Maybe Danny Boyle’s $42 million Olympic opening spectacle wasn’t a song of homage to working people, but it played one on TV.
It included a tribute to Great Britain’s National Health Service. The workers who built the arena served as honor guards for the arrival of the Olympic torch. There was a gritty look at the Industrial Revolution. And there were comic bits poking fun at the grandiosity of the event, including filmed sketch plus stunt-double-skydive that featured the Queen.
One conservative MP, Aidan Burley, tweeted that the ceremony was “the most leftie opening ceremony I have ever seen.” Of course, Burley is the same guy who got in trouble for attending a Nazi-themed party last year. I guess he wanted more Nazi salutes included in the Olympic opening.
The Christian Science Monitor wrote:
The director of the opening ceremony for the London 2012 Games created a production for the 99 percent, it seems.
The Daily Mail headline read:
Americans baffled by ‘left-wing tribute’ to free healthcare during Opening Ceremonies
I wasn’t baffled. I was pleasantly surprised. Most of the show celebrated or referenced England’s pop culture legacy, from Shakespeare to Mary Poppins to Paul McCartney. Popular culture can be confining and conformist, especially when the corporate suits take over and turn original beauty, insight or protest into pablum. Still, there has always been a deep egalitarian grain in much of popular culture (Shakespeare, in his day, was a pop culture phenom, not the elite specialty of stuffy Dons). Boyle polished that grain.
I can’t watch ten thousand proud and happy athletes stream into the arena from more than 200 countries without thinking that we should fire 10,000 politicians from more than 200 countries and replace them with these focused, fit and obviously tolerant young athletes. I say “obviously tolerant” because the Olympic Village is apparently not just barracks and curfews. Instead, it seems to be something of a Dionysian orgy. All these young folks from all these countries are quite willing to overlook cultural, racial and religious differences when there’s a chance to make love not war.
The Olympics originated around 800 B.C., and it’s generally accepted that at least one of the practical functions was to halt growing conflicts among the young and hungry city-states of the time. So I suppose the Games’ competitors have always looked like peacemakers next to the bully tyrants. They didn’t always gather in the posh surroundings of today’s Games, though. As Neil Faulkner writes in his entertaining A Visitor’s Guide to the Ancient Olympics:
The Olympic Village was a vast, tented encampment, with inadequate water supplies, heaps of stinking refuse, and huge, open, improvised latrines. The air was alive with millions of flies, mosquitoes and wasps. By the end, no one had washed properly for a week, and you could smell the Games a mile away.
And Mitt Romney thought there were “disconcerting” things about the London Olympics.
The Olympics were born in a time of great cultural creativity. It wouldn’t be too long before Homer took advantage of the new Greek alphabet with vowels built upon the Phoenician alphabet and wrote down stories that had been told, in one form or another, around the camps and ports for centuries. A re-birth of ancient democratic practices wasn’t far away.
Which brings me back to the greatness of London’s cultural celebration to open the Olympics. It was more like populist culture than popular culture. It was mythic, not in the sense of some founding “aren’t we great” origin story, but in the sense that “we made this stuff, some of it’s grand and some of it’s goofy but these are the stories we tell and the songs we sing.”
And, in the end, because there’s this authenticity to it, even the artificial works well. For instance, the piece where Daniel Craig as James Bond escorts Queen Elizabeth to the ceremony, could have been stagey, stodgy, and flat. Instead, it was hilarious. And, if there has ever been a better public relations move by Buckingham Palace I don’t know what it is. The Queen mugging it up in a scene with Daniel Craig? It looked like Craig was thinking the same thing.




29 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
24 billion pounds.
Protests.
Amen. Sick of the Olympics. Irrelevant fluff like gladiator games to allow the masses to arbitrarily root for the “home team” as if it somehow improves the quality of their lives at all. Who gives a shit?
Galloway (fond of this particular gadfly) warns Nasser (Bahraini prince who tortured Bahraini athletes) not to come to town.
I do. Those young people are becoming acquainted with other countries and maybe when it’s their turn to be in charge they won’t hate so much because they’ve met someone they liked from a foreign place.
What young people are you talking about? The extreme sport athletes?
Olympics were originally designated for amateurs bc only 1%ers could afford equipment & training. Gotta keep the hoi polloi away. Now the corp sponsors & govt do it.
Thus the athletes become accessories to the 1%ers. Guessing with training & rules & performing, each nationality is kept in its own bubble.
Right, Twain. Beats the hell out of Davos or G8 summits or whatever, gatherings of the incompetent and ill-trained. Maybe we ought force world leaders to bunk together, :)
With certainty, the emergence of material wealth as the only value has corrupted just about everything. It’s laughable that American pro basketball players are on the same “team” as a bunch of kids who almost certainly did not grow up and train in a 1% neighborhood. On the other hand, even the elite amateurs must have been given material advantages in time and training that a lot of poor kids never receive.
But I can grow weary of such critiques of life. Back in college, Marxist friends complained that I shouldn’t take art history, philosophy, literature. If it wasn’t propaganda that advanced the revolution, it was either irrelevant, the product of false consciousness, or another opium for the people. Life has more than one or two dimensions.
Unfortunately, amateurism survives to this day in the form of American “student-athletes.” Those who wish to play professional football or basketball must first work as unpaid interns at the college level. The NCAA, which governs college sports, has for more than half a century classified them as “student-athletes,” a concept it created in order to avoid paying workers’ compensation to injured players. Needless to say, college athletics are rife with corruption.
Yeah, well, the ceremony stunk, imo anyway.
There is far more to British culture than Mary Poppins. Beatles etc. Homage to classical music was (at least in the first half, which is all I could watch) a few seconds of “Nimrod” from Enigma Variations, while the Shakespeare was delivered.
I fail to understand why because it is “popular culture” at the time, it all comes under one rubric. There were times in “pop culture” where discernment was the norm and lasting value, expected. Today, those qualities are eschewed, and we celebrate the banal and lump it all together as Pop Culture.
So it must be ok, right?
Stuffy Dons.
I agree with you, and say as much, I think. But, the selection of iconic pop moments for such a show — to be watched worldwide before more than a billion people — deserves a bit of a break. This is not a setting in which one would expect discernment and lasting value.
I didn’t watch the opening ceremony but have read that some people hated it and some liked it. Which means it was probably about right.
Great commentary. Thanks. I’ve seen none of it so very glad for a revue.
Only one quibble: Im pretty sure Mitt never really had a thought…Assumes fact not in evidence, imho
Great point! Please pardon the unsupported conclusion…
Thanks…;)
Well I liked it. Go figure. Guess I’m too “common”.
Glenn W. Smith @7
Well said.
It saddens me that because of the corruption of the greed for money we can no longer celebrate ideals. No one has ever denied short comings but at least there was a time we greeted ideals. Now they are turned into commercial sleeze.
I guess that we part company at the discernment point. I expect the opening ceremony to have lasting value. I want to be able to show this to my grandchildren (and now great grandchildren) and say what a wonderful experience and exploration into greatness, as we expect from the Olympics themselves.
Someplace we have to exceed the banal propositions of commercialism.
I have not seen any of it, and it sounds like the opening celebration might have been worthwhile, if even for the laughs.
I was never a big sports fan, but I have to say that for the most part, these people have learned tremendous discipline over the years it takes to get to that level. I have a lot of respect for that. And they also seem to be healthy, their skin is very lovely, from what I have noticed.
If they enjoy the company of athletes from all over the globe and build relationships, all the better.
The Olympic opening ceremonies where an exultation to capitalism, however this doesn’t mean someone can’t enjoy the spectacle of competition in sports.
I found it odd that as the scenery started the peasantry that was dancing and working in the fields where interrupted by the capitalist led by Kenneth Branagh and made the peasantry to rip up the ground, tear down the central tree of life and then pollute the air to forge the rings. The working class was covered in filth. Was I the only one who questioned, this is what we humans consider progress? The commercialization of the world was later emphasized by scenes of Mary Poppins and Harry Potter.
Obviously Danny Boyle was going for a more uplifting and hopeful experience but if the theme was charting human progress, then he could have easily focused on all the great scientific achievements the British people have made but individual artistic direction is a matter of personal choice.
All this however takes nothing away from enjoying the games and what is the supposed meaning behind it all. A world that enjoys competition in the sporting arena not in our everyday lives which often manifest itself as global war.
No, I was cussing that scene as soon as the top hats showed up. My comment to the watchers was something like “The 1%ers should be happy with that scene.
It might be instructive to take that as a clip to classrooms all over and use it as a warning.
Well, gosh & golly gee, puhlese scuse me for not mentioning more than 2 dimensions in 8 sentences. Next time, I’ll try to mention 8 dimensions in 4 sentences.
Your description of “student-athletes” borders on farce, especially when you describe them as unpaid interns. Considering the astronomical expenses that are associated with attending college for even one year that the scholarship athletes receive in return for playing games, at an academic institution, they are well compensated. The fact that these schools serve as the minor leagues for pro sports is immaterial. While I’m no fan of the NCAA organization, they do not force these “students” to engage in athletics, nor do they force the athletes to be students. The players don’t even have to stay at school for four years. Universities are supposed to be institutes of advanced education, not minor league athletic organizations.
O My, I hope you feel better.
When the price of a ticket to attend the opening ceremonies is $1,500 or 980 pounds, there is nothing working class or leftist about it. What an incredible amount of money that could have been spent on something other than eye candy, $42 million wasted.
Universities are supposed to be institutes of advanced education, not minor league athletic organizations.
On that point, we agree. The NFL and NBA don’t run a credible minor league because the colleges perform that function for them. For that reason the colleges admit students who, if they couldn’t play ball at an elite level, would never gain admission on the strength of their academic credentials. These students are often funneled into dead-end majors–or courses with no real learning–which means that the value of the education they get in return for their services is negligible.
I’ll end on that note because I don’t want to hijack the thread. It is, however, an issue worth exploring in another diary at another time.
I’m old enough to remember a time when professional athletes had to hold off-season jobs to make ends meet. Once that no longer became necessary, it morphed from sports to entertainment.
Oh pshaw.
And how many hundreds of millions do the universities collect on the backs of these lucky scholarship students who get body & brain diseases in their 30s, owing to the physical abuse they subject themselves too.
The universities are only able to exploit these “students” to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars because of the disproportionate emphasis on entertainment, spectacle and distraction that has become a priority in the USA. The majority of these athletes have been subjecting themselves to physical abuse from preteen age, with parental permission.