After Citizens United, which was decided two days after Democrats lost their 60-seat majority in the Senate, there was a push to respond to the Supreme Court ruling with some legislation adding transparency and disclosure to the process. If the Massachusetts race went another way it would have passed; Democrats consistently got 59 votes in the Senate for the DISCLOSE Act. But Republicans wouldn’t budget because they reasoned that the new campaign finance system – actually not a system at all but a recipe for massive spending by corporations and the wealthy – would advantage them. In 2010 they were right.
House Democrats Ready New Version of DISCLOSE Act |
| By: David Dayen Thursday January 26, 2012 6:50 am |
Van Hollen Files Suit to Force Disclosure of Secret Campaign Donors |
| By: David Dayen Friday April 22, 2011 6:59 am |
The DISCLOSE Act would have mandated disclosure of most campaign spending. Having failed to achieve that through Congress, Chris Van Hollen is attempting to force the FEC to make certain rules to that effect through a lawsuit.
GOP’s Political Warfare: Long-Term and Virtually Unopposed |
| By: Jon Walker Wednesday March 16, 2011 3:17 pm |
Wisconsin is more than just ground zero in a fight over the future of public sector unions, it is the embodiment of the Republican Party’s commitment to bare-knuckle political warfare; their willingness to push the law to its limits to gain long-term political advantage for the party. While it is most evident in Wisconsin, this effort to structurally reshape our laws for the benefit of elected Republicans is happening all over the country.
Goo-Goos Float DISCLOSE Act Again for Lame Duck; Why It Won’t Happen |
| By: David Dayen Tuesday November 9, 2010 11:45 am |
If the DISCLOSE Act passes in the lame duck session, I’m a spotted egret.
PA-Sen: Toomey Wrote the Book (Literally) on Shadowy Campaign Spending |
| By: David Dayen Wednesday October 27, 2010 6:30 pm |
This ad has been credited for helping to bring Joe Sestak back into the Senate race in Pennsylvania. The latest poll, from Reuters-Ipsos, shows a dead heat, after Sestak trailed for months. Just like in his primary victory over Arlen Specter, Sestak stormed back in the final stages and now could pull off the upset, which may come down to the ring communities in the Philadelphia suburbs. But while one ad could bring Sestak back from the brink, it’s the overwhelming number of ads attacking him that has defined the race – a model devised and carried out by his opponent years earlier.
After Getting Hit by Truckloads of Corporate Cash, Democrats Should Consider Changing Mascot |
| By: Jon Walker Sunday October 17, 2010 7:45 am |
With the Democratic Party now awakening to the horrifying reality of unlimited secret corporate spending on elections, I have but one simple request, and that is for them to change their mascot from the donkey to a deer caught in a car’s headlights.
Nine-to-One -or- How Much Outside GOP-Leaning Groups are Outspending Outside Dem-Leaning Groups |
| By: Jon Walker Thursday October 14, 2010 9:49 am |
The Citizen’s United ruling has clearly unleashed a flood of outside corporate spending on our elections, and we don’t even know who is trying to shape our government with their millions. The beneficiary of all this new secret campaign spending is overwhelmingly the Republican Party.
Hill Democrats Whine About Third-Party Campaign Spending, Ignoring Their Own Failure to Act |
| By: Jon Walker Thursday September 23, 2010 3:10 pm |
This pathetic whining from Democrats about problems they could and should have fixed is deeply depressing. It is like watching someone starve to death because they are too lazy to walk to their fully stocked kitchen.
Democratic Senators Lie. There. I’ve Said it. |
| By: Jon Walker Thursday July 29, 2010 6:55 am |
We learned Wednesday from The Hill that many Democratic Senators don’t actually support all the great things they claim they have “fought for.” They lied to voters; they refuse to take the small step that would actually allow them to become law.
Giannoulias Uses DISCLOSE Act to Push for Senate Rules Reform |
| By: David Dayen Tuesday July 27, 2010 1:25 pm |
There’s nothing magic about a super-majority, it has not been found to make better or wiser policy, and in the present circumstances it leads to nothing but gridlock, as the nation’s challenges lay unaddressed. Maybe the filibuster is fine if it isn’t used very much, but you cannot expect that in a partisan era. All it does it facilitate broken government.


8 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake