Michele Bachmann is making the Republican establishment very, very nervous.
On “Fox News Sunday,” host Chris Wallace quizzed Bachmann on a series of apparent inconsistencies in her legislative record and personal background — from Medicare to government subsidies and earmarks to her opposition to same-sex marriage.
Then, as he wrapped up the interview, Wallace asked her: “Are you a flake?”
“I think that would be insulting to say something like that because I’m a serious person,” Bachmann retorted.
It is insulting.
Here’s the thing. I enjoy mocking Bachmann when she says something crazy. But the brand of crazy she deals in is par for the course in the Republican Party, and certainly, for Faux News. Even Bachmann’s flakiest comments — for instance, that Obama wants to indoctrinate our children “re-education camps” — have been echoed by others in the GOP.
The whole party is John Birch Society batty, looney tunes, chock full o’nuts — and has been for a couple decades. Bachmann is tied with Willard for the lead in Iowa — not because she has an impressive legislative record — but specifically because she says lots of crazy things.
But Chris Wallace would never ask Newt “It’s The Start of World War III” Gingrich if he was a flake. He would never ask Hermann “No Muslims in My Cabinet” if he was a flake. He would never ask Rick “Man on Dog” Santorum that question. And he certainly would never put that to Mitt “I’ll Double Gitmo” Romney — not to mention any of Faux’s professional flakes like Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity.
So Wallace’s question is clearly sexist, with some classism thrown in for good measure.
It’s always awkward when the Country Clubbers bump into the Snake Handlers.




28 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Yes, she’s a fucking flake.
End of story.
Seriously.
She also uses foster kids as slave labor on her family farm and took hundreds of thousands from the gubmint in subsidies.
I guess that makes her an evil flake.
She has good support from the fundies and the teabaggers (obviously some overlap in those groups). That gives her a base similar in size to Romney’s, without the Mormon/Romneycare baggage. So, yes, she is a contender.
I really don’t see Romney gaining much more support. He has a ceiling. He has great name recognition, has run before, people have already made up their minds about him. Sure, if he was the last man standing he would get the nomination, but he won’t be. As other candidates crash and burn, their supporters will NOT go to Romney.
EDIT: In other words, Romney is the first choice of about a quarter of the Republican primary voters, and the last choice of the rest.
A couple of weeks ago we saw Fox put the screws to Pawlenty, now this question to Bachmann. We don’t know who Fox’s preferred candidate is, yet, but I think we can pencil those two out.
At this point I’m expecting a Perry/Bachmann ticket, that will preclude Palin from an independent bid, and probably draw 40-45% of the popular vote.
I have no reason to be a fan of Bach’s, but I think you make a good point. Flake does imply youth, immaturity, and yes, probably light wt, feminitity. Thanks for making the point.
Flake is the nicest term he could have used. Of course, we don’t need a Bachman flake to make us realize that Obama and the current congress hates the citizens of this country.
She will just help increase the crazy hate.
Proper response to Wallace would be: “You have just declared yourself a pig. Are you aware you have just done that?”
Perhaps he was confusing Bachmann with Palin, who *is*, clearly, a flakey quitter.
You make a very good point, though.
Obama’s reeducation camps follow a distributed delivery model. Think the war coverage on NPR.
Bachmann is the opposite of a flake, she knows exactly what she is doing. She has so far suckered the religious wingnuttery, eclipsed the quitter. Continue to underestimate her at our/your peril.
Since we don’t have a primary to vote in wouldn’t we all be better served by switching our registrations so we can vote in the Republican primary and voting for Bachmann en masse? Don’t we win when she wins?
I suppose I should have said Bachmann has a potential base as big as Romney’s. With no other quasi-sane candidates, Willard has those voters to himself, whereas Bachmann is splitting her base with others. As candidates drop out, Bachmann will be the winner of those newly-freed voters.
That dynamic changes with Perry in the race. His base absolutely overlaps hers. I suspect that voters will gravitate to Perry in preference to Bachmann. That’s why I see her ending up as the VP candidate.
A: It is insulting.
B: She is a Flake.
But I believe that main thing is that she is a megalomaniac. Totally grandiose in her view of herself.
No, it’s not the end of the story. Which GOP candidate isn’t?
It’s always awkward when the Country Clubbers bump into the Snake Handlers
Perfect, thanks:)
Bob Schiefer asked her if she doesn’t have trouble with the truth. maybe 3 times. she didn’t answer. and, thuss, did answer. but she’s not really running for ‘the presidency” at this point. she’s running for the republican nomination. and being on 2 showsa this morning was great for her. and, on schiefer at least, she continued on the “oh my god, she’s not a total loon” transformation she’s getting in the media. but she can’t even come close to answering a direct question. at least not yet and i have doubts about ever. one thing she did do–she said she regretted her choice of words when she questioned Obama’s patriotism.
After reading Taibbi’s Rolling Stone article, I wonder if the condescension towards Bachmann isn’t intentional. As he points out, the more she’s called out, the more defensive her base gets. Fox just might be intentionally provoking this reactionary effect with this kind of talk.
This level of snark is what I love about this place… a wonderful phrase indeed!
Standard pathology for politicians these days.
Don’t waste your time, Gordon; the left-right illusory paradigm still rules the roost here.
Can you document the slave labor thing? It would surprise me if it were true, and I wouldn’t put much past Bachmann.
You may be right.
It’s unlikely to me that there will be a Perry-Bachmann ticket; even the Republicans get the notion of a balanced ticket. To have two UN-balanced people on together means all those hypothetical moderate Republicans would have no one to vote for. I would predict, rather, something like a Romney-Bachmann or a Perry-Huntsman pairing up. God, those sound bizarre, when I see them in print!
wallace’s question was a softball, i think. teed it up for her. an assist. he helped her. didn’t insu;lt her, in my view
Naw, shes a true believer even if its only her lies she momentarily believes, like Taibbi’s RS article points out. True believers are bad for the GOP game because there are some ways in which they cant be bought. Its important that a candidate be able to “play ball” when told.
Chris Wallace apologizes for the “Flake” question.
That was relatively quick – thanks for catching it, Elliott!
Frankly, I think Wallace is a major FLAKE, but that’s just me.
I’ve long since abandoned the left-right, R v D paradigm and am happy to report that I spent time this weekend with *several* friends who are also “getting” that… that it’s a CLASS war, and that the upper 1% is using the OUR team v YOUR team rah-rah to bamboozle most citizens.
That said, fwiw, I agree that Wallace is most likely reacting in a typically sexist fashion. Cannot abide either Bring on teh crazeee, Bachmann (who IS prepared, in her own way, and does, in her own way, at least *work*) or the Grifter Media Whore.
That said, methinks Wallace is perhaps sweatin’ bullets to see 2 double XX chromosome types soaking up the ReTHUG oxygen… prolly doesn’t like THAT one iota… more menz, plz… esp WHITE menz…
This is what Chris Wallace does, at 4 minutes he asks Tim Pawlenty to explain why Cain is beating him. At 5 1/2 minutes he plays a clip of O’Reilly calling him boring and vanilla and wants him to respond to it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zNWECF3agQ
Same interview, Wallace asks Pawlenty about his aspirational 5% GDP growth plan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUEzXQdW2vQ
Wallace is a tough interviewer, nothing like those ridiculous questions from John “Brown nose” King at the CNN debate, like “Coke or Pepsi?”