Just as Norm Coleman and other relatively progressive — or at least pragmatic — Republicans try to reassure Latino voters that the GOP isn’t stuffed stem-to-stern with lily-white bigots cowering in fear of skins browner than theirs, Michele Bachmann has to go harsh their mellow by visiting Joe Arpaio for the second time this year (h/t Bluestem Prairie):
The gentlewoman from Minnesota’s Sixth Congressional District can’t get enough of Sheriff Joe, returning to Arizona for a visit yesterday, MSNBC reports in Bachmann courts ‘America’s toughest sheriff’:
If you’re running for president, how do you convince supporters you are tough enough on immigration? Get the endorsement of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America whose uncompromising stand on illegal immigration is a point of pride.
On Wednesday Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann was the latest Republican presidential candidate hoping for Arpaio’s backing.
She met in Phoenix with the Republican sheriff, whose endorsement is frequently sought by candidates in all types of races across the country.
Arpaio said he hasn’t yet decided which candidate he will back in the GOP primary race. . .
The network reports that Bachmann didn’t answer questions about whether she supports SB1070. However, last year Immigrants List cited her support for the bill, Andy Birkey reported in Group inducts Bachmann into the Immigration Hall of Shame:
5. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) — The potential presidential candidate has a history of inflammatory statements which go along with her outlandish voting record. She’s spread the widely-debunked rumor that Phoenix is “the kidnap[ping] capital of the United States,” using that myth to justify her support for an armed presence on the border. She’s advocates Arizona SB 1070, and told Bill O’Reilly that all local law enforcement should be required to ask for proof of immigration status. Bachmann chairs the House Tea Party Caucus.
Bachmann also visited California on her trip out west, but it seems that her timing left a bit to be desired from the California Republican Party’s viewpoint:
The conservative Bachmann, who counts evangelical Republicans, home-school advocates and members of the tea party movement among her supporters, stops over on the same weekend the state party considers rewriting its platform in what supporters call an attempt to broaden the party’s appeal, especially with Hispanics and independents.
Moderates want to push the party toward the center on immigration, guns and gay rights. The proposed changes — opposed by the party’s conservative wing — retreat from opposition to same-sex adoption, domestic partner benefits and child custody, avoid any mention of overturning Roe v. Wade and drop demands to end virtually all federal and state benefits for illegal immigrants and establish English as the official language of government.
Yeah, I can see where a visit from the head of the House Tea Party Caucus, and a crushie of Joe Arpaio, might throw a spanner in the CA GOP’s works — especially with plans like these:
The party is also planning to outline a new effort to recruit Latino voters, an acknowledgment of the state’s changing face. Hispanics accounted for about 80 percent of the increase in registered voters in the state over the last decade and the weak showing of GOP candidates in recent statewide races has been attributed, at least in part, to a lack of Hispanic support.
Oops.



19 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Morning, PW.
Good morning, everyone! And how are you all today?
Hello, econobuzz! How are things buzzing with you?
I’m vertical — that’s a relief.
Great line.
The GOP’s attitude towards Latinos and towards immigration in general is interesting. They like to demagogue against it as a way to get votes as an updated form of the Southern Strategy — being that openly demagoguing against Latino immigrants is somewhat more “respectable” than openly demagoguing against black people nowadays — yet their major financial backers like having lots and lots of cheap undocumented labor to exploit; they don’t want it legal because then the immigrant workers couldn’t be used as clubs against non-immigrant workers, but they don’t want the enforcement efforts to be more than just for show as truly cutting off all undocumented workers would also force them to (gasp!) hire homegrown workers at living wages. That’s why Lamar Smith’s e-verify bill’s going nowhere.
Great analysis. We have a labor force of undocumented workers because the money people want it that way. Georgia just ran off some thousands of them with a too harsh law just passed. All the moans and groans could be heard to Mexico.
Our esteemed Governor Deal came up with a solution to avoid paying living wages to locals — hire out prison labor! You gotta love it./s
Anyone who thinks the Republicans don’t hate brown people has their head up their ass. Half of the Repugs want them for cheap, exploitable labor. (that’s the corporate side) The other half wants them all gone. Either deported or dead. (that’s the “christian” side)
Of course, both sides hate and fear them.
Indeed. In fact, I’m guessing that the example of Georgia, with crops rotting in the fields due to the lack of cheap labor (or rather the unwillingness of farmers to pay a living wage), has hit home with many of them.
The republican party wants cheap labor. That is the reason for their outsourcing of jobs. They create an environment of people desperate for jobs. This has been going on since the founding of this country. When wages in the U.S. match that of China then we will see so many jobs a crap wages. Meanwhile they will keep using the illegals. To appease their base they hate them talking out of both sides of their mouth so to speak.
They are just about there
http://www.gpb.org/news/2011/09/17/median-male-workers-income-lower-than-in-1973
The report blames education. Not so.
According to local news reports, Michele Bachmann snuck into Marin County (90% Gore in 2000) for a $100 a plate event at a private home.
The comments below the article are a good indicator of the local political climate for the GOP.
When can we just be able to say, ‘These people are just small-minded, ignorant bigots..’
…I would not hire these people to run my local ‘Micky-Ds’.
..Why in the H@## , would I want any of them running my State, Country or World???
…The only reason these people get to ‘run’ everything is because ‘Money’ talks, blackmail works and people are greedy/or scared… :(
Yeah let the free market take care of it. /s
The bar is so lo for Presdient thes daz.
(We’re like the world’s retarded cousins who won’t take off the cowboy jammies)
She was a TAX Collector
On the topic the mentally retardeds, political purity and party splits…
Totally Meghan McCain re-debuts at Redstate: Why Rick Perry Cannot and Also Can’t Win Being the President
Norm Coleman, “progressive”? Ah, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!! thanks for leading the article with a good laugh. It makjes it easier to digest. Good article, BTW.
Well, she did say that Stormin’ Norman was relatively progressive. In today’s Reprivatican Party, that simply means he’s slightly more centrist than Vlad the Impaler.