Assuming that interpretations of the Mayan calendar are wrong and the world won’t end on December 21, the presidential campaign of 2012 is about as close as we’re going to come to end-times mania. Maybe I should say “depressia.”
Mitt Romney’s campaign of lies seemed stuck on an an adjective accelerator, from big to bigger to biggest. Maybe the latter was his claim that President Obama bankrupted Chrysler which was now moving all Jeep jobs to China. Maybe it was that he opposed overturning Roe v. Wade. The accelerator moves too quickly to judge.
However the election turns out, Romney took the legacy press to something of a crisis point (or a teaching moment if we want to be kind). What is a reporter to do when one candidate just rejects reality, all previous statements and well-known facts? In a real way the Romney campaign and its operatives were saying a free press no longer matters. Political campaigns have always stretched the truth, of course. And presidents have lied. But I don’t remember a campaign of the past whose very premise was the Lie. It’s as if Romney’s real campaign message was, “I’ll Lie for You.”
The campaign, from start to finish, seemed more like a sack race in an asylum than a contest for the leader of the Free World. Remember those Republican debates? Remember when Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s “oops” moment was big news? All the GOP hopefuls were so afraid of America’s Hard Right that they came close to advocating the summary executions of everyone suspected of being less than a papers-carrying citizen. Maybe they did, but since memory is now the first victim of the modern political campaign, I can’t recall.
The manic behavior didn’t start or stop with loony candidates. This is the first presidential election I’ve gone through while participating in the Twitterverse. As a source of news, Twitter was terrific. I was able to follow some of the writers and analysts I respect.
I have to confess, however, that Twitter simply wore me out. It was the party I couldn’t leave ’cause it always seemed there was one more pretty fact about to sashay into the club. One hundred and forty characters passing by me at the speed of light was often more than I could take. It was like looking for the One True Sentence written on a ping pong ball being slammed back and forth by world champion ping pong players.
Also written on the plastic balls were one million polls, each of them with one million interpreters. By the end I longed for the days of the single ping pong ball, because it seemed to me I was now being asked to learn the current political landscape by reading regression analyses on the churning plastic balls of a lottery machine.
Did I mention that in the middle of all this the Republican Party decided to go all in on voter suppression? The GOP launched a serious effort to return to the 19th century when non-whites, women and property-poor Americans were denied the right to vote. They aren’t even hiding it. It’s like the Campaign of Lies. They dare America to call them what they are, figuring that what they are is so extreme that few will believe it if someone takes the dare.
Then there was the massive press over-reaction to Obama’s flat performance in the first debate. Judging from the coverage, you would have thought Obama, behind a Nixonian five o’clock shadow and a sweaty upper lip, had compared himself to JFK and said “oops” after claiming that pre-1989 Eastern Europe wasn’t under Soviet domination. But Obama didn’t make any substantive mistakes. He was just uninspiring. “Meth” Romney, on the other hand, gave a Red Bull performance that was downright scary. If he’d acted like that sitting next to me in a bar I would have left the place in a hurry.
Another word about this. Obama’s performance was poor, no doubt about it. However, if a magician had appeared in America and made all the post-debate cable pundits disappear (a guy can dream, can’t he?), I don’t believe the polls would have moved an inch. Romney got a bounce from the exaggerated press analyses, not the debate. I know, I know, I’m splitting hairs here because there is no distinction between debate and post-debate. It is all one circus. Political journalists are the stars of debates because for those brief shining moments the campaign is not a campaign billions of dollars in television commercials that penetrate the psyches of voters without intervention from the press. The press is back in charge.
I get the sense that the collective soul of America understands that our democracy is about as secure as the permafrost. Oh, and speaking of global warming, how can there be a presidential campaign in 2012 that completely ignores the greatest danger humankind has ever faced? Really? America was once worried that Russian subs would come up the Mississippi River and, I dunno, poison our precious bodily fluids or something. Americans like to be scared. Why don’t they like to be scared of the looming environmental catastrophe? Maybe because it is not a movie they can walk back to their cars from after the lights come up.
Among my favorite characters in this season-long disaster of a campaign are those pundits and players who keep channeling Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks. “Why can’t we all just get along?” Well, for just one reason, we don’t want to. On one side are authoritarians happy to bring back racial segregation, gender inequality, poor houses and forced child labor. On the other side are people who, well, don’t want those things. (I wish our side was a little better at messaging than this. But oh well, once our team gave up so many draft choices in order to get the truth on our side, we were bound to face some disadvantages.)
Actually, I think there a many, perhaps a majority, of regular Republican folk who don’t really share the extremist views of those in control of their party and their political campaigns. But they have been intimidated into silence. There are no extremists on the Left with the voice and power of extremists on the Right. That’s a false equivalency advanced by journalists afraid they will be attacked if they point truthfully to the real villains.
I don’t know. All I can do is struggle to see the messages written on the ping pong balls. Sometimes I think Mars has already attacked. And won.




25 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Scarily good assessment of the current situation.
I wish it wasn’t the case….
There’s one thing I learned from this campaign season – words no longer have meanings. Please let Tuesday come here quickly.
Im an oldie from the Civil rights era; today was I speaking with a bright 20 something telling me about the reality of no jobs for many of his friends. The thing most amazing to both of us, we agreed, is the blatant and in-your-face racism. We both had examples that are shocking….stuff I do not recall since the days of George Wallace and that crowd. What does that rage and dehumanization mean for all of us?
I agree with you. They say that they are not racists and then turn right around and prove that they are. It’s very troubling and I’m sure that blacks must be concerned.
Good Sunday Morning Glenn.. Insightful and totally true post!
http://www.politicususa.com/proof-war-women-2
Public Records Reveal Romney Profited From Corruption, Fraud, and Racketeering at Bain
A couple of links I think you might find interesting…
Post-election, I think we have to push hard for coverage and analyses of the rise in visible racism. For too long we’ve left it unchallenged. Few in the press want to talk about it. Interestingly, Chris Matthews has talked a good bit about it. Racism won’t disappear unless challenged and shamed. The keys to the Civil Rights Movement were moral righteousness and in-your-face persistence. Presence. Non-stop presence. That disappeared after the death of MLK and the Democratic Party’s unwillingness to continue the cause post-Civil Rights Act and post-Vietnam War.
My central critique of Twitter is one of my primary critiques of the Romney campaign.
Twitter warps the time continuum. Its relentless focus is on the omnipresent now. In so doing, Twitter relegates the past and the future to such a subordinate status that it bends reality.
Romney’s deceitful etch-a-sketch campaign has attempted to do the same. It has attempted to distort reality by campaigning as if the past is not legitimate prologue and the future Is of no consequence. Should this cynical technique succeed, the damage to our body politic will be catastrophic.
I agree, overt racism is acceptable again. It’s one thing to disagree with Obama’s policies but quite another to hang nooses out as some kind of protest.
I’m so ashamed of this country.
The problem lies with a minority of Americans, a minority of close-minded bigots being allowed to behave as a majority. I am hopeful that our democracy is resilient, that will regain something of the progressive spirit that has informed our greatest accomplishments. So, I am ashamed of a few Americans, not America. Maybe I’m being foolishly optimistic. But that is the choice I make.
I think that the sin of racism has been lurking below the surface all along. Racists just recognized that it was dangerous to verbalize it openly once its underlying hatred was exposed during the CIvil RIghts movement. The election of Pres. Obama just stripped the veneer to expose it in all its ugliness.
Here here!! It is a shame that a minority can push our society into such depths of bigotry!
I sometimes wonder Why did I serve our country when those who didn’t have been plotting for decades to bring us back to the days of pure hatred and selfishness towards our fellow citizens.! But I do have hope for my kids and grandkids as there are signs of progress being made but damn it is way too slow for many to be able to live the life they want with the conditions created by those selfish bigoted few!
Interesting that Chris Matthews has found something of his “liberal bias” – good for him, anyway. I haven’t watched tv for a while, so maybe this comment is out of date, but I was struck when I was still watching by the absence of a counter-narrative, among the msnbc evening shows, Dem politicians, and Dem spokespeople.
For example, there would endless footage of racist signs that showed up at Tea Party rallies, or shock at attacks on Planned Parenthood, or ACORN. But no promotion of diversity, reproductive rights, voting rights – just a political spin on how this helped or hurt the R’s and the D’s. It was particularly obvious during Rachel Maddow’s (very thorough and relentless, to her great credit) coverage of attacks on abortion providers, when some Dem politicians would come on the show and say “Oh, the R’s were supposed to be all about jobs, how is this about jobs?”
It’s important to identify and criticize the bigotry and hate, but it fills a void left when there’s a lack of vigorous defense and promotion of other values by the institutional political and media players who would seem to have a platform they’re not using. How do we address that? So few years ago it seemed that these other values were gaining so much ground, and maybe they have, but there doesn’t seem to be a public voice for them right now. Just my limited perspective.
edit: in reply to Glenn W. Smith @7
I’m cautiously optimistic that our democracy is resilient enough. After all, we’ve progressed to the point that most people would reject out of hand the concept that the color of a person’s skin is any indicator of a person’s value as a human being.
Another “look over there” response to a political culture that offers no choices. Lockstep support of a “side” is de rigueur because the other side is worse…
“On one side are authoritarians happy to bring back racial segregation, gender inequality, poor houses and forced child labor. On the other side are people who, well, don’t want those things. (I wish our side was a little better at messaging than this. But oh well, once our team gave up so many draft choices in order to get the truth on our side…”
Their side, our side and
truth?
Define “our side” please. Then, when you can’t, perhaps you/we – our side – should consider breaking the addiction. Below is an antidote that, given vague notions of sides, clearly comes from someone you’d expect to be allied with the equally vague notions of progressive values or the “left” as you, with all good intentions, conceive it. And when you are outraged at the satire that describes that perspective as cult-like and rush to defend the indefensible through the blinders of desperation we are wired to be fearful of acknowledging, perhaps you’ll find your way to the only side that matters, the side revealing that there are no sides, that all sides devour themselves in an attempt to feel good about something that can only result in feeling bad about everything. I’m not suggesting it’s an answer, but do believe it comes closer to the notion of “truth” in a world where being well-adjusted to the insanity is the antithesis of being well-adjusted.
“Your Brain on Obama” http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/11/02/your-brain-on-obama/
Using Obama makes some people prone to wild mood swings and abrupt changes in personality. In their brainwashed cult-like state, Obama users have turned on friends and colleagues who kept their principles regardless of which capitalist flunky commits the crimes. What were shameful atrocities ten minutes before Obama was inaugurated suddenly became badges of “toughness” after he swore to uphold/destroy the Constitution. (Take your pick — that what he does.) Obama users need treatment but, unfortunately, funds have been fast and furiously diverted to buy guns for Mexican drug cartels.
Sometimes the initial Obama trip will ruin a life for years. After that first big hit of Obama on election night four years ago, liberals soon papered over their “Question Authority” bumper stickers with a smorgasbord of new ones: “War Is Oftentimes The Answer,” “Love Your Mother Drone,” “All Options Are On The Table,” “Visualize World Domination,” “Live Simply — That’s All You Can Afford Now, Assholes,” “The Earth Does Not Belong To Us — It Belongs To The US,” “Please Spy On Me And Strip Me And Check My Cavities And Make Me Safe,” and “Indefinite Detention And Execution Without Charge Or Trial: Fuck Yeah!”
Mainlining Obama emboldens liberals to express their racism in the socially-acceptable way of hating another “other,” the Muslims, whose women cover up their heads and sometimes aren’t allowed to drive, things that keep white liberal women awake at night. These liberals are righteously certain that head scarves and no learner’s permits are bigger problems for Muslims than racist American goons kicking down Muslim doors at midnight and taking away adult males to be tortured and jailed for years without charge or trial, or Muslim children living in constant terror of America’s flying killer robots that circle the skies above their schools and houses. Enjoy your freedom, ladies, as you drive from your nonpaying job at home to your three/fourths-paying job at work while being carpet-bombed by the messages of “your” society, freedom central, that says you’re either good for sex or good for nothing. But, damn, those head scarves could lead to sharia law — and lawn jockeys replaced by camel jockeys in the coming Allahbama! The horror, the horror…
Now you know how some of us feel.
What does it mean? Indeed? I wish I could find a positive spin — just more open? More available to be changed? I don’t think so. It seems gratuitous and unrestrained libertine. I was disturbed by Howard Fineman’s prediction that the racists, especially in the south. will go ballistic if Obama wins.
Living in the rural deep south I hate to say it but I am afraid for my safety if I am too open in confrontation. We won’t yet acknowledge it but we liberals are living under oppression.
Obama is no liberal.
Is this a serious question? Because the answer seems incredibly obvious, even though I took only very rudimentary journalism course: a reported would line up the current statement with Romney’s prior inconsistent statements.
That is not, however, what our media chooses to do anymore. Instead, they play a huge game of “he said, she said.” Some Obama surrogates say whatever the hell they wish about it. Then some Romney surrogates say whatever the hell they wish to say about it.
Then, the reader/viewer/listener is left on his or her own, so they just believe the surrogates of one side or another, usually the side they are already on.
I disagree. I think the media are the ones behaving as though a free press no longer matters.
Among many other things, we have far more “commentators” and radio and television “personalities” than we have journalists. And investigative journalism is usually a distant memory.
Most mass media outlets are now owned by about 5 mega-corporations. The media has become spokespersons, first, for the right, and next for the Democrats. No one stands up for the truth or for the 99% anymore.
They cover politics either as though it were celebrity gossip or as though they were the propaganda arm of the status quo.
Sorry, but I don’t think you can blame that on Romney. Or on Obama, for that matter, because he’s been telling some whoppers as well and no one has called him out on them, either.
Thank you. Neither is any Democrat in anymore.
The Republicans did not weed them out. Their fellow Democrats did.
Yup. Republicans want their politicians to be liars. Why? because they really don’t believe in democracy- they much prefer a corrupt system where their votes are the only ones that count, where their politicians can lie with impunity to fool the press or the Democrats into supporting (or not opposing) an issue they know the rest of the voting public wouldn’t support… i.e. they know their politicians are liars, they just think the lies advance the agenda of their side. I think one of the reasons this is true is a lot of Republicans see themselves as the privileged elite who need to protect themselves any way they can from the horde of lazy moochers who want their stuff. It doesn’t really bother them that their politicians say a few things that aren’t true- because they think they are in on the con.
That’s an interesting (and depressing) perspective, that hadn’t occurred to me. Thanks for something to think about. My comment was more about those who do have a platform, and don’t need to be circumspect in the way of someone in a conservative family or community – media figures, politicians on the national stage, and the seemingly endless supply of pundits and “strategists.” There has to be something more than just railing against the bigots.
I am not alone in feeling that way. Sad to say.
I won’t argue with that truth.