This week we got two more examples of a government that can’t remember how to function. Fed Chair Ben Bernanke can’t understand why consumers aren’t spending. Enforcement Chief Robert Khuzami of the SEC can’t figure out how to hold people accountable for securities fraud.
Naughty Consumers
Bernanke gave a speech in Minnesota on the state of the economy. It was substantially the same as the one he gave in Jackson Hole last month, but in Minnesota, Bernanke added a long paragraph chiding consumers:
One striking aspect of the recovery is the unusual weakness in household spending. … The temporary factors I mentioned earlier–the rise in commodity prices, which has hurt households’ purchasing power, … are partial explanations for this deceleration. But households are struggling with other important headwinds as well, including the persistently high level of unemployment, slow gains in wages for those who remain employed, falling house prices, and debt burdens that remain high for many, notwithstanding that households, in the aggregate, have been saving more and borrowing less. Even taking into account the many financial pressures they face, households seem exceptionally cautious. Indeed, readings on consumer confidence have fallen substantially in recent months as people have become more pessimistic about both economic conditions and their own financial prospects. [My bold.]
He sees some problems, but he can’t understand why people who don’t have those problems aren’t spending more. We know why: it’s because all of us but the rich are scared that things won’t get better. We know that Obama and Congress intend to cut Social Security and Medicare to avoid taxing the rich fairly. We know we need to get out of debt and build up whatever savings we can. We know our kids are facing a miserable future, and we need to accumulate money so we can help them all their lives.
I wouldn’t expect him to empathize with the fears we all feel, partly because he believes in the school of economics that says people are rational decision-makers, and partly because he and his family and his friends are insulated from these pressures. But I would expect him to have an intellectual understanding. This bit, from John Maynard Keynes’ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (p. 130) should help:
Even apart from the instability due to speculation, there is [market] instability due to the characteristic of human nature that a large proportion of our positive activities depend on spontaneous optimism rather than mathematical expectations, whether moral or hedonistic or economic. Most, probably, of our decisions to do something positive, the full consequences of which will be drawn out over many days to come, can only be taken as the result of animal spirits – a spontaneous urge to action rather than inaction, and not as the outcome of a weighted average of quantitative benefits multiplied by quantitative probabilities.
Animal spirits, Mr. Bernanke. Frightened people don’t act rationally.
Naughty Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Dealbook at the New York Times tells us about the latest SEC fail.
The proposed agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the terms being discussed, would include no monetary penalty or admission of fraud, according to several people briefed on the case.
…
The agency is specifically looking at the way [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] reported their subprime mortgage portfolios and concentrations of loans extended to borrowers who offered little documentation.
Specific human beings at Fannie and Freddie lied, but no one goes to jail for securities fraud, no one pays any money, and no one is even sanctioned. This isn’t even a slap on the wrist; it’s a bald admission that the SEC is impotent.
Mary Schapiro, Chair of the SEC, and Robert Kuhzami must think that corporations like Fannie and Freddie are persons, and that they, and not the humans who work there, are the only actors. They ignore black letter law that the corporate shield does not protect officers, directors and employees from criminal liability. That rule is basic to an understanding of personal accountability in a bureaucratic world. Peterr reminds us of the words of Justice Jackson in the Nuremberg Trials:
Of course, the idea that a state, any more than a corporation, commits crimes, is a fiction. Crimes always are committed only by persons. While it is quite proper to employ the fiction of responsibility of a state or corporation for the purpose of imposing a collective liability, it is quite intolerable to let such a legalism become the basis of personal immunity.
The Charter [Articles 7 and 8] recognizes that one who has committed criminal acts may not take refuge in superior orders nor in the doctrine that his crimes were acts of states. … Under the Charter, no defense based on either of these doctrines can be entertained. Modern civilization puts unlimited weapons of destruction in the hands of men. It cannot tolerate so vast an area of legal irresponsibility.
Indeed. The people who worked for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wielded financial unlimited weapons of destruction. The SEC ignores Justice Jackson and allows them to act without legal responsibility.
Mary Schapiro, Robert Khuzami and Ben Bernanke should look to the past for help understanding how to do their jobs.





54 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Cannot look to the past. Only looking to the future allowed. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be able to see how much more wonderful life is in the future.
There are 3 refs to Keynes in Bernanke’s book of essays on the depression.
Two are identical; some advice Keynes gave Brits about returning to gold standard after WWI. The third had to so with the esoteric argument about whether real wages should or shouldn’t go up or down during depression.
There is no reference, repeat NO reference to fiscal policy nor animal spirits in the index.
Bernanke is stupider than a bag full of stones.
Besides his shamefully abysmal “work” on the depression, Bernanke has been taken in by the widespread recognition that U.S. consumer ALWAYS spends, no matter what. Housing & consumer spending have ALWAYS led the way out recessions in the past. They’ll do so again regardless of the headwinds. Or so they say.
The wolves never left the chicken coop, and have continued to have chicken for supper every night. Farmer Obama just keeps putting new chickens in to replenish those that have “mysteriously” disappeared.
There is no answer as to how to clean up this mess, because all the actors are part of the game. We, the audience, are made to think that there are some white hats amongst them. Reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act? Not with the congress of today nor this president? Put in regulations about revolving door employment with enforcement similar to what the DOD has? Don’t hold your breath. Outlaw Credit Default Swaps and other derivatives? Good luck on trying to get that to happen. Remember TARP, the Toxic Asset Reduction Program, where a lot of the bad stuff was supposed to be bought up and removed from circulation? How much was removed? Nothing.
I don’t think that more than 3 in 100 Americans learned anything from the collapse, because we’ve been fed a line of BS and we wanted to beleive it. Happy days just around the corner. Free market will save us. Sure.
I have always wanted to believe that Obama knew what he was doing. But time after time the only way I can believe that is to accept that the results he achieved were actually what he wanted. Yet in 14 months we may chose someone who will be even more shameless than Obama.
To me, this is more than disappointing, it is the reflection of our inability to govern, a fecklessness that has overtaken us. Here we are with 25 million unemployed and yet we can find nothing, nothing more to do than blame consumers for not spending, or demand more tax cuts for corporations who are moribund and unable to act. Heaven help us if the banks should lose a little money on their fucking liar mortgages that might actually help someone or that one of them should be put in jail. Our elite nobles do nothing but demand more from the public till and plot to spend millions more to have their way. And both political parties are controlled by those elites. Aw fuck it.
Household spending, like hiring, is being held back by Regulatory Uncertainty™. /s
I think that the classic housing model is broken. With the continued downward drive of wages, yet the continued upward trend in housing, fewer and fewer Jane and Joe Citizens will be able to afford housing. Perhaps a drive for more housing like “Extended Stay”, the modern equivelent to the boarding house of old, will have to occur.
Now I live in an area where any real turnaround in the housing market is projected at probably five or more years in the future, so my perspective is biased in that manner.
“…but he can’t understand why people who don’t have those problems aren’t spending more. We know why: it’s because all of us but the rich are scared that things won’t get better.”
WRONG!
People are spending because they don’t have any fucking money. Most families now are living from paycheck to paycheck, and they’re in debt up to their necks. Millions don’t have jobs, millions have part time jobs, millions have McShit jobs that don’t pay squat.
And people wonder why they aren’t spending? Morons
Bernanke’s suggestion he doesn’t know why consumer spending is weak suggests he is the only person in the world who doesn’t. Then he goes on with the confidence fairy stuff. First off why should people have confidence when the great high priest of money proves himself so stupid by not understanding consumer spending.
On a far more fundamental basis this embrace of confidence as the economic driver is stupid. That Bernake does not know that expanding credit is what drives the economy and that it is money flowing which produces confidence is shameful. While the politicians in the White House have latched onto this stupid new age confidence mumbo jumbo is understandable it is unforgivable from the Fed chairman. There is no doubt in my mind he is adopting this as a defense. ‘Hey, it isn’t my fault’ he is saying.
Confidence in the Fed and the politicians and business and the media is fading to nothing. It is an emperor has no clothes period now. From such a place a dislocation is quite probable.
Part of the founding fathers’ scheme was to make sure “voters” had only 3 choices (not voting is the 3d), as a way of manipulating people into thinking they had a choice to keep them pacified. There have been no major policy diffs bet parties in U.S. history, though there have been some great rivalries bet them. That’s how King of the Mountain is played.
Of course traditional model is broken. Anyone can see that, except the ones in charge of U.S. econ policy.
I guess you’re saying that you can’t have robust sales if everyone is fucking poor and millions don’t work at all.
Blame the victim is another tool the PTB use to escape responsibility when their rapacious policies have badder than expected consequences for voters. So now “workers aren’t prepped for great jobs that are really out there.” Wonder what the workers did in the last decade (unemployment 4% at end of Clinton) to get themselves unprepared…
I am not a lawyer but what am I missing here?
Article II Section 3
..he (president) shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,..
Big Ben is the high priest of Wall Street. Just listen to CNBC. He has learned his trade well and speaks shit whenever someone pushes his button. He knows what to say. But in the end he is fucking helpless. It takes the treasury to make a difference and that is controlled by, well, the other assholes of our government.
And everyone who has a job and isn’t solidly in management is worried that the job will disappear at any time.
Bernanke isn’t worried about that, either. But he should be.
eCAHN, they didn’t think we’d even have political parties. That lasted, oh, about three years, I think.
When was the last time anyone in the oval office paid any attention to the law.
Makes you wonder, was there ever a time?
3 years is close enough to the beginning to attribute the 2 party “system” to the ff.
The restrictions they imposed on demockracy earlier were a lot more severe to be sure. Only RWM could vote, etc.
I just finished reading Zinn. Lots of material so I can’t remember it all infallibly. But he does present a lot of evidence when prezes paid no attention to laws that were inconvenient at the time.
Our savings are being hollowed out by the real inflation our pseudo-government won’t acknowledge, while both corporate Parties intend to get all bipartisany and kill off poor, sick and age challenged folk while stealing by “strengthening”TM. And bin Bernanke’s worried we’re not spending enough? Who’s we? Maybe he should tell the fabulously wealthy to spend their ill gotten gains, pull their heads out of their banking casinos and create some old fashioned demand by buying American made.
The Fed and the SEC
Disappoint Yet Againare fully compromised and incapable of self correctingI posted on this over at Naked Capitalism, but beyond Ben’s Ivory Tower approach (“Why won’t these peasants buy cake?”), he also totally ignores the role of our “elites” in INSPIRING any kind of confidence.
How are hundreds of millions of Americans supposed to feel confident when everyone in power denigrates their unemployment, blames the worker for a “skills deficit” instead of corporate masters for a “vision deficit”, refuses to prosecute a single banker who broke the world economy, and spends months and months wailing about Social Sec and Medicare, as though these teensy life supports had anything whatsoever to do with the Economic Collapse?
Americans are rightly scared out of their wits, since it seems both the politicos and oligarchs are not just winning, but stomping their boots on the faces of the middle class.
I am retired but live a fairly austere life only buying what is necessary. Not because I have to but because I have chosen to. I see no point or reason to spend my money on anything that I don not really need.
Overpriced and generally poor quality goods that I have little use for.
As to following the law. Remember to that after WWII no only did we ignore the laws concerning Nazi fugitives, we hired a large number of them to do our dirty work for us. Because they were so adept at doing so,
I agree.
Next step would be revolt.
I keep watching for signs that such a spontaneous movement is gathering but don’t see anything much yet. WI demonstrations & VZ strike were 2 small signs but don’t seem to have accomplished much & momentum doesn’t seem to be gathering.
I’m in deacquisition stage. Got waaay to much junk. A lot of it is high quality but I no longer need it.
So far only minor stuff like books I won’t read again. Did give away 14 (!!!) board games a couple of weeks ago.
Oh an I am not the only one I know who is living like this now.
There are a whole bunch of average people, maybe as many as 25% of the population, who have little or no debt, maybe a house mortgage they can afford. They aren’t spending either, and for some of the reasons I mentioned. Bernanke can’t imagine that. What a maroon.
That is simply amazing. I can’t imagine writing a brief and ignoring a Supreme Court opinion on the subject. I can’t imagine publishing a physics paper that didn’t mention related papers, regardless of the outcome of those papers.
It’s one more piece of evidence that economics isn’t at all scientific.
Absolutely right. I assume that if Jamie Dimon or Jeffrey Immelt want something, it will hurt me and people I care about and just about everyone besides them.
You can’t run a country if there government, corporations and private institutions are greedy and corrupt.
I was planning on reading all the essays then writing it up as a diary. I’ve tried to read them twice but have only gotten thru 2-3 out of 8-9. They are so abysmally bad, I just can’t waste my time on them.
But even the abridged version tells you all you need to know about him, and about a bunch of other stuff, like a reflection on Krugman who supported him initially. And on what’s going on at “top” academic institutions.
Making a conspiracy nut out of me. How can someone who does such abysmal work get to be head of Princeton’s economics dept. Makes one go wild with speculation.
Any grammar smarties on here? Is the following sentence correct?
“This week we got two more examples…”
We got does not sound correct; it seems it should be we have. ‘We got’ sounds terrible to me :D
The picture above is in the Palazzo Pubblico in Siena, Italy. I probably won’t need the companion pieces showing good government and the effects of good government, but they are equally beautiful. I’m about 33 miles away from it.
Originally I wrote: “This week we were slapped in the face by”. That is the sense of the word “got” to me.
I’m not a grammar nerd and I hear ya.
I think in this case it’s actually correct usage
as the past tense for ‘have’.
As in ‘This (past) week, we got…’
One of those strange exceptions that sounds
odd to the ear.
The Obama appointee wants to blame the victims, just as GOP blames homeowners for the bank’s fraudulent mortgage fraud.
The idea that those of us with little to no debt should do what everyone else did and are now paying for is pretty repulsive to me. Most of the people who were savers or went on low debt to income ratios are always going to act in that manner consistently (it’s our nature)and Bernanke is ridiculous to assume otherwise. After watching people lose their homes when the housing market and financial markets imploded and took just about everything with it, what incentive is there to leverage “potential future earnings?” Why would we suddenly need a bunch of stuff we avoided buying in the first place with cash on hand? Most of us aren’t afraid, but we aren’t stupid either.
“You can’t run a country …”
No, but you sure as hell can ruin a country “… if the government, corporations, and private institutions are greedy and corrupt.”
Especially, massaccio, if certain basic principles, like the rule of law , the social contract, and the fundamental necessity of CREATING actual wealth (which, as an old economist told me, many moons ago, comes ONLY from resourses and what people do with them), are ignored and ridiculed. And decidedly so, if those three entitites control the information available to the people, from the “news” to “education”.
Particularly, if most things those three entities would rather were not known, then “secrecy” and “National Security” are a mighty handy things …
Even more so if the “national” cultural myths preclude rational thought and discussion of how such greed and corruption comes about.
DW
Yeah, we know about that like torture maybe?
LOL…Slapped in the face sounds appropriate.
At times like this, I like to remind people that CNN regularly features an economics professor or two from Harvard who are, well, like a bag of rocks.
I think it is fine. I also think Hemingway liked that word.
Isn’t ‘had’ the past tense for ‘have’?
Hi DW. You better stop with that “two plus two equals four” business.”
Yeah.
14th amendment, allegedly to make citizens out of slaves, was used to make corps into people, thru property clause.
Now when is Dred Scott rereversed, making people back into property, like congress, the prez, economics profs, etc etc etc.
I would very much appreciate your take on my theory that the reason we are witnessing so many seemingly irrational and self-destructive actions by big business and our political leaders re the U.S. is because they do not expect their future to be here, but rather in the fast-growth developing areas like Asia, i.e., why do proper maintenance on America when you are planning to leave it by the roadside soon and get a new vehicle? I think everything we are seeing makes perfect rational sense if the giant corps are following that strategy. And, if so, then isn’t our only hope to scare them into accelerating their departure before they suck every drop of capital out of this economy, so we can rebuild from within? (I asked this of you yesterday in a different thread, but I don’t know whether you came back to see it.)
I’m tending to think of what large corps are doing as simple looting. They prolly are thinking that 3d world markets might fill in the demand gap, and, who knows, maybe they’ll prove right.
The Gilded Age saw a similar situation of excess supply in the U.S. as monopolies expanded supply beyond the ability of U.S. market to absorb it. So U.S. military went overseas to conquer territory for customers for U.S. biz.
Were depressions back then too, but 1%ers came out just fine.
I agree, rc, it is an “end game” the MOTU are “playing” … but they have not perceived just how BIG an end is involved.
The MOTU and TPTB imagine thast they can continue on, pillaging as they have been, but without the MICC, the military might to do as they damn please, they will just be “players” who can be eaten for lunch just like they devour others.
So the military machine has to be maintained, somehow, and if it is bogged down controlling a sullen American “public”, then it will not be able, even with drones and the CIA, to exert the kind of “control” ranging from “fine” detail “work” like assassinating democratic leaders to the blanket “country building” so beloved by the neocons and the resulting “opportunities” so beloved by the neoliberals … America’s wealth production “capacity” lies, now, primarily in its ability to produce FOOD, should the environmental collapse continue apace with the collapse of civil society then Old Mother nature and Old Father Time will have the last laughs …
As skdadl long ago put it, those who “believe” that they “run” things “are too clever by half”.
DW
right-o, grammar smarty.
I was speaking loosely.
Thanks for your response. I’m not one to casually dismiss the notion that pirates might be short-sighted, but I feel very strongly that there are some very good long-term planners among the PTB (especially these last 30 years), and I don’t think they are operating without a strategy beyond the endgame for this market. Why ignore the multi-billion consumer markets developing in Asia, with future middle-classes that can consume at a high rate and produce high rates of growth for the corporations? I don’t think they are ignoring them, I think they are in the midst of making that transition right now.
Agreed, however, other markets will still require the use of military power unless you postulate some other means of “effective sausion”.
I have long held that a trillion dollars, spent or stolen, can be just destructive as a bombing campaign … suppose instead of bombing Iraq and Afghanistan … and sending in the troops, we had just dropped tons of money on the people, instaed of funneling it to certain “ones”, politcian$, “theirs” and “ours” … actually the Masters did both, but the politicans are beholden to the Masters and not the people from whom it was stolen, a “two-fer”?
The American/Brit/European MOTU are merely Oligarchs, now, no more powerful ultimately than the ruthlessness they may, collectively, employ.
Are the Russian Oligarchs, who are at least as well-connected to their government’s “apparatus”, from “intelligence” to the military, to “sausion”, as are those America can boast, and the Chinese, are they any less inscrutable?
It is likely, as you suggest, that the Masters imagine they have little use for the American public, the American “electorate” … but still the Masters are playing the media to play the people and the nail-biting questions about Obama, “Will he make it? Or will he lose?” continue, along with, “Look at Perry’ ain’t he cute?”
The Masters yet have need of the American dupes.
The long-term plans demand it.
;~DW
I cling to my thesis, I feel in my gut that it is correct, and the patterns that I am able to observe support it, they do not refute it. That said, I am describing a transition process that would take at least a decade or two, a dynamic process, and I see no impediments in the facts asserted by you that cannot be transformed over time. E.g., consider that the American military would become much less of a necessity for the MOTU if they gained thru monetary means political control over a bloc of govts in a region. We have never witnessed massive change in the hyper-technological era, and I can only expect that manipulation and control of the population and institutions of any global region are much more easily achieved using the tools which are available now but were not during past eras of massive change. I guess we’ll see, but I think this bears further discussion on future threads. For now, I’m off to bed. A good night to you, my friend, and to all our comrades here.
Priesthood of a false religion.
Why should it surprise anyone that the SEC is (still) utterly ineffectual when the person appointed to be its head was always (when she was the head of the NASD—now, FINRA), and still is, a captive of the industry.
Mary Schapiro was, and always will be, a fox (no, far from that kind) guarding the hen-house.