The Althouse blog would be a fine blog except for how it contains the “thoughts” of Ann Althouse, which resemble an apartment left empty after its ancient dowager inhabitant is finally carted off to the Home: vacant and catty.
Vide.
Paul Krugman says, “So, let’s try another shot to the head.”
I realize he’s talking about a misconception, and he has designated the misconception a “zombie,” and according to zombie lore, zombies are destroyed by shooting them in the head. But still. That’s quite a violent way to talk about the thoughts in the minds of the people you want to correct.
The “but still” is vintage Althouse: “yes, this is comical bullshit… But still!”
She thinks she has Krugman’s number, see:
And it was just last January that Kruman, responding to a terrible shooting, wrote:
So will the Arizona massacre make our discourse less toxic? It’s really up to G.O.P. leaders. Will they accept the reality of what’s happening to America, and take a stand against eliminationist rhetoric? Or will they try to dismiss the massacre as the mere act of a deranged individual, and go on as before?
Krugman’s point was about how right wing media, especially Fox, has mainstreamed all sorts of crazy paranoid bullshit, which is just true. Althouse’s point is that a passing reference to zombie movies in the context of a long-running Internets meme is exactly the same thing as say, what Paul Campos pretty accurately describes here. Althouse’s post is smugly “veni, vidi, vinci,” but is, as usual, more “vino, vino, vino.”
And, fishing in the Althouse comments cesspool, we reel in this inevitable brown trout:
The Crack Emcee [very sic] said… I’m not going to read the comments, because I’m sure somebody beat me to it, but I’d like to give a shot to Krugman’s head. To straighten him out, of course.
*Pop*
You knew that turd was floating around in there somewhere, didn’t you? If you didn’t, well, you have not been paying attention, then.



60 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
SaTHERSday Night Fever!
Speaking of fevers, I dare say La Althouse appears to be beset once again with some strange sort of brain fever which renders her incapable of distinguishing truth from fiction and fantasy from reality.
Is Ann still teaching at that college? I support teacher tenure but Ann is a great argument against it. So is Henry, Jon Woo and Condi.
Is she still drinking T-Rex showed her video blogging while drinking wine once Ann as I recall was a boring drunk.
Her comments section is fairly astounding. But predictable. The comment about shooting Krugman? I knew it was there before I went looking for it.
Krugman’s point was about how right wing media, especially Fox, has mainstreamed
all sorts of crazy paranoid bullshit,Outright calls to violence against Obama, Dark People, Gays, Muslims, etc.
Thersaturday Night Live!
Actually, I’m not at all surprised to see Ann siding with the zombies. They have a lot in common, like shambling around after dark (and in Ann’s case, long before it).
thersday nite live!
You are a braver man than I for wandering into that fever swamp.
Krugman is by the way not the only person to use the zombie metaphor. All the best writers use it.
I have a longstanding grievance.
Do you know, she once called watertiger a bad man?
Clearly Althouse is aware of all internet traditions.
holy moly
Has Ann done something recently for people to take her seriously again? Ok serious is to strong a word has Ann something to make us notice her Its been years since we bothered to talk about her on the front page.
I think keeping track of the loons is an important job but is Ann worthy of our attention? Aren’t there bigger loons to fry?
Demonstrating once again that keen critical judgment and discerning acumen for which she is justly famous and which only comes from downing far too many boxes of rotgut wine.
has Ann something to make us notice her
She has been sending forth Meade-ia Ogre and and the hordes of flying monkeys to protect her honor on the far flung fields of the internets.
She was just mentioned in the New York Times as a prominent “academic blogger.”
She gets a lot of mainstream attention, and little of it contains the important information that she’s a fucking lunatic.
And totally incoherent.
She is encouraging her flying monkey’s to troll the Lake and everyone else on ourside? Is she hoping we link back to her or even debate her on her site? Is this a ploy to generate ad revenue?
I have not seen Meade-ia Ogre here.
I don’t think that they have been trolling here, but they have been over at Ther’s place and LGM.
Yeah, I actually scrolled through it expecting that sort of idiocy, then found the comment too. What is it about people that gets them to blindly follow broken thinking like that?
Watertiger is a bad man. In fact, she’s terrible at it.
But still probably better at it then Meade.
It takes a Village.
Who else made the Times’s list I am scared they call her prominent the Uni Bomber had a degree too is his manifesto prominent? Infamous would fit better but Ann is not famous. Did any of our front pagers with degrees make the cut?
Mostly conservatives. Exactly what you would expect from the ultra-liberal NYT.
It’s pretty grisly stuff…
It really does, yet somehow they don’t manage to ever really challenge or attempt to figure out what in hades is going on over there. Oh, but hey, I’m probably just not smart enough to get it, or take her classes, or something =P
I hear the Gray Lady wears no panties.
Don’t tell Althouse.
On another note, this is a great tattoo.
didn’t know they had raybans back then
Why go after the smaller blogs if you want fame or add revenue? This seems more a plan to disrupt the smaller blogs from getting big this smells of Karl. If Atlas Juggs and the others ( I forgot the loser’s names ) are doing this then I would say Karl gave an order.
If its just Ann then this is her personal crazy but what would make even a crazy GOPer decide that independent thought and action is called for.
Maybe Karl is doing a small scale test run which if it works will be expanded upon or Ann is unhappy with the GOP’s handling of things? The Wisconsin protests she’s from there have got her shook up?
If so then the GOP has a problem Ann is a good measure of how the crazy wing of the GOP feels about stuff.
If she is off the reservation then the Crazy wing of the GOP is not listening to its leaders.
The GOP will have a harder time getting Moderate voters if Ann and the others decide to stop taking orders and go full tilt crazy.
Pass the Popcorn another front in the GOP civil war just opened up.
Really? I try not to hate on the times too much, but apparently they let filth like that get published. I mean seriously, a sample that goes into letting those people label themselves “libertarian” without any sort of challenge? That’s just absurdity, glad they got even more coverage.
Althouse’s post is smugly “veni, vidi, vinci,” = I came, I saw, to be beaten
I’m guessing you meant “veni vidi vici”, unless you really meant “vinci”, which is funny.
–Your Friendly Local NeighborHood Latin Nazi.
As long as it is on someone I do not know.
Who are you to judge what sort of things she’s into in the bedroom?
That being said, thanks for fixing my understanding of that latin phrase.
Someone I smell Karl wants to pump up the Righty blogs before the election.
Dude Jesus.
And of course try and tear us down Jane might need to hire more Mods for the election.
Do you have to mention Ann “going commando?” ick
Ancient personal joke from junior year high school Latin.
Wolverines! 8-(
All I remember of my high school Latin is “Omnia Gallia in tres partes divisa est.”
This is also a great site — pictures of famous actresses Photoshopped to have Steve Buscemi’s eyes. It sounds like it would be creepy, but actually, it is indeed creepy.
I remember that, too. It also helps working crosswords.
That’s the other thing I remember.
That is almost as creepy as Althouse.
Oddly enough it is actually useful as I use it in my intro class to illustrate S-O-V syntactical structure.
Stalin Obtains Victory, no doubt…
Subject-object-verb, which is the default syntactic structure in Latin. In English it is Subject-verb-object (SVO). We are now approaching the outer limits of my knowledge of structural or descriptive linguistics.
I was jes’ joshin’. I have gotten rich, after all, teaching youngsters not to bury the subject in the passive.
I do dearly wish you were teaching writing at my institution in that case. Most of my seniors have not figured that one out yet.
My young ones do not either, but at least but at least they get yelled at about it.
Anyhow, niters, all.
niters thers
Night! Active voice uber alles!
Think I will toddle off as well. Take care all.
g’nite dr dick
OMG,
The pictures of “academic bloggers” at the link looks like a poster for a bad horror flick. Very bad. Scary bad.
heh, indeed, quoth the Putz.
And many mistakes were made.
.
Fascinating! I went through the first 20 or 30 comments and a few of them make a big stink about how the 47% who don’t pay income taxes are nevertheless pushing the US into wars abroad and charging the (I guess “virtuous”) 53% for those wars. Sort of a kind of double reverse-whammy there.
Problems, of course, are: While the war in Afghanistan was more or less launched to popular acclaim, the Iraq War most certainly was not the idea of the Working Class. That was very much an elitist war that, remember, the younger relatives of Bush an Cheney did nothing to take part in (FDR’s younger relations did take part in World War II), heck Romney had five sons, all of whom were of military age in 2004, none of whom put on a uniform!
Second, the wars did nothing to add to the tax bill of Joe Average American. All of that burden was simply tossed onto America’s credit card and only 1% of the population really plays any serious role in the war anyway. There have been at least a few cases of people forgetting that there was a war on.