Two things have been crystal clear from the outset in the Obama Administration:
1. Banksters cannot be held accountable for anything no matter how awful, no matter how criminal, because that would interfere with the all-important financial sector and murder the confidence fairy.
2. The government won’t enact any programs that would actually help homeowners who have been destroyed by the housing crisis, because that might mean that banksters would have to take losses.
As to point 1, Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner told then New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo not to prosecute banksters for fraud, because it would kill the Confidence Fairy. Then we found out about the Obama Administration plan for coping with the biggest case of fraudulent banking ever. Paul Krugman saw it as a muddle through plan: “… hoping that the banks can earn their way back to health.” Krugman didn’t like the plan, and it was just one more time Krugman was right and for the right reasons. Now as dday explains, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan has joined the rest of the Obama Administration in assaulting representatives of the public who stand up to the banksters.
As to point 2, Obama refused to work the Congress to pass cramdown, letting the banksters win, despite his campaign promises. He and Geithner pushed hard for the useless HAMP, a total failure, as Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for TARP said in a report late last year. Now 30 months into his term the Obama Department of Justice has made it perfectly clear that no banksters were guilty of anything. None! It beggars the imagination that this decision was made without even the pretense of a real investigation, and in the face of reports of wire fraud, mortgage fraud and securities fraud, and fraud on state courts around the nation, reports prepared by special commissions, bankruptcy examiners, and congressional committees.
The Department of Justice and the SEC have both voluntarily surrendered to the banksters as Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story explain. These flabby agencies decided that they were too tough on corporate criminals, so they decided not to do their own investigations, but to rely on the criminals to investigate themselves and report to the feds. In the case of the SEC, the report itself might be punishment enough.
Our federal government has given up on law enforcement. Now we find out that not only are the Feds ignoring their own responsibility to protect us from corporate criminals, they are actively discouraging State Attorney Generals from conducting their own investigations and prosecutions. Among other administration officials, Shaun Donovan, the Secretary of HUD, is pressuring Eric Schneiderman to drop his investigation into the foreclosure fraud, and to agree to release the banks and their employees from criminal liability in exchange for a few billion dollars. They want the State AGs to stop investigating, and to settle before they understand the full scope of wrong-doing.
Hey, it’s good enough for the SEC and the Department of Justice. Screw the American People. Except for the Corporate People.




76 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
O’s pretty funny by now. Gone out of his way to piss off everyone who might consider voting for him.
1. Seniors
2. Unions
3. Progressives
4. Anti-wars
5. Environmentalists
6. Blacks
Who’m I missing? Young voters?
http://my.firedoglake.com/realitychecker/2011/08/20/fleshies/ Corporations are persons, Mas. The rest of us are just “fleshies.”
Well #6, it will get even worse.
Wait till unemployment for that group gets worse.
Then maybe they will wake up. It don’t matter if you are black or white. The only thing O considers is if you are rich. And the rest aren’t worthy of a consideration – see his policies.
Obama had a pact with Kissinger, The Bush Family, Dick Cheeney, Rumsfeld, Llloyd Blankfein, BOA, Wells Fargo, World Bank, Wolfowitz, Rush Limbaugh, Neil Boortz…
“Our federal government has given up on law enforcement.” Unless you provide medicine to sick people, or engage in passive civil disobedience, or are guilty of being Islamic or Hispanic or African American, or
indigenous to any where BUT Northern Europe. Then you better watch yourself.
With all those folks to imprison, who’s got the room for a few Banksters?
“Our federal government has given up on law enforcement.”
___
With the exception of medical marijuana.
He doesn’t think people in those categories have any place else to go.
This feels like a replay of 1991; that is, it looks like the implosion and collapse of the Soviet Union.
The most important thing that both the 1991 dissolution of the USSR and the teetering of the US have in common is (I hate all-caps, but I have to use it) THE END OF THE RULE OF LAW. That’s it. That’s all. That’s the end. When a certain class of people, whether it is the “nomenklatura” or the FIRE sector(Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate) can lie and rob with *complete* impunity, that version of society is done. As is yours. (I am a Canadian, watching south with growing horror.)
For what reason is there to cooperate in the institutions of society, to accept the responsibilities of a citizen, when a whole class of citizens is no longer accountable, is, in fact, invulnerable to the justice system?
You have institutionalized and even codified torture and indefinite suspension, erased habeas corpus and the necessity to see the evidence and accusers against you, declared entire classes of people immune from prosecution, enabled massive public bribery of public officials, and, quite clearly, have given up on governing, because governing would mean recognizing all of the citizenry of your country, instead of the people who have purchased you. (The “you” here refers to the economic and political elite of the US.)
Without law, even applied to all, there is neither freedom, nor security.
Please note that I do not include in my perspective the 97.5% of Americans who own only 20% of the assets of the country.
Austerity = Anarchy
http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2011/08/10/thomas-jones/austerity-and-anarchy/
Who’m I missing? Young voters?
You’re referring to that block of voters that stays at home no matter who is running or how important its vote is?
they don’t rate being on your list.
“not only are the Feds ignoring their own responsibility to protect us from corporate criminals, they are actively discouraging State Attorney Generals from conducting their own investigations and prosecutions.”
___
Just like their lackeys at the SEC and the CRAs did to protect the unfettered traffic in shit securities.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/michael-hudson-the-case-against-the-credit-ratings-agencies.html
I have personal experience with that. In 2007, at NetRoots Nation, before the D convention, but after it was obvious that O was the candidate (he was making one of his showy speeches in Berlin), I complained to his snot nosed kids at his booth about his FISA vote. They sneered back at me: So what’s your choice?
At 10% turnout in 2012, with O pissing off everyone who might vote for him, and crazy-assed Rs throwing red meat to their crazy-assed wingnuts, I’d say that Perry-Bachman might be a shoo-in.
World wide riots coming in 2013?
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27083/
I think some of them voted in 2008, but he’s giving them no incentive to vote in 2012, esp given that white, as well as blacks in that category have to go back to live with their parents, as pointed out above.
Saw a bit of a snippet on book-tv this past weekend that same thing happened in Japan (nearest model to U.S. econ outlook). Japanese, of course, are blaming the lazy f’g younguns for their own victimization. Another aspect you can look for to happen in U.S.
“Perry-Bachman”
__
:(
An aggregate IQ starting with a decimal point.
http://www.bgladd.com/PerrySuperPAC.jpg
http://www.bgladd.com/DrBachmann.jpg
Your points are valid. How are things going in your neck of the woods? (vis a vis Creep Harper, Con Majority, NDP, Liberal Party, Tar Sands Global Warming)
You’re describing a generational cohort who could just say ‘Oopsie’, you know, like, if they zapped the canary in the microwave, and Mom would like say it was uncalled for.
Canadian, eh? Can you get me in?
So, what’s Snookie up to?
Who’s leading on America’s Got Talent?
Aloha, Ma Cherie…! *g*
It’s amazing how oblivious Obummer really is…! ;-)
I’ve been saying the same thing.
Bachmann brings the bat-shite crazy.
Perry brings … well he’s considered “reasonable”.
Perry/Bachmann 2012. And I would bet on it.
And the scary thing … the PTB want them to win … so they will.
*heh* Perry/Palin…! ;-)
Nailed it.
If I was you folks, I would be really worried.
The tar sands is an environmental catastrophe, and … crickets.
Harper says they need to spend billions on fighter jets, and less on taking care of your people, and … crickets.
And I’ve read two pieces that say your housing bubble is about to SNAP, CRACKLE, AND POP, and … crickets.
Welcome to being the 51st state.
Sorry, no offense meant. Heart-breaking to see you folks are rocketing to our system.
To #16 and #18.
A majority of Canadians dislike and distrust Harper, but their vote was split amongst three parties. The worst thing was that yesterday our Leader of the Opposition, Leader of the NDP (Socialist) party died of cancer. It’ll take a while to get someone in there to oppose Harper.
The only good thing about the US going to hell in a handbasket is that our population is watching, and is resisting following your example (though Harper himself wishes to emulate it).
As for getting in to Canada — join the lineup, a lot of people throughout the world like us a lot. Best chance? Marry a Canadian.
No way hoss.
NO FING WAY!
No one puts Palin in the corner. She’s 99 parts ego, and one part wildlife killer.
No way she takes second string to Perry.
It’s Perry/Bachmann 2012. Remember I said that. I would bet money on it, but I have none. SO how about Monopoly money?
Ain’t that an awesome Analysis…? ;-)
Tis a shame they won’t heed it…!
Santayana must be spinning in his grave…! 8-(
Breaking News:
Goldman CEO Hires Prominent Defense Lawyer
(Reuters) – Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein has hired high-profile Washington defense attorney Reid Weingarten, according to a government source, as the Justice Department continues to investigate the bank.
t was not immediately clear what charges, if any, Blankfein could face personally.
One former federal prosecutor, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said Blankfein may have hired outside counsel after receiving a request from investigators for documents or other information.
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/22/us-goldman-blankfein-idUSTRE77L5VK20110822
Sorry to the Canadians, but moving to Canada is not the answer.
In 10 years they will be the 51st state in all but name.
They are switching/ed to the war is good philosophy.
They are cutting their social programs.
Harper will be cutting corporate/rich taxes AND abolish public-financed campaigns. I wonder how the rich will spend their money?
Even now, they are working behind the scenes to dismantle their public healthcare system and are working to privatize it. Slowly but surely.
Oh ya, their housing bubble is about to burst in the next 2 years. Remind you of any country?
Don’t take my word for it. Google it/do the research.
Most Canadians don’t want it. But did most Americans want what happened here? And Harper has COMPLETE AND ABSOLUTE control of the government. It’s like having the supermajority BUT WITH NO DIN[O/R]. SO they’re all on the same page. Imagine what Rs would do with a super majority.
So please be careful.
Yeah, that’s possible too.
2012 could be an intellectually interesting contest between money & turnout, even while emotionally devastating.
Nothing will happen.
It’s just for show.
They literally own the government.
And worse comes to worse, he can use the Gonzalez defense: “I do not recall”. It worked.
Tuned into a bit of Kagan (forget which one, but it was a Brookings forum) on cspan this weekend. The worst thing he could think of was U.S. losing its global police status by including U.S. military in budgetary cutbacks. All the other panelists were nodding in agreement.
Me 2.
I used to do that. CSPAN, MSNBC, …
But I kept shouting at the TV, “you mofos, you’re driving us off a cliff, and you’re using remote control” kinda stuff.
I mean now days I hear it, and all I can do is laugh, laugh, and laugh some more. I mean it’s ridiculous. Up is down, down is up they say. And then they get “experts” to defend it.
You can’t make this shite up.
Split between 3 parties, BS. I don’t know a thing about Canadian politics, but it strikes me as a naive outsider that the Canadian PTB have had the split all planned in advance. And, like U.S., Canadian voters haven’t a snowball’s chance in hell of getting anything they want.
“If god had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates.”
h/t Howard Zinn.
*heh* If I moved back to Ft. MacMurray, I’m sure I’d be assured of some kind of job, eh…? ;-)
Hey isn’t one of the late night regulars from BC?
I wonder what he thinks about the Canadian system.
It has to be….a pact with the Repubs before the ’08 election to run the weakest pair in history, McCain and his Alaska gal…then run the table. Since W, we know election if only by choice/fiat…wonder who we may see this next time?
When I said bit I meant it. Clicked off as soon as I got Kagan’s talking point.
One thing wingnuts still vastly lord over snivily Ds, is that the former get their talking point out in their first sentence. Saves a lot of time for those of us who want to know what the other side is saying. Ds still trying to hide their agenda with blather.
In Canada, right?
No idea if they have jobs, but you never know.
If you’re already a Canadian citizen, then you could always get a job up there, and at least have 5 years before the PTB gut that economy as well.
My confidence fairy died a slow painful death quite awhile ago.
Besides, only the middle class and the poor commit crimes. s/
“One thing wingnuts still vastly lord over snivily Ds, is that the former get their talking point out in their first sentence. Saves a lot of time for those of us who want to know what the other side is saying. Ds still trying to hide their agenda with blather.”
LMAO. Nailed it.
That’s their edge in our society. They literally memorize a line. ANd then just keep repeating it. It blows my mind that it works. Of course with the corporate media enabling it, of course it works.
Can we please kill the confidence fairy? Pretty please.
It’s not even real. Like trickle down.
I say we bludgeon the confidence fairy. Since it’s a figment of the imagination, it’s not murder.
Ground zero of the Athabasca Tarsands is Ft. McMurray…!
Something Hoover said in 1932
“Nothing is more important than balancing the budget with the least increase in taxes. The Federal Government should be in such position that it will need issue no securities which increase the public debt after the beginning of the next fiscal year, July 1. That is vital to the still further promotion of employment and agriculture. It gives positive assurance to business and industry that the Government will keep out of the money market and allow industry and agriculture to borrow the monies required for the conduct of business. I cannot overemphasize the importance of the able nonpartisan effort being made by the Ways and Means Committee and the Economy Committee of the House whose work are complementary to each other. ”
Obama is following this pretty closely.
At this point, I’d be glad to give their lovely remote waterways a third shot at drowning me lol.
“Our federal government has given up on law enforcement.”
Not true, they’re still prosecuting protestors like Tim DeChristopher, Dan Choi, and Bill McKibben. They’re still going after medical marijuana users. So, if you’re petitioning your government for redress and you’re a bit of pain to the president and his minions, well you must pay for breaking some law, whatever the hell that law is. Or if your state says you can legally have medical marijuana for your chronic medical condition, prescribed by a MD, well the morality police will come and get you. But if you’re a rich, fat nasty bastard banker or other rich person, well the law doesn’t get applied to you for fear of some unseen confidence fairy. Don’t you just love this nation of the rule of law we claim to be, the biggest fucking joke in the world. We are a fucked up nation aren’t we.
The Tea Party was right about Obama. This man cannot be trusted and must not be allowed to accomplish his goals. I truly believe now that he will destroy this country though his incompetence.
I voted for this fool. May god have mercy…
Hey #34. Harper has never had even 40% of the vote. Harper won for the same reason that many Repugs have won, because people in Ontario and British Columbia are seeing the “value” of their homes skyrocketing, and associate their dreams of cashing in on that windfall with their federal government. They will be very surprised when the bubble blows (as I know it will — current house prices are unsupportable. Here in Vancouver a detached house on a 33′x110′lot goes for over $1 million. Try the website http://www.crackshackormansion.com to see how crazy our real estate is.)
Our current leaders, like your current leaders, are neoliberal, Friedmanite scum, but our opposition is stronger, despite our seeming-dictatorship.
The tragedy is that Obama had the whole country behind him when he took office. He could have done great things. It is the lost potential and the lost opportunity that we all mourn. Lack of courage in this case is the same as lack of decency.
Gallup poll issued on Monday”
Mitt Romney leads Obama by two percentage points — 48 percent to 46 percent, when respondents were asked whom they would vote for if the 2012 presidential election were held today.
Rick Perry and Obama are tied at 47 percent.
Obama edges out Texas congressman Ron Paul 47 percent to 45 percent
Obama leads Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann for four percentage points.
Seems you can not piss off all of your base all of the time – but like refusing to see the 800000 drop in the Dem vote in the election of Senator Brown as not being a protest – instead seeing just the result of having a bad female candidate, these polls results will be seen as just reflecting the economy and racism.
I had heard around the time Obama’s election (!) that what causes revolution is not tyranny but failing to deliver on a promise of change, to meet people’s expectation of change for the better.
I’m sorry I cannot link to the source b/c I can’t remember it, but the idea really stuck with me.
Yeppers. My confidence fairy isn’t dead yet, but I think Torture Inc. tore the wings off…
I keep thinking about this little paragraph from Rolling Stone:
Why isn’t Wall Street in Jail by Matt Taibbi
Obama is a complete fraud and is a criminals’ tool. Old news. What people need to be squawking about is the fact that the Democratic Party is mysteriously behind him while pretending not really to be, but ,while, not offering any other choice what so ever. Screw the Dems. They are the same as the Repubs, just not as sickeningly entitled about it.
Dems just keep their mouths shut and let the thugs do their thang. People better wake up and realize we have NOTHING as an option and voting Obama or the Repub’s tool/fool is the same as sitting down and cutting Wall Street a big fat check out of you own account…and much much more.
“The irony is that Obama’s election was presented as a potent symbol of American democracy; the truth is that the two-party system has become a threadbare cover for immense feebleness when it comes to serving the diktat of elite power as opposed to the good of the people. “The most powerful office in the world” would be more accurately referenced as “the most feeble purveyor of elite interests”.
Obama’s presence in the White House indulges a superficial moral/political correctness while the masters whip us all into austere servitude.”
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25853
The entire country pulled together to get Obama his win. We all needed real change more than anything. We have been squeezed year after year. Boomers looking to retire can’t because stagnant wages have led to drowning debt, etc etc. Health care was sucking the financial life force out of the country, and so on. and then Obama turned out to be one of them. Just too happy to serve us up like a ditsy Palin or a half asleep McCain. Screw him. If that’s the best Dems can do, they can take my thirty years of straight ticket Dem voting and stick it right up their asses.
Im ready to vote for just about anybody else. And Im not voting for Obama again NO MATTER WHAT!!
Great post, but exception must be taken to one point. As I have posted repeatedly and will continue to do so, it is NOT the upper 2.5%, or 2%, or even 1% of income earners or wealth holders who primarily benefit from the plutocratic regime. No, the true beneficiaries of the plutocracy are the upper one-tenth, one-hundredth, or one-thousandths of one percent.
This is not a mere quibble, it is politically crucial. If the upper two percent are deemed enemies of the people, the chances of progressive success are nil–the two percent, feeling embattled, will marshal enough resources to be victorious against the progressive onslaught. If, however, the tiny number of true plutocrats are correctly identified and isolated, most of the two percent will identify with, or at least remain neutral, toward the people’s movement.
Not totally right though. Mr. Madoff was the only one who so far got accountability part from 2008 drama so far for obvious reasons. With Matt’s latest article and Sen. Grassley queries we can probably add SEC to the list with its document shredding and track cleaning activities.
If one is really concerned in the clean-up even if it is a mountain high then start scaling the mountain with one step a time. How about S&P for starters for sub-prime mortgage ratings. How about check with some-one like Mr. Spitzer to get a good reference to appoint as head of SEC who will be driven, ethical and smart. So far we have not seen any real steps so far just some sporadic talk of sweeping the mess into the carpet.
If no accountability the whole financial system itself which has become a drama center will wither and shrivel down over time with nobody investing it.
This has now evolved into bankergate. The federal government is meddling in a state attorney general’s investigation using political blackmail and possibly bribery to cover up crimes. Now we need to also investigate the feds to determine their guilt, and see how far up the chain of command it goes — all the way to the president.
So are we going to let him off the hook?
Time to change the Pledge of Allegiance to “With Liberty, and Justice for Some.”
The Bankstergate conspiracy
Obama = Plastic Man
A brief note to the FDL community of writers –
I must share with you guys here the pleasure, not only for myself but for so many others as well, that it has been such a delight to read your thoughtful and well layed out comments that I must say, after 10 years of blogging, I can hardly think of another forum of this quality.
Each blog of course has its own style. Personally I like to blog over at RawStory because it gets vulgar there, and borderline insane, and it is within this madness and vulgarity that I, personally, find refuge. To me a Republican is nothing more then a fascist homophobic rat bastard (which I generally condense into nazi), which, for me, captures the essence of it.
But for sanity, and having both feet on the ground, and appreciating the talents of so many, including Jane (and what top notch person she is) and you guys who blog here – thanks for the entertainment, thoughtfulness and dedication to documenting history.
God-speed that as a society we may recover once again our collective dignity.
Note: I edited this comment and appeared to have lost all formatting on “save edit” – sorry!
Rip Van Holder’s DOJ has become the leading Wall Street bankers’ criminal defense firm. What a deal. All those lawyers defending the banks and paid for by the taxpayers they ripped off.
As my first political science textbook explained, revolution, usually occurs as things are about to get better. Or, Rising Expectations. That’s what brought in Obama – a hope and change expectation. Now we realize that he’s betrayed our hopes and is smirking at us from behind the Chamber Of Commerce and Banker Phalanx.
I send my best energy to Eric Schneiderman. I do believe that as a profession lawyers are fighters at heart. If he has found something to dig his heels into, then may he stay the course. No pressure on earth should or will affect him until there can be justice.
You know what the worse part is…If Obama loses in 2012 we’ll have it 20 times worse under the rubes.. Now THATS scary..
Wait until the “super Committee” an Obama production, cuts the big three. Those numbers are going to take a dive.
Many of us are with you
You have not been listening, no one expects a change if a ‘puke is elected instead of Plastic Man.
As I have said many times to FDL members, I don’t have it so good with Obama now. I remember when Reagan was promoting his “trickle down” theory. My husband and I were so poor…out of jobs with two kids and finally getting minimum wage employment while trying to keep our house. Its not much better now with what I thought would be a new progressive president who would make a change that would benefit all of us. Instead I put in a guy who is going to screw my retirement. For years I have accepted the same rhetoric from the Democrats that “we must keep the majority” so we kept rewarding the same crap who stuck it to us after every election. NOT THIS TIME.
I cannot believe that people in the US or Canada will accept this for very long. I see massive demonstrations and riots coming down the pike . Am I the only one who feels that way???
corporations are persons/people/individuals.
This thought just occurred to me the other day. If the above statement is true and the scotus say it is so. then how long will it be before we have lets say for instance Goldman -Sachs running for POTUS???
This blog is so old and my comment is so very far down the line I doubt anyone will see it much less comment on my comment.
corporations arepeople
Late reader also, just wanted to let you know I read your comment.
Just so you know, Mr Goldman-Sachs is already preznut, see donor list from ’08 election, sorry, no linky, but its out there. He’s been bought and paid for.
Just as a side note, our local rag had a lte (letter to the editor) in today from the head of the democratic party in our state, and he was going on and on about how the dems are saving ss and medicare from the the mean ol repukes. Guess I’ll have to let him have and earful, like it’ll make any difference, they’re all bought and paid for!
Excellent comment, my friend.
If I may turn an old adahge:
“An army marches on its (full) stomach. A revolution marches on an empty one.”
On behalf of rat bastards everywhere, I gotta say that comment really hurt.