday March 1, 2010 2:15 pm |
Defining what are the three or four things people remember being in the health care bill is what will make or break Democrats, combined with strong messaging — not insider baseball talk about Senate procedure that most regular Americans don’t know about, don’t understand, or don’t care about.
Employee Free Choice: Beware of the Big Lie Bill |
| By: Tula Connell Thursday February 26, 2009 1:35 pm |
Opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act in Congress made their Big Lie into a bill Wednesday, when Republicans John DeMint (S.C.) and Mike Enzi (Wyo.) introduced the so-called Secret Ballot Protection Act.
Before we go further, let’s clear up the bill’s false implication right now:
The Employee Free Choice Act would not—repeat after me—would not, take away the secret ballot National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election process if workers seeking to form a union wanted to use it.


18 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake