What matters more, the right to vote or adherence to local voting rules and schedules even if a force of nature intrudes? We might find out the answer to that question if a perfect storm disrupts voting in the Northeast or Midwest or both.
As a twitter follower reminded me, in 2000 the U.S. Supreme Court basically decided that the right to vote was secondary to process. Of course, the Court’s political desire to appoint George W. Bush was so obvious the justices took the trouble of stating that their opinion could not be used as precedent.
Hurricane Sandy is expected to hit the coast and then duke it out with two winter storm systems coming at it head-on from the north and west. The timing and duration of the storm – and the devastation that could be left in its wake – will determine how much the will be disrupted. Coping with such a disaster’s impact on voting may prove difficult since election administration is left largely to individual states. One state might extend the time for voting while another does not.
The bad weather is also running into a perfect political storm as Republicans in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia pull out all the stops to disenfranchise as many Democratic voters as they can. Let’s say GOP election officials in Ohio do what they’ve done in the past and put one voting machine in Democratic areas for every three machines they put in Republican precincts. The point of this tactic is to cause long lines and delays for Democrats. Now imagine voters have to endure those lines in the wind, wet and cold. Maybe their homes are flooded. Maybe their electricity is still off. Maybe they are running short of food and water.
If it takes a lifeboat to get to the polls after one’s already been evacuated to an emergency shelter, what then? This is, at the moment, just a thought experiment. But it’s one we should think about now, not later.
The Republicans’ voter suppression efforts make clear what they will argue if weather becomes a barrier to voting – especially if it looks like enough folks will be kept from the polls that Romney and/or other GOP down ballot candidates look like they are ahead. The result is shipwrecked democracy.
The Right has always been about getting and maintaining power. Authority is their imperative. Popular democracy is their enemy. Try as they might to disguise it, they really believe that only those that agree with them should have voting rights. Everyone who disagrees with them is less than a citizen.
Texas Republican Attorney General Greg Abbott, one of the nation’s greatest enemies of voting rights, has gone so far as to threaten foreign election observers with arrest and criminal prosecution if they show up at the polls. What does Abbott want to hide?
Well, that’s obvious. Once again, right-wing vigilantes will be out in force challenging and intimidating African-American and Hispanic voters. The courts enjoined the new Texas voter ID law, but you can bet GOP election officials and their election-watcher thugs will be telling voters they need a picture ID anyway.
The AP poll released this weekend showed that a majority of Americans hold a bigoted view of African-Americans. This explains, in part, the conscious or unconscious rationalizations of the Right’s anti-democratic voter suppression efforts. People are divided into human and sub-human categories, and it becomes the imperative for those who place themselves in the human category to make damn sure they are in charge of the sub-human.
I don’t think the voter suppressors think they are doing something wrong. They think they are carrying out their moral responsibility. You can see it in their gazes of superiority. So just imagine, when Nature intervenes and does a little of the work of suppression for them, what will they think? They’ll think it is the natural world confirming their beliefs about their own superiority.
America is not polarized around issues of health care, education or jobs. It is divided – profoundly and maybe irrevocably divided – among those who believe their superiority demands their authority over others and egalitarians who believe us all deserving of equal recognition and opportunity.
We do not have to wait for this perfect political storm to arrive. It arrived long ago. It is time the press and pundit class saw the storm for what it is and quit pretending everyone is an egalitarian democrat in their hearts. Today it looks life half of America likes democracy only when they control enough of it to guarantee the outcomes they seek. Otherwise, democracy must be subverted in the name of their Natural Superiority.




49 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
While all that you have written is “gospel truth”, Barack Obama has turned it all around. Heads we lose, tails we lose.
Well, if the framers of The. Constitution. had wanted women and minorities to vote, they would have put it in there, after all. Just doing the Originalist math, yanno.
OT: Nice endorsement for Sadler….Thanks for your post.
I’m thinking this morning that election has already been disrupted because of greatly diminished early voting opportunities. If Ohio and VA are affected, could well be election will not be decided on election day.
Glenn, thanks for this post. It’s a wonderful post. I like your theme of a weather storm like Sandy causing the perfect political storm. One would think that Obama, like every politician, is so motivated by his own political survival that he would declare a state of emergency due to Sandy, take steps to extned voting, use the Justice Dept to put a stop to any voter suppression. But Obama has shown time and again that he is a spineless coward. He has caved in every time he should’ve stood up for working Americans. I jsut don’t think the coward Obama is capable of standing up for anything, not even when his won re-election hangs in the balance.
Can’t believe the title of Bob Dylan’s just-released album is “Tempest”! Artistic vision can be truly preternatural.
Thank you for your complements. I’m afraid I don’t agree with your assessment of Obama. Justice D. has aggressively fought voter suppression laws. Anyway, part of the problem with election disruption is that laws are administered by states. It’s unclear what the federal government can do if, say, Ohio GOP officials simply call off voting. It’ll wind up in federal court, but o boy what a controversy that will be….
Great point! Also, “Shelter from the Storm.”
Good morning and thanks Glenn.
It’s a good post with excellent metaphorical points. I find it more and more challenging to comment these days. It seems like so many of the threads turn into Obama flame wars. It’s getting tedious and frankly boring. After reading some of the threads with anxiety driven language, I thought of the nursery rhyme that includes
Leave them alone,
And, they’ll go home,
Wagging their tails behind them.
Obscures the point, I believe.
Better? Maybe, Maybe not. More accurate? You decide.
However the diary does omit the propaganda and manipulation, throwing divisive memes on the wall, race bating, and other propaganda tactics, from the 1% to convince half the electorate to vote for their preferred candidates, to reach the outcome the 1% seek.
Is this 50% being told what they want to hear to elicit a knee jerk reaction? Probably.
I keep coming back to Hilary’s indiscreet comment about “Vast right wing conspiracy” and reflecting on the accuracy of that comment.
I, too, am impatient with the flame wars. Many originate with trolls, of course. Those with genuine concerns often lose me with their anger. I do try to listen, even when they are shouting, because their voices, however irritating, matter. Please keep commenting. Many want the sane, thoughtful voices to disappear. You are one of those sane, thoughtful voices.
Try as they might to disguise it, they really believe that only those that agree with them should have voting rights. Everyone who disagrees with them is less than a citizen.
It’s even worse than that. Right-wingers don’t even want opposing views to expressed.
You probably have neighbors or co-workers who, without provocation, direct right-wing taking points at you. If you ignore them (your least bad option), they increase the volume. If you disagree, they increase the volume and spout more right-wing talking points. They’re not interested in a discussion, they want to silence you.
I’ve already been wondering about voting. In NJ, they’re warning of possible power outages lasting 7 to 10 days. Could take us right up to and through Election Day. And long outages beforehand could impede efforts to get voting machines set up.
Almost all of our perfect storms stem from the crippling legacy of our nation’s original sin.
In part, some on the Left, consciously and unconsciously, unfairly scorn Obama for failing to have redeemed this sin. Worse, many of the leaders of the Right, cynically exploit and inflame this sin to define Obama as the dangerous other.
If Obama wins this election, it will be because, we have done as Lincoln wisely urged us to do on the eve of our most potent and perfect storm: listened to the better angels of our nature.
I wish I could reply, retweet, and recommend. Thanks, oldgold. Well said.
Have a friend who’s a hair stylist. He was confronted a couple of weeks ago by a customer, an older woman who demanded to know if he would be voting for “that monkey”. He told her she should be ashamed of herself, said to me later he realized he had lost a customer but sometimes things said were so egregious they could not go unchallenged.
Good for him. America, I fear, is truly on the edge.
In response to gesneri @ 16
Race relations have gotten worse during the past four years, mainly because many right-wingers no longer feel the need to keep their racism under wraps.
The Tea Party has a racist streak as wide as the New Jersey Turnpike. Incredibly, the Democrats never called them out on it.
This Democrat has.
I definitely lost a friend in the last election….she sputtered something about O being a “socialist or a communist…ahhh, I don’t know what he is,” while denying there were any concerns for the middle class. We’ve only spoken one time since…..very sad.
The only parallel in our history is pre-Civil War between pro-slavery and abolitionists. Interesting, isn’t it, that race is at the center of our current divide as well?
demi,
I could not agree with you more on the flame wars and I think Glenn’s suggestion about trolls is right on.
One day last week every other comment was a troll/anti-Obama.
There is not much choice here in my opinion about who we need to vote for if we want to preserve our way of life and not be subservient to the rich class.
And that the “Lincoln” movie will be coming out….maybe a good way to look at ourselves. Maybe it’s always been race…
Glenn,
Interesting too is that 150 years later some Southern states want to try to secede again.
I blame Rupert Murdoch for one
and the leaders of the Republicans – they encourage it for their own gains and maybe their own prejudices.
OT: HuffPo has a good piece on the storm…
And when you look at the electoral map, it seems like they already have.
Whether you are a friend or foe of originalism, it is important to know what it is.
Originalism does not involve ignoring the fourteenth or seventeenth amendments to the Constitution, or any of the amendments to the Constitution.
Scalia’s problem is not so much that he is an originalist. It is that he claims to be an originalist when in fact, he goes for whatever outcome of a case he wants.
Unfortunately, the White House, the DNC, and elected Democrats didn’t call out the Tea Party. Even after the Tea Partiers did things like physically threaten John Dingell at a town-hall meeting to discuss the health-care legislation. (Mrs. Tiger was at that meeting and was, understandably, horrified by what she saw.)
Justice has only fought voter suppression laws as a Presidential election –Obama’s–approached. I don’t recall Justice fighting them in 2009-2010. Maybe not even in 2011.
That’s great, but what about elected Democrats?
Well said RevBev.
I am planning a trip to Gettysburg late June-early July next year on the 150th anniversary of the battle.
I have been to the battleground many times in the past as a tour director for a bus company so time was limited taking care of 48 passengers.
This time I want to go and take my time so I am reading all the books I can get my hands on that are not already in my library.
Interesting too is that the state where the battle was fought and caused the downward slide of the Confederacy toward Appommatox is now one of the states trying to limit voting rights.
Thanks. What a nice trip to be planning. I was there once a long time ago…I certainly recall the beauty and solemnity. The vote mess is crazy, the 2000 story still breaks my heart, and my homestate (TX) is doing everything it can to put in restrictions.
AC2,
I too have been to Gettysburg many times. I have been watching scenes from TBS very accurate movie on Youtube this week.
I too, have been drawing parallels to antebellum America.
Us history buffs have got to stick together.
Buckets of Rain
bayonets
sorry, couldn’t resist
If simple hanging chads can foul up an election surely a hurricane/winter storm combination can be manipulated to win the presidency for the Mormon dude. God has created the perfect storm for Mittens to win. Just wait, it will be stated this way. And who are the Republicans to stand in the way of God?
OT,again. I do not understand why Tebow (ie, blood) merits a Front Page. DO Not get it.
Why is failure to love Obama being a troll?
JClausen and RevBev,
I found that no matter how many times going there, I still learned something new each time.
Pennsylvania is a beautiful state, Gettysburg is kind of a magnet for me this coming year.
We should let them go this time. They’re not worth fighting over, they only drag the rest of us down.
Sounds wonderful…Glad you can go.
Im out for awhile to be away from storm and election; not doing me any good. ;)
I was thinking that today when I saw all those red states; yet I still have a number of friends over there. Hummmmm.
That is because the slave holding mentality has never succumbed to acknowledging defeat of its ideology, much less expressed remorse or guilt. The statue on the square in Gainesville carries the inscription to the brave soldiers who fought for the principles of the Confederacy.
It’s the principles.
I can give you hundreds of examples similar expressions by the elite of the south. And shilling fear of diversity they have infected regions well beyond the old borders.
You are not alone in your thinking here.
I thought about that and then remembered that a lot of our friends here on FDL live in those states and I am pretty sure they would not elect to follow the crazy leaders who are advocating this nonsense.
I could not have said it better than TalkingStick in the post right above where I am writing at #44.
Having that Black man in our White House has driven the racists into the open and they are very bold in their approach. I would include the Tea Party crazies in that mix.
Are there any good novels that imagine the US if we had let them go? I’m sometimes ponder/wonder where we’d be.
The duopoly confrontation is not a ‘perfect political storm’. Sandy is approaching New England with the potential to cause considerable damage. It also has the potential of the Long Island Express hurricane of 1936, and the Great Colonial hurricane of 1635, due to some of the parameters being in excess of anything previously encountered.
Were this the perfect political storm by comparison with Sandy, there would be forces from other storms that would make it so. There are not. Both of these supposedly ‘different’ candidates march in lockstep with the corporate overlords. When you criticize Republican interests you also by default, if you are honest, have to say the same for Democrats because they are the same.
There is indeed, however, a perfect political storm brewing, and that will be between the above described parties and the party of the people, however that in future takes shape. That party presently has Mother Nature speaking for it – emphasizing the need of people to be safe in our homes, which has been jeopardized as climate change is ignored. We hope this one isn’t the grandaddy it has potential to be – good if it isn’t. But if we don’t do something about the duopoly, Mother Nature will.
“Are there any good novels that imagine the US if we had let them go? I’m sometimes ponder/wonder where we’d be.”
Even if war had not broken out immediately upon secession, it would have occurred eventually. Slave country vs free country could not have co-existed side by side indefinitely.
In the main post you refer to states choosing to extend the time for voting. I don’t think that’s possible as a remedy for the problems arising from the weather, or at least it isn’t possible to hold voting open past midnight of Election Day. It’s my understanding that existing federal law requires the state process for allocating its electors, whatever that process might be, to be completed no later than election day.
Your suggestion here is more to the point. States are free to complete their process, or as much of it as they prefer, before e-day. States like VA, that have “absentee voting in person”, that is the same as early voting, only you have to have some reason that it would be impossible or at least a hardship for you to vote in person on election day — should just open early voting to all. If power is out here in NoVA between now and e-day, we’re all going to find it at least a hardship to vote in person on e-day, so we should all be given a blanket excuse, and every effort should be made to get as many people voting early as possible.
It’s too late to get very many people safely voted before the power goes out. But if we are going to have the power out for a week, we’ll get more people to the polls if we let them vote every day of that week rather than just the last day. People aren’t going to have much to do that week, since most job sites will be closed down. We might even get increased turnout if we organize barbecues at the early polling sites.