My beloved … My dear friend Nabeel Rajab asked me to manage his page in case of his arrest, with my deep pain that he was arrested from his home in such a time, but here I am keeping my word with your help until he return safely
Rajab was released two hours later and posted to his Facebook page (rough translation from Arabic):
Peace all – I am back to the house two hours after my arrest and beating and the destruction of my house – details on tomorrow – and make sure that these practices will only make us more determined to continue until we achieve our uprising demands
Rajab recently described those demands:
At first people were not asking for a change of regime. They were asking for political reform and political participation. They want greater respect for their human rights and the liberation of political prisoners. They demand an end to discrimination and torture. They are asking for the right to elect their government, they want a new prime minister and a new written Constitution. However, as the situation has progressed, the people have become more and more angry over the government’s response to these peaceful protests. They will not accept a government that kills it’s own people and their demands are changing, they are now requesting a regime change.
Patrick Cockburn notes in the Independent that many other activists have gone missing or been arrested:
“There are 80 people still missing that we don’t know what happened to,” said Mohammed al-Maskati, an opposition activist, in a telephone interview. He added that there was no information on the whereabouts of the seven reform leaders who have been detained, but they have been charged with “incitement to kill” and being in communication with a foreign power.
Secretary of State Clinton commented on the situation in Bahrain this morning in Paris and it’s very interesting to see how differently her remarks are targeted to the press – in fact it appears that she had two quite different messages, one for US consumption about “concern” and “dialogue:”
Clinton said she had spoken about Bahrain on Saturday with the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates and prime minister of Qatar, on the sidelines of a meeting in Paris about Libya.
“Our goal is a credible political process that can address the legitimate aspirations of all the people of Bahrain, starting with the crown prince’s dialogue, which all parties should join,” Clinton said. “That process should unfold in a peaceful, positive atmosphere that protects the freedom of peaceful assembly while ensuring that students can go to school, businesses can operate, and people can undertake their normal daily activities.”
…Clinton said Bahrain has a right to invite those forces into its country, but she urged caution.
And a very different one for the Gulf audience. From the Khaleej Times:
PARIS – US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accused Iran on Saturday of undermining peace and stability in the Gulf by trying to advance its agenda in neighbouring countries.
“The United States has an abiding commitment to Gulf security… and a top priority is working together with our partners on our shared concerns about Iranian behaviour in the region,” she told journalists.
“We share the view that Iran’s activities in the Gulf, including its efforts to advance its agenda in the neighbouring countries undermines peace and stability,” she said.
While the State Department has issued a pro forma statement of concern about the arrests of civil rights leaders:
“The United States is deeply troubled by arrests of Bahraini opposition leaders and others,” said State Department spokesman Mark Toner.
“We call on the government of Bahrain to ensure the security of person of all arrestees and to abide by its commitment to transparent judicial proceedings conducted in full accordance with Bahraini law and Bahrain’s international legal obligations,” he said.
Note that the State Department did not call for the release of these political prisoners or a halt to similar arrests, only saying they should be tried under existing Bahraini laws, laws which have been used so many times in the past to imprison and torture political opponents. The Secretary herself apparently saw no need to mention them at all and instead reinforced the Bahraini’s spurious charges of “foreign communications” with her scare talk about Iran.
Seems like Madame Secretary sent a very clear message – and it was not about democracy or human rights.



64 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Does this mean a no-fly zone over Bahrain is off the table?
How easy it is for the Obama administration to express ‘concern’ over the brutal and murderous crackdown in Bahrain, which it presumably knew about beforehand, which it certainly could see coming, which it could have stopped in its tracks, AFTER it has happened. How nicely that works out.
“The United States is deeply troubled” = “could give a rat’s ass”
Srsly, anybody in the ME (or places like Nigeria or Ecuador) who sits on or near oil – too bad about your concern for freedom, self-determination, life, natural environment – you will all be crushed again and again, until this human project of evil hits the final wall.
Note too the way that ‘peaceful assembly’ has been redefined here ….
“Clinton said. “That process should unfold in a peaceful, positive atmosphere that protects the freedom of peaceful assembly while ensuring that students can go to school, businesses can operate, and people can undertake their normal daily activities.””
… in a way that basically defines as unpeaceful any assembly capable of having any real political power.
More terrible news. The (arrests and) beating will continue until…
Thanks for the post, Siun. Your commitment is most inspiring. And, knowing that there are people like you, Mark and others gives me a glimmer of hope for humanity.
So, Clinton found refuge in Paris after Tunisia gave her the boot.
http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2011/03/19/hillary-faced-black-flags-anti-us-chants-in-tunisia
No money or support in this country for living and life here at home but plenty of both for violence an death overseas. Tell me somebody hasn’t gotten their priorities afu.
Very good point … and note that the Saudis were called in as soon as the protesters took their actions to the Financial district.
Real men (Hillary included) go to Iran. Many neocons and neolibs will consider Libya simply a warm-up for ‘democracy promotion’ in Persia, the seat of all evil. Special forces can stoke some protests, some people will die, and it’s Katy bar the door.
‘Look, Barry, that wasn’t so difficult, was it. You simply give the order and the Tomahawks fly. Now we’re seen that those old things still work, at least most of them, and the crews have some valuable refresher training, let’s get a couple boomers in the Gulf a let a few fly.’
The pressure will come for Iran. Clinton is picking that sore, using Bahrain, while Libya burns.
So, it’s OK for Bahrain and Yemen to murder their citizens but it’s not OK for Kaddafi to do it?
and it’s OK for US to murder Pakistanis, but it’s not OK for Libya?
Got it, I think.
110 Tomahawk cruise missiles have been fired by the United States at Libya so far, less than 24 hours after “Operation Odyssey Dawn” got started. At a unit cost of approximately $756,000, that means that we’ve spent a minimum of $83,160,000 just for the cost of the hardware of this one tiny piece of the slaughter. That doesn’t count fuel, warheads or support. That also doesn’t address all of the other attacks going on like a flight of B-2s flying non stop from the United States and dropping bombs on their heads. This was undertaken at the behest of the oil companies because they have largely been shut out of Libya. The very same companies that get billions in subsidies from the taxpayer also get their own private military force also paid for by the taxpayers.
Next time you hear somebody whining about the deficit, there’s a couple of realities to point out.
Oh, their priorities are straight. There are just a lot of us who are not their concern. Class war.
The great English novelist Margery Allingham had little idea how well she summed up our foreign “policy” in this quote:
“When one kicks over a tea table and smashes everything but the sugar bowl, one may as well pick that up and drop it on the bricks, don’t you think?”
Bahrain Rights Center is reporting other doctors have been arrested as well:
Dr. Ali Al-Ekry,Dr. Bassem Dhaif,Dr. Ghassan Dhaif,Dr.Mahmood Asghar
But, but, but….there’s a nice, shiny new (exploding) object in Libya. Bahrain where?
Yeah, it’s really too bad women have to act like men in order to have any kind of power. that’s not really why we need women in power, so they can act like men
Reuters now reports:
A man detained by police two days ago has died…
“We were recently informed of the death of Abdulrusul Hassan Ali Hajair from Buri village after he was abducted by security forces and the army from Wafiq market on March 18,” the Wefaq statement said. “His family was just told to pick up his body from the Salmaniya hospital.”
Excellent points as always
i’m guessing bahrain and yemen don’t have as much oil as libya
the double standard by our ‘elite’ is depressing
Yep. Hard to run on your compassion cred when you lose it immediately upon taking office.
I think their “priorities” are to bring the Messiah back. Expect more sighting of Jeebus on tortillas or cupboard doors.
The Great Mother has been warning us in her visitations for at least the last century. ( disguised as the Virgin)
Say, did the pope ever release the final prophecy of Fatima?
We don’t do reality.
Tomorrow’s Lie Industrial Complex won’t miss a beat: DEFICITS! DEFICITS! GRANNY’S SOCIAL SEC FREELOADING IS DESTROYING OUR NATION! THERE IS NO END TO THE DESTRUCTIVE GREED OF SCHOOLTEACHERS WHICH WILL KILL US ALL!
Obama will agree.
These wimmin must be insane because that’ not how the female brain works. They are going against their hard-wiring for life sustainance
Agreed, one would think (hope, know) that women would tend more toward relating and less toward manly competition. But look here, we have Hillary, Susan, Samantha and Ann-Marie beating the war drums and forcing poor Barry to get in step.
I would hope that despite the public statements made,diplomatic efforts are taking place behind the scenes.
Or maybe that’s just a case of wishful thinking.
And don’t, forgawdsake look at that noocluar meltdown in Japan.
I intuit that’s a part of what this new shiny war is all about. It’s much sexier than watching a country crumble to the sea over another bit of Man’s hubris
heh
It all goes back to when Kaddafi cut down that Rabbis trees, I tell you
diplomacy won’t work on people who are willing to slaughter their countrymen
Yep. It’s true. There are physiological differences in the wiring of the female brain. It’s not just a chemistry thing, though chemistry certainly plays a role in it’s development. Just more evidence of biological evolution and I feel it’s important to point out that even though I’m not theist, biological evolution in no way refutes or precludes god.
Clinton’s statements in Paris indicated to me that the Gulf Cooperation Council traded having a free hand in the Gulf countries for providing Arab cover what is a French and UK driven operation in Libya. No doubt “private talks” are going on with Bahrain asking for restraint and talk is cheap; leaders really can’t be shamed by other leaders. The political calculus on Bahrain is who needs the Sixth Fleet base in Bahrain more at the moment–the US for support of its Persian Gulf operations or Bahrain to deliver the jobs that might quiet down protest. So far it looks like the US needs it more.
Meanwhile, the revolution in Syria just got uncorked, unity talks continue in Palestine, Saudi Arabia has started down the slippery slope, Iraq is on the way to potentially contentious provincial and district elections, and Yemen is rapidly approaching the point at which it either plays out like Egypt or like Libya. With as many people in the streets of Yemeni cities, my guess is like Egypt but messier. Members of Saleh’s party and government ministers are deserting him more rapidly since the massacre of 52 people of Friday. We will see whether President Obama will make an announcement first that “it would be helpful if President Saleh stepped down and there was movement for real yad-da-yah-da” followed by “President Saleh has lost his legitimacy” when Saleh doesn’t and a sufficient number of ministers and military units have withdrawn support.
Foreign policy is driven by domestic politics (notice that I did not say domestic public opinion). And in the US, those folks who drive domestic politics seem to be split on US action in Libya. Those who were pushing hardest for the war in Iraq are questioning whether the US can afford the Libyan action (clearly not unless one dramatically raises taxes) and are afraid that it will distract from Afghanistan and require the US to leave “too early”.
@7 Yep, Margaret, exactly right. But it’s worse. The geniuses at DoD can’t seem to trim the fraud enough to pay for the wars they want. Oh, wait, that’s the point isn’t it. Another example of dooH niboR economic policy.
Pathological unable to stay out of a fight, aren’t we? And dreadfully inconsistent when we do jump in?
I thought that maybe, just maybe, one time we cold let somebody else do the dirty work, what with the two other wars, bankrupt nation, idiotic budget cuts, THEY’RE NOT A THREAT TO US, etc.
But NO!
So what we have in the course of one week is this.
Secretary Gates saying anyone who goes into a land war in the Middle East/Asia, should have their head examined.
Sec. Gates goes to Congress to tell them why we need the big budget we have to fight a land war in the Middle east/Asia.
We step into a new war tangent to the Middle East/Asia.
Gotta laugh. Either that or just give up entirely. Tough to choose which.
Good point, this is all about the oil.
Those who have oil get our help, those that don’t, suffer
It’s too bad that men have to “act like men” in order to have power to affect decisions. For example, the primary test of a manager in most of their superiors’ minds is whether they are “tough enough” to fire someone. Good decisionmaking skills, not so much. American society has a bad case of Trumpitis.
Margaret #11 excellent info; my only edit would be caling oil corps “companies.” It is an error made by everyone including Jane Hampsher and Thom Hartmann so you are in good company (note proper use of the word); however a corps should be called a corps as its dead hand has its grip on everything including our language.
Again, your comments are VERY pertinent; and I thoroughly appreciate your insight.
karen
Where was Secretary Gates when Bush went into Afghanistan and Iraq? What did he think about Vietnam and the Persian Gulf War? It seems to me that he is speaking the opinion of the brass, who are very concerned about the fact that they might have to trim as the deficit-mongering goes forward.
It’s just what kind. I refer to my personal mystery as “IT” as I cannot in any way comprehend It’s aspects.
I do know It loves Life in all it’s forms.
Dictators and bullies are, one in the same, they only understand fear and violence.
And they can only be dealt with one way, with violence and fear.
It’s only when a dictator is dead or in fear for his life that he will quit.
Sad ain’t it?
Good points
That’s not it. Our oil corporations are allowed to explore and develop in Bahrain and Yemen. In Libya, not so much. This is about control, not quantity.
Actually, we have only spent that amount if we replace the Tomahawks we used. The hardware on ships is already a sunk cost.
In fact, the oil companies have not been shut out of Libya since Bush “brought Gaddafi back into the international community.” And Gaddafi has been very reliable in delivering oil for Western money.
Which might explain why the domestic politics of this has been split in the US and much more enthusiastic in Europe.
Our buddy Don Rumsfeld was running the show back then, or at least the point man for the Cheney agenda.
Clearly, Gates is a tool, on two levels. And it’s hard to not say the same thing about Obama.
I just gotta love the way this whole thing evolved, our involvement.
It came out last week Friday afternoon West Coast, too late to call any legislators, and then they jumped in with both feet Saturday. There was any real opportunity for the American public to get a word in to the PTB prior to the invasion, I mean enforcement of the no-fly zone.
IMHO this was the perfect case where we could sit on the sidelines and let countries who, you know, ARE IN THE VICINITY of Libya do the dirty work of ‘peace-keeping’. Let the UK and France, and the Arab League absorb some of the cost of policing the world for fucking once, right?
Is that too much to ask, he says rhetorically?
recent news report:
Russia urged coalition nations to stop the use of force against Libya, challenging the use of the U.N. no-fly zone resolution as a ” controversial step.” In a statement published on its website, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said air strikes carried out by coalition forces killed 48 civilians and injured 150.
This is somewhat embarrassing to the U.S. as SecDef Robert Gates is currently in Russia.
Edit- NOT any real opportunity..
This is what Hillary and Zero support:
Bahrain hospital attack: ‘Physical abuse and humiliation of doctors’
The full story of how thuggish Bahraini security forces surrounded and took over a hospital treating injured protesters has emerged from eye-witness testimony of one of the medical staff involved. Security forces burst into operating theatres, beat staff and searched from ward to ward for doctors according to the first detailed accounts of a violent government crackdown at the hospital in Manama.
Opposition leaders in the small island kingdom described the attack by security troops as a “crime against humanity” and the United Nations said it seemed to have broken international laws.
Now a member of staff, who spoke to The Sunday Telegraph in secret for fear of retribution from government forces, has described the full sequence of events which caused outrage around the world.
“They are really after us,” he said. “There’s been a lot of physical abuse and humiliation of doctors. They treat us as if we were terrorists.”
Salmaniya medical centre, which had been treating people hurt in Bahrain’s street clashes with government troops, was surrounded by security forces last week during a violent crackdown on a month-long, anti-government movement which has been calling for a constitutional monarchy and equal rights for Bahrain’s Shia Muslim majority, which has been marginalised by the ruling Sunni Muslim elite.
A) Do you seriously think they won’t be replaced? And at a higher unit cost than they are currently?
B) From what I’ve read, the Europeans are the primary recipients of Libyan oil so of course they are a driving force.
C) Please point out where I figured in the cost of the ships from which they were launched? I alluded to the operating cost of them but not the cost of the hardware. That would only count if some are damaged or destroyed.
D) What does any of this have to do with my overarching point that the deficit blather doesn’t square with this action?
Defend slaughter if you must but let’s not be coy about it.
It never seems to be.
BEIJING — China expressed regret on Sunday over the multinational air strikes in Libya, saying in a foreign ministry statement that it opposed the use of force in international relations. “China has noted the latest developments in Libya and expresses regret over the military attacks on Libya,” the statement said.
NEW DELHI: India views with grave concern the continuing violence, strife and deteriorating humanitarian situation in Libya. It regrets the air strikes that are taking place. As stated earlier by India, the measures adopted should mitigate and not exacerbate an already difficult situation for the people of Libya.
God, and perhaps Michelle, only know how manipulated he must feel.
Regardless of what they say, they give not a fuck about “the people of Libya”
The corporations are now the only “people’ that count..
I gotta go…it’s been fun
We decide which dictators to prop up and which ones to take down based on how nice they are to us, not on how nice they are to their own people. So as soon as we get done taking down Gaddafi, the next Libyan dictator we decide to prop up will be nice to us, but will be mean as hell to his people.
And notice that we’re stepping in to help the rebels in Libya that actually have weapons, but we aren’t willing to step in to help the peaceful protesters in Bahrain who are, for all practical purposes, weaponless. I suppose that if the protesters find some way to arm themselves, we’ll help take their dictator down like we are doing for the rebels in Libya. But as long as the Bahrainis remain oil-less and as long as their dictator remains nice to us, and especially to the Israelis, despite him being mean as hell to his people, we’ll continue to prop him up so that he is free to slaughter his people into submission.
If it’s true that you eventually become what you create, America will soon become a dictatorial state no different from the ones in the Middle East.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2011/02/23/occidental-petroleum-libya-operations-continue-run-local-personnel/ Maybe US looking for a new puppet?
Yet Russia, China, India refused to veto this. ass covering IMV
Now the big one.
The Arab League: The Arab League chief said that Arabs did not want military strikes by Western powers that hit civilians when the League called for a no-fly zone over Libya. Reuters said Secretary-General Amr Moussa was calling for an emergency league meeting to discuss the situation in the Arab world and particularly Libya under UN resolution 1973. “What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians,” Mr Moussa told Egypt’s official state news agency.
Arab League being disingenuous at the least, for domestic consumption imo.I’m not advocating the strikes but I don’t know how you stop tanks and artillery assaults by just flying over them and waving (or shaking your fist?)
It was a bogus mission w/o a clear objective to start with, and big explosions which kill a bunch of humans clarify peoples’ thinking.
Marc Lynch nailed it days ago:
Don’t exaggerate Arab support for Libya No Fly Zone
Posted By Marc Lynch Tuesday, March 15, 2011
China and Russia could have cast vetoes stopping it in its tracks. Brazil, India, and Germany could have also vetoed it. For that matter, the Arab League could have voted against it and Lebanon not referred it to the UN Security Council. For those who have been following this over three weeks, it was not “sprung of Friday” at all.
And for once, I do believe the reluctance of the US military to get involved was genuine, not feigned.
Not all events fit preset narratives.
“Clinton’s statements in Paris indicated to me that the Gulf Cooperation Council traded having a free hand in the Gulf countries for providing Arab cover what is a French and UK driven operation in Libya.”
BINGO!
Hopey is good at this handwringing Hamlet act.
Plays well with the innocent media victims back home.
Grabs ankle for the Israel Firsters want (Lieberman, etc), but boy, does he hate it.
Hypocritical gasbag.
A. Of course they will be replaced. Jobs and all that.
B. Exactly, we are being pulled for once because of our NATO obligations. Sucks when the shoe is on the other foot.
C. The “hardware on ships” was referring to the Tomahawks. You are correct about what you said.
D. What this has to do with the deficit blather is that this particular point about the sunk cost of the Tomahawks is neither here nor there as an argument. And there are much stronger examples of where actions do not agree with the blather. A real easy one is unconcern about fraud in DoD contracts and operations. Lots more money there than in 110 Tomahawk missiles and much easier ways of dealing with it than trying to rejigger the entire US foreign policy.
To think that just because US troops are not involved the slaughter in Libya will go away is kinda naive. Libya is either in a civil war on in a revolution depending on which reports you believe. That means that Gaddafi’s forces are going to be killing people regardless of what we do. Defending or condemning slaughter is just words. What I see going on a lot is people saying I don’t want my tax money going for slaughter. That is a valid point, but it doesn’t make the slaughter go away.
I write to add details to the discussion, rarely to argue moral principles. International politics in practice from its beginning has been bereft of moral principles. What international norms of restraint we have have been wrested from an earlier mindset only by strong domestic political action and only since World War I. Actually institutions that might exercise restraint have only existed since World War II. And it takes constant vigilance to move things forward. If the Arab League and the UN Security Council merely went through the motions of considering the full implications of their resolutions then the domestic publics of the nations in these bodies need to press them to take their responsibilities seriously. And most likely after Libya they will. We in the US have a difficult time ahead, not because of the actions in Libya but because our domestic political processes are broken to the point that there is not even the pretense of popular rule. Until we fix that, we are yelling at the sky.
And as I itemized above, I was not necessarily saying that what you said was wrong.
The process of change in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries is not finished yet. And Saudi Arabia’s actions in support of Bahrain might have provided space for events to start changing there. Israel is going to look pretty silly when in a decade it is the only non-democratic country in the Middle East, if that is what comes to pass. And I don’t mean “democratic” in the US “march of democracy across the world” sense.
Consider this. The revolution in Egypt has caused the release of all political prisoners. One of those political prisoners is Ayman al-Zawahiri’s brother from Islamic Jihad. A mostly peaceful popular revolution accomplished in 18 days what Islamic Jihad and al Quaeda could not in 30 years of armed struggle. Let that sink in. Now tell me why we can’t withdraw troops from Afghanistan and Iraq now.
The plan of the United States (and Israel) is to destroy Arab secular/nationalist regimes.
They’ll accept window dressed events (Egypt) but they’ll retain the essential elements of repression (army, tame clerics) so as not to scare the zionist horses. Tame(d) islamic parties (MB) will be allowed to participate (by far the best option).
Syria’s turn will come, and then Iran’s.
Hopey/Clinton can window dress all they want, but only naive media victims will consume the bullshit about democracy in the ME.
“dreadfully
inconsistent when we do jump in” I’m afraid.Dog Sees Squirrel = Neocon Smells Oil.
india does not have a veto but agree she should have voted against along with brazil which also abstained – abstentions are essentially copouts