
The Lisbon Earthquake, picture from The Earthquake Engineering Online Archive - Jan Kozak Collection: KZ128 (via Wikipedia)
“Father, our heart breaks for America. We see discord at home. We see fear in the marketplace. We see anger in the halls of government, and as a nation we have forgotten who made us, who protects us, who blesses us, and for that we cry out for your forgiveness,” Perry said.
This is how the guy thinks. In a speech in May, he said “I think it’s time for us to just hand it over to God, and say, ‘God: You’re going to have to fix this.” And the fact that he has tremendous support among fundamentalists tells us that many of our fellow citizens think the same way.
It reminds me of a story. On November 1, 1755, there was a terrible earthquake about 150 miles west in the Atlantic. The earth shook for ten minutes in Lisbon, creating fissures 16 feet wide in the city center, and causing the collapse of a number of buildings. The shaking and destruction, coupled with widespread use of candles and cooking fires caused massive fires. Many people ran in fear, and streets were blocked by debris from the fallen buildings so fires could not be extinguished. They continued five days. Meanwhile, many of the survivors rushed to the beach and even boarded boats. When the tsunami came, they were swamped by waves estimated at 20 feet. Perhaps 30,000 people died and many more were injured.
The King of Portugal, Joseph I, and his court had left the city. When he returned and saw the devastation, he was distraught. He turned to his prime minister, Pombal, and asked what he should do. Pombal replied “bury the dead and heal the sick,” perhaps apocryphally.* With this leadership the people of Lisbon began to clean up and rebuild.
Among many others, the Jesuit priests of the community asserted that this disaster was a result of the sins of the populace, and that it portended the second coming of Jesus Christ. This is perhaps understandable. As Susan Nieman* points out, the combination of earthquake, fire and tidal waves could easily be seen as the result of design. That view would have been natural to people steeped in the Old Testament stories treating natural disasters and defeats in wars as a sign of God’s anger at the Chosen People for wandering from His ways. Religious leaders for centuries had made similar claims about other disasters, such as the Black Plague, which seemed plausible in the absence of better explanations.
Nieman describes some of this reaction. “Jesuits had no trouble responding … that the earthquake was God’s reaction to an Inquisition that had grown too lax – nor in following the quake with an auto-da-fé.” People who believed that the disaster was a sign from the Almighty spent years noodling about that, instead of getting about the prosaic business of burying the dead, healing the injured, feeding the hungry, and rebuilding the city. Chief among the Jesuits was one Gabriel Malagrida who said:
It is scandalous to pretend the earthquake was just a natural event, for if that be true, there is no need to repent and to try to avert the wrath of God, and not even the Devil himself could invent a false idea more likely to lead us all to irreparable ruin.
Malagrida preached like this for years, and eventually it became too much for Pombal. He arranged the arrest of Malagrida on tenuous grounds, and imprisoned him. While in jail, Malagrida had visions and wrote them down. That provided Pombal with the grounds for an Inquisition. Nieman says:
The daylong auto-da-fé in which [Malagrida] died was also the end of a form of explanation. After Lisbon, even relatively conservative Western cultures were no longer willing to tolerate God’s hand in their daily affairs. … Even today, major earthquakes can evoke cries and speculations that will seem archaic, but they are generally confined to fundamentalist sects and hapless victims. Political action will focus on corrupt officials who take bribes in exchange for relaxing building codes rather than on increasing the performance of religious rituals.
Nieman says that the Lisbon earthquake led thinkers of the day to the recognition that natural disasters like earthquakes have no moral dimension. They simply happen, and the goal of humans is figure out what can be done to prevent them, and to plan so as to minimize death and damage. After the Lisbon earthquake, the word “evil” was not applied to these events, only to human behavior.
Clerics lost their secular role. They could no longer say that natural disasters were the act of the Almighty, and that they had the ability to avert the wrath of the Almighty. If they wanted to be heard on matters of the polity, they needed to educate themselves in the secular world. Most religious leaders saw that their role related to the morality of personal actions, not to building codes or capital gains taxes. They began to teach the actual principles of the New Testament, especially the Corporal Works of Mercy**, adopting the language of Pombal, and led the way to dramatic improvements in the lives of average people. That change in the role of religion is central to the Enlightenment.
Texas has long been the home of people who think that they can do the will of the Almighty by restating history books and praying at football games. This is a large and apparently growing group of people. Perry and other Republican candidates are dependent on them, and they must think there are enough of them to give them traction. It is frightening to think that there are so many members of Nieman’s “fundamentalist sects and hapless victims” ready to claim that the political problems we face happened because “as a nation we have forgotten who made us, who protects us, who blesses us…” and that the solution is to “… cry out for [God’s] forgiveness.”
It is a profound rejection of the Enlightenment.
_________________________
*Sources for this description include Wikipedia, The National Information Service for Earthquake Engineering, and Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Modern Philosophy, by Susan Nieman Princeton University Press, 2002
** The Corporal Works of Mercy are:
• To feed the hungry
• To give drink to the thirsty
• To clothe the naked
• To harbour the harbourless
• To visit the sick
• To ransom the captive
• To bury the dead



55 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
This is just beautiful. Wonderful piece of writing.
Well done, masaccio.
Ken Wilber noted that the cardinal accomplishment of the Enlightenment was the separating of the spheres of religion, art, and science. The manipulators of the Idiocracy are hell-bent on destroying that humane accomplishment.
We’ll need a new theism to go along with the new feudalism that’s in store for us in economic life.
The Teabagger Ten Commandments
Leave it to the baggers to bastardiaze their own religion…
Commandment 5:
Thou shalt kill as much post-natal human life as practicable, including all black and Hispanic convicts, Arabs, ‘Mozz-lums,’ and all others condemned in Leviticus. (See Leviticus, ante at Chapters 1-20). Also shoot canines from helicopters and slaughter other mammals with glee and praise for Juh-EEEEEEEE-zuss.
Commandment 6:
If thou shalt commit adultery, don’t worry about it if thou shalt be Senator Vitter or Governor Sanford or a men’s-room-dwelling closeted homer-sexial Senator or Reverend Haggard, as long as thou shalt repenteth and pray to Juh-EEEEEEEEE-zuss for a cure and convinceth many that thou hath changedeth.
Article with all TEN beauties:
The Teabagger Ten Commandments
Rejection of the Enlightenment indeed. If those fools have their way, we will digress 1200 years and be vying with Conservative Islam for bat-shit crazy. The last thing they want is logic, rational argument or anything that makes them disbelieve that the Earth, is in fact, FLAT.
That such people can exist in this day and age never ceases to amaze me, that they are given more than a passing glance, depresses me.
Excellent diary, masaccio.
Earlier this summer I read Kevin Phillips’s American Theocracy. He ties together the heavy hand of religion, the accumulation of debt, and the financial sector’s dominance of the U.S. economy, and warns us that we’re headed in the same direction as Rome in the 4th century, the Spanish Empire in the 16th, and the Dutch Republic in the 18th. All three fell hard.
For what it’s worth, Phillips thinks that after a spell of theocratic government, the American people will put a stop to it, like the French did. I’m not so optimistic. Once in power, the theocrats have an entire hardware store full of tools they can use to keep the people passive and frightened. Especially if the coming shortages of energy and food create a state of permanent crisis.
Another great piece, Masaccio. Thanks much.
The big three of modernity. Art, morals, and science. The beautiful, the good, and the true. Self, culture, and nature. Or make it four: soul, sense, society, and culture. I agree that the right is hellbent on returning to a pre-modern reality; I don’t understand why.
Bravo,thank you Masaccio.
See http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/08/15/110815fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all
No, the enlightenment is bouncing back.
And Jim Boehner has it exactly backward.
http://goo.gl/OFLvM
No. We don’t shaft decent people’s retirements, health and education
in favor of war, “‘going naked’ or ‘premium death spirals’,” and people’s savings or good decisions in favor of buying the whole lock stock and barrel of the banks’ mistakes.
But, if Mr. Obama is too unprincipled to defeat the person who might ‘
very well otherwise be President, Michelle Bachmann, then we better find
a principled person championing rational, sociable principles.
Why is it ok to attack Perry for his insane, nonsensical, and “weird” religious beliefs but not Romney again? Why is Fundie clap-trap ok for ridicule and scorn but not Mormon clap-trap?
Maybe it is just here in the parochial south but I think we would be amazed at how many people vote strictly on the basis of who claims the most extreme fundamentalist Christian. I cannot tell how many times I have heard my neighbors explain “I voted for him because he is a good Christian.” They know nothing of economics, their own self-interest, etc. They place their trust that those claiming to “turn it over to God.” Pitiful!
I hereby rhetorically savage both. Both are equally as silly. As someone once said, Mormonism is just Scientology without the technology. There ya go!
Don’t forget Imam bin al Bachmann.
Excellent history lesson – “natural disaster” was indeed the resulting thinking
But “they are attacking the worldview of the Founders” is a stretch as the group known as the founders had many views – some, indeed most, quite religious. The leadership tended to be deists, but not all of the leadership. Indeed the first Amendment Freedom of Religion was to placate the Baptists over State Government State churches (Episcopal) stopping other Christian sects by using state power – something not banned, the State Churches continued for decades, but a Federal equivalent government church was banned.
But the Jews and other religions and the various Christian sects would be surprised to hear that they did not believe in prayer (although Franklin thought God did intervened in the affairs of man he was convince there had been no new intervention since Jesus).
Speaking of enlightened, this piece is worth a look.
http://www.texasobserver.org/cover-story/rick-perrys-army-of-god
These people are a bunch of flaming lunatics, and there just isn’t any nice way of saying it. Further, I consider it to be the most egregious journalistic malpractice for the MSM to avoid discussing this reality in any sort of meaningful, substantive way. They need to be roundly and routinely condemned for it. Just reprehensible.
Kant said that the Enlightenment was the era in which humankind grew up and became adult. It is the time for us to think for ourselves and take responsibility for our own actions. It is time to stop crying and calling out for Big Daddy in the sky to come and rescue us and tell us what to do.
This is a situation that is very frightening and threatening to some people who do not want to grow up. It is especially threatening to those who want to be the Big Brothers who take the role of telling us what Big Daddy wants us to do.
When I got out of the religion business, the biggest benefit was that I no long had to explain and make excuses for God when people died and terrible things happened. My attitude now is that if God is going to do this shitty stuff, he can explain for himself.
As I see it, the key point is that the entire American experiment is grounded in Enlightenment beliefs. Even in the wake of Lisbon, it was, and remains, quite reasonable to hold religious beliefs, and hold them dearly. I left out a whole discussion of the intellectual ferment in philosophy of both secular and religious thinkers, including Kant, who reported from the scene of the Lisbon disaster for reasons of length. I highly recommend Nieman’s discussion of these issues.
What isn’t acceptable is to convert personal beliefs, no matter how deeply felt, into policy for people who don’t agree with those beliefs, enforceable by the secular body politic. That is the wall that the fundamentalist sects and hapless victims of fast-talking politician-evangelists can’t accept.
Amazing that these evangelicals have more in common with the Taliban than with thoughtful folks like those at this blog. Or maybe not so, the ‘Amerikkkan Taliban’ lable seems to fit well.
Wonderful article, Masaccio.
These are some of the people who think we should get back to that “old time religion.”
“Give me that old time dying of strep throat because antibiotics hadn’t been discovered yet….”
People who remember truly hard times are very appreciative of knowledge, education, science, modernization.
Reminds me of a comment I saw on dKos in response to a diary about the Catholic Church’s refusal to honor certain end-of-life directives at church-affiliated hospitals. A spokesperson for the church said something to the effect that suffering earned the patient a greater reward in Heaven. The commenter responded, “why, then, do you still use anaesthesia?”
A pause for humor. When I was doing oncology and achieved an astounding result (any cure in those days was astounding) through the latest cutting edge therapy and my own considerable clinical skills— I was usually met with “Praise the Lord. Our Prayers have been answered.”
So much for the much publicized God Complex. :-)
I be interested to hear which ‘mortal sin’ exactly caused the SEC to eliminate the net captal rule for Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs Group, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, & Morgan Stanley allowing theirt leverage ratios to exceed 12:1? Nope, naked greed & corruption don’t count, gotta choose from atheism, homosexuality, religious tolerance, Democrats, … And just exactly how is god gonna fix that?
:) Well, not that I’m a true believer, but this much is a fact: yesterday, one week to the day of Perry’s Pray-a-thon, it rained for several hours here in Dallas. First rain we’ve had in months. Of course the nonbelievers will say “coincidence” and while the true believers will say that it is an answer to prayer.
As far as Texas being “home” to this sort of thinking, you might consider broadening your perspective a bit, masaccio:
1.COLORADO you can include Colorado along with the Texas. Colorado is home to that awful sect called the Dobson Family. As a matter of fact Mr. and Mrs. Dobson were the opening at at Perry’s Pray-a-thon. But we don’t hear people like you calling people of Colorado “crazy” do we?
2. KANSAS Then you can add with the state of Texas the state of Kansas because the state of Kansas is home to the International House of Prayer and the forerunner to the “New Apostolic Movement”. Many of their leaders were featured at Perry’s Pray-a-thon. But we don’t hear people like you calling people of Kansas “crazy” do we?
3. OKLAHOMA Then of course you will have to include Oklahoma, home to Oral Roberts–founder of the University that Michele Bachmann graduated from. Oral Roberts in the eyes of many, including me, was just another version of Elmer Gantry who took money by the bucket fulls from people who could least afford it. etc 1& 2
4. UTAH Then you can add the state of Utah because frankly you can’t get weirder than a Mormon. Of course I’m sure many will be as insulted by this statement as I was by your piece which was a generalization of all the people in the state of Texas–a state that produced a president who got the Civil Rights 1964 law passed and issued a presidential order to ensure that all government agencies following the guidelines set by the affirmative action implied by that bill. A President who had the guts to walk up the hill to bang heads of Democrats together to see that Medicare was passed. You wouldn’t every see Lyndon kissing the ass of a Republican like Obama has.
5. VIRGINIA And omg, we can’t leave out the state of Virginia, home to religious fanatic Pat Robertson, the 700 Club, the Christian Broadcasting Network. Is there anyone who does not know of Pat Robertson’s 1986 bid for Presidency? Robertson said he would pursue the nomination only if three million people signed up to volunteer for his campaign by September 1987. Three million responded, and by the time Robertson announced he would be running in September 1987, he also had raised millions of dollars for his campaign fund. He surrendered his ministerial credentials and turned leadership of CBN over to his son, Tim. Robertson, like the fruitcakes from Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, etc. was also an advocate of Christian dominionism — the idea that Christians have a right to rule.
6. FLORIDA – There we have church man Terry Jones and his Koran burning
I could go on, but I hope you get my drift:
-Not all Texans are religious fanatics
-not all Texans are dumb
-every state in the union has religious fanatics and in fact the leaders of this groups are not in Texas–you will instead find them in Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, Tennessee,Missouri, Virginia and Florida to name a few of the more outstanding ones
-We have a Texan President to thank for the 1964 Civil Rights Act and for Medicare
I’m not voting for Perry, but then I’m not voting for Barack Obama either.
We have a name for people like them in Texas–sorry asses.
I agree.
One can not divorce one’s ethics and morals from one’s thoughts on policy, but you can actively work to not imposed something that goes against the ethics and morals and beliefs of others.
There is no reason to force a set of religious beliefs, or non-belief, on others as a public law. There is the nose to nose fight problem where the one side must be chosen and someone is angered – but one tries to minimize both frequency and impact of such decisions.
Great post masaccio. No less of a luminary (and contemporary, as Candide was written in 1759 four years after that event) than Voltaire mocked that anti-intellectualism going on in Lisbon:
How pathetic, a Bats hit k razy Person with principle. Obama principles depends on what side of the bed he get up on for that day. Hell Obama principles are worst than a 5 day weather forecast.If a five day weather forecast was so accuracy why would need to see same dam weather person everyday? Something have got to give. To dam many same people on prescription drugs and to many Crazy people need and increase in the medicines they refusal to take.
I’m not sure Perry actually believes all the religious stuff that comes out of his mouth. But I suspect that it is part of his Corporatist agenda. Religion, especially the monotheistic variety, works very well for Corporatism. It reinforces authoritarian obedience, substitutes the benevolence of god for the role of government working for the collective good, and by subverting scientific knowledge it provides fertile ground for the propaganda of Corporatist ideology.
Corporatism serves its role in this relationship as well. By producing perpetual war, shock doctrine and a never ending series of crises, Corporatism fuels religion. If history provides any examples, religious beliefs rise during times of social upheaval, uncertainty, poverty, war, fear, ignorance (see US public education), and similar collective anxieties. In the US, especially over the last generation, Corporatism and religion have evolved a symbiotic coexistence.
We see the expressions of this relationship and its negative effects on Enlightenment ideas everywhere. The President does what his “gut” tells him. A political speech can’t end without the words “God Bless America.” Religious charities are meant to replace social programs. We divide our world into camps of irrevocable Good and Evil. We see an increase in sexual repression (e.g. abstinence programs). Scientific research, theories and conclusions are publicly mocked. Propaganda from the pulpit and television trump informed, reasoned debate. The executive branch is both the law and at the same time above the law (just like the god of monotheism). And Fear rules the day.
I saw that the rain broke a 40 day over 100 degree period – just short of the current record 42 days of over 100 degrees in Dallas.
Of course the high was 97 degrees – which the normal high for Dallas.
Back in the late 50′s when the Prudential was doing its expansion into regional offices, it had to design the Texas one with a pool and a long lunch so folks could swim – folks did not want to go home too early in the hot afternoon! :-)
Perry will say his prayers were answered – but as with all things of belief without proof (including that there is no God), the view depends on where you stand.
“There is no reason to force a set of religious beliefs, or non-belief, on others as a public law.”
___
Michele Bachmann didn’t get the Memo.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/08/15/110815fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all
A relevant thought from Franklin: “”When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not care to support it, so that its professors are obliged to call for the help of the civil power, ’tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.”
ANd one for Perry’s prayer meeting: “I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies.”
A friend of mine had a Marvel Super Heroes character whose most common saying was, “kill them all, let God sort them out”. Makes me wonder if this is what Perry has in mind. Wouldn’t surprise me.
Is there anyone who does not know of Pat Robertson’s 1986 bid for Presidency? Robertson said he would pursue the nomination only if three million people signed up to volunteer for his campaign by September 1987.
I live in Michigan, which was Ground Zero for the Robertson presidential campaign. There was no GOP presidential primary in 1988, which meant that under state law, the delegates to the national convention would be selected by district and county conventions; and the only people entitled to vote were precinct delegates elected in the August 1986 primary. The Robertson forces elected hundreds of precinct delegates, most of them in heavily Democratic districts where the GOP organization existed only on paper. What followed was a bitter fight between the party establishment and the Kemp-Robertson forces, which resulted in lawsuits, fistfights, and two rival slates of delegates to the national convention. Pass the popcorn.
Let me try to be a bit more precise. Enlightenment principles didn’t stop the Founders from doing a lot of stuff that we don’t do today, beginning with slavery. What the Founders thought was that the people could govern themselves, and that democracy, a system that allowed citizens a lot of input, would be the best instrument for self-governance.
These principles are near the heart of the Enlightenment, which, as PragmaticRealist points out @19, teaches that we are responsible for the things we can control, including our government, that we are the adults who must handle ourselves and our society. I believe that personal responsibility is the single most important identifier for the Middle Class.
Over time, as we work out the principles of the Enlightenment, we get closer to the ideals I lay out in comment 20.
I think it’s a big con like Huckster-has-been positions were (David Dayen, Dec. 28, 2010). Dubya wasn’t a believer and publicly admitted it on national TeeVee (Dec. 11, 2008) just before turning over the reins to the next corporate puppet. It would be strategic to really cramp the financial style of the rogue corporate franchises posing as churches in the Commonwealth of Virginia as they articulate with Century Strategies. Goldman Sachs’ pals in the Chinese and Saudi hedge fundies might not like it but too bad.
How pathetic, a Bats hit k razy Person with principle. Obama principles depends on what side of the bed he get up on for that day. Hell Obama principles are worst than a 5 day weather forecast.If a five day weather forecast was so accuracy why would need to see same dam weather person everyday? Something have got to give. To many sane people on prescription drugs and to many Crazy people need and increase in the medicines they refusal to take.
Very interesting!
What frightens me in this post is that for the first time the true market for Perry’s lunacy has been identified…and it is massive. That market is, “fundamentalist sects and hapless victims.” and there are massive conglomerations of each.
What if, for example, the true hapless victims of Republican/Randian/Austrian Economic policies could be convinced that their fate is really out of their hands? What if only “god” can save them? There is only one hope and that is to vote for the “party of God”…that Perry is trying to make himself the secular head of.???
This is more frightening than I could have imagined.
I think he does believe a lot of that garbage. It is about all you can hear in southern Red states. He certainly knows his lines.
The actually worship a god they call “The Invisible Hand.” That was very important to Rand that her theories form a moral philosophy and her followers pledge unquestioning belief in the Invisible Hand of Capitalism ordering all aspects of life.
All I can say is, why the fuck should Texas have to wait longer for God to deliver rain than for Domino’s to deliver a pizza? Maybe they directed all that prayer to the wrong place? OR, do you recall during the oil crisis in the ’70′s that the most popular bumper sticker in Texas became, “Let the Yankees freeze in the dark”? I remember. Maybe God remembers, too. Or Domino’s.
You’re so right that Enlightenment thought pervaded the American experiment and the creation of the Constitution. The world view of the founders in terms of their personal religious beliefs was indeed various. What was not was their insistence that government not promote any one religion over another. In part this was a reaction against the established Church of England, New England, after all, having been settled by Puritans who came to the New World for religious freedom. After they established their own theocracy, however, seekers for religious freedom left in large numbers, some founding Rhode Island and some coming to New York, then New Netherland (New York), where a considerable degree of religious tolerance existed under the Dutch. Even there, though, there was an established church, the Dutch Reformed Church and there were strictures against other sects worshipping in public. In reaction to this, immigrants from New England to Long Island sent the Flushing Remonstrance in 1657 to Governor Peter Stuyvesant, a protest against the latter’s persecution of Quakers. Stuyvesant was reprimanded by his superiors in the Netherlands and the inhabitants of New Netherland enjoyed freedom of worship – until the colony was taken over by the British. The recent religious turmoil in Britain, the Civil War and the harsh rule of Puritan Oliver Cromwell , had led the British government, after Cromwell’s downfall, to believe an established church was the way to keep fanatics on both sides from each other’s throats. So when New York became British, its governors tried to establish the Anglican Church there. This led to a long struggle between the colonial government and colonists, through their elected assembly, trying to keep their religious freedoms. Religious freedom became intertwined with democratic aspirations and with the growing contention the colony experienced with British rule in general.
This background partly explains the founders’ world view, even those not from New York. But in fact some of the most influential founders, Washington, Jefferson and Franklin, were Deists, believers in God but not in any organized religion or in supernatural events such as the Resurrection of Christ, miracles and so on. In its earlier phases the Enlightenment had striven to replace such beliefs with a faith in reason, that the universe worked according to the tenets of a benevolent creator whose creation operates according to natural laws which, when left to their natural operations undistorted by the injustices of human society, will lead to the good. Voltaire, until the Lisbon earthquake, was a fervent Deist, a follower of Leibnitz in his belief that (in the words of poet Alexander Pope) “everything that is, is right.” It was Voltaire’s deistic outlook that perished in the earthquake, as recorded in his book, Candide, in which a Lebniztian philosopher is lampooned for his belief that “all’s for the best in this best of all possible worlds.”
Interestingly, deism was already eroding by that time because of the writings of the Scottish philosopher David Hume, who had demonstrated conclusively that the existence of God, by “the laws of just reasoning” cannot be proven but must remain no more than an axiom. Even more interestingly, Hume also showed that scientific principles such as causality also can never be proven either. Science must recognize its own limitations, just as much as religion must.
They weren’t aware until he told them. But did they call for God to strike the Bush down? They never go after the puppeteers and are always ready for the next God-talker.
But don’t worry; the dominion they pine for will never replace the one that already exists. That’s worry enough.
Thanks for your detailed discussion of this fascinating part of US history. I think that deep below the surface of the views of the Founders was a general belief in what we now call Pragmatism, as exemplified by John Dewey. Count me in with that; I’m a big fan of Richard Rorty on the abstract side of these arguments, and of Dewey for the actual practice.
As I understand it, John Dewey’s pragmatism, a view he shared with Oliver Wendell Holmes, deemphasized the importance of ideas divorced from real world situations, from context. For Holmes, laws likewise must be interpreted in a real world context and have little meaning without this. Possibly it’s this relativistic view that Rorty espouses. But as Paul Boghussian (philosopher of science at Columbia) shows in his book “Fear of Knowledge,” Rorty has gone very far down this road, claiming that all knowledge, even scientific, is culturally constructed and therefore totally influenced by its cultural context. Rortian thinking has led, for example, to the dilemma faced by archeologists studying early human cultures in the Americas, that Native americans’ beliefs about their ancestors are just as valid as findings by archaeologists. Boghussian quotes several archaeologists saying that beliefs such as those of Lakota people that their ancestors were buffalo are equally valid with their own findings.
I suspect he is following George W.’s tack here. W.’s twangy “aw shucks,” simple man, Christian Conservatism along with his “ranch” was a put on for the Presidency. He didn’t play that character when he was Governor. Likewise, I don’t remember Perry acting in this way ten years ago. I could be wrong.
Rorty’s discussion of academic issues like the one you identify are too theoretical for me, though I will say that as you move away from math and into economics, you are getting into culturally constructed thinking. I like Achieving Our Country and Philosophy and Social Hope. These books helped me understand Dewey, whose writing isn’t always clear.
He’s Elmer Gantry. The line between the sermon and belief in his powers to enchant is mighty thin.
Ha! Indeed. That line between the character one plays on TV and the morphing into that character is one of the most fascinating things about political actors.
But seriously, if you don’t think God has a voice in policy making, or if you think clerics have “lost their secular role,” you just aren’t paying attention. The name Pat Robertson ring a bell? Billy Graham? For a look into one ongoing cohabitation of Church and State, you should pick up Jeff Sharlet’s book The Family — the Jesuits in the court of Portugal had nothing on these folks. And we all remember the Ds trampling each other trying to be first onto the Jesus train after the 2000 election debacle, right?
Bad news: Lisbon didn’t demonstrate anything that wasn’t forgotten in a generation or two. Good news (I suppose): Tomorrow is another day.
@masaccio: You leave out a huge piece of context. Over the last 50 years, the most vociferous attacks on the Enlightenment have come from the Left, from Foucault to Derrida to Rorty. This is not an opinion but just historical fact. Go back and review the responses to Alan Bloom in the 80′s. And in the 90′s the loudest shrillest voices on campuses were from those denouncing the Eurocentrism and the mistaken essentialism of the “dead white males” of the Enlightenment.
@Cathy: I think that Rorty was quite right about the role of pragmatism both historical and prescriptive for America. As for Rorty’s thinking more generally, it can be quite stimulating. However, ultimately, with the exception of his revival of American pragmatism and his historical work on “the linguistic turn”, his thinking will ultimately be judged to be derivative (mainly from Derrida and Davidson) and defective. His ultimate pragmatic positions cashing out truth in terms of utility are rejected by nearly everyone in philosophy and notably by Davidson himself. But he is deeply missed by many including myself.
Interestingly, Bloom thought that perhaps the only charitable review of his book from the Left was the one by Rorty.
Wonderful article, Masaccio.
These are some of the people who think we should get back to that “old time religion.”
“Give me that old time dying of strep throat because antibiotics hadn’t been discovered yet….”
People who remember or give a thought to those times are very appreciative of knowledge, education, science, modernization.