It’s not only that John Kennedy is an icon for Democrats, although he is. It’s not simply that JFK is America’s first and only Catholic president, although he is. It’s not that this speech is almost universally recognized as a breakthrough, addressed as it was to a group of Dallas, Texas, Baptists.
I mean, imagine Rick Santorum addressing the Human Rights Campaign and you’ll get a sense of the difficulty John Kennedy faced. Or George W Bush addressing the NAACP.
But not since this moment in American history has another candidate for President even gone into the belly of the beast to face and address his critics so directly as John Kennedy did in September 1960. This was bravery. This was confrontation. This was no apologia; this was as in-your-face a moment as 20th century politics saw.
And not only did Rick Santorum insult the memory of our martyred president, he also completely mischaracterized the letter and spirit of the speech. Here’s how Rick hears JFK:
“To say that people of faith have no role in the public square? You bet that makes me want to throw up. What kind of country do we live in where only people of non-faith can come in the public square and make their case? That makes me throw up. And that should make every American [throw up],” Santorum said on ABC’s “This Week.”
Of course, that’s not what Kennedy said. And it’s certainly not what he meant. He never said that people of faith have no role in the public square. In fact, he said exactly the opposite! That all people of faith have a role in the public square, that every person, regardless of faith or non-faith, can come into the public square and make their case in America.
“I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish — where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source — where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials — and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.”
I can only conclude that Rick Santorum likes to throw up. He lies about the speech John Kennedy made. And then he claims he’d throw up over it, and so would we all. Choosing to defame such a historically resonant speech, by lying about it, really tells you all you need to know about Rick Santorum and today’s Republican Party.
That Rick Santorum could become the GOP front-runner is really shocking to me. His lies about what John Kennedy said about religion in America’s public square completely disqualify him from the presidency, if he were not already utterly disqualified.
You know what makes me want to throw up? Rick Santorum, that’s what.



134 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Teddy!
Frothy Mix makes me want to throw up and he is unworthy to lick Kennedy’s shoes. It is especially ludicrous, since the Kennedy speech he finds so loathsome is in large part responsible for Santorum’s career.
Santorum makes me want to throw up.
DrDick beat me to it!
Thought I was going to sleep after Stratfor comments, but that didn’t happen so back on that tread to explain.
Santorum’s frothing at the mouth again. The question is, how did the froth get into his mouth in the first place?
Speaking about people of faith in America, I’m joining a new group in my area. Check out the website here.
I prefer the old ways myself.
Lovecraft! Yes!
Is Lil’ Ricky play the victim card?
Why is it that some people of faith in America enjoy pretending that being a person of faith in this country means being a victim?
What makes me want to throw up is the “church/state separation = no place for the faithful on the public stage” strawman that idiot bigots like Sanctimonious Santorum continually use to spit on this country’s ideal of equality under law.
And, of course, not to be outdone, Newticles played his version of the “Christians-are-so-persecuted” card in Georgia today:
Fuck them both.
Teddy: Santorum achieving frontrunner status (if he does…) doesn’t make me want to throw up, but it pisses me off…because it allows Barack Obama to stay right-of-center on so many issues, while he pivots to campaign-kabuki “progressive” mode.
The problem is, that watching the GOP eating themselves is so much fun that I don’t want it to end. :o)
I mean, some of us are appalled by Santorum’s lunacy, but I don’t think Barack Obama is one of them. I think he’s whistling a happy tune, and if Santorum takes Michigan, we might see him out on the White House lawn, dancing naked in the moonlight, while chanting “Centrism forever!”.
I have a WWCD? (What would Cthulhu do?) sticker on my office door. Mostly just confuses the students.
If he’s going to get RC Church law imposed on the US – like, no cntraception; what’s he gonna do to get US Law imposed on the RC Church – like, pedophelia is a crime, those who cover it up are also criminals? I grew up with those people. Abolish it. Sell all that it owns, distribute it to those in need.
Fuck them both.
Not with a ten foot pole and a hazmat suit.
Teach the Controversy.
I dislike 99% of Santorum on every issue, but afraid I lose my progressive liberal FDL badge on this one.
“What kind of country do we live in where only people of non-faith can come in the public square and make their case?”
He vastly overstates the concern, and indeed mis-states it, but there is a very real concern to many many people who are not GOP, not evangelical, not fundamentalist, not trying to impose their religious beliefs on others.
If you treat discussion of a believers religion relative to an issue as disqualifying the person from the discussion, the only voices heard are the ones who have a faith in no God – the atheist voice. Oh, the religious obviously get input because 85% of the country, and of those elected, are believers, but they should not feel like there is a danger, a penalty, a shame attached to their opinion if they allow a reference to their belief system to enter a speech – indeed esp. not while others mock religious reasons for advocating a position.
All have ethics and morals and a sense of fairness – it is not limited to believers – and public policy must be based on that – but to claim a right to muzzle believers from mentioning their beliefs in the public square, or to incentivize them from doing so, is troubling to many.
Good evening, all. What a boring Oscar program, eh?!
And another commercial!
Isn’t it funny how only those Christians who think that their faith is about using the power of government to impose their beliefs on everyone else are the ones who feel like they’re being persecuted?
Frothy is woefully ignorant of the words of the founding fathers on this concept, as well as those of the Rabbi Yeshua bar Yosef (“Render unto Caesar…”).
Careful, shooter might decide to show up and take your comments out of context so he can accuse you of being Worse! Than! Hitler!
I had to look over the info at your link. It would have gone over my head, too!
It might be funny if it weren’t for the fact that they’ve beaten this dead horse twenty-three feet into the fucking ground and it hasn’t become any more true than it was when they started.
I didn’t bother to turn it on. Maybe I should, it might help me sleep.
But no one says this, except Santorum.
You are registering a problem that doesn’t exist, I believe. As an unbeliever, I am surrounded by religiosity in the public square wherever I go. If that’s where folks need to find their ethics and morals, fine. But don’t try to tell me that the West is crowding out Xtianity.
Which Santorum is saying.
That is soooo going on my office door tomorrow.
Their victimhood suits them so well, they cannot shed it for rational thought.
You can get t-shirts, too.
That’s okay. Santorum makes me throw up. Both kinds.
If you worked at Miskatonic, it would already be on your office door but then I guess you’d hafta move to Arkham..
The single most persecuted religious group in this country is athiests.
It is on our money for Cthulhu’s sake!
Reminds me of The Life of Brain when John Cleese shouts, “Persecute! Kill the heretic!”, except that was over some juniper berries…
I am trying to start a branch campus.
Not that this country has a great record for religious tolerance in general. The NYPD’s current Muslim-watching habit just being one of the more recent examples.
Blue Texan speaks for me on this.
I’d go. Just don’t ask me to volunteer for any expeditions to Antarctica, tombs or vaults.
No, we have persecuted lots of religious minorities including the Jews, Catholics, and Mormons.
Irony: They believe either that they have to make everyone else victims of their right to impose their narrow beliefs on everyone or that the rest of us – Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Atheist, etc – are making them victims because we tell them that they can’t impose their narrow beliefs on us all.
We’re either willing to submit to their beliefs, or we’re against them?
I read that earlier and thought how funny it would be for Obama to start saying really obvious shit so Frothy could contradict him. Something like childrens cancer hospitals should be funded or salmonella outbreaks should be avoided and then we could watch him sputter.
On a related note, it makes me wonder why BT left here and went to C&L…
Was wondering where he went.
Now you know!
I am not sure frothy is even a functioning human being.
Oh, my.
Also: Imprison its princes.
That I can’t tell you, but he didn’t go to C&L immediately; there was a couple of months when he was only posting at his own blog.
Yeah, I remember that too.
I’d say that the above is what Ricky objects to, except that everything he says is utterly dishonest. He does want to impose his own 13th century, pre-Vatican II Catholicism on the country, but I doubt that even he really believes what he said.
Although I do think, from what I’ve read, that his religious views and what follows from them are sincere, as horrible as that is, he is a deeply corrupt person who was big on the K Street Project, and once was listed as among the very most corrupt members of Congress. That was more what got him thrown out by PA than the religious thing, which he hadn’t pushed so hard at the time.
Though the Terry Schiavo thing didn’t help.
Rick Santorum is a deeply disturbed, bad person. I’m trying to avoid the “evil” word here, because it has humorous connotations.
Of course, the competition among the three R contenders is fierce for who is worst. They all, if they really believe in heaven and hell, and if they should exist, are in for big, big shocks when they get there.
He may be an anatomically modern human in the strict biological sense, but he’s about as enlightened as a sociopathic chimpanzee.
What have you got against sociopaths and chimps?
he’s about as enlightened as a rabid sociopathic chimpanzee.
FTFY
Yeah…. That’s why I look at the rapture as a win-win. The only way I lose is if it’s not true, which of course, it isn’t.
Thanks! I knew I was being too gentle.
Reminds me of the differences between Obama and Bush.
Sadly, enlightened or not, once they get into the Oval Office, it seems that the results are about the same.
OT, but I produced my second Ph.D. (4th in the department) on Friday. She starts a postdoc with the Centers for Disease Control this summer.
I haven’t made a big deal about it, but the speech above is really worth watching, all of it, if only for the reaction shots of the audience. This was not a welcoming group of people JFK spoke to; it may be one of the most hostile audiences any presidential candidate ever addressed.
These are not pleasant people, sitting there listening to this Catlik Yankee.
I think there is some secret radioactive gas under the White House that turns all of it’s residents into corporate lackeys.
I so agree. Rapture – yeah, take ‘em all, we can get back to behaving sensibly and enjoying ourselves sometimes.
That said, I haven’t seen one of those bumper stickers in a long time; according to a Times story on a Santorum rally in MI, the parking lot ws full of them. Which, of course, figures.
OTOH, the Rapture is most definitely NOT a Catholic doctrine, not even a 13th century one.
(I’ve forgotten again who said Santorum is the perfect 133th-century candidate, and it is so true.)
w00t! Congrats to you and the new PhD.
I cannot imagine any GOP candidate with the cojones to do that.
Yep! If it happens and it’s the version of god I was taught, I get raptured up to paradise and I’m away from those dicks. If it happens and it’s their version of god, they get raptured up and I get a lot of free shit and I’m away from those dicks.
I’m so old I remember it. Not in detail; I was not yet a political junkie, being ten years old. But I remember the response, and teh “worry” that led up to it.
Even now I don’t especially worry that even Santorum would take orders from the Pope…Pius VI pretty much ended that sort of deference among ordinary Catholics with Humanae Vitae (often known, in those days, as “The Pill is a No-No” Encyclical).
It’s Santorum’s own views that scare me.
But not away from DrDick, who I’m certain will share whatever my fate is…
Absolutely! In particular (free stuff for us), muuuuch better cars. Just have to peel off the “Christians Prosper” bumper stickers. *g*
Frothy is like any other fake Christian: He uses Leviticus as a cudgel but only the parts he agrees with. Teh gayz = bad but lies, pork on the sabbath, shellfish = all good.
It’s those post-election, pre-Inauguration briefings from the CIA.
Although anyone paying attention should have known he was FOR the Establishment; the betrayal on FISA was all the evidence required.
Trust me, I ain’t going nowhere with those asshats.
I’ll just plaster over them with deadhead stickers and so forth.
Referring up above: Do young folks still read Lovecraft? Back in the ’70′s I read just enough, at the urging of a friend, to know who you’re talking about.
OT–this is funny, in a nice way: clips of a fund-raiser for Special Olympics here tonight, watching the Oscars, dressing up, complete with “Red Carpet interviews.” “Who are you wearing tonight?” “I don’t know, but I got it at Nordstrom’s.”
The one woman who named the designers/makers of her dress, necklace, and shoes…I never heard of any of ‘em. and I thought I was so fashion-savvy. :(
LMAO! Mental image of DrD holding desperately onto a bike rack or something while his body is trying to float away, screaming “No! No! Not me! I was baaaad!”
I was speaking with a well educated relative and her husband this afternoon. They had not heard about Santorum’s wife’s history and the hypocrisy that riddles the entire Santorum madhouse. I told her to just google ‘santorum’s wifes’s lover’ to get a sense of how insane these folks are…..and how bizarre their form of religiosity is.
That the Republicans are entertaining the idea of nominating this madman is shocking. The Republicans I know are horrified, embarrassed and disgusted.
What an interesting time we are living in.
Judging by the number of Lovecraft references I’ve seen on the Internets, they do indeed.
Exactly. I give Neal Conan credit for asking a caller the other day who objected on religious grounds to gay marriage (talk of the nation, npr) if she was quoting Leviticus (or is it Deuteronmy? My OT memory is fuzzy); when she said yes, he asked why we don’t give the death penalty to eaters of pork or blasphemers. She said that was “completely different.”
LOL! I might even put on a Cat Lady sticker.
Dude! I’ve always wanted somebody to ask me “who” I’m wearing so I could say something like, “The shoes are from Katy Couric’s abdomen, the bag is from Billy Joel’s calves and the dress is just something I skinned off a homeless guy two blocks away”.
Translation: “I don’t agree with that so Leviticus was full of shit when he said that part”.
And all the ‘born again’ ‘leave it in the confessional’ nonsense is NOT going to cut it for me. Bob McDonnell (State-Rape-Advocate.. R-VA, Gov) is not getting any pass from me no matter how hard he backtracks.
These idiots need to be held accountable. If the Democrats can’t do that, then I’ll have to find a political group that will hold them accountable.
Personally, I am going with Planned Parenthood, “I Vote Pro-Choice”, and “Hate is not a Family Value” stickers.
Dearie! Wow. Yeah, the way these folks claim moral authority over Dems is —- astounding? unbelievable? Dishonest?
Are there any Dem public officials with the marital history of Mitch Daniels (wife left him & kids for a year or three to live with another man, then returned, they’re still married! Or was it divorced and remarried?0 or Santorum – of all people – and his oh-so-Catholic mother-of-eight wife who lived in sin with an “abortionist” for years? Or of course, Newt…thre isn’t enough space to describe him, and we all know it anyway.
We really need to continue the outreach.
Not everyone knows about him. And should he be the nominee, the MSM will make every effort to scrub his past; a close ‘contest’ is important to their cashflow.
Of course! I read Lovecraft when I was young and while that was some time ago, when looking at the span between Lovecraft’s death and my picking up the first book, it’s wasn’t that much shorter than from Lovecraft’s death to right now.
Those are good, too. I favor the funny. Oh hell, mostly I still channel my parents’ “we don’t put our personal opinions on our car for strangers”. Ingrained, I guess.
That’s what they get for recruiting and then encouraging the baggers.
The best part about Karen Santorum isn’t her living with an abortionist for eight years before marrying Rick; the best part is that she and Rick chose — that’s the word, CHOSE — to prematurely end a pregnancy so as not to endanger the baby’s life, which would have been short and brutish at term.
Choice for me but not for thee — The Santorums
What’s interesting to me is that there has been low voter turnout in most of these Republican caucuses/primaries….and the current 4 are providing lots of fodder for further grist when the general election comes along. Of course, I really cannot stand Obama nowadays, and I do not trust any of the Democrats to hold the R’s feet to the fire. I try not to despair, but I really kinda think we are toast…………so maybe I just oughta pay attention to whatever I’ve saved up for my old age. Ya know?
I on the other hand have “The Road to Hell is Paved with Republicans” and “I vote Pro-Choice” on my truck.
I would call what they did a therapeutic abortion to save Mrs. Santorum’s life. YMMV.
Sure! It’s the way they roll. People choose to be gay, except for Ted Haggard who was seduced, coerced, drugged, corrupted, etc.
Uh-oh. Nope, no global warming. From local news: scenes of an ice fishing shack in Minnesota collapsed on melting ice. Looks like mush around it, more like spring. (admittedly, sound is on low so I’m just going on pix)
We have another cloudy night here; did anyone see the second configuration of Jupiter, Venus and the Moon tonight? They were SO bright last night… then the clouds came.
Some of that is because a lot of these are caucus states, which tend to have lower turnout. On the other hand, I expect a poor turnout by GOP voters this year, especially if Mittens wins (speaking of religious bigotry).
In Montana?????
I have an FDL sticker, a Romulan Military Academy sticker and one that says “Stop using Jesus as an excuse for being an intolerant, bigoted asshole”.
So would any rational human being. Unfortunately that does not include either of the Santorums.
Missoula is a lot like Austin apparently.
Yeah, this “winter” in the Midwest certainly isn’t any indication that antrhropogenic climate change is a real and worrisome phenomenon.
That is so true. I have read the tortured explanation of how the procedure was not at all in any way an abortion…not being a doctor, I can’t say there is no grain of truth, but…from somebody who has screamed for years about “partial-birth abortion” and Obama voting for “infanticide” (oh, wait, was that Newt?), it’s at best a distinction without a difference.
Yep, like we always say, if you’re rich or powerful you (or “your women”) will always be able to get your abortion.
Hell, we have had a fair bit of snow here, but there is almost nothing on the ground because it has been so warm during the daytime.
Yep.
Think I’m going to sound the retreat for the evening. Peace out, y’all!
Many of the Republicans I know, and I seem to know a lot, are considering doing what they did when McCain was their flag bearer…. that is, voting down ticket and just skipping voting for president. Santorum is appalling. Gingrich is anathema. Paul is a non-starter. Romney is a joke, an empty suit, a vapid pretense.
Yep me too. Though it seems unlikely I’ll make it to work at this point, I’m going to try to sleep. I’ll be back if the attempt fails.
Yeah, interviews with Repubs do seem to indicate they’re not real happy with any of ‘em. But too often that’s because none of ‘em is “conservative” enough!
It is. In the eastern part of the state they used to call it “The People’s Republic of Missoula.” Hands down the most progressive place in the state (also the most diverse). Also a haven for the LGBT community in the state.
Good luck with the sleeping thing. Hope the morning finds the cough gone.
Win-win either way!
Night. I should toddle off as well. I have young minds to corrupt in the morning. Take care all.
And all of this speculation in the press about a “dark horse” or a brokered convention is just stupid. The reason there are no first tier candidates is because the more or less sane Republicans know they don’t stand a chance in Hell.
I’ll watch for you, Meg….but I do hope you can sleep. Good dreams!
Aw man. Can’t the right-wingers be original? It’s the People’s Republic of Austin, the People’s Republic of Cambridge, the People’s Republic of Bloomington (IN), etc., etc.
Sheesh. They should come up with something new.
Congrats on your Ph.D. student. You must be so happy and proud!
Of course, when you hear those terms, you can imagine why Santorum wants to wipe out higher education!
If Ted Kennnedy was still alive and heard that, he’d have a stroke. This was not just a source of pride because he was “one of ours.” Catholics were happy Kennedy was laying to rest-or at least beginning to- alot of unfounded fears about Catholics in public office. For this moron to denigrate that…. Doesn’t he realize that JFK is one of the biggest reasons-if not the biggest-that he, being a Catholic, is even able to have this platform to spew his buffoonery? Simpler beerfart: If not for JFK, you wouldn’t even be where you are, Santorum.
It was also the People’s Republic of Norman when I was in grad school. They are conservatives, so new ideas are anathema.
Oh, of course, how could I have left out Norman? Truly, walking around Norman I always felt remarkably at home…
Santorum makes ME want to throw up.
I was growing up in Houston in 1960. I was Catholic. It was hard to be Catholic while surrounded by Southern Baptists who thought we were “evil-doers” …. hard. Kennedy gave a sense to the crazies in the South that everything would be okay. For Santorum to speak against that speech….. well, that’s just sick. What’s the matter with Republicans????
Always interested me how it seems that the most anti-catholic in JFK’s time are now the allies of what might be called “mainstream” Catholics.
Interesting, isn’t it. We need to learn a whole bunch more about Santorum.
‘Cept, I kind of trust that the actual Republicans will cut him off at the knees before he gets to much crazier. I simply cannot imagine that he would be the Republican nominee. Just can’t.
I fail to understand what possible appeal to the rational Republican voter is offered by the down-ticket races. This year, the ballot is just fulla crazy.
I can imagine. Those were truly the days when to Baptists, as well as many other fundie protestants, the Catholic Church (and sometimes the Episcopal Church!) was “The Whore of Babylon.”
It made me sad there was no Kennedy in our national legislature to defend JFK’s memory from this assault. It always means more when there’s someone available to say, “Let you tell me what my uncle said, Senator Santorum….”
I’m glad for the news that Blue Texan has landed at C&L. I’ve visited his own blog from time to time, but miss his being here everyday.
Anyway, scrolling down, I discovered this post: Rick Santorum Rejects Catholic Teaching on Evolution. Wherein Bt quotes some more Frothy insanity about evolution-teaching being “anti-theist”, and points out that Pope John Paul II (JOHN PAUL II! The Pope who damn near overruled Vatican II!) officially accepted evolution as well-founded.
But Lil Ricky, that Cafeteria Catholic, has rejected evolution for himself.
How old is Santorum anyway? More and more I suspect he’s old enough to have been raised pre-Vatican II, when Cathlics were not encouraged to read the Bible, and hasn’t progressed from the Baltimore Catechism, either. He really does not seem to have a clear grasp of either the Bible or the Church’s modern teachings (well, I guess he just rejects them, too. I read somewhere he attends a Latin Mass. Sigh. 13th-century, I’m tellin’ ya.)
“We need to learn a whole bunch more about Santorum.”
No s**t.
And on a very trivial, pure curiosity kinda level…does anybody know what-the-hell-kind-of-name is “Santorum?” I’ve heard him reference his Italian grandfather…but Italian names haven’t ended in -um since, oh, the fourth century? Whenever Latin turned into Italian, or some predecessor local dialect.
Frothy will say any amount of crap to wrest the Tea Party votes from Paul. That way, he will convince Newt to back him Vs Romney. I don’t think Paul will go anywhere, and wants his day on stage at the Convention. This is gonna be fun all the way …
Teddy !
Yep, there is something disconcerting about the fact that rational Catholics aren’t stepping up. “Mrs. Pelosi to the white courtesy telephone. Mr. Gingrich to the red courtesy phone.”
he’s 53, going on 54. same age as me. i barely, barely remember Latin mass. I can remember being taught to say the Latin words in the mass by the nuns and my mom took it on herself-b/c the nuns didn’t-to teach me what they meant. that was 1st grade as i recall it.maybe 2nd too. we were in an english mass by third grade. he’s born in 1958 so Vatican II is going on when he’s about 7 which puts him in what? 2nd grade? I guess alot depends on how he was raised. my mom explained later that she thought it extremely stupid to have mass in Latin (and alot of other things about the Church, like how she was sick of priests treating the people in the pews like they were stupid). Catholics were actively discouraged from reading the Bible. Then I went to a Jesuit high school and that changed, literally, on day 1. I don’t get the Latin mass people and wished the pope would have just told THEM to find another church because that’s not how real catholics do it. christ knows I’ve heard that enough. I guess the church reserves that kind of language for Catholics who question stuff.
is Catholicism newt’s 2nd or 3rd religion?
It seems to me that years ago, some European priest got excommunicated, or at least defrocked, for insisting on performing what was called the Tridentine Mass, which I think is not just Latin, but the old form of the Mass, pre-Vatican II.
As a Lutheran kid, with the Catholic Church being treated as that old-fashioned, stuck-in-error church from which Luther had to break off because the Pope refused to reform, I was kinda fascinated with the Catholic church, and the differences in our liturgies, as well as the similarities. Also with the Latin part…but that’s because I was always interested in languages. (I had a great time at a nuptial mass in 9th grade, when I was taking 1st-year Latin, trying to decipher as much as possible. lol) Born in ’49, I’m old enough to have observed the dramatic changes. The RC church was downright exotic to me, what with all those statues and saints and the rosary and stuff that Lutherans rejected.
So, who knows why Santorum is so mired in pre-Vatican II faith. But I do bet he doesn’t know the Bible well at all.
I’ll have what you’re having. Santorum is a repulsive little God-bothering punk.
Not sure…let’s see, are we mixing up the number of marriages with the number of religions he’s professed?
I can’t remember where I read it, but in a piece comparing Santorum’s and Romney’s rallies in Michigan, an attendee at Romney’s, referring to the candidates’ religions, said something like, “they’re not all Christian; Romney’s Mormon, Santorum’s Catholic, and Newt, well, who knows what Newt is?” Can’t find the link now.
3rd, actually.
exactly why i asked. LOL. i thought i was getting the # of marriages and religions mixed. teddy answered. thanks, ted. loks like the # is the same.
It’s the only game in town. It’s been perfected to a point by conservatives. I’ll never forget the turning point for me becoming “liberal” was when back in the late 90s this kid Casey Martin qualified to play on the professional golf tour. Problem was, he had a withered left leg from a circulatory disease and it was the width of a tooth pick and he rode a cart. Suddenly the PGA tour was fighting tooth and nail to keep him from playing, even though he qualified playing on a minor league tour riding a cart. Walking 18 holes with a stooge carrying your bag suddenly was equated to the Bataan Death March or the trail of tears. It was so unfair this disabled kid got to ride a cart they said. The argument became he made the tour “because” of his disease instead of “in spite” of it. What should have been the most joyous time in the guy’s life suddenly became a court battle which went all the way to the supreme court where they ruled in his favor (American’s With Disabilities Act was all that decided it) and he finally got to play. I was shocked the tour wouldn’t embrace the kid and reading all about it found out the tour was overwhelminginly conservative politically which was analyzed as a key to their fighting him tooth and nail. All I could think about was if any of these pros had a kid with the same disease, and they accomplished what this kid accomplished would they be fightning to keep their own kid from playing??
For me it was the classic example of a “conservative” grouping of people actually using a disabled kid who overcame overwhelming odds with his condition to accomplish something great and they made themselves the victims. To force the kid to go all the way through the supreme court was one of the sickest things I’d ever seen and was the turning point for me, and from that point on, I saw without fail that this tactic was pretty much used all the time and I actually started paying attention to it.
And you are right, having a kid with the disability would have changed any one of them to a fierce advocate. Look at Cheney’s apostasy on marriage equality, solely because his daughter Mary is a lesbian.
I was born a few months after Kennedy’s inauguration, and first learned about his speech reassuring protestant clergy that he would not be beholden to the Vatican while in high school in the 1970s. At that time, the concerns of those protestant clergy — indeed, the fact that Kennedy should even have had to make such a speech — were generally viewed as evidence of a widespread and unfair anti-Catholic bias. 51 years after Kennedy’s inauguration, faced with a contender for the presidential nomination of a major party who openly disdains the notion of separation of church and state (one of the nation’s core founding values), along with a politically aggressive Conference of Catholic Bishops who have recently sought to bully public policy concerning contraception, the concerns of those protestant clergy a half century ago would appear to have been not entirely unfounded.