As a Liberal in the British Parliament in the 1860s, John Stuart Mill once said Conservatives were “necessarily the stupidest party.” That might seem as simple as an infant learning where its nose is, but Mill’s insight into the permanence of “necessarily” ranks right up there with Newton’s thoughts on gravity. It’s certainly been confirmed and re-confirmed by subsequent experiment.
Mill came to mind recently as I tried to think about the self-martyring frown of thorns that many in our culture wear. We’re in something of a funk. We’d like to think we’ve sacrificed for our dreams, but even our dreams seem empty. Every political opponent is an anti-Christ. We would have succeeded but for Them. Succeeded at what is an open question.
In his twenties, Mill suffered a personal depressive breakdown that might hold some clues to today’s collective gloom, not that he was ever as nutty as many are today. He felt emotionally disconnected. His goals for himself and society suddenly seemed like thin gruel.
Mill blamed his malaise on his rigorous but narrow education (today we’d call it a technocratic education). His father had turned him into an efficient thinking machine. We might think of him as the first victim of standards-based education reform. Mill was committed to liberty and equality, but when it came to feeling human he was a child left behind.
The simplicity of his escape from depression is striking. He turned to the English Romantic poets, Wordsworth in particular, broadening his understanding of human flourishing:
I needed to be made to feel that there was real, permanent happiness in tranquil contemplation. Wordsworth taught me this, not only without turning away from, but with a greatly increased interest in the common feelings and common destiny of human beings.
Remember, Mill was once arrested for helping poor people get contraceptives. His essay, “The Subjection of Women,” is as beautifully radical an argument for equality as has ever been written. It’s not the case that he didn’t feel for others. He would have tossed Margaret Thatcher from the room if he’d been around to hear her argue that there is no such thing as society, only individuals.
What got Mill into trouble was an overly simplified or quantified view of happiness and human nature. What got him out of it was a new understanding of an open, creative universe combined with an understanding of human limitations. Today’s poll-driven politics, micro-targeted marketing, dry, dehumanizing bureaucracies, test-based education policies etc. are as inhuman as Mill discovered his early thinking to be.
Stumbling through this desert, we reach for a little dignity. We grow immodest thinking we need to save the world to deserve it. But we are not gods, only humans. Mill said Wordsworth taught him that. He dropped his divine ambitions in favor of more modest, mortal, earth-bound goals.
I think Mill would have been helped even more if he had turned to Keats instead of Wordsworth. Keats’ epic fragment, “Hyperion,” and his subsequent “Fall of Hyperion” are about the decline and withdrawal of the gods. But they are also about the possibility of human flourishing found in open, creative contact with the world. Apollo becomes a mortal human poet.
The modern Romantic, Rainer Maria Rilke, saw Apollo in the marble sculpture, the Torso of Miletus (480-470 BC). The head is missing, as are the gods, but Rilke found something godlike available in simple human creation. It’s a lesson we need to learn if we are to save ourselves and reinvigorate democracy.
Archaic Torso of Apollo
Rainer Maria Rilke
We cannot know his legendary head
with eyes like ripening fruit. And yet his torso
is still suffused with brilliance from inside,
like a lamp, in which his gaze, now turned to low,
gleams in all its power. Otherwise
the curved breast could not dazzle you so, nor could
a smile run through the placid hips and thighs
to that dark center where procreation flared.
Otherwise this stone would seem defaced
beneath the translucent cascade of the shoulders
and would not glisten like a wild beast’s fur:
would not, from all the borders of itself,
burst like a star: for here there is no place
that does not see you. You must change your life.




33 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Nice turn of phrase there.
Poetry has saved many from depression, or its consequences. Going to come back to read more carefully. I rather like Wordsworth, too.
As he would have Ayn Rand, the proudly amoral sociopath and serial killer crushie from whom Thatcher seems to have cribbed her worst ideas.
Thanks, and, Read On! Write, too!
Yes, Rand he might have tossed from a window! You know, the Right twists Mill like they twist Adam Smith. Mill was all about individual liberty, but he saw it as social, as the freedom to be together cooperatively and empathetically. Smith thought an open market would make us more sociable, understanding and cooperative. Mill is interpreted by the Right as saying every person is an island. Smith that the “free market” is almost divine, that individuals can and should be sacrificed to it and that civil society is myth.
Why are liberals always violently homicidal?
It is too bad contemporary conservatives do not take the words of another 19th century pol, one they claim to revere, only two years younger than John Stuart Mill, who also suffered from bouts of depression, to heart.
The last paragraph of Abraham Lincoln’s first inaugural address.
Well said as usual, Mr Smith.
“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives. “
John Stuart Mill
Great quote. Thanks!
One of your best posts ever. Thanks.
“Poetry has saved many from depression, or its consequences.”
It may be the only reason I’m still here. Conversely, you’ll know you’re in trouble when poetry invariably sounds hokey. Do not waste time self-justifying: find yourself an anchor, which as the Mill story tells is likely to be in midst of the earth.
Thanks so much, tammanytiger. One of the things I love about the FDL community is that it makes room for attempts, however flawed, at this kind of thing. FDL is multidimensional, likes life in 3D and is not just straight political observation.
You do recall postulating the “two-year-old” explanation about whether violence, which you seem to see only on one “side” is, essentially human nature while refusing to answer my question to you, yesterday, do you not, 2fer2?
Check out number 45, on this thread, and again, answer, if you dare.
http://firedoglake.com/2012/02/25/come-saturday-morning-evilralph-reed-projects-like-a-multiplex/#Respond
Nice phrase, and so true. And interesting that it’s such anchors that let us move.
The “malaise” of the “child left behind” seems all too familiar in today’s world. The young people now seem to feel disconnected from the larger world although they have an infinite number of “toys” with which to communicate. And there lies the problem IMO. They are bright and intelligent but are always looking inward. Obviously this is not true of all the young – thinking of Occupy – but I wonder about the future leaders and despair that they might not be able to function without a cellphone.
Thank you, Glenn, for once again, as you always do, providing us some substantial food for considered thought. The history which you place before us, encourages both needful context and broadened perspective.
DW
Thanks, I needed this. Such a good and powerful reminder.
And too much of education is now “vocational.” It’s telling that 20th Century thinker and education philosopher John Dewey is demonized by many on the Right for wanting to teach the whole person to think and feel. Or a Santorum suggests that higher education is little more than a snobbish conspiracy. Better to stay in your place in the assembly line, do not think, do not look right or left….
DWBartoo, thanks so much. It’s just me thinking out loud, too, so thank you for helping me listen.
RevBev, you can probably tell that I needed it too!
Superb comment, Twain, you touch upon thoughts which, increasingly often, trouble and concern me.
I try not to succumb to unconscious or deliberate generational “prejudice”, however, the distance which these “toys” place between the young and the natural, real world, with which you and I had no choice but to interact, as well as the “manipulative” distance and “power” which these “toys” erect between flesh and blood human beings is, I consider, I think very rationally, concerning.
DW
Still waiting for you to honestly answer the real question posed by my post on Ralph Reed, Shooter.
By the way, I had intended to call attention to these lines by Rilke early in the thread, speaking of words to contemplate:
And also to you! Peace! And Rilke says, “Live the question”; gives meaning, I think.
One of life’s great paradoxes!
I think we move better with reference to something, at least most of the time.
Conservatives cling to their primitive defenses and styles because they must. To resume growth involves taking up mature personality and cultural traits. To do so involves once again confronting infantile fantasies and terrors.
One must have the courage to be. (Not original with me, Can’t recall who said it>)
It almost killed Mill.
Paul Tillich, “The Courage to Be.” Because I found it in a neighborhood bookstore at age 15 or something, one of the first books of philosophy/theology I ever read.
Thanks. I was wracking my brain.
Asked and answered. If you don’t like the answer I gave you, that’s your problem.
Mid Twentieth Century liberal, post-existentialist Theologian, Paul Tillich, coined the term, “The Courage To Be” and his 1952 seminal book had that as its title.
Thanks. I knew it went back to my sophomore days.
(Greenberg, 1978)
I’m not sure what “stupid” means anymore aside from a convenient label used as a PC slur nowadays. Let’s not parse the word’s Latin, or Old Norse, (or whatever they are) roots to satisfy ourselves that we know what we are talking about.
It is tempting, however, to hear something like “stupor” here, which could be a medical condition whether self inflicted or not. If there is some connection between the two words then they could both suggest a disability is in play. Connect the dots, and leave it be.