Now that he is safely reelected, President Obama is reassembling the crowd of thieves, thugs, cheats and liars he gathered for his first run at a Grand Bargain I, The Betrayal, but this time he is adding a Veal Pen full of naïfs to help him press his case. It’s painful to watch.
The Republicans field the same crowd of thugs that shot down the first Grand Bargain in a hissy fit over tax hikes. Voters threw out some of them, and a bunch more quit. But our President, fresh off a crushing victory, decided to give them one more chance to disrespect him by acting out their infantile fantasies of bravely fighting the Muslim Kenyan Socialist.
Obama thinks the election will encourage the Republicans to act like human beings and remember the needs of their constituents. And they will. Mitch McConnell and John Boehner can be counted on to carry the water of their billionaire constituents and screw the rest of the country. The hyper-rich may have lost the presidency, but their serving-men will fight to destroy Obama’s second term even harder than they did his first, and if the country goes into a second recession, well that’s too bad. The thieves who steal money from every human on the planet want tax cuts, dammit, and they don’t want their precious corporations to pay taxes, dammit, and the odious twins will do their damnedest to accomplish the wishes of their masters.
Across the aisle there are plenty of lame duck Blue Dog Democrats who were always willing to dishonor the legacy of the Democratic Party and screw their constituents in search of some mythical middle ground between themselves and the true believers on the back bench of the Crazy Party. These losers get one more chance to insist that Obama bow to their wishes.
Standing behind the thugs of both parties are their moneymen, the thieves of the tax-evading union-busting consumer-defrauding corporate sector and the cheats from the financial sector. The thieves and cheats did their best to steal the election, pouring hundreds of millions into the Presidential race in support of one of their own, a man sworn to insure that Plutocratic Power would be enhanced, and into defeating a handful of candidates with mildly anti-plutocratic agendas, like Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown. But, their pet legislators will be standing up proud for their side in the lame duck session. Obama wants to negotiate with these losers.
The new member of the team is the naïfs. Obama spent his first term ignoring the people who elected him, especially progressive activists, the professional left, but also all of the members of his coalition who can’t live decent lives without Social Security and Medicare. So, when Grand Bargain I, the Betrayal, came out, it did very badly with Obama’s base. There was a lot of anger and hostility among the professional left, and a lot of it carried over to that base. No one was sorry to see Grand Bargain I pulled from the stores to be replaced by the laughable Supercommittee/Fiscal Cliff.
Fresh off his electoral victory, Obama called in the leaders of groups that supported him and asked them to help him in the introduction of Grand Bargain II, Revenge on the Old. Of course, he didn’t exactly ask them to sign on to cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Instead, he asked them to carry the message that taxes on the rich should be increased. Practically every sane American thinks that the first step in dealing with the deficit is to hike taxes on the richest among us, the people who caused the Great Crash, who sucked up all the benefits from government action to deal with it, and whose outsized influence kept the government from lifting a finger to help millions of homeowners. So these leaders signed up for this term’s version of the Veal Pen.
Apparently they forgot how Obama treated them during his first term. Or maybe they think that the election gave Obama a new reason to stand firm on the social programs that are critical to the hope for a decent life for their members. And they no doubt agree with the Obama fantasy that the Republicans will return to sanity.
Not one of these people is telling the whole truth about their interests or intentions. Liars all.
The worst part of this idiot bargaining is that the President is really worried about getting the Republicans to actually do the deed. In Grand Bargain I, the Republicans were supposed to pretend to accept tax hikes, none of which were specified. That was intolerable to the worst of the crazies, and Boehner couldn’t deliver the votes. This time, the President is looking for some other idiotic sop to throw to the nutcases to conceal their defeat on the tax hike issue. Charlie Pierce has some sage advice:
The president, and the congressional Democrats, are under no affirmative obligation to make John Boehner’s life easier just because he’s got a caucus full of more nuts than a Wal-Mart fruitcake. The president, and the congressional Democrats, are under no affirmative obligation to arrange for John Boehner’s mellow to stay unharshed just because he’s dependent upon a political “base” that went to the monkeyhouse 30 years ago, pitched a tent, and never left. John Boehner’s political problems are John Boehner’s political problems. They’re not the country’s to solve, and certainly not the president’s, either. Let him solve them himself.
The political wing of the Administration can’t hear this advice. They will let the Republicans take yet another slap at decency and good governance. They will cling to some fantasy of bipartisanship. They will trade away the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid that are the trademark social policies of the Democratic Party. In return, they get absolutely nothing they couldn’t get by forcing Boehner and McConnell to deal with this next year.
Grand Bargain II, Revenge on the Old, coming to Congress this week.
Photo by kevin dean under Creative Commons license.




45 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Agreed Obama must surrender now and make at least a temporary deal for a few years to avoid automatic spending cuts. He must surrender now while there are enough Tea Baggers to make any long term deal impossible now.
Obama will likely cut SS, Medicare and any program that helps the poor plus non military government spending all in exchange for what the GOP wants a limit on deductions and a deal that forces the congress to act later.
When will that be after the next congressional election when the GOP expects to win the back the Senate.
The GOP expected to win the WH and the Senate this year and repeal everything Obama did thats why they agreed to the automatic cuts in the first place.
Obama will deliver Dem votes for cuts now in return for a promise later for the GOP to do something the GOP expects to win the next elections then they will claim a mandate to go back on that promise.
I expect a deal to be passed in secret and details to be very sparse until the holidays when nobody is paying attention. However the Tea Baggers are so crazy they very well might insist on no deal with Obama.
cue steven rattner with a “reasonable plan” for raising revenue from the very very wealthy at nytimes today.
when i see a column on how to fix the tax system by a plutocrat, or even someone just damn rich, i always look for what is left out.
why?
because that is what they really want to protect.
want more equality in the united states?
want a fairer tax system?
want to level the playing field?
levy some realistic taxes at death on the transfer of wealth between generations.
when folks like mr. rattner completely omit the estate tax from their arguments for reasonable and doable adjustments to the tax system, i know that is where the money is!
try an exemption of $2 million, then tax the overage at 35%; for every increase of $2 million in the size of the estate, add another 10% to the tax rate.
if you are feeling generous, stop at 90%.
No need to even talk about Hope and Change I. Hope and Change II never even got to the drawing board. Forward!
Notice no discussion about cutting military spending only SS, Medicare etc.
The “tell” will be whether O lets us go over the fiscal
cliffstage prop.If he doesn’t, or at least say he’s willing to,
he will have voluntarily surrendered his best negotiating tool.
Thanks masaccio, as always. Tweeted. Recommended.
You make me want to just go to bed and curl up. Maybe this will pass. Ugh!!!
Any bets Obama after making a deal/surrender will blame the Left again for his failure’s? I remember how when Obama surrendered on healthcare he said we were wrong and that healthcare would win him reelection. Healthcare and the economy were the only things Mitt could attack Obama on.
I feel you are too kind to Obama about Grand Bargain II.
The “deal” is America’s continue servitude to corporate. Which is no deal at all. Achieved by either party, as all are beholding to the monied interests, hence policy protects money, opposed to people.
Yeah, I admit that’s more likely than not but I’m going to reserve judgment until I see what they have in mind. No use in raising my blood pressure based on speculation.
Dick Durbin is the point man in the Senate on this Great Betrayal. He voted for Bowles-Simpson and sat on that committee. He raised Bowles-Simpson, or the chairmens’ recommendations as the model for solving the ‘deficit’. In a Subway Interview he asserted that this had to be done to keep from paying forty cents on the dollar to borrow money to pay for government. He is ‘the bridge’ from austerity to the Senate Democrats. Forget Conrad, Kerry, Dick Durbin has been a part of this push from the start. Obama cannot do this without the complicity of Senate Democrats. It was Kerry and Durbin who refused to sign Senator Sanders letter pledging not to cut Social Security and to raise taxes on the 1%.
It seems as if there is media agreement not to name names except to batter at some edifice called The President. This is a compact for silence and allowing this to happen. People have to start naming names.
Here is Durbin in a video passionately advocating for cuts. April 19th, 2011.
The 3 Mostly Likely Obamacare Cuts In A Debt Deal
Where can I sign up to play poker with the Democratic leadership?
I think that Howard Dean has it right. Let us go off of the fiscal cliff, and them later in the year bring back the middle class tax cuts (but keep the cuts to defense and the increased taxes on the rich).
Even when the Chicago clergy protested Durbin’s refusal to sign the pledge not to cut Social Security in November, 2012, he still would not commit to the pledge.
Here is the article on that.
The demonstrators presented him with a golden calf award.
He is the leading edge of the Democrats in the Senate who will ‘cave’ to cuts.
How about congressional gridlock. They revert to
the fine art of kicking the can.
(kicking the can will be taught along with econ 101)
April 17th, 2012. Dick Durbin in a video demanding to put “everything on the table” and claiming that it will be devastating to our economy if the changes are not made.
HERE is where he claims that Bowles-Simpson is “the roadmap”.
Democrats are already signalling (flicking like Bambi’s white tail) that they are willing (desire to, really) to CUT, CUT, CUT Obamacare first.
They first intend to cut the parts that cost the “Health Insurance Companies” (AHIP) money.
They are willing to cut – right out of the gate – in exchange for nothing – as a bipartisan token of good will – to the drunk golfer Boner and the closeted McConnell.
Republicans will use this win like a slab of meat to drag back to the Tea Baggers as a great prize.
(Of course, it does the average tea bagger no good whatsover. It’s only benefit goes to billionaires as usual.)
Durbin has been as consistent as Obama in pursuit of austerity. They’re willing to sacrifice retirement and medical security for most Americans for absolutely no reason except to serve the interests of the 1%, who won’t rest until they have everything.
Whether or not this comes with some real or sham “tax on the wealthy” is insignificant. Either way, crushing income and wealth inequality continue, to the great harm of all of us.
Don’t forget that it was Dick Durbin in an article dated, April 27th, 2010, who called people who disagreed with his intentions to make cuts to social programs, “bleeding-heart liberals”.
He has been advocating for cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid since the beginning of the Bowles-Simpson commission. He adopted the Republican memes of “we can’t afford” to keep our promises to those who earned these benefits. He has complained about the retirement of the boomers as if they were the invasion of the pod people. “9,000 are retiring each day.” Horrors.
We had a chance to make our voices heard. We had a chance to fight what we knew was this president’s agenda (he had made it abundantly clear, over and over again). It was called voting third party.
Some of us took advantage of the opportunity. The fight to keep the ball rolling and to win more converts to our side continues.
Ah, masaccio, I am glad you are discussing the “Grand Bargain” most calmly, reasonably, and dispassionately, in the proper context and with all appropriate perspective.
Any sense of urgency, or concern about consequences resulting from the means and method of achieving the Great Betrayal, as well as the likely results of that Wonderful, Necessary, Inevitable Deficit Salvation would, of course render you far too close to what the business-like might readily term “panic”, a most unseemly and uncool state of wretched outlier anticipation.
In the immortal words of the resident humorist and master of satire, the unstintingly munificent TBogg: ‘I find the panic over the “Grand Bargain” on the level with the hysteria over “creeping sharia law”.’
So, great and enduring good upon you, macassio, for not dipping into the hysteria pool, nor evidencing panic in your thoughtful considerations of the probable course of this great nation, and the political class, which includes the media, “looking forward”. Let us not glance aside, to left or to right, let us not raise our sight upwards, toward Olympus, nor drop our gaze toward the teeming, huddled, and frightened masses, let us instead, never peering, short-sighted, into the rear-view mirror, rivet our full attention on the near-distant future when all this, which causes concerns only for the unbelieving amongst us, has been accomplished and a thrilling new golden age flourishes all around us, when the corporate astute have their just and mighty compensation and where the merely flesh and blood may know and inhabit their proper and appropriate place … sic transit gloria mundi … dum vivimus vivamus …
We are all in great need of a “tempest prognosticator” … something along the lines of a device invented by George Merryweather in the 19th century. Also known as the “leech barometer”, warning bells were rung when the leeches became sufficiently “agitated” … the only question of course is; who might “serve” as the “leeches”?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_prognosticator
Technology might well save us yet. Should terminology somehow fail to do so …
Ah, well …
What have we, here, if not the very best of all possumable worlds?
;~DW
DW, thanks for noticing the dispassionate view of our government of thieves, thugs, cheats and liars, and the naïfs who can’t see that at the end of the chute is a slaughterhouse. I believe in naming things in clear, simple and direct English prose, and I hope my beloved High School English teacher, Brother Daniel, would be satisfied with my prose.
I have to confess that I went back on third edit and cut out the curse-words. This piece became noticeably shorter.
Your prose is quite unmatched, masaccio, as your grasp and moral compass are both impeccable and most-well calibrated.
I thank you for your continuing and most agreeably successful efforts to render the truth digestible, for truth it is most necessary to healthy minds and honest hearts.
Namaste
DW
I had forgotten that particular insult (not to the “bleeding hearts” but to the concept of civil society and the common good).
Bless your heart, you who have not forgotten that ‘we take care of our people’ in contrast to ‘we take care of our generous oligarchs’.
In conclusion, my most egregious complaint about the refusnik, Dick Durbin, who would not demonstrate his solidarity with the American people in a time of great uncertainty and of great need,….is his use of royal dismissal in having 19 demonstrators arrested outside of his office in November. This royal dismissal of his constituents reminds one of the royal behavior of one Senator Baucus, who had a single payer expert arrested during health care bill hearings.
But Dick Durbin deserves his own ‘royal craphead’ identification card for arresting citizens whose only ‘crime’ was coming to tell him what was important to them.
Book Salon up with Susan Clark and Woden Teachout’s Slow Democracy: Rediscovering Community and Bringing Decision Making Back Home hosted by Riki Ott
Every time I hear “everythings on the table” I cringe. What I hear is: “Even the dumbest, most retrograde nonsense must be considered” It is a phrase designed to allow bullshit to replace common sense.
As they say, word.
Predictable as clockwork.
A no-brainer.
For the gullible at heart, go back to negotiations 101 . It posits a strategic approach to any negotiating process whereby each party starts out proposing positions far beyond what they expect realistically to wind up with, and then through various tactical manuvers, essentially retreats to the place they hoped to wind up.
Obama’s starting positions, giving away crucial issues to his base at the outset, if taken in strictly negotiating terms, reveals his intent to get a deal that sacrifices far more than he has stated publicly is on the table.
Or he doesn’t understand negotiations. Or he thinks he has a force of will that is immovable even though the other side are damn good negotiators, or at least they don’t abandon their positions.
I don’t believe either of those things. I believe he is playing a different game than his ‘base’, and by any rules that will get him a win, a misguided f–king legacy. He might even think he is forestalling greater cuts if the putative other side gets to call all the shots.
I don’t accept that as credible either. The only thing I accept is Obama increasingly seems a weak, credulous and at the same time egotistical, fraud.
here all you need to know Obama and the Dmes support these crooks
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/25/deficit-reduction-council-fiscal-cliff_n_2185585.html
This is wrong. You have to realize that their wishes ARE Obama’s wishes. Maybe you get back on the rails somewhere in this diary, but your frame right up front is false. Obama is not fighting against these people, he is fighting for them against us.
Also wrong. Check the stats on inequality. See who has returned to and even exceeded their pre-crash levels of wealth and who has gotten the shaft. The hyper-rich have their man. Obama is it.
They can’t claim they haven’t known since 1983 and the Greenspan Commission (and if it was a surprise then, it was only because they were idiots) that this was coming. As sure as baby boomers were born, they were going to retire. Somehow it’s still a tremendous shock to many of our esteemed lawmakers. As I said, idiots.
hey DICK we are people who have paid into a system for years and expect to get what is owed to us
If Obama rolls over AGAIN or cuts SS when NOBODY wants it cut (except for Wall St and DC Republicans who represent Wall St crooks), he’ll have ANOTHER shellacking in 2014.
Some people never learn
If Obama gives away safety net benefits, he should be impeached.
The American people expect and deserve healthcare and those who have paid into Social Security should demand full payment or take to the streets every day and stop paying any taxes or using any banks.
This criminal cabal of which Obama is only a puppet needs to be put out of business, for good.
Obama has sold us down the river in his first term. Why would this one be any different?
The difference is that we need to go to the streets every day until he is removed from office along with the congress. I’m thinking massive demonstrations, a la Tariar Square I Egypt!
Time for American Spring.
So Obama is walking along, and runs into a couple out in their front yard, fighting. He turns to one of the neighbors who is watching, and asks them what the story was. The neighbor tells them that the guy has made a regular habit of abusing his wife. He intimidates her with false accusations and emotional abuse and he controls the family finances in order to control her. Today, however, he’s physically abusing her. Obama walks up to the couple and asks if he can “mediate”. He asks what the man what he wants, and he says he wants to kill his wife, to beat her until she’s dead. He asks the woman what she wants, and she says that she doesn’t want to be hurt at all. Obama puffs out his chest and says “I have the perfect solution. Sir, you may beat your wife until she is half-dead.” At that, he walks away with a smug, self-satisfied look on his face, certain that he has found a “center” way.
masaccio,
Your assessment is an excellent example of what will be facing all of us.
And Recommended, of course!
However, where I quibble is in the “process” and in particular, the role of the “players” on the Democratic side of the aisle.
By way of background, three of the “players” in this Game, comes to us in the names of Durbin, Schumer and Velasquez, all former Progressives when serving in the House. As such, Durbin was Obama’s mentor when Obama was in the Illinois State Legislature, and nothing has changed much since Obama is far more compliant today than when he was in the Legislature or in the Senate. When Schumer was in the House, Nydia Velasquez had Schumer as her Mentor, and today, when she walks into the room, the windows have to be opened in order to let the stink escape. Today, she is the ranking Member of the Small Business Committee, but she was the Chairwoman when Pelosi was the Speaker. And yet unnoticed, Schumer promised to support her candidacy for the Senate, but shortly thereafter, swithched to Gilibrand, leaving Velasquez with egg on her face, while seeking “donations” from Wall Street tycoons, for Schumer’s benefit and for further largesse to his-Schumer’s pals in the Senate. As to Schumer, having once been a Progressive, today he is the ‘back avenue channel’ to the Wall Street Crowd, and its for this ‘reason’ that Senator Reid apponted Schumer to be the Party’s Message-Guru, thusly evevating him to the Third Seat in the Senate.
Consequently, Obama doesn’t have an “agenda” other than the one provided by both Durbin and Schumer. Thusly, Obama’s “success point” is found between what Boehner provides/delivers and what Durbin/Schumer provide/deliver, in terms of provable votes. Therefore, the “success” for Obama is found in where Obama wants to place himself between Boehner’s far right strategy and the Durbin/Schumer center-right “positioning” is. In the final analysis, Obama cannot “lose” but the general public “loses” and subsequently, what the general public “wants” is not found in Obama’s deck of cards.
In closing, what Durbin/Schumer can “deliver” will determine the fate of the American Public and its for this “reason” that we, here in the Sonoran Desert, think that Obama doesn’t “owe” us a damn thing, given that we don’t want Obama’s fiasco on our conscience. In short, our “dedo” or middle finger is pointed at the Durbin/Schumer crowd, and which is the prmise of our current political behavior and which is our Self-Defense posture.
Jaango
More a case of “Some people don’t give a fuck”, IMO. Obama sees this as his “legacy”; so what if old people die? (After all, he regularly assassinates Americans without anything resembling due process.) Bring bi-partisan agreement to “tame the beast” of the “entitlements” is what gets his dick hard, human casualties be damned.
The fact that this will cost the “Democrats” seats in the mid-terms? I’m sure he couldn’t give even one-thousandth of a shit. Obama cares about the Party about as much as DBagg cares about treating opposing viewpoints with respect.
Fuck him. He sure loves to fuck us.
But remember, just because Obama should be impeached, that doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be re-elected!
(Daniel Ellsberg was once a man of courage. Now he’s someone who needs to be reminded what the point of impeachment is, apparently.)
And, personally, I think Obama should have been impeached for fighting Spain’s efforts to extradite Cheney for war crimes trials. Or for letting BigPharma write the “health care” bill (in exchange for campaign contributions). Or for helping BP cover up the oil spill. Or for assassinating American citizens. Or for giving the banks functional amnesty for systemic mortgage fraud. Or for torturing Bradley Manning.
So many reasons to kick his ass out. Or just kick his ass.
Nice post and good Charley Pierce quote, but Pierce has one thing wrong. Walmart fruit cakes do not actually contain any nuts. Examine the label closely and you’ll find that the ingredients are only nut substitutes formed from byproducts of chicken, pork and nuclear waste.
Yummy.