Throughout the media the figure of $17 billion has been paraded out as the penalty Bank of America will pay for its crimes in the mortgage security market that led to the 2008 financial crisis and resulting Great Recession. But will BofA really be paying that much? If the other deals struck for the same crisis causing activity are any indication, no.
|By: DSWright Thursday August 21, 2014 11:10 am|
|By: David Dayen Wednesday December 19, 2012 2:40 pm|
The Financial Times points out today that Tim Geithner, while heading the NY Fed, knew all about the Libor fraud at the major banks, and that traders were manipulating the rate purely to make money for themselves on various deals. This is a stronger charge than the idea that banks manipulated the rate for reasons of financial health, and Geithner knew it was happening. But he did nothing. As per usual.
|By: David Dayen Tuesday December 18, 2012 2:01 pm|
While we wait for more settlements in the Libor case, banks continue to face exposure for their fraudulent mortgage conduct dating back to the housing bubble. Two more major lawsuits emerged yesterday.
|By: David Dayen Monday December 17, 2012 9:05 am|
Where is Patrick Leahy on this? He has made no public statement on the HSBC case, despite being the co-author of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, which was supposed to deliver funds toward prosecuting fraudulent big bank activity (it never actually did). Grassley, a co-author, has spoken out. Why not Leahy?
|By: David Dayen Friday December 14, 2012 9:25 am|
You don’t have to be a big fan of the drug war to suggest that extending a helping hand to murderous gangs is probably not activity an allegedly reputable bank should be involved in.
|By: David Dayen Wednesday December 12, 2012 12:05 pm|
Maybe at some point, banks will face prosecution or at least fines in the Libor case. Everyone expects UBS, the Royal Bank of Scotland and several others to face some sort of sanction. But we’ve been hearing about imminent charges for months now, with nothing to show for it. Banks have individually terminated people they claim are responsible for the rate-rigging, but that internal discipline has been the only kind on offer.
|By: David Dayen Monday December 3, 2012 2:52 pm|
Late last week, the Justice Department issued a filing that attempts to reinforce the release limitations set by the foreclosure fraud settlement, stopping Wells Fargo from reimagining the deal as a broader release of liability on various mortgage claims. However, a judge will have to make the final decision.
The US sued Wells Fargo in late October over issuing insurance claims on FHA loans while knowing that the loans did not meet underwriting requirements set by the agency. Wells charged in court that these specific charges were covered under the foreclosure fraud settlement. I actually thought Wells made a fairly compelling case on that front, but the DoJ disagrees.
|By: David Dayen Monday December 3, 2012 11:02 am|
Maybe Glenn Hadden getting banned from trading will somehow create the long-absent deterrent for financial fraud. But actually putting him in jail would go a bit further.
|By: David Dayen Thursday November 29, 2012 10:56 am|
Mary Miller, a Treasury Department official seen as the expected pick for the next head of the SEC, dropped out of contention yesterday, leaving an unclear path forward. Elisse Walter, who was designated as the new chair, replacing the departing Mary Schapiro, is seen as a stopgap pick. But her elevation to the top slot means that the SEC is one member down on its commission, with a 2-2 split between Democrats and Republicans. This will likely stall out almost all its important initiatives in the coming months until a new commissioner gets nominated and confirmed, and unless the Administration wants to give credence to the theory that they want to tie the bureaucratic hands of a key financial regulator, they need to nominate someone soon.
Speculation has focused not on a career prosecutor or someone with a record of tough oversight of the financial industry, but Sallie Krawcheck, “a longtime Wall Street executive” from Bank of America, and Robert Khuzami, the current head of enforcement.
|By: David Dayen Monday November 26, 2012 11:15 am|
Geithner’s protestations about employing the “best feasible solutions” are really disingenuous. Unless by “feasible” he means the “solutions which hold banks the most harmless.” The truth is that Geithner wanted to protect banks and their bondholders at all costs, and that didn’t match with delivering debt relief to borrowers. Period.