It’s a shocking historical juxtaposition. The pro-democracy movement known as the Arab Spring is in significant part a consequence of rising literacy and declining birth rates in the Mideast. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Right is mounting a direct assault on education and a renewed war on contraception. This ought to tell us something.
It may be spring in the Mideast, but a chill wind is howling in America as America’s Right puffs its cheeks like Old Man Winter. Education and the personal freedom to control one’s body and sexual life fuel powerful democratic movements. What kind of movement then is America’s Right engaged in?
French social scientist Emmanuel Todd is explicit about the democratizing power of literacy and reproductive freedom. They lead to:
…the transformation of the political system, a spreading wave of democratization and the conversion of subjects into citizens.
But the American Right seeks the opposite, the conversion of citizens into subjects. That they do so while speaking of liberty is just more authoritarian “denying and distorting of information” in the words of Italian humanist, Auschwitz survivor and anti-fascist Primo Levi.
Is the Right really mounting a war on contraception? While far-right conservatives have largely succeeded in snookering the credulous news media into framing its anti-birth control agenda as all about abortion, they seek much more than an abortion ban.
In a moment of unintended candor, a leading conservative Texas state legislator, Wayne Christian, recently confessed. The Texas Tribune asked Christian whether he was engaged in a war on birth control. He answered:
Of course it’s a war on birth control, on abortions, on everything. That’s what family planning is all about.
Christian is no isolated crank. He has helped lead the charge to eliminate spending on family planning and force women to undergo sonograms before a pregnancy is terminated. In Texas, insurance companies no longer have to cover birth control.
Despite the recent federal budget fight over Planned Parenthood, progressives seem only drowsily aware of the assault on birth control. Painful as it is to do, we should listen more carefully to Rush Limbaugh, who recently mocked birth control and laughed in agreement when a caller said a woman should just keep her legs closed. We should also keep tabs on the Family Research Council, which thinks birth control is a contrivance of the devil.
On education, the Right’s assault is well underway. According to Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 34 states and the District of Columbia have cut aid to K-12. Forty-three states have cut funding for public colleges and universities.
This weekend, we can add Texas to that list. The Legislature, wrapping up a session that looks more and more like a Rick Perry for President campaign commercial, is cutting public education by $4 billion and locking 20,000 qualified students out of a college education.
Most Americans don’t support these anti-democratic policies, but they don’t really know they are happening. It’s a very small number of conservative elites driving the agenda. Their followers are blind and weak, convinced by decades of conservative propaganda that all their troubles stem from a too-big liberal state or from various “Others.” Some of these Others, demonstrably poor, stand accused of taking more than their fair share. The contradiction is lost on the intellectually infirm.
America’s most dangerous myth is the “It-Can’t-Happen-Here” story. The cowed political press continues to treat the profoundly authoritarian conservative agenda with kid gloves.
And Democrats get the framing wrong on most of the issues at hand. For instance, millions of American Catholics defied the Vatican on birth control. Don’t we think Catholics and non-Catholics would defy the anti-contraception Wayne Christians of the world? But we allow the debate to be framed solely around the question of abortion when we should be talking about the War on Contraceptives, government control of our bodies and private lives and the loss of personal liberty.
We get deep in the wonky weeds on education, and we always have. The fundamental issue is simple to frame: Without free public education there is no democracy, there is no America.
But, of course, It Can’t Happen Here, so why worry. That’s my great frustration. I know most Americans are deeply committed to democracy. We stood in awesome solidarity with the pro-democracy rebels in Egypt and elsewhere. But many are blind to the real struggle at home.
Primo Levi, in a 1974 essay called “A Past We Thought Would Never Return,” wrote these words:
Every age has its own fascism and we see the warning signs wherever the concentration of power denies citizens the possibility and the means of expressing and acting on their own free will. There are many ways of reaching this point, and not just through the terror of police intimidation, but by denying and distorting information, by undermining systems of justice, by paralyzing the education system, and by spreading in myriad subtle ways nostalgia for a world where order reigned, and where the security of the privileged few depends on the forced labor and the forced silence of the many.
In his brilliant, just-published essay on Levi, Stanislav G. Pugliese adds:
…the attempt of the fascist state to seize control of the family through social legislation (preventing abortions, outlawing contraception…)
Let’s check off the list with reference to the American Right’s agenda. Paralyzing public education. Check. Outlawing contraceptives and abortions. Check. Denying and distorting information. Check. Undermining systems of justice. Check (Patriot Act; tort reform). Forced labor (union busting; wage and pension cuts). Check. Nostalgia for an imagined world of perfect order, authority and obedience. Check.
With regard to America or Americans, the word “fascism” is taboo. We could be prohibited by convention from using the word “cancer,” too. But rogue cells would still destroy bodies.
There is no comparison to Hitler here. His was a special evil. I would just like the Right’s agenda to be seen for what it is, profoundly anti-democratic and authoritarian. When it is seen for what it is, and if it’s not too late, Americans will condemn it. And defeat it.



44 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
This is from Wikipedia’s summary of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
Apt, very apt, frightening parallel.
Neil Postman, in Amusing Ourselves to Death, argued convincingly that Huxley’s rather than Orwell’s vision of future dystopia was the real danger.
It’s interesting that we were assigned both these books in high school. They had a big impact on me, and still do. I wonder, are these books still assigned to school children?
I lived for several years in Korea. There, the first 6 grades of school are free. During this time kids learn to read and write-99%+literacy rate in Korea(of course their written language is one of the worlds easiest to learn-all spelling is phonetic-the written language itself was constructed a looong time ago by a ruler who was tired of the fact that you had to have lots of education to be able to communiate in writing, so he sat a few of his people down and said make a written language that everyone can learn. Which they did. That date is a national holiday in Korea.
Back to education. We currently have at least a 30% national HS drop out rate every year. Our HS grads have to take remedial classes in math and english in order to take college programs. I call it the dumbing down of america.
One problem is that all HS emphasis is on going to college, not on skilled trades where you don’t need a college degree but can, in many cases, make really good money
Example, I am a master plumber. I only worked at it part time due to my job with the FedGov, yet I made more money doing that than I did working for the US.
Getting back o Korea. Afer the first 6 years of govt paid education, it is up to the parents to pay(or get scholarships) to continue education, whether it be in skilled trades or in a college track.
Considering that, Koreans today have 56% of their age group graduate from college every year. More than any other country in the world.
99%+ literacy, 56% graduate college, a red hot economy. Bleeding edge science. IMO they are doing something right. Of course, the kids put in long hours 5.5 days of school every week. Only 2 months off, 1 month in summer, the coldest month in winter. Compare to US. less than 6 hrs school a day, only 180 days per year. We have gone way past the agricultural model for school wherein we had to let the kids out of school to plant, take care of and harvest crops. But we keep up the same model.
Despite rethug claims that we are #1 in education, we have fallen a long ways from that. and if the rethug plan for education continues, we will quite soon find ourselves as nothing more than the basket case of the world, just like Africa is today.
If doing something means privatising HS, then lets do it. Test the kids-like they do in Germany-to find out where their strengths lie, machinist, plumber, brick layer, mechanic, etc etc. or if they should continue on to college
Not vouchers, but real private HS that actually teach academics aiming towards a career that the student shows the most ability(here in San Antonio the school district that I live in has a health careers HS where kids get a big jump on the various fields of medicine) rather than sports. IOW, no major in football, or bball.
In India, kids are celebrated in newspapers for their academic achivement rather than like the US where it seems that all we care about in HS is sports and the stars who are playing.
So instead of major universities giving out free scholarships for sports stars, they give them to the students with the best GPA.
A dream I know. But if nothing is done, then we will continue to fall further behind and corporations(much as I hate them)will once again hire amcits rather than go to other countries to find people who are qualified(as a recent corp did here. Had 4000 good paying jobs, no american qualified to fill them, even college grads)
I always like to read what you write Glen but I have 2 main issues with this piece.”Techincal Problems” really. By Calling it American Winter you imply that America has a spring to look forward to. By going after the “American Right” you imply that there is an American Left.
Points taken, though it’s more than possible to read it as our spring is behind us. As to the existence of a viable American Left, I’d refer you to Kevin Drum’s excellent analysis.
http://www.alternet.org/rights/151108/why_the_democratic_party_has_abandoned_the_middle_class_in_favor_of_the_rich/?page=entire
I like the India story.
When our kids were small, we took them out to dinner on their birthdays at a restaurant of their choice, and gave presents after dinner. One year, we had dinner at a Chinese restaurant, and when we broke out the gifts, the Chinese owner came over and said with a big smile “It looks like someone did really well in school”.
Aren’t you part of the American Left?
It exists, or you wouldn’t be here.
Kevin Drum still seems to think Obama is a liberal Democrat. That makes me wonder if he’s correct on anything else.
One concern I have regards the testing and sorting of young people into intellectual or vocational classes. It’s done awfully early in many places, effectively determining futures, I think, before they should be determined.
As to privatization, my difficulty with it involves accountability. America’s free public schools are theoretically (I stress, theoretically) accountable to all of us. I dunno if I want our children turned over to the education equivalent of British Petroleum. That said, I’m no opponent of private schools. And I’d be even more supportive if I wasn’t aware that many conservatives simply want to confiscate our tax dollars to send their privileged children to exclusive schools.
I think he’s accurate about the impact on the Left of the collapse of Labor. I don’t think that lets Obama or any other Democrat off the hook. I really don’t think it relates to how they might be characterized. Today’s elected are pretty much universally condemned in the piece by reference to their exclusive attention to the very, very wealthy.
I just wish I could think of a way to revitalize Labor.
I think so. Brave New World wasn’t part of my high school curriculum but I know others that say they took it in school. We read Animal Farm at my high school. And the Great Gatsby. There were others but I can’t remember (maybe the Bell Jar? I’m not sure, it was over ten years ago).
Lets hope the 99%’ers wake up and see just what the right is really up to!
Great post Glenn and happy Memorial weekend to ya…
Sliding a cold St Pauli Girl down to ya…
One of the many, many strategic blunders by President Obama and the “leadership” of the Democratic Party is their effort to “reach out” to evangelical Christians. Their means of doing so is selling out women and their reproductive rights. And the likely payoff is close to absolute zero.
In Huxley’s Brave New World, soma was handed out to everyone. In the American Right’s version, only the rich and those with health insurance will be able to afford it.
Prison labor is cheaper for businesses than slave labor was for plantation owners before the Civil War. Plantation owners had to feed, clothe, and house their slave.
The remaining prison labor costs is paid for by all of us. The Government pays for the prisons, the food, the clothes, the guards.
Unwanted children winding up in the criminal justice system at a lot higher rate than other kids. Unwanted kids almost guaranteed to be cheap labor later in life.
It’s always about the money with the Republicans.
Assuming facts no[longer]t in evidence. Americans self-identify and behave as consumers in nearly every activity, almost never as citizens.
If you accept as true the old saw that a fool and his money are soon parted, it should follow easily that commercial advertising’s chief objective has been to convert citizens into fools. When TV reached every home, the process accelerated, and here we are.
The assault on public-sector unions has the potential to revitalize the labor movement?
.See Wisconsin and FDL commentor and general all around philosopher and activist Norskeflamethrower about the situation in Wisconsin.
Thanks for your Sunday posts. They are thoughtful and much appreciated.
Your piece makes me weep (seems to happen often these days). A very fine Law School Prof. told me that one of the major forces behind Roe was the image/horror of back street abortions…That vision seems very timely and instructive here today.
I agree that American fascism isn’t about a Hitler – yet. But the groundwork is being laid for things to get so fouled up that a strongman seems to be the only answer. Bush damned near ran the country onto the ground in his eight years; Obama is just treading water – at best. It won’t take a whole lot to push us off the proverbial cliff, economically. When that happens, the masses will scream for a savior.
For me, the first part of the answer to this question is found in Julius G. Getman, Restoring the Power of Unions: It Takes a Movement. The short answer is that it requires changes in the strategic focus on unions. The difficulty then is figuring out how to bring about that change in thinking within the labor movement. On that, I do not have any answers. For a real depressing read, check out the latest from Harold Meyerson – which might be summarized as, having lost the battle for EFCA, many in labor have given up.
People who have followed the so-called Religious Right (which is neither religious nor right) have been aware of their agenda to push an authoritian agenda that includes disenfranchising women. We need to get this information out front and center and keep it there.
I agree with your assessment of Kevin Drum’s article. It is definitely worth reading and makes some valid points. I also agree with you that we need to find a way for “labor” to have a stronger voice again.
What is problematic – “…the Right’s agenda to be seen for what it is, profoundly anti-democratic and authoritarian. When it is seen for what it is, and if it’s not too late, Americans will condemn it. And defeat it.”
We now live in a country where both political parties are pushing “the Right’s” agenda. Need a blatantly obvious example, the near unanimous vote to extend the Patriot Act for four years. Have Americans been protesting in huge numbers this continued attack on civil liberties and privacy? It appears to me that the vast majority of Americans either don’t care, or are unwilling/unable to stop the authoritarian type takeover of this country. I’m hoping that people will wake up to what is happening. I would say before it’s too late, but, perhaps it already is… (by the way, I’m also hoping with everything in my being that the majority of Americans will choose compassion for their fellow man over authoritarianism.)
We defeat the Right by remembering that successful politics is about addition. It is not about subtraction [purity].
We stop opening trendy liberal issue botiques. Instead, we focus our resources on building economic justice bridges to the moderates.
Thanks for the drink and the toast! Sorry I was away from the pub for awhile.
Speakingupnow, I’m with you and everything you said.
I was away for awhile. Sorry.
But I wonder, labor is oriented to specific workplaces. I’d join a union for the political benefits. Meaning, I wouldn’t expect — although I would be willing to accept and sacrifice for the greater good, if necessary — help boosting my consultant retainers. But how could we make that happen?
You know, RevBev, I’m not weeping. But maybe I assume insight (however meager it might be) equals more hope than it does.
The thing is, Americans have voted over and over again for justice, for change. That it hasn’t happened doesn’t change the character of American voters. I have faith in them.
No worries, but I am afraid I do not understand your question.
(Also, let me say I agree wholeheartedly with your point at 29).
If I recall, the German education system is Public all the way through college/trade school. When I attended, the school day was 5 hrs long with any specialized courses taught later in the day.
Prior to budget cuts (last 10 years)school was planned here for 7.5 hrs/day. Our Oregon Coast districts now shorten the school year due to lack of funding.
timr is on target with the need for applied skills training (the Trades). These courses would enhance Public education and are more than worth investing in as a group. Such classes increase relevancy for the students as well as society as a whole.
Skilled Tradesmen shouldn’t have to work separate jobs for the benefits either.
I have supported labor unions my entire life. Perhaps we need to think of the “labor movement” as more than just “unions”, especially when union representation is so low (thanks in large part to the concerted attacks by conservatives and former President Reagan in the 1980′s). Whether it is a coal miner, an engineer, a secretary, or anyone else who “labors”, they should all be concerned about their working conditions, wages, etc. “We the people” – that is the majority, need better representation.
I should make it simpler. I’m a self-employed consultant. But I would support a union with dues just because of the political benefits of a revitalized labor movement. If that’s possible, I don’t know how to do it.
I think it’s time to take names. Here’s one: Don Blankenship, Chairman and CEO of Massey Energy Co. (Mark Sumner, May 29, 2011)
I thought anyone could join. I’d like to hear more if you explore joining as an at large member.
Given the number of Rush’s ex wives and no children if he hates birth control as well as abortion then either he can’t have kids or really hasn’t tried to have kids.
What about these folks? http://www.workingamerica.org/
OK. I suspect there is no way to do that (Working America is rhetorically not that far off, but I am not sure in reality it is). I do wonder if individual unions might create such an affiliate member status-I suspect that would be more likely than anything run through the AFL-CIO. (FWIW I would join such a thing as well).
Good durn point!
this post fits nicely with what DeMint, leader of the SC TeaPublicans, said recently:
Jim DeMint Gets His Delusions On LINK
There are some structural issues why the union movement has atrophied over the last fifty years:
1. The enemy is not the corporate employer, it is the overseas worker who needs work and is willing to do it for less.
2. The most heavily unionized industries are the ones that have been least successful. Cars, steel, appliances, electronic goods and the like have all have shrunk or disappeared from the American landscape.
3. While Americans may say they want to buy American, they actually buy the less expensive goods from overseas.
The net is that the successful unions today represent workers that provide a service that cannot be outsourced – government employees, teachers, firemen, retail clerks and the like. That is not a base to revitalize our movement, nor is it a base to rebuild American manufacturing.
We cannot dream pipedreams – we must make our economy more competitive. BTW, this is not a troll but a concern that we are trying to return to an older period that is not in our future.
I don’t disagree with your perspective, though I have some concerns about specifics (for instance, that the foreign worker is the enemy).
Still, you’re right. We aren’t going to return to the old labor days. The better question is, how do we build a powerful, representative infrastructure that represents the middle class? It won’t look like yesterday’s unions. It may, however, have a union-like structure.
Perhaps enemy is the wrong noun – the foreign worker is at least the competitor in a serious game. I realize that the world economy is not a zero sum game, and gains by one party do not necessarily mean losses by someone else. However, we have lost very many productive jobs to overseas operations and our citizens buy the output.
No question that American businesses chased cheaper labor overseas. At the same time, as several studies show, creating the greatest income disparity at home in our history.