If this is the first week of the 2012 general election campaign (as conventional wisdom seems to have it), it’s gotten off to the kind of funhouse-mirror start that, if nothing else, is consistent with how the Republican preliminaries went.
I mean, after Newt Gingrich’s championing of a permanent moon base and Rick Santorum waving around a chunk of shale, how much weirder is it for Mitt Romney to accuse President Obama of having “spent too much time at Harvard” when Romney himself earned not one, but two degrees from the same school?
But you don’t have to hear Karl Rove fervently stage-whispering to Team Romney from the wings to understand the strategy here. Rove famously smeared Democrats as out-of-touch elitists when they were running against George W. Bush, so why not see if the same trick works against an incumbent president? It’s the old “When all you have is a hammer…” joke come to life.
It’s also no surprise to see Romney accusing Obama of hiding his second-term agenda. In classic Rovian fashion, it attempts to reverse the usual dynamic of running against a sitting president — a contest in which the incumbent traditionally benefits from voters’ comfort with a known quantity against an unfamiliar challenger. In Romney/Rove’s fantasy, Obama can be transformed (with the help of millions of dollars in paid advertising) into a mysterious, risky stranger you wouldn’t trust with your future.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, there are limits to their ability to create political reality via commercials and rhetoric. They found this out in 2008, when the economy turned so bad that even a relative newcomer (and a black one at that) couldn’t be made scarier than the prospect of another four years of GOP policies.
This was especially true when their opponent — then, as now — was just as lavishly well-funded as Republicans are used to being, and so couldn’t simply be drowned by negative ads. And if the economy continues to improve, however marginally, all the self-consciously clever tactics in the world likely won’t keep Romney (who for the last several years has seemed determined to embody the concept of “generic Republican”) from going down as just another standard-issue, unmemorable challenger for the White House.




67 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Hi Swopz.
Obama has sexier smile.
That’s far from the weirdest thing a Republican candidate has said during the last twelve months….
The corp media treats the R candidates as if they were, ya know, well, um, like real human beings. That’s the most amazing part of this whole disaster called the U.S. political system to me.
There is no sanity clause.
Thank you Sharkbabe…now I can say those in the Veal Pen carry Elite Club cardsand can call each other what they are tthemselves so the insults are double edged swords that cut both ways.
Their owners are Republicans…so they lose the paycheck if they do not bow.
I got rid of my TV. When I wake up during the night, it helps me to go back to sleep to have a sound on softly. Used to be some mindless rerun on TV. Is now NPR. Heard David Wessel as day or so ago talk about Ryan budget as if it were real. I know Wessel doesn’t get paid enough to lie like that. Alternative hypothesis is that he’s toast if he doesn’t lie. Amazing how far down the rathole the U.S. empire has gone in a decade.
I owe ya a drink. Name your poison. Taking poison is the only way out.
DC has long gone over the edge. Some group like the Tea Party throws a nutty idea into the arena and they all react to it instead of ignoring BS as in (Bowles/Simpson)
Well Socrates chose Hemlock…but but I am on a health kick thank you all the same.
Nice sum up.
Scotch on the rocks is supposed to be good the digestion.
I really do know Wessel to some extent. Used to talk with him when I worked on Wall St. Can’t say I was shocked to hear the way he tried to rationalize Ryan’s budget (“there aren’t a lot of details available, so it’s hard to tell…), just really really sad at what passes these days.
But apparently not for prepositions. ;)
A preposition is a good word to end a sentence with.
ROTFLMAO!
You asked for it. Now I’m going to bore you with why I can’t read or type straight. I have had this attic cleanout project going for over a month. My knees, not good when I started, have taken a beating going up & down the stairs skeenteen times, carrying boxes of books, etc. Today I crashed & burned. Nap, 2 ibuprofen later, I’m starting to recuperate. So a widdle sympathy please. :-)
2,500 million liters are consumed annually so you have some strong support for that notion.
Do you have a link for that stat? It will come in handy with a certain person I have ongoing discussions with. (Making more use of the proposition that a preposition…)
Sliding the Scotch bottle down the bar. Have you ice?
Boink! http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/jhb/whisky/swa/chap5.html
You have it. :)
What???!! You dare to think that I should be iceless?
My late husband described my party making prep: if every person coming decided to consume only ONE of the offerings (it could be either one of the foods or one of the beverages), I would have enough of that one to feed to drown the entire party in that one.
Ice included.
Not that I have food, drink, or ice agita. Nope. Not at all.
It doesn’t matter when they shake Mitts head for their new list of positions, he can say anything. No matter what he says there is video footage of him saying the opposite. The hardest choice will be which year to use. Making Mitt look like a lying fool is child’s play.
Thanks. I have just the recipient in mind. Heh.
When has a pol (except for that boob John Kerry) ever paid a price for being an incompetent campaigner.
As for Romney, etch-a-sketch.
Corp media rips up the cover sheet and his prior utterances magically disappear. Great metaphor.
Thanks.
Has anyone written a book called “Rove’s Brain?” 300 blank pages? Gotta be a best seller.
Nixon-60; Dukakis-88; Gore-00
The moguls you ski must be a killer for your knees…is that what the bolsa bag is for. G)
Um no,
Nixon, not incompetent as evidenced by getting reelected on his secrud plan to end VN, AFTER Watergate broke.
Duke was running against H.W. Duel of the incompetents. Can’t tell to this day who was the biggest loser (Wow, ya mean there are scanners at the supermarket checkout counters…)
Kerry was clearly the least odious of teh 2 in 2004, the Iraq invasion was already falling on its face, and Kerry still managed to lose.
Gore was a loser from the getgo. Just another RWM with no fire in his belly who expected to coast into the WH on his creds.
Gave up skiing about 5 years ago.
ditto. And Gore was the worst. It was his to lose…..so he did.
Is it my computer or has FDL been hacked? Strange things are happening. Diarist names are changing, some nonsense diaries have been posted, and both the ‘contact us’ and the ‘send comments’ links give a ‘page not found’ message. I’m putting this here so maybe someone will see it. I will put this on some other threads as well.
Nicely put.
Choosing LIEberman as his running mate was the tell.
Yep, I noticed that diary names had been shuffled. first noticed about 10-15 min. ago.
Haven’t noticed any probs yet. Will keep an eye out. Have you tried the contact us button to get your problems to FDL central?
I wonder why FDL doesn’t have a link to contact. Have to leave the site and go to my email server. Never get a response back anyway. Oh, well.
http://firedoglake.com/contact/
On edit: if that doesn’t work, let me know. I have other emails that may be more productive.
Hey, eCAHN, you are on and off the site all day, as I am. Have you heard of anyone who needed help being sponsored for membership? I didn’t see anyone this year, but fdl charged me for two anyway. Interesting. It was fun being able to sponsor “founding members” last year, but I’m not sure I want this to be a yearly event. And, yes, I’ve emailed twice for info.
I will try that, but the two links that FDL provides ‘contact us’ and ‘send comments’ give ‘page not found’ messages.
maybe it’s my computer (and I”m not computer savvy, anyway), but that just gives me the fdl at gmail address. Still got to go to my email server.
And, back to politics: I think Romney is an empty suit (or worse)… well, he’s just a shell of a man who will do whatever he’s told. But Obama is scaring the hell out of me….. he and Holder are dangerous, in my opinion. And I don’t think Obama will stand up for anyone really (certainly not unions, not women, not victims of ongoing wars, etc., etc.) I can’t figure out which one I loathe the most.
I actually tried to sponsor someone last year but didn’t get a response. This year my donation ran thru and I was notified. Didn’t pursue it.
Will email two people I know & let you know feedback.
When that happens, I assume it is computer fart and just relax until indigestion runs its course. If I hear anything diff, will advise.
I’m so cautious about doing anything over the internet that I actually called Ryan and made my donation and two sponsorships over the phone with instructions to flag my account so there would be no automatic renewal. So much for that. I’ve emailed him twice to say, “Please don’t do that again.” No response. Hope I don’t have to cancel my credit card. And I didn’t see anyone asking for sponsorship this year. I’ll be crazy if I find out they gave a membership to Shooter-P-Tooter. :P~
Rove is again using the technique of claiming your fellows weakness is actually the weakness of the other guy (GWB’s lack of caring about average person and no plan for future was Gore’s real problem, GWB’s lack of heroic military service was actually the problem of the fellow (John Kerry) that won the Silver Star, Bronze Star, and three Purple Hearts, and now Romney’s out of touch, Richie Rich, don’t care about Medicare/Social Security, I like to fire people, attitude is actually Obama’s as proven by the jobs numbers and going to Harvard – which happens to be the school that Romney went to but forget that – and the media will forget it).
One would think the media would point out the game Rove always plays – but so far they have not shown an interest in doing more than he said/she said.
BC & Dearie,
emailed the other addys I have; will let you know.
As a general principal, I regard FDL as both more & less professional than BoA, if you catch my drift.
[Mod Note: We'd ask people with contribution or Membership issues to contact the MyFDLEditor@firedoglake.com email box for the time being, as that's the quickest resolution for any recurring contribution issues at present.]
Yeah, but I still OWN some of BofA. (I know, I know!)
The media is bought. The Congress is bought. The Supremes are really bought. It’s all over but the shouting.
Sell BoA on any rally.
To clarify on FDL, small staff, small op, hard to keep up. So I forgive a lot of sins. That is the less competent side.
The more competent side is obviously that FDL is on correct side of issues and BoA isn’t.
I was just thinking how Mitt strikes me as the Republican version of Dukakis. Now if we can just get video of him pretending to drive a tank, preferably with a dog carrier strapped to the turret.
Funny I was always told Metaxa (a VSOP type brandy with a strong grape flavor) and OUZO (a 80 to 90 proof anise-flavored aperitif that is made in every household on Crete and in many households around Greece) were supposed to be good for one’s digestion :-)
But Scotch will certainly do – make mine single malt.
eCAHN, I used your link, but, as with Dearie, I had to go to my own email to send a message. I haven’t heard back. If I hear something I’ll pass it along.
Did y’all see this: – Lee Whitman calls Chris Murphy an AIPAC Whore at Conn Dem debate
Supremes being bought is no surprise. Just wondering how they thing about it in their own minds. Is it speakers’ fees? Seems kinda petty motivation. Is it power hungry monomania? Seems more likely.
BTW, I saw a dog carrier strapped to the top of an SUV in a store parking lot. When I got close I could see that there was a teddy bear type dog in the carrier with a sign that said something like dog lovers against romney or something to that effect. I thought it was clever and funny and it really did slam rmoney.
That doesn’t sound kosher…
I’m with you. And FDL is my place to be. Just wish they had some editors. I even volunteered (English teacher) to help where needed. I do think there is some editing going on…..front pagers seem more clean these days. I think it would be nice if there were some editing help for diarists who asked for help. Perhaps too big a chore.
Gee, you take me much too literally. (Luckily you have not made the mistake of taking me literalarily.) On first approx, anything that dulls the senses today is good for the digestion IMHO.
BUT, if you want to support MY local economy, I HIGHLY recommend the locals. They are VERY good, have found their way into very classy Manhattan restaurants and the distillery is exactly 2.4 miles down the road from me.
You know that overused word from the not too distant past, ‘gravitas.’ Well, Thomas certainly didn’t have it; Alito certainly didn’t have it; Scalia has it in his pants, I suppose. I don’t know anything about Roberts (does anyone?) They were not jurists, any of them, worthy of elevation to the Supreme Court. And they’ve proved up as expected. I don’t know about Kagan or Sotomayor. Time will tell. I’d like to see some real lawyers/jurists/scholars elevated to the Supremes. Probably won’t happen in my lifetime.
The dog that didn’t bark might well be the negative tipping point for Romney. Kinda his Swift Boat attack that he just can’t find the talking point to dispute. Though it would be, as in Kerry’s case, easy to anticipate and easy to dismiss.
And if so, a lot cheaper for the “lefties” than Swiftboating Kerry was for the righties. Not that I care.
Nice use of the word gravitas. Why did I immediately think of adult diapers? (The gravity catchers of the SCOTUS shit.)
I don’t know enough U.S. history to be able to cite examples, but enough to know that corp capture of SCOTUS happened before. Gilded Age? I’ll go back thru my brain file drawers to see if I can resurrect (heh, given it’s almost Easter) the ref. Think it’s an audio book.
Except for the Warren Court, the decisions of the Supreme Court have been less than above reproach.
That was the tilt of the book I listened to. I tired a couple of key word searches of my books read list, and couldn’t come up with the title.
The gist of the book was that the extreme corp righties have almost always had the SCOTUS majority, at least from the Gilded Age. Just wishing I could find the title of the book.
Here.
also here
http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/history_corporations_us.html