The richest humans on the planet no longer bother masking their control over nations and individuals. In England, employment is falling, wages are falling, and people are falling into poverty. The rich are doing quite well during austerity, though, thanks to Quantitative Easing:
But Spencer Dale, the Bank of England economist, said that for pensioners the negative impact of QE [because it depresses interest rates on savings] was offset by the rise in asset prices. He said that without the central bank creating money and using it to buy bonds, the stock market would have collapsed and property prices fallen through the floor. Pension funds are heavily invested in shares, bonds and property, which means they might not be getting a good interest rate, but the value of their assets has largely been maintained.
Dale doesn’t say it, but it’s obviously true that this is huge benefit to the richest Britons, who own most of the stocks and real property. Dale also avoids another piece of reality, the richest Britons joined the richest Americans in wrecking the lives of millions of their fellow citizens, and now insist that those citizens protect them from loss, and accept poverty as their lot in life. Screw those 3.5 million British kids in poverty, and especially the 1.6 million kids in extreme poverty.
China is facing huge problems. There are riots at factories, as workers begin to refuse to submit to the militaristic enforcement they suffer on monstrous assembly lines. It is becoming clear that China’s export machine is sputtering, and that structural changes are needed as the government is in transition to new leadership. The richest Chinese aren’t going to allow that.
Similarly, many analysts question whether the incoming leadership has the political will to overcome the resistance of the so-called princelings and other well-connected families that have prospered under the current system.
One of our own oligarchs, the gambling mogul Sheldon Adelson, explained why he wants to run the political show to Mike Allen at Politico. At the top of the list is his desire to stop the investigations into his gambling empire. These appear to center around the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and allegations of bribery in connection with gambling in China, specifically Macau. Asia is now the source of 90% of Adelson’s revenues. He wants more support for Israel, as if the Congress weren’t already in Netanyahu’s pocket. I can just see both parties leaping to their feet to cheer on the bomb chart Bibi bought from Acme Corporation. And, of course, Adelson hates unions and the people they represent. He runs the only non-union shop on the Las Vegas Strip.
And for good measure, we have the solipsistic monarchs of the NFL, a crowd so in love with their own power they wrecked the game and arguably were forced to relent on their lockout. Dave Zirin calls it a win for the refs, though it’s hard to feel good about watching another group of new employees robbed of the security of a safe pension. But maybe the next time one of these greedheads demands that taxpayers build them a new arena, the fans will remember that they have the power.
In fact, the biggest fear of the oligarchy is that people will decide to strip them of their obscene wealth. Forbes columnist Kenneth Rapoza says that what the rich fear most is that their lapdog congressionals will suddenly start carrying out the demands of the electorate, not that Rapoza thinks that could ever happen. Robert Frank from the Wall Street Journal’s Wealth Report says that the rich are afraid of violence in the streets.
Granted, America isn’t a country conducive to class wars in the streets (even a mention by the President of rolling back the private-jet tax breaks sparked denunciations of class warfare). But at a time when most of the country is mired in unemployment, weak housing prices and a stack of bills from the bailouts, the rich have reason to fear public resentment. And some fear even worse.
Where is this power of democracy that the rich fear? Look at Greece, Spain, and Portugal, where the government uses its monopoly on violence to assault its citizens for complaining about their miserable futures. Spanish Prime Minister Rajoy assures his bond market masters* that the beatings will continue until the masses pay every penny of debt. It reminds me of the Whiskey Rebellion in this country. The government imposed a tax that affected primarily Western farmers to pay off the government bonds owned by the rich, a tax that took all the profit from a crucial cash crop. This was the equivalent of an income tax that was not imposed on the rich in the eastern states, but was used to pay debts to those same wealthy people. The effective tax rate was lower for large distillers, mostly in the East, than for the farmers in the West. When the farmers rebelled, George Washington sent the militia to insure payment.
The future of US workers is starting to become clear, and it isn’t much better that the outcome for the farmers, who wound up paying the tax. There is an excellent article in the Toronto Star (yes, Gene Elk is Mike Elk’s dad) showing how companies like Caterpillar and GE are able to screw workers into pay cuts that will keep them out of the middle class. Here’s the conclusion:
Chris Townsend, who refers to himself as the Washington guy for the [United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America said] … “What we’re facing down here is public policy that goes right to the White House that now sanctions what has been increasingly at the private board room the mantra that wages have to be reduced. All the euphemisms — we’re not competitive, we have to have a competitive wage.”
Townsend speaks quickly, and in long sentences, and he has more to say about this current political moment. “All these companies surely have come to a consensus that $13 an hour more or less, or somewhere in there, that that’s the rate of pay that the tycoon chairs have sort of said, yeah, we will continue to do some manufacturing in the United States if that’s where we can slot it.”
That’s the future: jobs at about $13-18 an hour are competitive with Chinese labor, considering other costs, so that’s what we get. The oligarchy is certain state and federal government will enforce that policy, just like the Greek and Spanish police, and George Washington’s militia.
I guess that will continue to work. Until it doesn’t.
———————-
*By bond market masters, I mean the scum on Wall Street and their counterparts in the European Union, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong and other money centers who enforce the demands of their masters the oligarchs.





26 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
There was a reason it was named the “President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness”,
not the “President’s Council on Living Wage Jobs and Competitiveness”.
The first step- destruction of the union movement, was critical to the emasculation of worker power. Once Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers, it was the death knell for labor, and I think that action will go down in history as the beginning of the end for workers in America.
“The rich are doing quite well during austerity, though, thanks to Quantitative Easing….”
Well, well! Somebody at FDL has finally pulled his head far enough out of Krugman’s butt to notice who really benefits from QE.
QE = inflated prices for the things the 99% buy (gas, food, etc.) & inflated prices for the things the 1% own (stocks, bonds).
After our 150 years of migration from agrarian roots to industrial drones, the quantum leap required will be a return to serfdom, with mandates from a perceptive electorate ensuring living wages and retirement benies for tackling the pervading ecological problems of big AG… but nobody seems to see the forest from the trees…
So torches and pitchforks will line the road to our dubious future…
The Oligarchs View of laws,who enforces them, why:
CHRIS HEDGES: ….And I think we have to ask, if the security establishment did not want this bill (National Defense Authorization Act), and the FBI Director Mueller actually goes to Congress and says publicly they don’t want it, why did it pass? What pushed it through? And I think, without question, the corporate elites understand that things, certainly economically, are about to get much worse. I think they’re worried about the Occupy movement expanding. And I think that, in the end—and this is a supposition—they don’t trust the police to protect them, and they want to be able to call in the Army. And if this bill goes into law, and it’s slated to go into law in March, they will be able to do that.
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/1/17/journalist_chris_hedges_sues_obama_admin#transcript
Hedges, et al have won this round, how long that lasts, who knows. http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/we_won_–_for_now_20120917/
My question is, So if we are so certain that this is what is happening to us in our country and our world, Why isn’t it open season on all of these motherfuckers? How is it that that fat fucker’s casino is still standing in Vegas? Why doesn’t the union burn the motherfucker down? Seems to me that that would be pretty easy and after have been fucked with by the gestapo in that town, I think they’d go down just like a fat hog if they took a round or two too. WTF America? They have us so cowed no one has the balls to do anything, except the young occupiers because they are too young to know better. God Bless the Young Occupiers. I’ll be happy when they start throwing shit bombs and gas/piss cocktails!
Why we must rise.
There was blood shed in the labor movement last century, why does anyone think it’s not going to happen again.
Yep, dead uncle milton freidman kill Main Street finally comes home from it’s long journey of kicking other Main Streets around the world in the teeth. Please remember 0 taught at the same school as dumf so you shouldn’t have to think to hard whats instore for Amerikas Main Street.
I think Hedges places a lot of faith in Occupy. I doubt it. I think the future will be violent if we break out of this at all. And it could well be spontaneous. No one knows when it is coming.
It is a pretty grim picture…big money is consolidating power at the direct expense of the vast majority and crippling the ability of the democratic process to respond.
It seems clear at this point that the crash greatly increased the power of the financial elites, with everyone else cowed by the risk of job losses.
I just put together a mash-up of the Lorax’s “How bad can I be?” with Romney quotes peppered in. It’s obviously a cartoon, but dramatizes the situation pretty well. I’m not so sanguine about an easy happy ending in the real life version.
Here’s the link:
Great post. Thank you.
Masaccio, you paint such a rosy picture of our future under our entitled Capitalist Masters. We’re just beginning to see what they have planned for us in USA Inc.
What democratic process was that anyway? Not in a free market fire zone.
Massaccio,
Excellent piece, and spot on.
Book Salon up with Arun Chaudhary’s First Cameraman: Documenting the Obama Presidency in Real Time hosted by Christina Bellatoni
yes, thanks very much.
I hate to be a pessimist, but I’m not seeing us heading for anything but some Louis XVI solutions. That is the only thing I can see stopping the plutocrats in their tracks. They are psychotically sick/mentally damaged people overwhelmed with greed and lust for power. They couldn’t stop their destructive greed even if they wanted to, which they wouldn’t want to. They have adopted a value system that equates personal worth with financial worth: the more money, the better person they think they are. Thus the more pillaging they do the better person they are in their sick minds.
Sorry to have to tell you this, but it was the neo-liberal Jimmy Carter who began the destruction of unions.
Ease up there, kafka. The big problem with QE is depressed interest rates for savers and retirees. I have been discussing this for years, as have other contributors. It has also been all over the New York Times, including this recent article: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/business/as-low-rates-depress-savers-governments-reap-the-benefits.html
…X 2
The real death knell of the labor movement came when the unions purged it’s ranks of the communists and socialists. The union hierarchy actually believed the bosses that they would be allowed to reap the benefits of capitalism if they would only rid their ranks of the “trouble makers.”
The “Occupy” movement allowed itself to become a parody.
The last thing the “bosses” wanted was for the American working class to have semblance of class consciousness and the union bosses from the 50′s to the present have insured that.
Yeah Kafka ,mas@20 is correct ,and if you think the worst part of austerity is QE ,maybe thou should look up his own ass whence seeking a better understanding of asset stripping .
Obama only wants to increase the capital gains tax from 15% to 20%. The capital gains tax was 28% under Reagan. Most of the deficit reduction from taxing the wealthy comes from increasing the tax on capital gains. So lets increase the capital gains tax to at least 28%. Obama is putting the interests of the wealthy ahead of the middle class and poor. Social Security benefits which have been paid for on the table, but the tax on capital gains, which includes carried interest, remains at historically low levels. So who is representing the 99%?