Now that Gov. Scott Walker has said he won’t challenge the estimated 1 million signatures filed against him, let’s move to a recall election as soon as possible.
The threat of an unprecedented recall attempt against Wisconsin’s governor has loomed long enough. It has complicated the state’s already mangled politics and made it difficult to get even small things done at the state Capitol.
Let’s get this thing over with, accept the result and move on.
That’s an editorial in a major mainstream newspaper, by the way, basically saying we’re sick of democracy and covering shit and doing our jobs and working every day. It’s tiresome, the exercise of constitutionally protected rights. It’s exhausting, having to sit around all day writing about it and working on it and paying attention to it. It’s too much. Can’t we just watch TV? I wanna watch TV.
All reporters have stories they’re sick of covering. I’m sure all politicians have things about the political process they wish they didn’t have to do. We all have days we hate our jobs, really. You know what most people do in these situations? THEY SUCK IT UP AND GET ON WITH IT. They don’t write 12 inches of whining crap about how terribly difficult and inconvenient it’s been to have to do stuff, because absolutely no one cares.
No doubt those actually affected by Walker’s policies are bone-tired as well, and would like to “get this thing over with,” to quote the profound headline given this self-indulgent garbage. No doubt those whose jobs and health care and lives are endangered by Walker’s policies would just as soon none of this was happening. Nowhere is their suffering rated higher than that of the poor journalists and politicians whose overwhelming desire to “get things done in the state capitol” has been compromised by the inconvenience of those who dare to fight back.
And in their oh-so-detached-and-objective defense of apathy, the paper’s editorialists even get the basic facts wrong:
We aren’t fans of the recall process — regardless of the target. Voters elected Walker 16 months ago to a four-year term, not a trial run.
Actually, Walker was elected under the terms of the state constitution of Wisconsin, which allows for just such a process as is occurring right now. If “the voters” really elected Walker for four years, about a million of them wouldn’t have signed petitions saying he and his fellow ten-a-penny fascisti should am-scray with all appropriate speed. It’s so annoying for the self-appointed Voices of Reason when the actual voters don’t mirror in action the Noble American People that exist in the editorial board members’ heads.
You know, when I first started blogging way back in the dark ages of 2003 people would ask what the difference was between traditional newspaper writing, which I’d done before, and what I was doing now. And I always said it was a matter of passion. So many, many people writing on the Internet seemd to get that we all had skin in the game, and that the powerless deserved an advocacy equal to the very measure of our strength. Who’s in charge and how they vote mattered, it mattered terribly, and the who’s-up-who’s-down reporting of too many major establishment outlets didn’t convey that in the slightest. People were angry and afraid, and their plight was covered as if it was a game, and the outcome as inconsequential. I could not come up with a better example of this than the editorial linked above.
To the Wisconsin State Journal, all of this is just a big ironic joke, and they’re tired of waiting for the punch line.
A.
x-posted at First Draft




22 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Funny, I thought that’s what the recall was for.
Allison!
The truth be told, far too many in the press hate actual politics (especially among political reporters) and are not very fond of democracy. Indeed, there are few people around who seem to understand less about policy and its implications for peoples lives than most political reporters.
Yes, but understanding that would require some basic understanding of democracy and the political process.
Indeed, the one percent bubble has become so very opaque.
Far too many of the press today are vacuous, complacent, apathetic airheads. Sort of what happens when the Valley girls (and boys) “grow up.”
Plastic, talking heads. Like Rush, the line between news and entertainment has become blurred and ambiguous. People like David Gregory who represent what passes for serious journalists these days, patiently explain to the lay people that it’s about maintaining access. So what’s a little false equivalency here and a lack of follow up there if it keeps the owners of the elbows he loves to rub happy? Then you have others who defend Limbaugh by calling him an “entertainer” and for some reason that gives him license to be the world’s biggest asshole.
But Moooommmm. Policy is booooring!!
I agree with you Dr. Dick. That is one of the reasons that so much of politics turns in to horse race stuff or scandal stuff. X vs. Y stories are easier to write and also easier for people to wrap their heads around.
Also many are driven into doing the “he said she said” stuff and that requires “fair and balanced” stuff even when you know one side is full of crap and that there is a third “side” that you really should be covering, but heck, two sides are plenty, right?
I read a good story on Salon today about how Brietbart (and Drudge) understood what the political press wanted an then gave it to them.
If the press aren’t going to do their job, then do it for them, is Drudge and Brietbart’s motto.
The thing is that people like me know how to give the press the kind of stories that they like. My background is in comedy, PR and entertainment. Those kind of skills, combined with an understanding of a narrative, can go a long way with today’s media.
The problem is that the people on our side often still hope that the press will do a policy story or cover an issue with out some kind of X vs. Y or crisis.
It is a sad commentary on the decline of the press over my lifetime. The better old time reporters actively wanted to know and understand things. They were intellectually active and curious. They dug and prodded and talked to experts to understand what was going on and to figure out who was lying about what and why.
I think you give the modern press too much credit. I do not think most of them are even capable of understanding the nuances of policy and are too lazy to do the work if they could.
I agree with you on old time reporters verse now. I respected old time reporters and most people were afraid of the good ones.
The funny thing is that lots of people still seem to have this idea of “the press” one funny thing to note. How many people think that when you have “press conferences” that a bunch of reporters show up in a room and then ask questions? Those are very rare. They are often done on the phone where the person who is controlling the press conference is controlling the phone. Press 1 to ask a question. Now this is great for the people controlling the press conference because a follow up question is not as easy, plus the other reporters can’t get a sense of “the room” and the person.
Also because of TV and movies people still think that a much of photographer and press people are going to rush the person coming out the the courtroom or their home with cameras flashing or shouting the name of the person who is the subject. Very rarely happens any more.
I will tell you what WILL happen. The right wing is developing a much of tea party people to act like the press of old, only with out the same love of the truth. I know because I attended one of their seminars.
I’ll probably write about it, but not yet.
Rush Limbaugh’s attack on Sandra Fluke was his way of expressing the unvoiced sentiment of all the “religious freedom” Republicans at Rep. Darrell Issa’s “religious freedom” hearing, who were not about to allow a young woman like Sandra Fluke testify.
IOW, Limbaugh just said what all religious fundamentalist “religious freedom” Republicans believe regarding the use of contraceptives, or abortion, by American women, especially those unmarried, they’re all sluts and prostitutes, an abomination in their “religious freedom” eyes. Which is why I’ve yet to hear any Republican flat-out say that they disagree with what Rush Limbaugh said about anyone using contraceptives, or getting an abortion, being a slut and prostitute. They all believe this, so they’d all choke on chastising Limbaugh, or the religious misogynists at Issa’s hearing, or heading their own church.
But on a positive note, footage of what Rush Limbaugh said should be used in all campaign ads by Democratic Party candidates this year, and in 2014, and in 2016, ad infinitum, because it’s not every day that a Republican blurts out the truth that they all believe, especially the “religious freedom”-spouting Republicans, that contraceptive-using American women are a bunch of sluts and prostitutes. This Rush albatross should be hung around the Republican Party’s neck over and over again.
Dammit Allison, they’re trying to create a narrative, and you’re not being very helpful. Don’t forget that they create our reality, we only live in it.
As Sen. Dick Durbin said, “frankly they own the place.”
What financial interests control the media?
from Sibel Edmonds’ site
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/09/30/the-eyeopener-cia-in-the-news-media-2/
Here’s “George Carlin and Bill Hicks tell it like it is”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ3xxwQvVnE
Ya nailed it!!!
Aloha,NWxN…! I’m working on a post with that Wapoo ad…! ;-)
I just got another WARNING from Firefox that malware is messing with this site. Do the technies have a clue about what’s going on??????
[Mod. Note - we found the offending image on MyFDL, and have had it taken down. We are currently working with Google to restore our previous good page ranking. So sorry for any inconvenience, and this problem should subside shortly. Thanks for your patience.]
Aloha, Dearie…! I’m up top again, after a 4 hour notice that I’m needed up here…! ;-)
Well, now, that’s going to be interesting. What do you do?
I’m gonna be a ‘human popsicle’ tonite…!
Oh, I thought it was going to be a photo of you decked out in some kind of super snow suit!
Thanks, Mods. Love what you all do in the dark, behind the curtains. Behave yourselves!
On edit: rereading that just gave me a creepy flashback to someone else … let me just say, be good to yourselves and others. And use protection where indicated. I.e., unplug all electric devises and so forth!
I didn’t bring my camera tonite, maybe next time I’ll have someone snap a pic of me all geared up…! ;-)
You should get together with OMB. He makes and runs devices and networks for NOAA to measure effects on tundra. And anything weaather/climate, really.
He also brews excellent beer. :)
NOAA has a research facility atop of Mauna Loa that shoots a laser up amongst other doodads and gadgets to sample the air…! One researcher had told me awhile back that when Beijing get’s hit by a Gobi sandstorm, 48 hrs later they’ll detect here sand particles from it…! ;-)