Eugene Jarecki’s powerful documentary The House I Live In, which won the Sundance Film Festival Grand Prize, traces the roots of the War on Drugs and lays out the inequalities in drug enforcement, mandatory sentencing, and the prison system, while also explaining the economic realities that create both drug problems and a rise in incarceration. Using his relationship with his family’s longtime caregiver, Nannie Jeter (Nannie is her given name, not her title in the household) and her family as a stepping off point, Jarecki explores the failure of America’s drug policy.
Over $1 trillion dollars spent over the past 40 years have made no dent: Drugs today are purer, cheaper, and more available than ever. And America which has 5% of the world’s population has the world’s largest population of incarcerated, the majority of which are serving time for non-violent, drug crimes. Police departments profit from drug arrests under RICO, police officers make more overtime pay with each drug arrest, and are positioned for advancement based on the numbers of arrests they make. There is an incentive to roust the “suspicious” (and yes, profiling happens), rather than to focus on the harder to solve crimes like murder, rape, and robbery, and this leads to a greater distrust of police in urban communities further creating a war-like atmosphere.
And then there’s mandatory sentencing, which even judges find imbalanced and counterproductive, yet which has provided a vast economic boost to rural areas where whole towns now rely on privatized prisons as their economic base, moving populations from poor, racially concentrated neighborhoods (ghettos) into incarceration.
What is at the root of America’s (perceived) drug problem? When the War on Drugs began, about 2% of the population felt drugs were a major problem facing America, yet in a bid to seem electable, politicians became “hard on crime,” and drug use–which for over a century was used as way to marginalize non-white members of society–was the easy target. From the late 1960s on, black Americans, first with heroin and then crack cocaine, became the focus of the War on Drugs; before that it was the Chinese with opium, and Mexicans with marijuana. But for disadvantaged and marginalized classes, underground prohibited economies have long been the only means for survival. And now, because of the shifting economic downturns, white Americans have turned to home-based meth making and dealing, providing a whole new stream of inmates for the prison business. In an interview with Jarecki, David Simon, creator of the acclaimed television series The Wire and a former crime reporter, exposes the mentality behind the scenes:
All these Americans, we don’t need them any more, factories are closing… Let’s get rid of the bottom fifteen per cent of the country, lets lock them up. In fact, let’s see if we can make money off of locking them up….At that point why don’t you just say, “Kill the poor, if we kill the poor we gonna be a l0t better off,” because that’s what the drug war has become.
While drug laws have become an economic stimulus on the backs of poor people, addiction expert Gabor Mate´ expounds that we are not treating the reasons people do drugs, that at its core drug use is a deep situational and public health issue, not a criminal matter. Jarecki weaves a tragic tapestry, the interconnecting threads of a dreadlocked professor whose son is facing drug charges; a woman who deals drugs in her neighborhood to make ends meet and provide for her family and the children who live in the projects; a young man facing a minimum of five years in prison whose own father grew up idolizing the dealers in his neighborhood and was subsequently jailed for drug dealing; a prison guard who sees the realities of his job; patrol cops and narcotics officers; prison reformers; and the entwined lives of the Jarecki family and Nannie Jeter, who left her children in New Haven to earn more money and hopefully better their condition by moving to New York in order to care for Eugene and his brother, whose own parents were strong civil rights supporters.
The House I Live In takes its title from a song about America; the great Paul Robeson, himself a civil rights crusader, sings the version that rolls over the end credits, a fitting coda for this film as America is the house we live in; and with current drug policies, we are building additions and renovating on very ugly, shaky foundations, on the backs of the poor and disadvantaged.



43 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Before we start, just a couple quick notes:
Make sure you are logged in to comment. Please refresh your browser every minute or so to see new comments, questions and answers.
Please be respectful of each other and our guest.
To reply to specific comment, hit the reply button underneath it and then type away. Always hit “send comment.” Thanks!
Please stay on topic/s–in this case tonight’s film The House I Live In; director Eugene Jarecki, drug policy, the (failed) War of Drugs, mandatory sentencing, prison industry, racial imbalances in the judicial system, prison warehousing of the poor, drug enforcement… If you’d like to discuss today’s other newsworthy matters, please find a post elsewhere on FDL to do so. Thank you. And yeah, I tpye badly…
Welcome to Firedoglake Movie Night, Eugene, and thank you for being here tonight!
Thanks for having me. (this is Eugene)
Eugene, Welcome to the Lake.
Thank you for a great film.
IHi Eugene, what a uniquely personal, that universal film. How long were you in the making and how did you find and choose the stories you did (aside from Nannie Jeter)?
Stories emerged in different ways. Sometimes, I would read about something in the paper and pursue it (like the Judge going up against the Federal system in Iowa). Other times, I would literally just stumble into something, like the Marshall in New Mexico, who I literally asked for directions one day when I was driving through New Mexico and we got to talking…a month later I was driving around with him in his patrol car police drug traffic. So it varies. and one must remain open to circumstance.
Website – The House I Live In
Screenings – check for your city
Your personal story brought this film to a new level, so much more than just facts. How did Nannie Jeter react to your original request to film her and her family story?
The marshal was a great character, and the judge–wow. I thought at first he was going be a real hardliner, but instead he turned out to be frustrated by mandatory sentencing.
The narcotics cops you interviewed, were they gung-ho, or do they realize the inequalities, and that with RICO they have an incentive to bust more and more drug dealers on every level? I shuddered when on said to a dealer
when i first talked to nannie about filming her, it was quite abstract and didn’t get real. but she was open. she was to some extent less confident then than she is now about the power of her views on the subject. at the same time, i had an intriguing conversation a few months later when i mentioned to her that i had seen the movie American Gangster and thought it had things in it that would interest her. i learned an interesting lesson that day. when i explained the movie to her, it became clear she could not have been less interested in seeing it. and would prefer, honestly, to watch something like Finding Nemo. Becuase what i realized was that she had lived that movie. So she didn’t need to see it. People like me needed to see it. I thought she would at least appreciate that someone had made a movie that was understanding of the life experiences she had witnessed. But while that might be true, after a hard week’s work, what most people want in this country where so much is so difficult for so many, is a breather. and i hate to say that is a larger issue that we face. the harder things get here, the more thinking about the drug war or any other kind of major social justice issue just feels like one big add-on to people. they have enough to deal with. and yet, i need to remind us that if we do not get our heads around these issues and our boots on the ground in protest, our very republic and the life we have any comprehension of, is in peril.
How long was the filming process, the interviews seem so candid / relaxed. The viewpoint of the officer / marshal / correctional officer / judge seem open and real.
I really appreciated you interviewing Gabor Maté. I ;ve read his book Hungry Ghosts, and have seen him speak, he is a very power proponent of drugs abuse as a public (mental/spiritual) health issue.
i went across 25 states looking for a wide range of viewpoints from every level of the criminal justice system. oddly, what i found was a huge number of people inside the system (virtually everyone i talked to) have deep reservations about what they do and the larger implications of the system they are participating in. so it was incredibly inspiring to see a judge, from his chambers, criticize the drug war whose laws have tied his hands and stripped him of the discretion we entrust him with. it was inspiring to see prison officials (jailers and wardens) wearing their uniforms and from the prisons they run, criticize the draconian laws (and the politicians and corporations who profit from them) that they have to enforce. and yes, it was also inspiring in several states across the country to hear law enforcement officers, from the front seats of their patrol cars, lament the laws that they enforce, which arrest the same people week after week, largely nonviolent, who aren’t a threat to society, but whose lives they see only become worse with each arrest, a treadmill to nowhere. all of that sadness on the part of those working in the system is actually a very inspiring glimmer of hope for change. becuase the human majesty of such people to speak out in that way in a way that could imperil their very livelihood sets such a standard of behavior that the rest of us — for whom it would be so much easier to voice protest — must be inspired by.
I understand not wanting to see something you lived, I retired from the Fed Bureau of Prisons (22 yrs) – and I will say you did get “it” right from many perspectives. I cannot watch prison movies or reality shows.
This is a must see film for everyone! I highly encourage everyone to find a screening.
Gabor Maté is fascinating and both a compassionate and deeply analytic person. he also is a victim of nazi occupied hungary, and so brings a deep distrust of how societies can turn on the defenseless among them.
sorry everyone, i have been misusing the reply button (or failing to). will do better now.
Tech note:
For our new readers/commenters:
To follow along, you will have to refresh your browser: PC = F5 key, MAC = Command+R keys
If you want to ask a question – just type it in the Leave Your Response box & Submit Comment.
If you are responding to a comment – use the REPLY button under the number, then type your response in the box, Submit Comment.
we filmed for about 3 years. we pride ourselves (my team that is) on approaching people with vast reserves of our own compassion and humanity. we assume that everyone is in some sense or another a victim of whatever system we are concerned with. and if they aren’t, if they are really a monster, i guess we will figure that out too. but we don’t start there. i believe in due process.
I was stunned to learn about redlining property for FHA loans going back to the 1930s, a process that helped create ghettos. And the explanation of war crimes and the decimation of populations was linked so clearly to our current War on Drugs–I was speechless.
A very true comment – I was there when it went into effect, and the correctional staff did not want the mandatory sentencing, immediately saw the down side.
it was all eye opening to me when our research uncovered it all. and of course david simon, who is a national treasure, was the one who put the FHA malignant redlining process into an historical context that taught me how such redlining explains the undermining of black progress since blacks came north to urban centers. without such understanding, even the most liberal white people harbor some kind of patronizing sense that black folks somehow didn’t quite make it the way, say, chinese or korean immigrants have. this feeds mythologies about black “shiftlessness” or “laziness,” and the like. when in fact, black people were systematically kneecapped in a way others werent.
What can we as citizens do to change mandatory sentencing?
pressure your politicians local or national to be aware that you will not tolerate hearing any more “tough on crime” rhetoric that simply ensures their political survival and lines the pockets of their coroporate paymasters in the prison industrial system that has so poisoned this country. and mandatory minimums, where are constantly attached to bills by every manner of politician because they fundamentally increase the bednights that prisons can cant on and thus all the related industries can service and profit from, are a fundamental part of tough on crime rhetoric. so just boo and hiss your politicians in every way you can until they tell you how they will be “smart on crime.”
Dr Hart, a professor/researcher who works in drug addiction, faced his son’s trial for drug possesion/trafficking (for those who havent seen the film, Dr. Hart only learned of son when the boy was 16, and has been buiding a relatinship with him, despite the distance).
Has that case been resolved? What was the outcome? And the outcome of other cases we saw?
ANd Shanequa, the drug deal in Yonkers, do you know how is she doing? Really a storng image of her with the kids from the projects eating ice cream jsut after a former dealer explained how he got into the life.
i spoke with carl the other night when we screened the film together at the apollo theater in new york to a packed house of community members to whom we had given free tickets. the event was a joy. carl’s testimony about his son was not, as Tobias continues to struggle with many of the obstacles that young people like him struggle with in forsaken inner cities and heartland communities across the country. nothing has changed for him much, because nothing has changed much.
shanequa is wonderful. she was cheered at the apollo. and two weeks ago she and i appeared at the Caravan of Peace, a delegation of Mexican poets and activists and family members of slain drug war victims at a vigil event in New York. Shanequa testified about her ghetto experiences in America alongside 7 mothers from Mexico who had lost much of their families to drug violence. Her reaction was astonishingly adult, sensitive, and deep. I watched her at one point make light of her own suffering by comparison and stroke the arm of one of the mothers. She is a special person.
She is really special, there is a lot of power in her, and hope her life goes well.
What do you think would help decrease drug dealing and drug abuse in the US? People will always use drugs–it goes back to pre-history, but abuse is another matter. WOUld more economic opportunity be a solution? Is harm-reduction a viable method? (Considering the lousy rate of “cure” for 12 Step and other rehabs, 1% to 5%, there has to be a better method, and incarceration is NOT a deterrent.
we need to follow the example of portugal who have decriminalized possession of all drugs and only punish drug dealing beyond a quantity that says that someone is a serious drug dealer. they have taken a huge shift to putting their money into drug treatment and removing the stigma and taken it away from law enforcement. and every leading indicator in portugese life, from crime to aids incidents, to the burden on their legal system, to cost savings, has been a resounding success. it humiliates the way we do it here in what we think is the world’s most advanced democracy.
The civilized world recognizes that the U.S. is a nation fucked up beyond all hope.
Do you think meth and the arrests/imprisoning of more whites could cause a shift in drug policy?
richard pryor said an epidemic is “when it affects white people.” i would hate to think that is the case. but there is something to it.
The House I Live In – Get Involved
Drug War Today, Drug War History, Community Action, Organizations, Join the Movement, Addiction and Treatment, Drug War Blog
Shudder…. Eugene I know you have to leave soon, so i wanted ot thank you for being here tonight and making such a power, smart film that clearly lays out the whys and hows of America’s failed drug policies. Absolutely brilliant. Thanks you.
thank you all very much for participating in this dialogue. please do see the movie in new york this week and in l.a. when it opens this Friday. Please also visit thehouseilivein.org to learn more about the film and how you can get involved in efforts to fight the drug war in your state. there is a zip-code prompt where you can enter your own zip code to learn what is happening in your area.
thank you all. it was a pleasure.
Eugene, Thank you for stopping by the Lake and spending the evening with us discussing your new film.
Next week’s film is The Love Patient a romantic comedy (and total indie film) about the things we do for love which has a very different take than most LGBTQ feature films. Our guests will be Michael Simon the writer/direcot and the executive producer Maria Montgomery. We’ll be discussing the film, how to make an indie feature film, and LGBTQ films. YOu can see the trailer here: http://youtu.be/rRDAYymWbzA
That’s so beautiful, it’s bringing tears to my eyes.
Looks like your movie will be in Austin October 26. I’m planning to go.
Thank you so much for all it took for you to make it.
Edited. Now, I hope it makes sense.
Thank you!
~
I was reading today the Govt of Canada’s 1999 report on the advisability of drug testing by employers. The section on The American Influence gave me an AHA moment. Workplace drug testing programs started under Reagan, and were among other things, a tool for decreasing and demoralizing the work force. When applied to government jobs it attacks unionized employees making middle class and above incomes. So it isn’t just the poor who are suffering, although a higher proportion is probably imprisoned for drug offenses. I wonder how many people who considered themselves middle class have become unemployed and long-term unemployable because of workplace drug testing.
Looking for a screening in Toronto, not seeing, I will talk it up with friends and see if we can’t work up interest in hosting a screening here.
“The House I Live In” was written by Abel Meeropol, lyrics, and Earl Robinson, music.
Meeropol wrote the lyrics for “Strange Fruit” and later adopted Michael and Robert, the two orphaned sons of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg after their 1953 execution.
Earl Robinson also wrote the song “Joe Hill,” “Ballad for Americans,” and “A Walk in the Sun.” He was blacklisted during the McCarthy era for being a member of the Communist Party. I saw him perform once at a rally in Santa Barbara, CA during the student strike after the Cambodian incursion back in 1970.