
Pictured: Dan Pfeiffer, fielding a question at NN11.
You’d think that, to become the Communications Director of the White House, you’d have to be pretty good at communication. But based on Dan Pfeiffer’s performance at Netroots Nation, the president must have filled the post using some other criteria.
Here’s Dan, explaining the hector the base strategy the White House employed so successfully leading up to the 2010 midterms.
“When Glenn Beck and John Boehner and Mitt Romney attack us, we expect that,” he said. “And sometimes when our friends attack us, we get frustrated. It doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do to get frustrated.”
Facepalm.
Glenn Beck makes millions comparing Obama to history’s worst mass murderers, while the liberal base of the Democratic Party has been known to remind him of his campaign promises. Easy to see why Pfeiffer would lump those “attacks” together.
Moreover, the White House didn’t just “get frustrated” with what it sneeringly dismissed as the “professional left.” These weren’t just a offhand remarks. What they did, in fact, was engage in a very systematic campaign to antagonize us. It was political malpractice at its worst, and it failed miserably. And because it failed miserably, what Pfeiffer should’ve said was, “It was stupid, and we were wrong to do it.” Full stop. Rather than, you know, compare us to Glenn Beck.
Then there was this little piece of historical revisionism, about Obama’s 1996 support of gay marriage:
“If you actually go back and look, that questionnaire was actually filled out by someone else, not the President. There was a long debate about this in the campaign. … This was litigated in the campaign,”
This statement was such bullshit, the White House had to scramble around and cough up a non-denial denial immediately after. Nicely done, Dan!
Lastly, there was this.
Pfeiffer said the White House would serve as a check against Republican efforts to undercut Medicare, privatize Social Security and repeal the health care overhaul. Obama, he said, would work to bring wireless technology to rural areas, develop alternative energy sources and offer tax incentives for small business.
That’s the big pitch this guy brought to enlist the support of liberals for Obama’s 2012 campaign? Really? “We don’t suck as much as Sarah Palin, and, also, too — tax cuts!” Fucking brilliant.
Pfeiffer, who got his start working for Evan Bayh, is clearly more than few sandwiches short of a picnic. He should be gone after this debacle.



104 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
So American Democracy has come to this;
Who would you prefer to front for Goldman Sachs, GE, ATT, The Carlye Group and all the rest of the zombie vampire squid that are sucking the life out of us?
A phony, amoral democratic liar, or a bat-shit-crazy, amoral republican liar?
If you don’t understand that Timothy Geithner, Jeffrey Immelt, and William Daley are Obummer’s bosses and not his employees, then what do you understand about our predicament?
We’re still making believe here folks.
We’ve got to stop making believe.
http://my.firedoglake.com/watt4bob/2009/04/30/its-all-only-make-believe/#more-5061
But but but, someone else did fill out that 1996 survey. That would have been pandering-to-the-base candidate O, an entirely diff person from giving-away-the-store-to-the-donors prez O.
Perino attractive?
It’s hard for me to see anything past all that evil.
And Pfeiffer is perfect for his job. The fool that everyone points to and the perfect distraction.
How many days will this be kept around as “news” by the corporate media? Or will they just use Hilton/Lohan/[insert name of person who makes very very bad personal decisions here]?
Frankly I get tired of this nonsense/kabuki. We already know you’re going to totally skrew us. This ain’t hiding it. And the other peons mostly don’t watch this stuff or care. Dancing with the Stars is on, you know?
So why even bother with this useless charade.
Can we please just have a really really really smoking hot press secretary?
And of course we shouldn’t discriminate, so let’s get a man and woman who fit the above criteria.
And no, he/she does not have to smart or know anything. In fact better if they do NOT know anything. And can we please have someone who has a good sense of humor. Sorry, personal preference.
So any chance we can get a totally clueless really really smoking hot man AND woman with a good sense of humor to tell us lies (and oh those sweet little lies)? Or is that too much to ask?
the stoopit continues….
Who’re your nominees?
glad your here
some real news
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/06/honeybee-pessimism
Now that’s a good question.
I was thinking that the criteria above is almost impossible to fill.
But, maybe some models …
Honestly, I didn’t really put that much thought into it.
Any ideas?
agreed
Obama: Part of the Problem.
At least he’s helping expose the “lesser” evil myth.
Fine, the bullshit survey was 15 years ago. This horse is dead enough, and if we have to club one, how about giving banksters a pass, or jared bernstein admitting that O NEVER considered a jobs bill.
http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/05/30/jared-bernstein-lets-slip-interesting-info-about-wh-economic-views/
yea FDL needs some new topics
same ole,same ole
You find the most obscure but interesting info on honeybees. Thanks.
You sent me that article on training honey bees, and Chris read it. He told me (and I think I saw it somewhere else, maybe even a link from you) that honeybees are being trained to find buried land mines. Scents they are attracted to are associated with scent of explosive, and then they are let loose in the mined area and hover over the mines. Unlike dogs, they don’t get tired as quickly and they don’t get blown up if they goof.
I’m just in for a few minutes. It’s a perfect June day, I rode my bicycle into the farmer’s market, and now I’m reading Fall’s classic book on Two Viet-Nams outside.
Hey, it’s only Netroots – let’s send the stupidest person we’ve got – they won’t be able to tell – Tea Party, Netroots, what’s the difference?
Someone forgot that Progressives tend to be a bit better informed than most. What ass hats run/are destroying this country.
Obama never fires anyone for incompetence. However, if Pfeiffer had said something which sounded LIBERAL he’d be in the unemployment line tomorrow.
None. The older I get, the less I find members of the opposite gender physically attractive. I used to find a few actors ‘hot’ when I was younger (I won’t embarrass myself by identifying any of them). But now I’m fully in the mode of judging a person by what’s inside his/her head, not by how s/he looks. That’s why I asked you for your candidates. *g*
Messaging Blockheads (see Pfeiffer, Gibbs, Axelrod). This administration has the worst communications team since the Hoover administration. It cannot even ‘message’ to its own base never mind the body politic.
Political Malpractice and Policy Losses:
The incoherent whisper that epitomizes ‘messaging’ from the Obama Administration is profound political malpractice. It would not be so remarkable if there were not, on the other side of things, a malignant political force that celebrates greed, ignorance and war …
Article:
http://beeryblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/dems-political-malpractice-aids-right-wing-war-on-reason/
Um, what about Nudge Ghoulsbee?
Yeah, the trick of his prez campaign of being all things to all people wore thin pretty quickly once we saw the hopey changey in action.
Dan Pfeiffer is a whining aparachik with one message: you’re all ungrateful layabouts and you better shape up.
This is who they send to a conference populated by the people who worked tirelessly to put Obama in office, and by that I mean the DailyKos community.
I don’t care if that IS how you feel, or even if it’s justified. Choosing Pfeiffer as a messenger on the eve of an election is, as you rightly note, nothing short of political malpractice.
I mean, what did they possibly hope to achieve, aside from pissing everyone off? I know I’ve said it before, but I’ll repeat: it would have been slightly less offensive to send Bo.
Same old make believe.
Obummer is a symptom, not a cause.
It’s a measure of his contempt for us.
Multiple personality disorder. Nice insanity defense move, there. Might have a chance with that.
They’re basically asking us to accept them, as they present themselves, unless we prefer tear-gas.
I believe the correct spelling is “simpleton.”
I thought Pfeiffer’s message to NN was pretty clear and concise, the same as Obama’s message to those who voted for hope and change has been since 2009 – get lost (putting it politely).
Is Caturday up? I remember vaguely that SD wasn’t going to be around this weekend.
Yep, he won’t expose any policy makers to the awful Left, just the town crier.
I don’t think so. S’okay, Mr. Dragon deserves a weekend off.
I’m not complaining, just inquiring. Agree that SD deserves all sorts of good stuff. Was looking to stop by if it were but couldn’t find it.
I’m off again. It really is the perfect June day.
The WH has no message except “vote for me”. The loser who showed up at NN was probably as good as anyone would have been.
It is. They have OFA as an organization and the Administration is peeling of whatever of who else is left as Democratic activists for people who want to be in the “win” column for the 2012 race.
They don’t care if they wreck any of the miniscule remaining and crumbling groups/institutions for Left activism after they’ve achieved their “win” and it’s going to take a LONG TIME to try to re-build any of that.
It pisses me off no end that they are using up and throwing away what good work some people have done for years.
As long as the left behaves like two steps behind wives, Obama and any other Dem so inclined will smack them around and stomp all over them with impunity. And everybody knows that. The left has no self-respect, so why should they expect any.
Right. Sending no one would’ve been preferable to sending Dana Pfeiffer.
Which is bottomless.
You’re correct. Obama himself would have essentially the same message, that he never broke any promises, it’s all just an error of perception on our part.
Not to get too serious or anything, but there is nothing simple about the charade that has been perpetrated upon us since Nixon, or the people who have planned and executed it.
We have made the mistake of finding comfort in thinking that people like ‘W’ and Obama are autonomous simpletons, when in reality, they are agents, all the more dangerous for their inteligent execution of their handlers wishes.
Enjoy! Tell eCahnstance and beeCAHN I said “Hi.”
i love da bees
hahaahhahahahahahah
gah….i miss you
I have concluded that O’s intellectual capacity has been greatly overstated. He’d likely have been a corporate tool in any event but as a political operator he is a complete bonehead. If he possessed any shrewdness he’d have figured out a way to serve the MOTU without completely alienating the people who helped elect him.
It’s good to see you.
Hi to you and Bazzie and horsie and the rest of the brood.
yup…same mold,same message….wash,rinse repeat
(((Twain)))
thankee…scritches to Bob
he is just lazy…both him and his wife
Any progressive who votes for Obama again is a congenital wimp, or weaker.
I don’t bother grading first spouses, except for Nancy who was the defacto president.
Uh, Dana Perino is a smart, beautiful woman.
Dan Pfieffer is an imbecile who can’t help lying for his crooked boss.
Why are you comparing these two? Short of subjects to write about, such as the wonderful economy, or how Obama’s zillions of new regulations are creating jobs all over?
many were
Woodrow Wilsons come to mind
they love the parties ,attention,travel,but to actually do something for regular folks….hey throw us a crumb
“except for Nancy who was the defacto president.”
Reagan beat your party twice, in TWO landslides.
Knocking Reagan doesn’t say much for your party, and I knew Geraldine Ferraro. She was a great lady.
takes an imba to know an imba
When reminding Obama of his campaign promises is called “attacking” him, he is not only an ingrate but waxing paranoid. Something does not add up.
I WORKED to help get him elected in ’08. Never again.
go visit your dad today …if you werent cloned
okay infestation is happening again…bbl
“takes an imba to know an imba.”
Uh, yeah. Whatever.
Next.
Your Mom never told you that you died at birth, did she?
MY party? At least that comment places your earlier statement that Dana Perino is intelligent in a clearer perspective.
BT’s posts tend to bring ‘em out from under their bridges. See ya, sadly.
“your party”????? What blog are you on? Read.
On the unemployment line and on the first train to Siberia (or its American equivalent).
For a guy who can give a great speech, Obama’s communications team really sucks.
Your party…do you vote DEMOCRAT or REPUBLICAN?
You have two choices.
Let me help you decide…in 2008, did you vote for Obama (D) or McCain (R)?
If, as I believe, you voted Obama (D), then I was right when I said “your party.”
Sorry if that kinda confused you. I can see how it could, what with using (D) and (R).
He sucks.
Duuuuuude. Obama’s hero is Reagan! This blog is full of people who don’t vote Dem. This is not the orange blog.
Hey – you voted for him.
You pays for the entertainments you selected.
She’s a status-seeking uterine missile.
No. I didn’t vote for him.
It’s more simple than that – she’s just a liar.
Oh Dana….
He didn’t come here for intelligent engagement. Feed him if you like. Time for me to mosey.
He’s probably…Dana. Mosey on down the line..:) It’s kinda like the zoo.
It always stuns me how the Left only wants to hear supporting opinions for their side, and can never have an intelligent debate about anything.
I go on right wing sites, and I always find liberals getting a debate. They aren’t called “trolls” or denounced – they are confronted with their ideas and are forced to support them with facts.
Not here. This is just another reason why the Left is so out of touch with what Americans are thinking about.
We are all Americans. The right doesn’t get to “own” “America”. The right is wrong.
I didn’t say that you were “wrong.”
I said, “This is just another reason why the Left is so out of touch with what Americans are thinking about.”
That’s a big difference.
Well, I have to go.
Happy Father’s Day to all of the Dads out there.
I wish there were more actual thinking Republicans coming on FDL…I’m not convinced that you are one of them, based on how you approach the discussions and how you respond to challenges.
.
But I will ask you: please recommend a right-wing blog for me to check out. One that will treat my dissenting views with respect, one that criticizes the right from the right.
Ah, shit, I type too slow…
How do you know what Americans are thinking about. There are a million gazillion opinions out there, many of which are based on basic smoke and mirror B.S. That’s what I’m talkin’ about. The country is in a horrible mess and the actions of both parties and their loyalty to corporate special interests got us here. I just don’t like it when someone claims to speak for what “Americans” are thinking about. Maybe they are thinking about jobs, the economy, not becoming homeless, affording medical expenses that are out of control, not letting seniors and vulnerable people (Americans) from starving to death or dying from the lack of affordable medical needs…not losing income from union busting, etc. That is just basic humane thinking…but..maybe they are just all about me, me, me…screw everyone else…sink or swim.
But apparently tone deaf is the norm for them–look at the furor POTUS left behind in Puerto Rico.
OT: hey, rats, good to “see” you, we haven’t seen you around Caturday lately (unless I’ve missed your posts). You’re right, SD is spending time with family today.
Dan’s is correct that the left has been sniping at Obama, so I’m not sure why Firedoglake even bothers to deny this charge. For example, Iin the course of the last week I’ve seen articles suggesting a President Romney would be a good thing, and multiple creative ways of casting aspersions on our democratic president. Now, Firedoglake may claim it is merely principled opposition, and I won’t complain about people upholding their principles. But then stand behind those principles and admit what you are doing: infighting, backbiting, and sniping at the democratic president out of a belief that it is somehow good for the party or country. Don’t act shocked, shocked, that someone could claim you are sniping at the president (true) or aiding republicans (also true). If passing a (in your view) watered down healthcare reform bill, watered down (again, in your view) financial reform bill, and repealing don’t ask don’t tell is so piddling as to be unworthy of mention, then throw Obama under the bus, get a Romney elected, and proudly wave your flag of complicity. Don’t get snarky that Dan dares to compare you to Beck.
“Your party…do you vote DEMOCRAT or REPUBLICAN?
You have two choices.”
Nice try at trying to falsely claim limited options. I can say that in the last election I voted for none of the above and I also have no party membership of any kind.
Stop calling it “the Party”! We are sniping at Barry…he deserves it, because he is acting like a Republican Neocon. So…what are you talking about? Besides…what do you know about the “Left”? What the heck is the definition? Something like “treehuggers”..something like “liberal”…something like..people who care about other people? Oh just stop it. Besides, it is naive to assume the people decide the “big” stuff…they don’t. Obama’s policies are unacceptable as are Romney’s or any other idiot that is chosen by those who choose, and it ain’t us.
So you are basically saying we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that, which also happens to be The Britney Spears Theory Of Politics.
I don’t regard it as infighting because I’m not a Democrat nor are quite a few others here. Why should I not speak my views because they don’t fall into the neat categories of Democrat or Republican? I owe no more allegiance to President Obama than I did to President Bush.
So, you would characterize demanding the President keep his campaign promises as “infighting, backbiting and sniping”?
“So, you would characterize demanding the President keep his campaign promises as ‘infighting, backbiting and sniping’?”
Salamander just wants apathetic uninformed voters who just vote based on the letter next to politicians names…then once voters have done that task, they’re supposed to sit down a shut up.
Are you truly so uninformed that you believe that voters can only vote for Republicans or Democrats? There are several third-party choices on many states’ ballots, and in my state, I can write in a vote.
I’m annoyed by the framing (from any segment of the political spectrum) that lumps “liberals” with the Democratic Party. There is nothing remotely liberal about the modern Democratic Party, which is much more conservative than the GOP of my youth. The fact that Dems might be two centimeters to the left of reich wing Republicans is not enough to earn my allegiance.
I think this remark was actually worse:
Says it all.
I wonder if what happened to the Whig Party – which got destroyed over a split a the slavery issue – will happen to the Democrats. The last time a big political party was destroyed, it resulted in the Republican party. Perhaps this corporatism and warmongering will have the same effect on the Democratic party with some new party taking its place.
I doubt it, the two major parties have completely rigged the game to fend off third party challenges. They’ll continue to play good cop/bad cop for the voters (which is which depends on your perspective).
The reason we’re really screwed though is that pols no longer care if they fail to win reelection. As long as they provide good service to the MOTU while in office they can clean up when they reenter the private sector.
Per Pheiffer, O offers a check on Republican efforts to undercut Medicare & Social Security? Rural broad band…tax incentives for small business….?
Thin gruel Mr. Pheiffer, thin gruel.
I don’t know the persons name but I did see a picture of a trnsexual model that was way hot just the other day on the tube.
You mean “what Cuban Missle crisis” Perino.
Fuck off, RNC filth.
You won’t be missed.
Read the post again. I am not asking people to support Obama or a republican, per se, though personally I will probably vote for Obama. I’m criticizing the disingenuous game where Firedoglake snipes at the president, helps increase the odds of electing a republican, and then mocks a democratic spokesperson for daring to point out that certain left wing groups (like Firedoglake) are sniping at the president. Dan’s statement is true. I think the appropriate response is to either say “damned straight, I’ll be happy to throw Obama under the bus and elect a republican b/c our country will be better if we support Ryan’s budget plan” or what have you, or alternatively to say “I am criticizing Obama to pull him further left, but will not undermine the effort to elect a democratic president, when push comes to shove”. From reading Firedoglake, I increasingly think that the first response seems to be where most of the denizens are headed. There’s a term for that: cutting your nose to spite your face. I hope when Medicare is a voucher program, financial reforms have been repealed, Obamacare is repealed, and collective bargaining is in the history books that you comfort yourself with the thought that you were taking a principled stand b/c you couldn’t abide by the thought that Obama hadn’t regulated options (in now repealed financial reform) enough and that a public option hadn’t been included in the (now repealed) ACA.
“oops! I did it again” kind of politics?
‘I played with your heart …’
at least 0-bummer keeps reminding me why I will NOT waste a vote on him again. when I write in “medicare forall” and I lose, I’ll know why I lost.
rmm.
I did read the post and I stand by what I said about you and Britney Spears:
“Now, Firedoglake may claim it is merely principled opposition, and I won’t complain about people upholding their principles. But then stand behind those principles and admit what you are doing: infighting, backbiting, and sniping at the democratic president out of a belief that it is somehow good for the party or country.”
You say that principled opposition equals infighting, backbiting and sniping. You are an opponent of opposition of any kind, even if it is principled, which that is just like Britney Spears saying to support the President no matter what.
This guy looked a very bored lying used car salesman who have rather been playing golf and drinking a mint julip!
When Obama admits to what he’s doing (exclusively sucking up to and shilling for the wealthy elite), instead of acting like he’s working on behalf of the people and progressives, then the conversation might move forward.