(PW notes: Important updates are at the bottom of the story. Read all the way through!) Here’s where Phoenix shows her age: How many of you out there remember Peyton Place — the book, the film, or the TV series?
For those not in the know, Peyton Place is the story of a small town that looks and pretends to be wholesome and hyper-moral on the surface, but is just rife with all sorts of inappropriate sexual and other sorts of hanky-panky — hanky-panky that in many cases was based on real-life events. For example: One of the pivotal parts of the novel, a girl’s killing of the stepfather who abused her, is based on the real-life story of Barbara Roberts, who came from a family said to be politically prominent locally — and who in December of 1946 shot her father after she and her sister had suffered years of rapes at his hands.
Having chronicled some of the more outré happenings of the Republican Party of Minnesota, I keep thinking of Peyton Place — and most especially now, now that Amy Koch, less than a year after being sworn in as Majority Leader of the Minnesota State Senate, has resigned as Majority Leader:
Minnesota Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch resigned her post Thursday after she was confronted by GOP Senate leaders about allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a Senate staffer, according to high level State Capitol sources.
Those sources confirmed that four Republican Senators held an emergency meeting with Koch Wednesday night, after multiple Senate staffers reported the possible improper conduct.
Now, when Koch, who is married, first announced her stepping down from the Majority Leader job on Thursday, there was no hint or indication of any sort of scandal, or any reason at all for her quitting; she just said she was stepping down to have more time with her family, and that while while she was no longer Majority Leader, she would keep her Senate seat though she wouldn’t be running for re-election for that seat. That apparently wasn’t good enough for the people who forced her to quit the leadership gig, because yesterday, the very next day, the news was leaked about why she was quitting the gig.
One interesting, and darkly ironic, thing here: Even as she’s had the Scarlet Letter publicly stapled to her chest by her fellow Republicans, her male partner in naughtiness — the Reverend Dimmesdale to her Hester Prynne — has so far not only gone unpunished, he’s gone unnamed. In other words, as is all too typical with these sorts of events, she gets the public shaming and disgrace, whereas he suffers only whatever his conscience might choose to mete out to him — and being that he is a staffer in the the Republican Senate Caucus of the Minnesota State Legislature, I think we can safely assume that his conscience isn’t likely to give him anything near what the silver-tongued great communicator Dimmesdale’s conscience gave him.
The persons running the Republican Party of Minnesota wanted to show they really weren’t a bunch of sexist slobs by having The First Female Senate Majority Leader, yet when she and a male staffer were found to be doing the horizontal bop, she and only she is the one who loses her job — just as typically happens when a male boss in private industry is caught in an affair with a female subordinate. (I have witnessed this twice myself, at two different workplaces: Both times, it was the woman whose career suffered the most by far.)
The Republican Party of Minnesota really needs to stop this double standard in its tracks. Or do they really believe that, when it comes to inappropriate office affairs, only the woman should pay the price?
UPDATE: Well, well, well (and a hat tip to Mark Gisleson in the comments). This goes beyond “Friday afternoon news dump”:
Minnesota Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch resigned her leadership position Thursday after fellow Republicans confronted her about an “inappropriate relationship” she was having with a direct subordinate.
Senate Republicans have declined to name the staffer, but rumors began flying this afternoon that it was Republican powerbroker Michael Brodkorb, Koch’s communications chief. Those rumors have intensified following the news that Brodkorb is no longer working at the Senate, which was revealed in an email sent by Senate Majority Leader Geoff Michel to staff late Friday afternoon.
Other local news outlets are following City Pages’ Gregory Pratt’s lead and are now connecting the dots between Brodkorb’s late-Friday-afternoon resignation and Koch’s fall from grace. Have we found our Reverend Dimmesdale?
For more on who Michael Brodkorb is — namely, a running buddy of Tony Sutton and up until Sutton’s fall from power, the second-most-powerful Republican in the state party apparatus, able like Sutton to order around legislators and tell Koch and House Speaker Kurt Zellers what to do — go here.




55 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Demi Moore character in Margin Call was the one who got fired, not her male colleague. Most predictable part of the movie.
Sorry but I have little sisterhood or sympathy for this or any woman who chooses to hitch her star to the modern-day Republican party.
The man is referred to elsewhere as Minnesota’s Rove. So besides gender the other republicans need him.
The Boss got caught playing with a staffer. This is playing out the way it is supposed to.
Fun OT,
Author of my fave book of all times, King of the Mountain, interview on book-tv Encore Booknotes is going to be replayed at 6p. Since that will be in the middle of book salon, I have a dilemma. Will prolly be at book salon, as I watched the Ludwig interview on when I was prepping for my hosting of him.
You miss the point. The boss gets punished disproportionately when boss is female & other person is male, than when the gender situation is reversed.
Why is she protecting her lover??? I also find this disturbing on another level. In most cases this would not be something the Rethuglicans would care about. I’m sure their have been many Majority leaders who have had affairs in the past and nobody especially in the Modern day Hypercritical Rethuglican party. There must be more to it than the sexual affair. There is a back story here and I wonder what it is.
It doesn’t play out that way all the time, especially if the boss is a male.
It’s too early for me to start calling bullshit on comments here.
And how many of those who confronted her and have now outed her have had or are now having affairs, probably inappropriate? Call me cynical, but I’m betting at least one of them, and probably more. Think Newt/Clinton. Think almost every virulent anti-gay Republican, almost every Pro Marriage Republican, think…
It’s never too early.
I’m not saying it plays out the correct way all the time. It just seems to be playing out that way this time. The staffer is gone too. The press has been putting the dots next to each other in picture and headlines. (they can’t quite connected them directly without some confirmation, that will come).
I’m not calling this BS it is a logical extrapolation from past experience. All I’m saying is let us be a bit restrained. There is plenty of hypocrisy to highlight lets just not get trapped.
And why do you think all of Herman Cain’s affairs became public knowledge & mattered, but the WM power structure not so much.
Double standard.
Recognizing the pattern in hypocrisy and exposing it is important.
Don’t you think that the Republicans ( and the democrats) have amply proven that it is the woman’s responsibility for ALL the sex that occurs in the world?
Here, I’ll adjust the quote:
“she just said she was sleeping around to have more time with her family,”
Heh! Well, I never actually read Peyton Place, but hey, I saw the porno parody with Jesie St. James! Does that count?
On a more serious note, yeah, I’m reminded of an advice column written by a right-wing pastor. The pastor was told about a businessman who was being distracted by an attractive secretary. In order to remain faithful to his wife, the businessman was advised to fire the secretary. Problem solved, right? Whoa! Hold on a sec! Why in the bloody hell was the attractive secretary being made to suffer for the fact that the businessman never heard of cold showers or other types of self-control?
Yeah, I do remember Peyton Place (the movie). I would have been in about 9th grade, and I was surprised my parents let me see it.
That’s the way they think.
“That woman is distracting me. I better get rid of her before SHE causes trouble”
Read the book, never saw the movie or series. Went around the high school like wildfire. Really tame by today’s standards.
I may have been misinformed the above comment is not gospel!
But still don’t discount the “affair” being a sting operation.
Thanks.
A-yep.
A-yep, again.
It’s so strange that that the male figure involved is being protected so utterly.
Because he has no udders.
There are many who continue the fight to have all people treated fairly.
Thanks for being one of them.
We will not sit down and shut up. Or, stop calling bullshit.
Somebody knows who it is and when that knowledge makes its way to somebody who’s outraged about the ouster it’ll be all over the media. Think Linda Tripp.
And, yes, speaking of the Reverend Dimmesdale, I must admit that whenever I see or hear that name, I think of Chillingworth as Spiny Norman:
Dinsdale!
I understand why you’d be cautious in reporting the male staffer’s name, but the Star Tribune this morning put a link to Michael Brodkorb’s resignation as a Senate staffer directly beneath the link to the Amy Koch story.
Brodkorb is a former hate blogger (Minnesota Democrats Exposed) who parlayed his hate site into a top-paying job as the Republican Senate caucus’s communications director. He’s the former deputy chair of the state Republican party (the chair stepped down recently for gross financial mismanagement).
I honestly do believe most modern Republicans are sincere Christian rightists. Who just happen to be very vulnerable to any and all Svengalis who come along preaching hate and division. Which also just happens to be the best way of getting into a Republican’s pants.
My rule is simple: Cheaters suck. But I will admit sometimes it becomes a bit complicated to determine who sucks the most.
Why would anybody want to?
Yeah but to a 13 year old, that “tame” was pretty wild. I think I read the book, too, but that’s too many years ago to be sure. I know I didn’t see the TV show.
Oh, yeah, it was the hottest thing any of us had ever read.
So you’re suggesting that this Brodkorb is the other half of this tryst?
I am still waiting for the chorus to home in on Newtie’s past escapades. So far I’m not seeing much. Can’t be long until he’s brought down hard.
Aha! Enough folks at the Strib wanted to connect the dots, I see. I’ll edit accordingly.
That’s why I was so surprised my parents let me see the movie. Of course they didn’t try to restrict my reading either. Maybe because they were older (my mother would have been 52 then) they didn’t get too panicked by my reading tastes.
Brodkorb = Broadknob?
It’s early so this Minnesotan may change her mind, but my reaction was that the Republicans handled this quickly with no apologies or excuses. Considering the endless bipartisan spin, whines, games and pathetic pathos that are inflicted upon us every day, I was surprised to find it refreshing.
LOL. Got polished, didn’t it? Tee hee.
Except it wasn’t actually handled that well. It’s been a case of drip, drip, drip.
First, on Thursday morning, Koch’s unexplained resignation. Then, on Friday morning, the RPM leadership releases a partial explanation. Then, on Friday afternoon, Brodkorb quietly resigns his Senate post — and it’s left to the media to connect the dots.
Yeah, but that’s warp speed for scandals.
So would you and PW consider Brodkorb a Rovian-like figure in state politics or too Neo-Christian for that comparison?
Was it a sting just to get the woman out of power? Certainly she must be ultra-conservative to get the leadership role, or no? (I always though the Clinton pizza delivery and thong affair was a sting.) Still two to tango & easier at the office.
@Greenbell: did they handle it “well” because they knew it was coming and had made plans?
Oh, that’s certainly possible. I’m just giving them credit for their apparent ruthlessness in getting it wrapped up. We had to put up with the Kardashian un-marriage longer than this.
So who will now fill the power gap at the State Capitol, with Sutton and Brodkorb out of the picture? Will the Emmer/Quist TheoCons suddenly step into the gap, or will the Seifert crew, aligned with Sutton, step into the breach? And what Crazy Mary Kiffmeyer, ALEC’s fair-haired girl in Minnesota?
From everything we know about the hierarchy of the MRP, can we really tell which person is the ‘Boss’?
This is a real question PW, I don’t mean to say that I know, who has the higher rank in the MRP, Brodkorb or Koch?
It seems quite possible that Brodkorb had the upper hand in this relationship, until recently at least.
The jockeying for power in the post-Sutton/Brodkorb/Koch Era has begun:
http://northfield.patch.com/articles/senate-leader-resigns-northfield-s-thompson-to-seek-post
It’s rather like Kremlinology, isn’t it — especially compared to the relatively straightforward, if sometimes ossified, process in the DFL, Minnesota’s branch of the national Dems. In the DFL, the people who hold nominal rank hold the actual rank as well, whereas in the RPM, there are lots of powers behind the thrones. It’s been a running joke all this year in the Minnesota political scene that Zellers and Koch are pretty much Sutton’s and Brodkorb’s hand puppets.
Sutton and Brodkorb, until very recently, had the backing of some of the richest and most powerful Republicans in the state, the most important of whom are the members of the Cooper family of TCF fame. The Coopers are the ones who bankrolled Sutton’s attempt to turn the Baja Sol chain, which Sutton bought with their help in the mid-2000s, into not just a major fresh-Mex chain but a giant cash cow and turkey farm for Republican and conservative operatives and their allies. But under Sutton’s mismanagement, the chain’s expansion faltered, then abruptly reversed, to the point where the Coopers took it away from Sutton late last year.
Good that the sisterhood thing hasn’t clouded your judgement. This is about the hypocrisy of a anti-gay zealot and the concept of sexual harassment by a powerful woman.
Reading the post, my first question was whether or not the “affair” fell within the bounds of sexual harassment? I can imagine any number of reasons why the victim of harassment might be shielded, especially as you note the biggest penalties usually fall to the victim, not the harasser. I spent decades in public service, most of it at a senior level. I can therefore claim expertise in the matter of politicians’ private lives, far more than I would have preferred. If you cleared out every philandering politician, the municipal, state, and federal elected officials’ offices would be almost empty. That goes for both sexes. I think that the reasons for this deserve far more study than they get. My theory is that politicians get into that business for the power their offices confer (occasionally for the social aspects of the office). Once in office, they quickly discover they are special, laws and rules apply differently to them. Most politicians are far less interested in the particular policies they enact. Sex is simply one of the ways that drive for power is expressed. By the way, retaliation for saying “No” is common, again for both sexes. All this is a significant problem.
A power broker and a Senator might be equals, or she might be his boss, or he might even be effectively hers. The difference matters. If he wanted to press some action in court, he would be forced to come forward. Absent that, the resignation is noteworthy, but we ought to wait to see the unfolding spectacle before deciding what it all means.
So this has been handled quickly and with precision, I suppose my question is would it have been handled the same way if Koch had had a penis? Or if it wasn’t the gender of the leader but their choice of partner? The more I read the comments, the more I’m thinking there has been a palace coup. Was this about Koch and getting rid of her, or about Brodkorb? If she had been his sock puppet, getting rid or her (and him) cuts his power more then hers. If these power games didn’t effect the citizens of Minnesota it might be fascinating instead of scary and repellent.
Kremlinology, I love it.
So the Coopers ousted Jabba the Sutton, and Brodkorb, and Koch just had her hopes hitched to the wrong star?
Seems to me the headline could well be something about honor-among-thieves, or maybe shit-rolls-downhill, instead of an object lesson in sexism?
You’re my favorite source for the ‘real’ story in Minnesota politics, and I recognize that you always get to the bedrock, so to speak, so please don’t take this comment as criticism.
I don’t know Amy Koch but I’ve met and dealt with Brodkorb and it’s hard for me not to suspect he was very much the aggressor if in fact it was him and Amy up in that kissing tree.
I don’t think Brodkorb or many of his close allies really have any kind of coherent political philosophy other than shilling for the rich and trash talking the left. He’s a very manipulative person. As a blogger he engaged in all the usual infuriating rightie tropes from stealth ellipses to insisting that correlation equals causation.
But as a technocrat making $90k at the legislature, he was obsequious and reached out to the media in classic glad-handing fashion. In fact, in almost every regard, he does remind me of Karl Rove, but without any of Rove’s successes.
Lost in the shuffle is that there are a lot Republican staffers at the Minnesota capitol who are true to their beliefs. Koch-Brodkorb wasn’t ratted out by the opposition: Republican staffers demanded the Senate Republican leadership take action. Personally, I don’t care who’s sleeping with who so long as the relationship is not coercive, but I applaud those staffers who turned on their leadership for playing at King David and Bathsheba (even if Brodkorb makes for a somewhat hairy Bathsheba).
Brodkorb is not a power but a servant of power. This certainly seems to be playing out as a Tony’s revenge story. Tony + Mike, Tony does the Emmer, Amy does the Senate, Mike moves to Amy, Mike spills the dirt, Amy gets to Tony, and finally Tony hits back. You know it is all very Peyton Place.
Just read your update and laughed over the thought of Tony Sutton having a “running” buddy. (For the non-Minnesotans among you, Tony Sutton ate way too much of his restaurant’s faux Mexican food, and clearly is not a jogger or runner.)
And it will continue that way until men can wear deep-red lipstick without anyone saying anything.
I remember the Peyton Place TV series for its hybrid experiment of prime-time soap opera, but instead of airing every day, only once a week, and instead of live or videotape, movie film, a child of The Fugitive formula and grandparent to Dallas and those.
Nonsense.
Think John Edwards.
Why do we need always to politics of sex into anything happening in this country. This is not about sex.
This women is our Minnesota answer to New Jersey’s Chris Kristy.
What an embarrassment.
Brought to you by the party of GOD, these christianists get a LOT on the side amen?
Gay marriage strikes again.