As the still-unfolding recession leads to a disturbing preponderance of PhD’s working at Subway, there is one increasingly infuriating bright spot of iron-clad job security: the op/ed page of your local newspaper. Once upon a time, the op/ed page became my favorite part of the newspaper; as the third kid out of four, I seldom got first crack at the comics most mornings, but that page had cartoons, too, and Mike Royko and Art Buchwald were a lot funnier than, say, “Family Circus,” to boot.
When The Oregonian gobbled up its more liberal afternoon counterpart, The Oregon Journal, it (temporarily) assuaged Journal readers by expanding the op/ed page to four (!), and the comics to two. This gave me even more time to branch out into Mary McGrory, Flora Lewis, Jack Anderson, Anthony Lewis, James Reston, and many other talented writers from all sides of the political spectrum, all of whom had worked long and hard in the practice of actual journalism before landing in the catbird seat, where they could write about whatever they wanted each day, and make a good living in so doing.
In high school, I gladly gave up the stiff competition for the editorial slots on the school paper in favor of writing a column of my own, and when I went to University of Oregon to pursue a degree in journalism, my fondest hope was that if I worked hard, someday I’d have a space of my own on that page, even if it was in Grants Pass, or worse.
Sadly, by the early 80′s, the supposedly highly-regarded Journalism School at UO was already morphing into an intellectual backwater where a few aspiring hippies who actually wanted to write were inundated with a tidal wave of sorority types more interested in advertising or public relations, and the whole experience was so dispiriting I switched to History and basically gave up on writing as a career. Best. Decision. Ever.
Of course, had I been either a right-wing shill or a “liberal” whose chief passion was slamming liberals, today I’d not only be overpaid for typing utter nonsense, but I’d be having makeup applied on my surgically enhanced mug in a comfy green room each Sunday morning, like the cranks and buffoons who clutter those pages today.
I could be George Will, airily dismissing Climate Change as “summer,” Maureen Dowd, cattily calling Hillary Clinton a harridan for the eight thousandth time, David Brooks with my vast spaces for entertaining, Tom Friedman, serially pretending to find deep insight from the world’s cab drivers, or Rich Lowry, trying in vain to find my ass with both hands and a flashlight. And, despite (or as Glenn Greenwald would point out, because of) being catastrophically wrong and insultingly unreadable, I could type away into doddering but luxurious old age.
Worst of all, my pathetically uninteresting musings would appear in every dying newspaper in the country; the talent pool having been drained dry by corporate bean-counters firing the aspiring competition faster than you can say “core competencies.”
To be fair, among liberal op/ed writers, there still remain a few able and even entertaining writers on the dead tree side of journalism: Harold Meyerson at the WaPoo, Paul Krugman at the NYT, and even a few new entrants like Greg Sargent and David Sirota, but the fact remains that Robert Scheer was dumped at the Los Angeles Times to make room for Jonah Goldberg, for Pete’s sake. And for every Dave Weigel or Ezra Klein who cannily moves on to better things, there’s a dozen Robert Samuelsons and David Ignatius’ eager to warm their deck chairs on the Titanic of American journalism for the ride to the bottom.
When the epitaph for American democracy is written, the op/ed page of the daily newspaper may as well be on the tombstone.




72 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
As Bill Clinton might say: I feel your pain.
Just wanted to say I enjoy Maureen Dowd (so sue me).
I miss Mike Royko from Chicago and Jimmy Breslin from New York.
But Tom Friedman is the absolute worst, followed closely by Brooks.
Hag!
I too remember the days when newspapers still practiced journalism and actually expected their writers to be more than marginally literate. They even expected their writers to actually know something about whatever they were writing about. Sadly it is hard to maintain a 20% profit margin in the face of stiff competition from cable and the internet with that many skilled people on staf, so they gutted the news rooms to improve(sic) the product.
Sadly Brooks and Friedman, while immensely painful, are far from the worst in a universe that gives Jonah Goldberg and Ross Douthat a public platform to spew their uninformed and quasiliterate bilge.
I have nothing to add but laughter.
@johnnyred: I think you got Friedman and Brooks in the wrong order. At least Friedman seems to believe his own BS. Brooks is a propaganda organ, or some sort of organ, and he knows it.
I constantly rib an internet friend of mine who once said he can’t stand her work, but he thinks she’s kinda sexy. Give it a few years, and maybe you’ll both get over it. Whatever her charms, she does not deserve that slice of 1st amendment protected real estate.
Calling Hillary a harridan for the 8000th time is accurate.
Aloha, Hag…! I would’ve gladly read your ‘pathetically uninteresting musings’ in the dead tree form, I’m just glad it’s in a more eco-friendly format these days…! ;-)
And yet, they flush money down the toilet, and drive away their shrinking pool of sentient users with crap like the aforementioned.
I just find her constantly working out her personal issues (especially the daddy issues) in public on the editorial page disturbing and annoying.
Nostalgia.
Presstv & RT-tv still do in depth half hour programs like U.S. stations used to do.
Just as biased a U.S. stations used to be, but at least you learn something.
Dang. In a booze-addled moment of mental abstraction, I unaccountably forgot to mention Douthat. Twenty lashes with Maureen Dowd’s push-up bra strap.
Hence the (sic) after “improve”. The biggest problem, I think is the consolidation and corporatization of newspapers. The people running these mostly know absolutely nothing about newspapers and are all finance guys (who think they know everything). In the name of saving money, they destroy exactly those parts of the operation, which while often the most expensive, are their strongest draw: dedicated beat reporters who know what they are doing and how to find out what the do not know, in-depth local reporting, investigative reporting, and the like.
You’re right. Friedman is A) Dumb as a box of rocks, and B) married to a shopping mall heiress, which undoubtedly adds to the cluelessness. Brooks is much worse.
Yes, but Jonah Goldberg doesn’t have the cachet of the former.
Also I feel like I can be forgiven for not reading anything he writes, whereas the opinions of Brooks and Friedman are actually discussed at cocktail parties. Douthat is often mistaken, but at least knows how to make a point.
You are putting your good efforts to best use here, cth.
Thanks. Another nail on the head.
Ah, what might have been. Grants Pass isn’t as bad as people think….
Anybody who seriously wants to discuss a Friedman or Brooks column (other than derisively) is a mental feather weight to be avoided like the plague.
Corporate control aka: the Bain of our existence.
That woman’s a nut, and a boring one, to boot.
Or the Newscorp or Gannet of our existence.
Yep.
Ain’t it sad when their ‘Biased’ reporting is deadly accurate and prescient, while ours is dead wrong… day after day after day…! 8-(
I’ve read a dozen or so books on just that subject: if you’re interested, I highly recommend “Knightfall,” by Davis Merritt, and “The Paper,” by Richard Kluger. Both saw this coming long before it became apparent to the reader.
Thank you so much for that; having spent 30-some years doing other stuff, I’m always afraid I’m getting rusty.
And then, of course, there’s The Pasty Little Putz. (I refuse to type his name, all I’ll say is DON’T do that…)
Heh.
Liver & loin, as the butcher said.
Finding al Jaz coverage comical, now that their owner wants to overthrow Assad.
Fixed that for you.
He really is a semi-literate, monumentally ignorant, pompous, insufferable twit.
Dya think.
Gotta be at least as incompetent as CIA & USM.
Well, at least she’s finally (better late than never)decided to get REALLY pissed at the Clan of the Red Beanie and Penn State football. Which probably wasn’t all that easy for her… (And yes, she’s a waste of dead trees and pixels. Take it from the broad who reads her regularly.)
*heh* I do pity ya, Marion, for tirelessly reading their tripe and blogging about it, day after day…! ;-)
I don’t know how you maintain your sanity and keep your breakfast down.
Funny.
Guest on presstv is talking about Egyptian constitution when they don’t have one.
*heh* Those are some breakfasts, to boot…! ;-)
DrDick,
Truth teller!
Thanks! I often get the feeling that I’m just tormenting those around me, trying to make them suffer as I have!
And to Dr. Dick — I read that stuff BEFORE breakfast, and then I go and play with kittens which makes it all better!
Now it’s time for me to curl up with Morpheus so I can face them again tomorrow. Sleep well, all y’all!
Christine! How are you fairing in this infernal summer? It has even been in the 90s for the last week here. We are supposed to get a little relief over the weekend, but then it is back in the 90s again. We normally only get about 5 days over 90 a year. Summer temps are normally in the 70s and 80s (the latter this time of year).
Night!
Sweet dreams, Marion…!
We have had a break this week, and it has been lovely! Last Saturday though, we shut up tight and I even put newspaper over a western window to block the sun out. Really classy, looked like a meth lab. I’m working like a fool in air conditioning, and thinking about Maine. My brother bought 30 acres with 1000 feet on the savage coastline. Wish I was there!
CH!
I love your writing. When I see you post, I’m THERE.
No AC here (even at work), since we do not usually need it (gets down into the 50s at night). Spent the 4th at 6500 feet (on an alpine lake) to avoid the heat. My hand has almost healed from that experience.
Early during the Reagan era, the DC pols realized that TV shaped public opinion much more than newspapers, so they more or less favored TV ‘reporters’ over the print journalists, much as they favored airports to train whistle stops. Sic transit democracy.
When I was a boy in NYC, in winter we’d buy hot sweet potatoes (probably from Joisey) on the avenue, the vendor would wrap them in crisp newspaper so we could hold them and warm our hands.
JR, did you ever read Friedman’s “The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization”? It’s a vapid, thoughtless commercial for Globalization. About a third of the way through it I’m thinking, “If Globalism is so fucking great, Friedman, how come everybody ain’t on board?” A chapter or so later I read Friedman’s response (paraphrased here): “Lots of folks in the third word are just stupid and lazy.” Well, there you have it. Utterly top notch analysis from a truly great thinker.
As the not-even-close-to-mediocre, religious nut job, “journalist” Marvin Olasky once told me in private (also slightly paraphrased): “Journalists who try to do their own thing usually fail, so you’d better earn to conform now.” I suspect most heard some form of this and took the advice.
For years, I wanted to rent an apartment near the NYT, and stand there dangling an air conditioner out the window until she walked below, no matter how long it took. Now that I’ve been priced out of the NYT, I’m over it. Sorta.
If you ever feel deprived, go to my eponymous blog. I write there, too.
http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog
Thanks! I miss great reporting, so I’m going there to read you. I used to value Friedman pre 911. I loved Anna Quindlin and Laurie Colwin (not political writers, but still…).
I delivered the miserable things, 7/365, from age 12 through 15, when I could finally get better job. In those days, all but a house or two per block subscribed. The cost? Six bucks a month. Same as ONE Sunday NYT, minus the cretins like Brooks, Dowd, and the rest.
In all fairness, Friedman’s “From Beirut to Jerusalem” was pretty good, but it was all downhill from there.
I’d cite Ray Gun’s first salvo fired, as his strong-arm tactics on the FCC, in revoking the long standing ‘Fairness Doctrine’, in that equal time for opposing viewpoints was stripped away…! 8-(
True, that made me a fan. At first.
Alright ya’ll, I’m headed out to my weekly, Occupy Hilo General Assembly, keep up the fight, as I know ya’ll will…! *g*
Give ‘em hell, CT!
Kisses, CT!
Me too, from 12-13, 7/365 and twice on Sat, 75 subscribers, loved those 18-page Sat afternooners, folded them into tomahawks and flung them onto the porches. Half were in tenement apartment buildings, supper smells wafting through the halls and stairwells.
Yeah, when he started talking about Lexuses and olive trees, he kind of turned into just another village skid mark.
Time for me to toddle off. It has finally started to cool down here and since I do not have classes tomorrow, I might take a hike in the morning before it gets hot. Take care all.
I went for the better money (and increased misery) of the morning paper. To this day, I can’t sleep in past 5:30.
Me too, my route earned me a penny and a half per daily and 3 and three-quarter pennies per Sunday, hardly worth it when a good bike cost close to $100 (Sturmy-Archer 3-gear). After, in summer I went to work in a box factory for a buck an hour (minimum wage), good enough for dime-quarter card games.
When I first proposed my money-making scheme to my mother, she balked because it might not be safe to be wandering the streets so early. “Take your brother,” who is slightly less than a year younger, she advised, for safety reasons. We made a buck a month per subscriber, and thought ourselves rich, pulling down $80 each per month at our two-route peak.
Oh mothers, and fathers, mine wanted me to be a nurse.
Hazardous job. The papers were dropped off at the corner bundled with a heavy coat-hanger kind of wire, you needed a wire cutter or pliers, and the thing snapped away fast and hard. Wednesday sucked: the daily was the heaviest of the weeklies plus the Sunday filler stuff was dropped off (the mags, the comics, feature secs, tons of adshit, TV Weekly — ha, it listed the players for the All-Star Golf TV show that aired on Saturdays, meaning you could know who won before. It took longer to stuff the Sundays than to deliver them.
I’m just happy that those two great pseudo-intellectuals Safire and Buckley are gone.
Not sure how to respond, I’m so suprised. I’ve been called JR most of my life, but there’s no way you could know that.
Anyway, Friedman is the worst kind of navel-gazer, one convinced of his own brilliance.
In defence of Dowd : she’s just so cosmopolitan!
Yes, I have a crush on her. Where else can a guy get a smattering of conversational French, followed shortly after by some German?
I know she can be catty, and maybe even a bit of a snob, but so what?
I’m not looking to marry her, I just enjoy her style.
Glad to see people remembering Mike Royko. And surprised I didn’t notice anyone mentioning Molly Ivins. I miss both of them often when thinking about newspapers and “the good ol’ days.”
I agree totally about Friedman.
Dowd is fine as long as she is recognized as a comedienne, a diversion, or a bon bon. Enjoy her output as inconsequential fluff to be read if there’s time. Read Krugman first, then check your watch before going to Dowd.
The difference between Dowd and a real journalist, who reveals important stuff, is that her craft can be satisfied by soooooo many people ranging all the way to the Hollywood sophists. A real journalist, like Krugman, is exceedingly rare nowadays.
If we think in the old way about American journalism then everything looks f-ed up. But our new form of mainstream journalism is very different from the old one because the stakes have become very high. Each major “journalist” or talking head usually is a spokesperson for a particular faction of the oligarchy which is why they can afford to be spectacularly and consistently wrong and still keep their jobs while those who are better writers, journalists, and are usually correct have no chance without cultivating a segment of the power elite. These people are courtiers, not journalists as we used to think of them. Journalism is alive and thriving on the internet and the smaller magazines. The problem is that we have a far less literate and far more ignorant public but that’s another matter.
As for Safire yes, but Buckley is another matter. He was a relatively honest man who actually thought what he thought and told you so and why. He was consistent and his ideas were well-thought out. I didn’t like those ideas but he was willing to dialogue with those who radically disagreed with him. I miss him very much. Compare him with the current crop of “conservatives” who listen to no one and can only rant–Buckley at least appreciated the need for reason–current crop of conservative journalists, including Will (who never seems to tire) are ranters and nothing more–maybe Brooks is the exception–he does recognize the need for reason and defends science.
Safire and Buckley were unwelcome dissonance. It is perfectly human to be happy they are gone. In their lifetimes we were lucky enough not to have to read them.
I gave up reading most of our “progressive” writers when they fell for Obama’s bullshit in ’08 and became knee jerk Obamabots. Some just didn’t seem so bright others were obvious careerists.
I know what you mean about Dowd. I used to feel the same about Niall Ferguson before he started to appear on TV and thus sound no different than any of the other talking heads.
I completely disagree with you about Buckley. He was the most dishonest and condescending debater I’ve ever watched. The moment he realized he was outmatched he brought out the “Governor Moonbeam” BS. He ridiculed people when his paper thin arguments fell apart. He threatened to smash Chomsky in the “goddamn face” when Chomsky was making it obvious what an intellectual charlatan Buckley was. He was a nasty piece of work and his influence on the current crop of conservatives is obvious to me. Like Buckley, conservatives only have ridicule when their dippy arguments end up going nowhere. Try watching debates with conservatives over abstinence policies or gay marriage or cutting defense spending or creationism. Time and again they abandon their positions to attack their interlocutor. It’s the Buckley school of conservative debate and it’s alive and well.