Yesterday, the Minneapolis, Minnesota City Council approved an amendment to its fiscal year 2013 Federal Agenda, calling on the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to establish a principal reduction program for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac owned or insured rental mortgages From Minnesotans for a Fair Economy’s press release:
According to the amendment approved today, “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or insure approximately 60% of the nation’s residential mortgages. As a result of the foreclosure crisis, the two agencies and private mortgage firms have been urged by housing advocates and governments to develop policies to assist homeowners to remain in their homes. Among the policies have been mortgage modification programs that include lower monthly payments, forbearance, principal reduction, shared equity and a combination of the programs. A recent court settlement involving mortgage lenders, the states and the federal government will provide refinancing and form of principal reduction to homeowners whose homes are “underwater” – mortgage value exceeds home value. The principal reduction program is available to loans serviced by banks but loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not eligible for the program.”
The foreclosure crisis is so scary that nobody seems to want to measure just how big and scary it really is, because if they measured it, then they’d have to deal with it. This also allows people like Wells Fargo’s home loans head, Mike Heid, to get away with spewing things like this.
But we don’t have to wait for accurate measurements of the scope of the problem to take effective action against it. Mortgage principal reductions provide the most taxpayer bang for the buck, which is why the anti-Fannie/Freddie-principal-reduction stance of acting FHFA head Ed DeMarco has aroused so much ire. Kudos to the Minneapolis City Council for taking a very public stand on this.



7 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Good morning, everyone!
a move in the right direction. Is there anything out that makes a mortgage company give up their fees? Do you know? But it seems that it’s even harder to make them give up the fees that pad some of these loans. Are they getting rid of fees in the refinancing of the loans? It seems like they refinance these mortgages without evaluating the payment history and without reviewing the fees that have often been piled on illegally. My understanding when reading about people struggling in these foreclosures is that they are not giving them up. Am I wrong about this? The principal reduction makes sense for those who home value is less than they owe…but what they owe is often padded by erroneous fees?
DD(?) also had comments about this, and pointed to the possibility that the IRS might look at this as taxable, and that tax could also sink the home owner.
Add that to the inflated property taxes we’ve paid during the bubble years which have not entirely deflated as home prices fell.
Predatory taxation of residential real estate was/is the insult added to the injury of predatory lending.
We’ve been tag-teamed by the banks and our government.
He mentioned it (and I’ve linked to him in my piece), but he seemed to think it wasn’t a big risk and that the benefits far outweighed it.
FIFA?
It is dependent on Congress’ action, IIRC.