Polls show Mitt Romney lost badly to President Obama in the Battle of Conventions. Obama appears to have gained ground during the GOP convention and to have widened his lead over Romney during the Democratic convention.
So what does Romney do? He doubles down on culture war lies, implying over the weekend that Obama plans to remove the word “God” from the nation’s coins. Call it coining lies. I have to ask once again, should Romney somehow manage to win, why would anyone grant his victory legitimacy? It would be based completely upon a foundation of lies that the denial of voting rights to millions of Americans. The NCAA would give the death penalty to a college football team that cheated to this degree.
So it’s down to God and Man on the Campaign Trail, to twist up the title of William F. Buckley’s 1951 book. In the book, Buckley accused Princeton of indoctrinating students with liberal ideology. Now Romney, Paul Ryan and the idolatrous brigade are trying to indoctrinate American voters with preposterous lies regarding the faith of their Democratic opponents. The Republicans have become precisely what the Founders warned us about.
For the moment, though, let’s focus upon another Romney/Ryan lie, on an issue David Frum called “the H-bomb of the 2012 campaign.” That issue is Medicaid and the devastating consequences on America’s elderly of the Romney/Ryan plan to dramatically reduce benefits and turn it into a dangerous block-grant program.
It was Bill Clinton last week who put the lie to the Romney/Ryan claim that nothing in their proposals for Medicare or Medicaid would harm seniors. Clinton said:
They also want to block-grant Medicaid, and cut it by a third over the coming 10 years. Of course, that’s going to really hurt a lot of poor kids. But that’s not all. Lot of folks don’t know it, but nearly two-thirds of Medicaid is spent on nursing home care for Medicare seniors who are eligible for Medicaid…
…It’s going to end Medicare as we know it. And a lot of that money is also spent to help people with disabilities, including — (cheers, applause) — a lot of middle-class families whose kids have Down’s syndrome or autism or other severe conditions. (Applause.) And honestly, let’s think about it, if that happens, I don’t know what those families are going to do.
Now, the lie that the Obama Administration wants to gut Medicare benefits is no more believable than the lie that Obama wants to take the word “God” from our coins. Still, Romney/Ryan persist to deliver it. Such a strategy of deceit reveal them both as men of no character, men who should be disqualified for the offices they seek.
As fact-checkers have pointed out, Clinton was correct in his prepared remarks (which he garbled slightly above), in which said that two-thirds of Medicaid goes to seniors and to people with disabilities. I checked this with the facts and figures from my own state, Texas, and it holds true here as it does around the country. Sixty-percent of Medicaid benefits here go to seniors and people with disabilities.
We can look at it another way. Medicaid pays for 70 percent of all nursing home care.
Lies are nothing new to politics. But the Romney/Ryan campaign has taken the Big Lie to a whole other level. They cannot beat the real President Obama so they invent one no more real than the Obama in Clint Eastwood’s empty chair. They cannot win with their devastating economic policies, so they lie about them. Should they manage to eke out a victory, they will have earned a mandate for nothing – nothing but the efficacy of the lie in American politics.
If I may wax theological for a moment, in just about every religious tradition the transcendent being or possibility of enlightenment is identified with Truth – with Universal Truth so powerful it cannot be fully comprehended. So I ask this question: By their sacrifice of Truth, is it not Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan who are eliminating God from our shared lives?




59 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
rmoney.
shapeshifter, liar, cheater, scam artist and bullshitter-in-chief.
now we know what was the key quality he sought in vetting his VP; the ability to lie lie lie without blinking.
r-ayn.
It’s hard to shock or surprise me, but the level of Romney/Ryan deceit does. I struggle to find one more-or-less true thing they’ve said.
Warmongering Republicans and their constant invocation of their bloodthirsty warmongering God. “In God We Trust.” “One Nation Under God.” Their favorite: “Let God sort them out”.
Democrats and Republicans. Their God is Mammon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon
Our God is the one we’re taught to pray to after they’ve stolen everything that isn’t tied down.
It ain’t working.
GWB lied no less during his campaign in 2000 and with the collusion of media he not only gained legitimacy but got elected to a second term on the prowess of his military record over John Kerry’s. Why would you think Romney’s campaign would be any different?
In 21st century America, anyone with a big enough bank account and a dumb enough audience can buy his own facts. Willard Romney, who has both, knows this.
“The lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies.” ~ Tennyson
Is the GOP claim that the PPACA’s restructuring of Medicare cut spending on the patient side of the program a lie? Yes. Is the claim that Obama wants to gut Medicare outside of that a lie? No. Obama, like all corporate whores in the Party and the stupid, stupid well-meaning people who happen to work for them, claims we should raise the eligibility age for Medicare because “people are living longer.” This sounds reasonable… until you look at the data and realize that only the rich are really seeing significant gains in life expectancy. Obama, simply put, wants to raise the bar on Medicare until most working people will die before they are eligible. That’s arguably as bad as what Ryan and Romney want to do, just using a different approach.
Kerry was a terrible candidate and I had hold my nose to vote for him.
I’m pretty sure they also warned us about rulers who kill their citizens without due process.
It’s that the foundational premise of the Romney campaign is a lie. They are running fictional versions of themselves and fictional version of Obama. Yes, of course, others have twisted the truth. In recent years, especially Bush. But Romney/Ryan really have taken it to a new level.
We talk about this aspect of what’s going on in politics at our house a fair amount of time.
The other day, my mister was saying that what we are experiencing now is similar to the situation that Jesus of Nazareth faced with Rome: how to confront those who have immorally claimed the power and authority.
He also, just this morning, said that the Republican Party Candidates are people who should be held as criminal, negligent incompetants.
Just a shout out from our personal domain.
Nice to see you, as always, Glenn. Thank you so much.
I have a severely disabled adult child (CP). She continues to live in our home by virtue of a Medicaid Program that pays for attendant care so that I am able to continue to work.
By association, I know dozens of people in similar circumstances. Most continue to vote republican even as their school budgets are cut along with other programs that directly benefit them. No amount of facts or reason will dissuade them even though they have no real objection to the specific programs they benefit from.
And in the absence of these programs, they offer no viable alternatives. In fact, most are not able to articulate any alternatives at all, viable or not.
I will never, ever understand why Kerry and his campaign took so long to answer the Swift Boat ads. That, by itself, cost him the election.
We should, among other things, also take a page from Havel et al: hold the corrupt to the truth of their own commitments. In this case, keep challenging them about their plans to end Medicare, gut Medicaid and repeal Obamacare. That’s what’s meant by “truth to power.”
No amount of facts or reason will dissuade them
That’s because they live in a post-fact, post-logical environment. It drives me crazy that neighbors and co-workers make their political decisions based on emotion and a succession of logical fallacies. I’ve given up on the idea of persuading them otherwise.
Well. I don\’t believe any of them.
ACA does and will cut benefits, not only for Medicare but for younger insureds. And I don\’t trust him on Social Security. After all he wants credit for what cuts he has made. And then there is his surrogate Bill Clinton giving Paul Ryan a thumbs up on his even more extensive gutting of the safety net.
But the fact is the Republicans are insane and who can predict how awful their policies will prove to be. We need Obama to win re-election. And the Obama bashing, of which I am a perpetrator, really needs to stop.
But we also need for those majority of enthusiastic joyful people at the Democratic Convention to grasp power and hold the candidate and, God willing, his administration’s feet to the fire.
Plus some not so reliable vote counting, as I recall.
Absolutely. When Clinton ran the first time, they had a rapid response team which had an answer for every charge made against him in about an hour. It was the best I’ve ever seen.
Totally agree with you!!!
Thanks, Coach Bill. Yours is an extremely important point. I don’t do it justice by saying that. It’s more than important. It’s critical, and adds the human moral view. The Right only advances these arguments by abstracting the human consequences out of the debate.
And I seriously think that Romney is devoid of knowing/feeling/experiencing human consequences. I would not ordinarily say that, but he can really not keep his facts/narrative straight. So, that makes me think there is something seriously deficient, even if I do not know what that exactly is.
” And I don’t trust him on Social Security….”
I don’t trust him at all on any subject and I will not vote for him.
His “We Suck Less” campaign has the virtue of being true, at least in the short term.
As a Texas resident, I can vote my conscience knowing that my vote will have no bearing on the outcome of the election.
I have a niece who today lies in a hospital bed with cancer. She has been there for over a month and off and on now for over a year. She is losing her battle. But thank God, all her care and her many operations have come from medicaid. She had no other insurance. There must be others like her who will lose the little comfort they have. I hate to say it but Grayson was right: the republican plan if you get sick is to die quickly.
There is something odd about his lack of connection to those beyond his kin. It may simply be that he’s lived all his life in a sheltered bubble, a self-reinforcing view of the world that can’t see others outside the economic, social status, and, dare I say it, even his faith. Taken together, just too self-contained. I don’t really know, though. All I can say for sure is that sure is the appearance of it.
If I may wax theological for a moment, in just about every religious tradition the transcendent being or possibility of enlightenment is identified with Truth – with Universal Truth so powerful it cannot be fully comprehended. So I ask this question: By their sacrifice of Truth, is it not Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan who are eliminating God from our shared lives?
From my perspective on Truth:
Truth is something to be pointed to, but not to be known. Why? Because whatever we say it is, it isn’t.
So I’m not worried that anyone is going to eliminate Truth. Maybe point in the wrong direction, but we do have instruments with which to make corrections.
I find zero comfort from anything I have heard coming from any republican candidate for any office, even here locally. But, hey, that’s just me. I keep looking for a ray of sunshine where there is none. Obama? Terrible man but the only hope I see of surviving the next four years with a little bit of our safety net in place.
As much as I admire your earlier comment, I must disagree here. There is no progressive issue or concern, moral or practical, that will not be buried forever by two more Scalias on the Supreme Court. I am no Obama worshipper. I’ve never viewed any political figure with anything but skepticism, a legacy of growing up professionally as a journalist. As for Texas being out of the electoral picture, no vote is ever meaningless. Just my opinions.
And that supreme court thing is huge.
When my daughter was born and for about a dozen years after that we had private, employer provided insurance that was pretty good even thought the max out of pocket kept creeping up. The company got sold and the out-of pocket immediately doubled because I lived in a state where there were no “in-network” doctors.
We went bare for about a year and eventually qualified for CHIP which provided excellent coverage. CHIP became Medicaid when she turned 18. We have had great coverage for major medical but can’t find a decent primary care physician which, I have written here many times, is the fatal flaw of ACA’s Medicaid expansion. There are simply not enough Medicaid providers to accommodate 15 to 20 million additional clients.
Coach Bill,
My sister-in-law was in that exact situation for the 54 years that she lived. We were just talking about that.
Courage and patience, Bill. Big Hug, too.
I did really think there was something promising in the convention itself…several of the speakers were very good, such as the San Antonio mayor and Sandra Fluke, etc etc plus the enthusiasm of the delegates. Renewed my hope (a bit), if I can use that word.
You are one on the front lines of this battle. Lose to the republicans and there is no telling how far they will go. As Glenn said, they lie. So if tommorrow they say ” you must have misunderstood” am I supposed to believe it? These people adhere to the Randian view of the world. ‘ I got mine fuck you’. And this battle is not only at the Presidential level, it is all over at every level of government. They are our modern brown shirts IMO.
Yes, and I loved John Lewis, what an inspiration and treasure he is.
I have thought for some time that Mitt has Aspergers. He has many of the classic symptoms that I have read about. I”m certainly not qualified but his behavior is so odd.
There’s a lot of that going around. Future historians will have a lot to say about the MBA mentality that took hold in this country about 30 years ago. That mentality gave us Willard Romney and Bain Capital.
The supreme court thing is really just as much about the Senate as it is about Obama. He has shown no stomach for any fight and will surely make appointments that will be easily confirmed. They may not be Scalia or Thomas but they will not be liberal or progressive and they will push the court further to the right.
It will be another round of “We Suck Less”.
I will never get why so many people harp on the importance of Supreme Court nominations in this election. Obama inherited two liberal Republican appointees who basically stayed on the Court as long as they did to deny Bush more nominations. He replaced one with someone who had been on a Republican short list for the same position and the other with a person whose career at Harvard Law School was characterized by a worrying lack of diversity in staffing, i.e. he replaced two people who were left-wing by modern standards with “New Democrat” types. Given that, on top of that history, people like Cass Sunstein are rumored to be on queue for the next nominations should he win reelection, I really just do not get why people hold onto the hope that an Obama win means a better SCOTUS lineup than Romney would give us.
“New Democrat” = Republican lite. And what Harry S. Truman said is still true: Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time.
In the 2008 primaries I supported Obama because the alternative was Hillary Rodham Clinton, a card-carrying New Democrat. I should have known that Obama would have brought in the same cast of characters, with the same views, as HRC.
Maybe so…During the Primaries, I heard some one/writer commenting he is so much better/relaxed when Ann is around. Guess he really just needs extra attention or help.
i’ve already seen and heard enough; i’m no fan of Obama, trust me- but I can’t say anything but that Ryan is a lying sack o’ shit
good point; while i’d prefer obama picking than romney thing is since these people are on there so long, sometimes they change or just don’t turn out exactly as the picker hoped– sometimes
The fatal flaw is the preserving of huge profits for corporate shareholders in insurance, pharma, appliances for profit hospitals etc. There are no realistic cost controls of goods and venues. A single payer non-profit system is provably the only thing that works. (And the ACA writing committees had single payer advocates wanting to give testimony escorted from the Capitol by armed police.)
“A single payer non-profit system is provably the only thing that works.”
Exactly. I would have been very happy to see Medicaid and Medicare combined into a single program with a gradual increase in eligibility.
This article brings to mind the premise that the left lies better than conservatives tell the truth. It’s
stunning that the first line denies that “God” was an issue. It was removed from the platform and was reinstated over the CLEARLY louder “noes”. Romney said he would retain “god” in country and on coins etc. He didn’t say Obama was going to remove it. Every line of Ryan’s speech was accurate and was spun into distortions by the word manipulators. He didn’t vote for Simpson/Bowles because it didn’t deal with health care – he never said he did vote for it. In fact, he produced his own deficit reduction budget. The Janesville plant closed in Apr 2009 and Obama did not take action to save it – that’s TRUE. If Obama could win with the truth, fine. But nothing in his character attacks on Romney were true, except that he is wealthy. Quelle horreur! Obama is promising 4 more years of EXACTLY the policies that have failed miserably. How can the American people be so bloody stupid? if you want a monarch vote Obama, for a president vote Romney. It was cheap and abundant credit that caused the crash – that is EXACTLY what Obama is doing now through the Fed, Fannie/Freddie/FHA, CFPB etc. by encouraging low cost loans to low quality borrowers. No one in their right mind would lend money for 30 years at 3.5% – except with government guarantees, i.e. the taxpayer. WAKE UP.
Senator Kerry, our next Secretary of State, may have been slow to respond to swift-boating in part b/c he put his ass (literally) on the line and rose to the challenge of approximating Jack Kennedy’s stellar service to the country by going to war on the closest thing to a PT-109, a river boat (Viz., “Apocalypse Now”). Never before in US (or Greco-Roman history would a war hero be criticized for the act of being a war hero: it was just mind-blowing. GWB was elected on the rubble of ruined careers including Dan Rather for having the audacity to question GWB’s phony military record. The lying liars will lie about anything to get elected.
Also, on this and other threads, I keep seeing people refer to Julian Castro as someone who restores their hope in the Democratic Party. This is extremely worrying–it seems like 2008 playing all over again. The Castro brothers are corrupt as the day is long. Neither San Antonio City Council, nor the position of Mayor, nor the Texas State Legislature pay salaries to its officeholders. The Castros have only been out of school for a little over a decade and have been career politicians and non-practicing attorneys holding non-paying elective office for much of that time. Yet they live in nice houses, dress well, and live well. That should raise red flags for people paying attention. (Hint: The man who manages their political affairs runs his business out of the Mayor’s office, has most of his staff on the city payroll, and is really, really good friends with developers, lobbyists, and an energy industry representative in the state.)
Outside of the corruption of the brothers themselves, Joaquin was outed in testimony in the redistricting trial as one of the two Democrats who cut deals with the Texas GOP to gut Gonzalez’s district and get rid of Dogget’s in return for getting a Democratic vote dump for a Hispanic running in San Antonio. Then, of course, all of their associates in politics are even more corrupt than they are… mark my words, if the Castros prove to be viable national figures, the future of the Party is pretty fucking bleak.
If you’re looking for some actual policies that reflect the few words of Jesus that I know, nobody in either party has come up with anything, a policy remotely close to the Gospel. Not one word of it.
Take Obama/Romney, any of them, their professed belief in the word of God and the like is ridiculous and a con.
seriously.
Obama made the “hard choice” to cut heating assistance for the poor. which part of the Gospel is that covered by?
It’s possibly the most sickening part of the whole charade. The phony faith.
You may remember that we were all made to understand the Blair and Bush prayed together, when deciding to invade Iraq.
We are told Blair is deeply religious.
Nothing has changed.
Of course, we are all tired of hearing that only the GOP lies.
Medicaid may go mostly to seniors, but there was nothing in the “fact check” that said seniors would get less care. Only and ASSUMPTION that if less total dollars go into the program, less care would result.
Now, the odd thing is the Democrats say, “Well, even though $716 billion less is going into the Medicare program, there will be no less care.”
Because it is a fact that $716 billion less will go into the Medicare system. And, saying, well, its just a part that goes to insurance companies and hospitals doesn’t change the fact that it is coming out of the Medicare system as a whole.
So, if funds coming out the Medicare system as a whole don’t affect care, then, funds coming from the Medicaid system as a whole don’t affect that care.
So, the lie is, “They are going to block grant less money to states for Medicaid. Seniors get Medicaid, therefore they will get less care.” No proof of ANY kind about HOW the block grants will result in less care, if at all.
So, more smoke and mirrors. And not ONE so-called fact checker discovered this. So, we know the fact check thing is a sham too.
I hate living in the 21st century where I dont even use coins
The point of the block grant program is to force the burden of funding of the program onto the states and eventually the patients themselves. I’m not sure you noticed, but 99% of us have been living through a demand crisis and several banking scandals that have left municipal and state governments completely strapped for cash. If you force the state to completely shoulder the burden of a former federal program in those conditions, you’re basically demanding to lower the overall quality of the program, including care. (If a state is broke due to lower revenues due to historic unemployment and less and less money coming from the federal government by choice, do you think adding liabilities is going to yeild good results?)
I know conservatives who are in a similar position to you – that is, having relatives who are severely disabled and are getting care via some govt program or other, usually Medicare. These conservatives continue to blissfully vote against their own interest, railing about the usual minorities who are “robbing them” etc, all while worshipping the almighty 1% and wanting their “horrible unfair” taxes to be cut.
Go figure.
One friend has an older schizophrenic (severe) brother, who’s been in care for many decades, all courtesy of govt programs that fund his care. My friend is “angry” bc he *blames* his brother for “getting” the schizophrenia bc his brother apparently took some drugs in his youth.
I pointed out to him once that it’s highly unlikely that his brother “got” schizophrenia due to taking drugs. It’s *more likely* that his brother was attempting to self-medicate on street drugs bc of the schizophrenia, as it was developing. My friend didn’t want to hear that. I guess he’s been brainwashed enough by Rush that he just wants to “blame” his brother for being a drain on the system. In other words: why should my friend have to PAY for his brother’s care??? My friend at least does admit that he RESENTS his brother and the care that HE has to provide to him in various ways… soooo easy to *blame* it all on his brother, who is ill.
Let me hasten to add that this person goes piously to church every Sunday.
So many citizens have been carefully taught to be narcissistic self-absorbed uncaring assholes. And the beat goes on…
BTW my friend will most definitely pull the lever for RMoney/R-ayn and think that’s the bestest thing evah!!
It’s a good thing that Obama is running for re-election, because he’s a paragon of truth that either fulfilled all of his campaign promises or attempted to by using the “bully pulpit”./s
Obama was probably counting on the continued generosity of that pinko, commie, socialist Hugo Chavez to provide the discounted heating oil again./s
What liberals are up against in making our case is the fact that the most enduring belief among conservatives is that the victims of misfortune, illness, abuse etc. are inherently evil. They believe not only that they don’t deserve respect and help from more fortunate people but do deserve the suffering they bear, even punishment by the community. This is as strong within many families as it is for neighbors and the general public.
Book Salon up with Greg Palast and Ted Rall’s Billionaires & Ballot Bandits: How to Steal an Election in 9 Easy Steps hosted by WaterTiger
Yes. Agreed. It’s very sad and frustrating. The attitude is that the person *deserves* their misfortune, whatever it happens to be, and they should just *suffer* and lead a life of horrid deprivation and likely early death bc, after all, they shouldn’t be a “drain” on those who are more fortunate.
What to say when your friend has no understanding of schizoph? No, his brother did not cause it or catch it from the Gov….a couple of basic facts would be a good start. Very sad…Does not indicate much hope for other understanding, does it?
Dear sweet Cthulhu! This idiocy would have embarrassed the John Birchers. We have moved beyond tin foil hats to padded cell territory.
Good pt. Whatever lies RMONEY dreams up the M$M can be counted on to catapult and amplify for him.