On June 22, 2009 President Obama signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act which allows the FDA to lower the amount of nicotine in tobacco products, ban candy flavorings that appeal to kids, and block misleading labels such “low tar” and “light.” The act was signed 20 years after groundbreaking Congressional hearings into tobacco companies’ manipulation of the brains and bodies of their customers.
Addiction Incorporated, directed by Charles Evans, Jr., methodically and dramatically lays the groundwork for the smoking gun–a research paper by scientists Victor DeNoble and Paul Mele which explains the addictive nature of nicotine, a paper whose research was funded by Philip Morris, a paper which the company ordered withdrawn from publication in a prestigious journal after it was made clear by the company’s attorneys that the data contained therein could provide litigants with evidence in pending lawsuits.
The central figure in Addiction Incorporated, Victor DeNoble, PhD, was the first person in his family to attend college, let alone get an advanced degree. While working as a post-doctorate lab researcher, DeNoble was hired by Philip Morris to develop a nicotine analogue that would deliver the pleasurable effects of nicotine without leading to heart disease. What he and fellow researcher Dr. Paul Mele discovered working with rats–a violation of an agreement made by tobacco companies years earlier that animal models were not to be used–was that nicotine was in fact addictive; and that the compound that made it so, acetaldehyde could be enhanced for
optimal reinforcing effect.
Since acetaldehyde occurs naturally in tobacco, enhancing an already extant substance would not require FDA approval. Philip Morris was ecstatic. But at the same time DeNoble and Mele were submitting a paper for publication in the Journal of American Pharmapsychology on the addictive properties of nicotine based on the lab rats self-administration of nicotine doses (self-administration is the criteria the FDA used to determine if a drug should be scheduled as a controlled substance), high profile lawsuits against the tobacco companies were cropping up. Philip Morris ordered the paper pulled, and then fired the scientists.
Ten years later, in 1994 ABC News had finalized their story on the addictive properties of tobacco, and just days before the story was set to air, it was announced that the FDA was investigating the tobacco industry. Both Mele and DeNoble were approached by investigators. Spooked by the investigators, DeNoble declined to talk with them, but Mele did, and their paper was added to the congressional hearings on the tobacco industry. Called before Congress, the CEO and President of Philip Morris William Campbell released DeNoble from his confidentiality agreement with the company, and Pandora’s box was opened.
Addiction Incorporated reveals not only the corporate machinations of the tobacco industry to maximize profits, but also the behind-the-scenes manipulations of news and public opinion by Big Tobacco (applicable to other groups), and the corporate strategy of out-manning and out-spending the opposition in lawsuits.
And the film clearly makes the point that if smoking wasn’t addictive, people wouldn’t be doing it.
Addiction Incorporated opens December 14 in New York City, and in January comes to the West Coast.



102 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Before we start, just a couple quick notes:
Please refresh your browser every minute or so to see new comments, questions and answers.
To reply to specific comment, hit the reply button underneath it and then type away. Always hit “send comment.” Thanks!
Please stay on topic/s–in this case tonight’s film Addiction Incorporated and filmmakers Charles Evans Jr and Charmaine Parcero and scientist Victor DeNoble….If you’d like to type about the economy, Mittens’s big bet, Newt’s eyes, or other issues please find a post elsewhere on FDL to do so. Thank you.
Please be respectful of our guest and of each other. And yeah, I tpye badly…
Hello, Charles, Charmaine and Victor. Welcome to Firedoglake Movie Night and thank you for being here tonight!
What a great film! So full of information. Charles and Charmaine, what drew you to the subject?
Hi everyone, whoever is out there. Thanks for stopping by, we’re all here now
Hi everyone. This is Victor… any questions you have, we’ll be happy to answer.
Hi all! Victor, you were doing pure science when you worked for Philip Morris–did it shock you to learn they had an agenda?
Victor, Charles, Charmaine, Welcome to the Lake.
Good Evening everyone
First off, thanks for making the picture and especially thanks to Victor for speaking up.
The title threw me, at first I thought it was going to be about the drug rehab industry.
I really thought they wanted to help people. But once we found a second drug that would help addict people, their agenda was clear.
Saw victor when he was testifying on cspan and was intrigued by his story. Got to know him and researched the tobacco industry and took a long time to figure out how his story would feel like a complete movie. Afterall the bad guy never dies. After the RICO ruling in 2006, that felt something like an ending so in 2009, the financing was set and we started shooting. I write too slowly to communicate well in this venue.
8
I really thought they wanted to help people. But once we found a second drug that would help addict people, their agenda was clear.
And why did the tobacco insudtry has a “gentleman’s agreement” against animal testing? And how did the other tobacco companies react (if you know) to learning PM had violated that?
hi. its good to be here.
Good evening Greg.
Interesting, addiction automatically pointed you to drug rehab. Well, cigarettes are a drug, nicotine is a drug.
In the early 1950′s the tobacco industry knew its product was deadly. So they decided to form a coalition of untruth to protect their profits. I certainly am not in their best of graces for having blown the whistle, but that’s their problem.
Thanks for having us, good to be here tonight
Charles, you’re doing great, I type with two fingers on each hand, looking at the keyboard and even ttne I make typos.
How do you guys feel about an industry who sells a product that causes more death and health problems than all other diseases combined, and what can we do about it?
It must be nice to be able to sleep at night,
I’ve never understood how the people that ran Big Tobacco could. The word that comes to mind is EVIL.
As a technical note,
there is a “Reply” button in the lower right hand of each comment. Pressing the “Reply” will pre-fill the commenter name and number you are replying to and helps for everyone in following the conversation.
An understandable interpretation. The title is a reference to the uniqueness of an industry where winners are distinguished by a company’s ability to addict its customers.
Being able to sleep at night is very important and I’m glad I can. People like you, who care, should also be able to sleep at night without the tobacco industry targeting our children.
thank you.
Victor, I quit smoking because I couldn’t justify supporting such a corrupt industry, plus the litter from packaging bummed me out.
And vanity. I admit that too–vanity and morals, weird combo. I take a botanical precursor to dopamine instead.
The tobacco industry’s tort response is also telling”we may be wrong, but we’ll outspend you until you quit suing us.” appalling. It’s a technique I have sene used by other organizations. Disgusting.
Sounds like a great decision to me!
You’re absolutely right. That was their technique until recently. Now, they’re asking to be regulated by the FDA which has no money to spend on regulation and the tobacco industry will sue every legal tactic to delay all regulation.
Did/do any of you smoke?
Thanks for having us. I wanted to know what god firedoglake.com interested in in the film that brought us here today?
the gentlemen’s agreement was a result findings in 1952 that the tar in tobacco smoke caused cancer on the skin in mice. The industry knew this could have catasrophic consequences and met in a nYc hotel room: Check out the interviewee flag on our web site : PHIL HILTS address this meeting and the subsequent actions by the industry .
http://www.addictionincorporated.com
Mom and Dad–Yes. Sister–Yes. Friends in high school–Yes. Me? I’ve never had a cigarette in my mouth. Was too damn scared. And it didn’t look cool.
I used to smoke, socially, but quit while making this movie. I never was an avid smoker, never everyday, I guess I was one of the lucky ones that never got addicted really. But then again I also started smoking after the age of 18.
Victor your work was really ground breaking–a quick search of “acetaldehyde” and “nicotine” on google shows a vast numbe rof papers which built on your original study.
YOu moved on to speaking before groups of kids–are you still doing that?
And when you and Dr Mele were fired form PM, where did you go? Were you still contracted b them, or did you both move on to other research jobs?
Yes–my goal is to speak to as many kids as I can. Not to tell them what to do–but to give them the science. They make their own decisions.
Paul Mele and I were both fired. Paul got a job in Maryland, and I got a job in Delaware completely unrelated to the tobacco industry. The problem was the secrecy agreement that prevented us from discussing our work. The movie Addiction Inc. covers our release and the results. I can’t tell you what a relief it was to finally tell people about the science.
Is that important? Starting smoking later in life, less addiction?
No–absolutely not. While it’s true that the developing brain gets addicted faster, addiction is addiction. I don’t care whether you’re 18 or 68. It will happen if you continue to use the drug.
My mom and dad smoked, as did their respective next spouses, though my dad, stepmom and both my stepfathers all quit. My mom died of esophageal cancer in concert with CPOD, and she smoked up until the day before she died. My last stepfather died from CPOD.
Smoking is really one controllable thing we can do to prevent dying a nasty death.
I smoked from 18-45. I can’t any more–and Addiction Incorporated is a powerful moral reinforcement.
Phil hilts on our web site has an interesting analogy to tobacco executive’s unwillingness to acknowledge the carnage caused by their product: compares them to a syndrone observed in concentration camp guards. Its a well observed analogy.
How did the FDA investigators learn of the existence of your banned research paper?
He’s such an amazing speaker. He gets their attention so well because he respects them and their decision, it works. By the end of it, they know so much more than when they walked in and are empowered to make better choices.
What you’ve gone through is a consequence of the tobacco industry’s product. We can’t replace what you’ve lost but we certainly can help prevent other people from falling into a life of addiction. I’m glad you’ve stopped smoking and I hope Addiction Inc. Will help you understand why it was so difficult.
Victor, you were spookedby the FDA investigators–you showed them a photo of the FDA director, Kessler and they couldn’t identify him. Did you later relax about that? Were you very concerned about PM and your safety?
How long did the Congressional Hearing take? What kind of preparation were you given? It had to be very hard to sit there and answer questions.
Charles, Charmaine: How did you decide on the type of animations in the documentary, they are very engaging and tell the facts quickly for all the audiences.
When the investigators from the FDA–not really FDA–found us, Dr. Mele –Paul– told them of a paper we tried to publish back in 1983 but was suppressed by Philip Morris. The editor of the journal kept our paper because it was so unusual to withdrawal scientific research from publication. In 1994 when they approached him, he gave them the paper which revealed the suppressed science.
It was my wife’s idea to test them with the photo of Kessler. It was brilliant. When they couldn’t identify them the shit hit the fan. I was so scared that they were from the tobacco industry. Paul and I testified for about 3.5 hours. There was no preparation. Paul and I refused any coaching. We were there to tell the truth and that was it.
We actually used 3 animation companies for all the animations. Cartoon Saloon in Ireland, AniBoom out of Israel and StudioNYC in New York.
My parents both smoked but I never smoked cigarettes. My father bribed us us kids not to – fortunately.
He always said it was easy to quite smoking, he did it a thousand times.
in the end both he and my mother quit, again – fortunately.
First of all–kudos to your dad for bribing you. It was probably one of the best decisions he’s made and it worked. You don’t smoke.
To quote Mark Twain–”Quitting smoking is easy. I’ve done it a thousand times.” Addiction is never hard to overcome.
How long have you been giving the talks to students? Have any approached you afterwards and said they would / did go into science because of your discussions? You make the science interesting – fun.
And the movie, Addiction Incorporated is very clear about the science. I have a passing knowlegde of animal models in research as well as in addiction studies, so it was great fun for me–and also easily understandable to the lay person with less background than I
Did you later meet the investigators and have a good laugh about that incident?
We shopped around for some animation companys and divided the work between two. Then hired a company in NYC to complete the work that the first two were never going to be able to complete. Just a handfull of shots.
It communicates impossibly complicated brain chemistry issues but working with the animators consumed ridiculous amounts of time. I am told this is standard, even when working with talented animators.
Are the tobacco companies still giving away free cigarettes to the other countries. I remember a friend’s mom telling us how cigs were given to college students for parties called “smokers” and to the military.
I’ve been talking to students for 17 years. The last 12 have been full time. I talk to about 350,000 students in elementary, middle, and high school every year. Several colleges and universities have invited me to talk. Almost all of them initiated by students who saw me in middle and high school. Some of them became scientists, some FBI agents, some just went on to live happy lives. I’m glad you enjoyed the movie. Science should be fun, and thanks for your support. Check out the website– http://www.addictionincorporated.com/about
ahh, so he was quoting Mark Twain – lol
It’s hard to believe smoke filled rooms/buildings/cars were the norm way back when, thank goodness that is the past. – Thanks to you guys.
True, and it’s amazing to think how many Bugs Bunny cartoons were created and how quickly!
How hard was it to access all the archival footage? And how do you think the tobacco lawyers feel nowadays about their work?
Yes–Tom and Gary and I are friends. We’ve had lots of laughs. They clearly were the good guys and they covered my ass.
You’re absolutely right. IN the U.S. we can’t give away cigarettes any more. However in most other countries–especially in Asian countries–cigarettes are handed out in the street like candy. The restrictions on tobacco marketing in these countries is years behind anything we see in the U.S.
I sure hope this film gets a lot of play, a lot of attention.
How is it being promoted? Any notable engagements? Award possibilities?
I was shocked when the spectchromagrpah studies of cigarette ingredients came out and we learned that vanilla, lemon and sugare were used.
American Spirit cigarettes were oncea smal tobacco company has been absorbed by one of the larger companies. Weirdly, they make “organic” tobacco cigs–but those still have the industry-wide “FSC” fire safe chemicals in them. ICK!
Our country was founded on tobacco. Go to Washington D.C. and look at the congressional hall. At the top of the columns are tobacco leaves. Look inside congress’ chambers. On the desks there are tobacco leaves. I’m not saying that it was wrong to found a country on a product like tobacco. I’m just saying it ‘s about time we move on.
We open this Wednesday Dec 14 at Film Forum in NYC.
1/13 Los Angeles
1/20 Berkeley and San Francisco
1/27 Philadelphia and San Diego
2/3 Washington, DC, Denver and Seattle
2/24 Boston
3/9 Minneapolis and Atlanta
3/23 St Louis
How have the advance screening been received? Have you made any changes to the film after the initial screening?
How much of Victor is on the cutting room floor? I know there is bonus footage on the website http://www.addictionincorporated.com/video/outtakes/
Will you qualify for Academy nomination for this year?
If you burn natural tobacco without additives like vanilla, etc. it forms over 4000 chemicals. Spirit Tobacco was “natural” because it had no additives. But when you burn it… it still made 4000 chemicals. I don’t know if Spirit has fire suppressing chemicals that they put in other cigarettes, but what does it matter when you’re inhaling 4000 chemicals? It’s probably safer to suck on the exhaust pipe of your car than it is a cigarette. But that’s just my opinion.
We also are working with a grass roots/advocacy public relations company, Young Communications group out of Los Angeles, to bring together the different organizations and communities to come out and support the film. You can goto our website, addictionincorporated.com to see where we will be playing as more cities will be added.
We did apply and unfortunately did not make the short list this year.
Are other industries doing the same type of science to make their products addictive – as Big Tobacco did? Diet drinks wiht artificial sweetners can suppress the “I’m sated” response in the brain, resulting the consumer consuming more…
One of the chemicals I noticed on the list was “heliotrop-somehting” is that related to the plant helitrope, and what does it do to the brain?
Do smokeless tobaccos has as many chemicals? I know they can lead to jaw and head cancers.
just trimmed a couple of minutes before the FILM FORUM premiere. Like a haircut before going out in public.
There are over 35 minutes of cut scenes that are not in the film.
Charles, Charmaine, are you on the festival circuit at all?
The film has been well received by the audiences in NY, SF and LA where we have shown. It’s interesting how much people don’t know or do know, but didn’t piece together the way we have, for them, in this film. Everyone knows someone who smokes or smokes themselves, so it’s gotten great attention and promotion from those who have seen it. People leave the theater wanting to know more and share it with friends.
We have made a few small yet important changes that make the film flow better than during that initial screening. However, the story that was there is the same story that is there now.
Drugs like nicotine, cocaine, etc. produce a brain addiction. When you talk about things like chocolate, gambling, sex, etc. these addiction s are learned. They can still destroy your life but they are not in the same category of chemical addictions. Do other industries add additives that create a craving for their product? The answer is absolutely yes. But that does not qualify as an a chemical addiction. We learn to like these products. Drugs that are ingested into our body change the way your brain works, and that’s very different from a learned experience.
We are not, we did try for a few of the large ones, but the film wasn’t in the shape it is now. We may still try to show in festivals in Europe out of competition because there is an interest there as well.
Spit tobacco is broken down in your mouth by saliva and the chemicals that are formed are the same chemicals as if you were smoking a cigarette. They are absorbed by the skin in your mouth and transported to the blood stream. Once they are in your body, they have the same effect as a cigarette or cigar. Using spit tobacco is no safer than using any other tobacco product.
Please goto our website addictionincorporated.com and tell your friends about it. And keep checking the site because if we haven’t booked your city, we may.
What about nicotime gum and lozenges?
Is Victor doing talks overseas, internationally? Will the film be shown internationally?
I know that I fell into the trap of “light” cigarettes. I finally did quit, but it was probably the hardest thing I’ve ever done in my life. Over 10 years later I still get an occasional craving… I know people who’ve kicked both heroin and tobacco, and it seems to be a toss-up which addiction is worse to quit, with tobacco maybe edging out heroin. This film should be required viewing in every school in the country, and shown widely either in theaters or on network and cable TV.
Charles, Charmaine, could you explain a bit about the ABC “Day One” story on Big Tobacco, the libel suit by the tobacco companies, the settlement and ABC’s apology to PM and RJReynolds? It was a pretty chilling moment for journalism
And don’t you also run the risk of oral cancer instead of lung cancer?
In drug addiction, the faster something gets into your brain, the more addictive it is. Lozenges and gum are absorbed very slowly. So it’s extremely unlikely that they will cause addiction. It’s also unlikely that they will help addiction. Think about it this way–If you’re snorting cocaine and somebody gives you a patch of cocaine, are you still addicted to cocaine? They answer is yes. The way it enters your body doesn’t matter. The fact is–it enters your brain.
Victor you made some public service announcement commercials. Will you being doing any more?
Victor has only decided to work in the United States because this is where he lives. We are working on showing the film internationally and have had some interest abroad.
In fact, we are working with the 15th World conference on tobacco or health in Singapore to show the film there next year.
I never smoked. I always wondered why doctors would prescribe the same drug for people trying to de-tox from that drug.
In the mid 1990′s, studies were done with people who were addicted to multiple drugs–heroine, cocaine, anphetamine, cigarettes. The overwhelming result was that people could give up everything but cigarettes. It was the hardest addiction to beat. AS far as light cigarettes go–they legally can’t use the word light. And in typical tobacco industry fashion, they now use the word “mild.” What a bunch of BS is that…
Yes–oral cancer instead of lung cancer. But there’s good news and bad news. Lung cancer survivors last about 5-7 years. Oral cancer–less than a year. It’s very aggressive.
Can the brain be retrained? I know that I’ve found some help with “dopa-bean” (Mucuna pruriens), exercise and water–though there are times after a meal–because of cigarettes’ effect on insulin, that I really CRAVE a smoke…
It was a very chilling moment for journalism and in fact we have the journalist and producer involved in that “Day One” story in our film. It showed how much influence the tobacco companies had or have. They were successful in shutting down that particular show, but it was too late, the story was out.
But folks are turning to that REALLY revolting habit (have y’all ever watched anyone spitting into a nasty cup? EEEWWW) thinking that at least they won’t get lung cancer. And there are smoking bans everywhere, so if you’re hooked… The dearth of information or PSAs about chewing tobacco or snuff is horrifying. (Full disclosure, I work for an ENT practice… If not for HIPAA I could show you pictures that would curl your hair.)
I think Victor’s life is a public service announcement talking to over 350,000 people a year, mostly kids giving them the information they need to be able to make a decision with the facts.
Was there pressure during this time by Lobbyists to stop the FDA investigations, Congressional investigations? Your film?
Yes the brain can be retrained–but with drug addiction it has to be detoxified. Once you are a drug addict, you are a drug addict for the rest of your life. It doesn’t mean you’re on the drug, but it means your brain remembers how to be addicted. There are lots of natural remedies and some may work for some people. The data isn’t clear. But in my mind, it’s like chicken soup. It may not help, but it certainly won’t hurt. Whatever works, works.
You’re absolutely right. The tobacco industry is using spit tobacco as a “safe alternative.” IN my lectures to kids, I emphasize, there is no safe alternative. There are only alternative diseases.
I dont know if there was pressure during this time by Lobbyists to stop the FDA investigations, Congressional investigations.
As far the film, we have been under the radar. Have you seen our one sheet?
Thank you so much for having us. We really appreciate your support.
Please goto addictionincorporated.com to find out more
To everybody who chimed in, thank you so much. I appreciate your support and all your interest in this topic. It’s timely and it has the potential to save lives. Thank you from me–Victor, and from the producers and directors of Addiction Inc.
Cheers-Victor
Also for press materials you can goto:
http://www.variancefilms.com/addictionpress.html
What are your upcoming projects?
Thank you so much for being here tonight! This has been a really exciting and inspiring discussion, and we appreciate it so much. And we appreciate you making Addiction Incorporated–and Victor, you so rock. Thank you!
Thank you Charles, Charmine and Victor for being here, and firepups/firebaggers, thnak you. Please check out http://www.addictionincorporated.com/events/ for screenings in your area.
Next week we have HOT COFFEE a look at how a spilled cup of hot coffee has affected the legal system. Please join us!
YOu can view the trailer here
I’m currently working on directing a short and always reading scripts, looking for the next project. Actually found a book, I’m trying to get the rights to.
My sister is in a nursing home with COPD. Pretty sad. I stopped at 32. What a dirty activity promotes gum disease, bad breath, pollutes with second hand smoke, dirty ash trays, fires lung disease and cost a lot of money.
Very good post!