
Pictured: It fed Ronald Reagan in the '30s.
Sadly, Our National Worship of Reagan Week isn’t over. Cue John Fund in today’s WSJ, on how Reagan became Reagan.
Years later, Reagan was uncharacteristically revealing about himself in a 1984 letter to the daughter-in-law of Harold Bell Wright, the author of “That Printer of Udell’s.” He noted that all of his boyhood reading “left an abiding belief in the triumph of good over evil,” but he singled out Wright’s work for having “an impact I shall always remember. After reading it and thinking about it for a few days, I went to my mother and told her I wanted to declare my faith and be baptized. . . . I found a role model in that traveling printer whom Harold Bell Wright had brought to life. He set me on a course I’ve tried to follow even unto this day. I shall always be grateful.”
Mr. Morris says reading that book marked the moment “when Reagan’s moral sense developed.” Peter Hannaford, a longtime Reagan aide, told me on Sunday that “Reagan profoundly empathized with the fact that, like him, Dick Falkner also had an alcoholic father and yet overcame poverty and adversity.”
So Ronald Reagan willed himself to take on the qualities that would allow him to become the hero he wanted to be.
What Fund doesn’t mention, conveniently, is that the Reagans were destitute during the Great Depression, and the only thing that kept food on their table for years was socialism FDR’s New Deal.
In his memoirs, Reagan tells us that his father “believed energy and hard work were the only ingredients for success.” During much of the Depression, however, Jack was out of work, until the New Deal employed him in the Works Progress Administration, which distributed food and food stamps to the distressed in Dixon…Reagan does not record his reaction to his father’s work for the WPA.
Why would he?
That would just muddy up the Horatio Alger myth Reagan hagiographers like Fund love to write.



78 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
What else can one expect from Mary Rosh?
I like to think of it as Multiple Reagasms…
Fund was on Maher’s show last Friday night. (For what F-d up reason, I do not know.) Although he seemed uncomfortable, he did manage to do his best “Bill Kristol Smirk” impersonation. Not the Real Deal, but he could be in the running…
All those social welfare programs providing for the welfare of teh soshuls. Geez. Who’da thunk?
Had to turn that off. That guy makes ill. Literally.
Thanks BT.
Nice catch, Blue, thanks . . .
Maybe someone should tell Reagan’s big fan, Obama, about this?
I hear he wants to help ‘folks’ who are struggling.
Reagan was a complete phony. Can we stop celebrating his birthday now?
I’m pretty sure you have to clear that through Princess Dumbass of the North.
I have never celebrated his Birthday. I did however say a silent prayer of thanks when he left us. Finally.
I want to know why we don’t celebrate FDR’s birthday. Or JFK’s.
They didn’t say things like “tear down that wall” and “it’s morning in America.” You have to get your sound bites going and then you’ll be celebrated. s/
But what about “…a date which will live in infamy.” or “ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”?
Way better than “it’s morning in America”, IMHO.
Way better but they were not Rs.
Because FDR was a dirty America hating socialist who tried to destroy this country with his insidious New Deal.
Completely OT, but pandora radio has now played Piano Man 5 fucking times for me in the last day and a half. I’m all for some Billy Joel, but this is just too damn much.
Bastard, ruining the country by saving it from the brink. What a dick.
Which makes them even better!
Just add to the emerging list of Repub hypocrites -what’s good-for-me-is-terrible-for-you-and-the-country, along with Paul Ryan and Ayn Rand.
I’m sure there are many more.
Seriously, Rs simply do their organizing way better than the Ds. They decide on a plan and don’t stop until it’s done. They wanted a god for the foolish to worship and an actor was perfect. I’m still convinced that Reagan’s mind was already slipping when he was elected the first time. My guess is that Nancy ran the country.
I spent much of the day of his funeral gagging every time I went into the break room at work, where CNN was spending the whole day on the funeral, the pre-funeral, the post-funeral, and hagiographic stories about the deceased.
It was disgusting.
Some reasons re FDR: 1) birthday of January 30 too close in time to Presidents Day in Feb; 2) birth year of 1882 meant his centennial celebration in the MSM happened before cable tv got big.
JFK: media attention almost always on date of his assassination not birth
You just don’t get it do you? Reagan willed the New Deal. If it wasn’t for Reagan willing it into existence, FDR would have only done a Raw Deal.
Nancy? RR’s VP would be pleased to hear the con worked so well.
OMG, you’re right. I see it now! Reagan Forever!!
Probably because they both were adulterers..JFK never acomplished anything other than almost causing a nuclear war with the Soviets, and FDR, endorsed programs which prolonged a recession and turned it into a deep depression.
Reagan was and still is the very best president of the 20th century.
I haven’t mentioned my friend Greg Palast for a while. So here goes. Greg posted this article, after Reagan’s death. Since he reposted it, I thought I would provide the link in case any FDL’s need/want/care to read some scathing words about Uncle Ronnie.
Obvious when you look at it from the *right* perspective, is it not?
Agree on all points.
As to better organizing by the Goopers or sticktoittiveness, again check. Though it doesn’t hurt their efforts at false revisionism of the Reagan presidency that they have a compliant corp media to work with — recall how they were all on “bended knee” (Mark Hertsgaard) for him during his presidency — with one major network, GE-owned NBC, a former major employer of Reagan.
Dems have no such built-in propaganda advantage, and have to hope for a few positive media scraps thrown their way re FDR or JFK.
I should have said Nancy and her astrologer. I remember reading during his tenure that he consulted Nancy about many things. Being the control freak she is, I’m sure she wanted to know everything.
That’s how Barry OilBomber must see it. I completely understand now, and I’m going to donate money to his re-election campaign and vote for him as many times as I can defraud the pollsters. Because that’s what Sainted Uncle Ronnie would want me to do.
Thanks for playing today. Run along.
I know I’m supposed to ignore this, but, still. I can think of several emotional conditions that might motivate you to come here and make that comment. But, I won’t. K?
And now back to reality!
BT?
BT what?
who put the FUNny in FUNd?
Because some may have missed it this morning. The real Reagan.
Especially for you, provencial.
;)
No need to slum under the troll-bridge today. Let him flog the dolphin to pictures of the Gipper while tooling around the internet and waiting for the welfare check that FDR created for him.
I was doing a “throw”, like when reporters turn it back over to the anchor?
The first paragraph alone makes me happy to be literate! Which is a skill that would’ve perished under Raygunz if he’d had his way, I’m sure.
Oh, slowNOT, I did see that link earlier and reading it reminded me of the article I linked to above. I love rudepundit too.
Nancy apparently consulted her astrologer as to when Ronnie should be inaugurated as CA gov. The answer: midnight. And it was done, or just a few minutes after. Little noted by the press, btw.
Imagine if Jerry Brown, then or now, had tried such a wacky thing. MSM would have gone nuts with nonstop 24/7 coverage of flaky moonbeam governor too eccentric or “out of step” even for California.
Reagan’s father earned money in the WPA! This is the first I heard of it. Of COURSE you never heard one Republican even mention this key fact! I will be sure to remind all my Republican acquaintances of this whenever they bring St. Ronnie up. The importance of FDR’s programs should never been denigrated or underestimated. If not for them, my ancestors would not have survived the Great Depression and I would not be here to type these words. Oh, and BTW, about those Horatio Alger books: I actually read one or two. The hero works hard, yes. But his reward is NOT directly as a result of the hard work but as a deus ex machina, completely by chance, sudden stroke of LUCK. Horatio Alger is way overrated.
My Gawd. That was perfect.
{ LOL } Good one.
If *some* folks decide they really want to keep up this Reagan deification sh#t, Robert Greenwald might have to go do a “Real Reagan” exposé and that would be very unpretty at this late date.
Something about Moonbeam?
Good thing I had my keyboard on top of the tower or you’d owe me for a new one. My tea just came out my nose with that load of horseshit. Bring that here in a front end loader, didja?
9:22 (Cairo time)
The response to rigged 2010 midterm elections in the US? Not a peep.
Rock on, #Jan 25 Egypt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCbpiOpLwFg&nofeather=True
May I go off topic for a brief personal moment?
I [heart] SD.
End of rant.
Just one week of Reagan? We should be so lucky. They have Reagan crap scheduled through the next year, including some in Europe. These people are serious about making their dead frontman into some kind of chickenshit god. And of course, Obie’s only too happy to help.
Nope, carried it in on their backs, like Raygunz with the World.
BTW, for a real laugh, go read all of David Dayen’s tweets from Saturday morning.
David Dayen on Twitter.
A sampling -
In hastily arranged legislative session, CA Assembly votes to rename everything in the state Reagan (Reporting from Reagan, RE) #Reagan100
9:13 AM Feb 5th via web
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/reagan-alzheimers-family-feud-lesley-stahl
I remember Reagan acting oddly in the mid/late-1980′s, although it was not well-reported but if you watched him closely, you saw it.
You do know that Reagan was also an adulterer, and also nearly started a nuclear war with the Soviets in 1983 through sheer ignorance, right?
I remember Reagan
acting oddlypoorly.John Fuld in Simi Valley and “The Roots of Ronald Reagan’s Ambition” (Feb. 8, 2011) states:
I’ve noticed that there’s more to “alcoholism” than just the biochemical component. Also, children of alcoholics have to overcome the distorted, dysfunctional psychology and group dynamics of the alcoholic-enabled family system otherwise they are just “dry drunks.” Ronnie was alive during the time of AA but, unlike Ted Kennedy and from the result, it appears he didn’t do the program. If he had, it’s possible this country could have had a whole different trajectory. One of the best exposes on addiction and its role in history of American leadership during the time period of Reagan is by Scott Peck, a former assistant chief of psychiatry and neurology in the office of the US Surgeon General (see the book, People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil). At the time of Peck’s writing this expose as a former Washington insider, he figured out a way to say a lot of very important things although indirectly for obvious reasons which still would have made him “enemy” in the eyes of The Villagers. So, from my viewpoint, if you read it like a detective and a historian, you will get everything he has to say.
Whaddaya know, ignorance is bliss.
I literally called my senators to complain about all this stupid Reagan hub-bub last week. They are both Dems. Surprisingly, at Carl Levin’s office I got the phone-answerer all upset, saying she did not believe Reagan had anything to do with today’s problems and that she doubted anyone in the entire office would agree with my stance. She was very upset that I would besmirch the name of Reagan. I asked if she lived through his tenure and she, of course, said that was too personal a question. So I told her he was a prick but you probably would not know that if you had not lived through it. (I hope Carl Levin knows who is speaking for him).
You obviously don’t know Reagan if you don’t know that he was an adulterer. But thanks for the laugh!
LOL!! Thanks for the daily It’s OK If You’re A Republican (IOKIYAR) hypocritical double-standard *chiding.*
Both Ronald & Nancy Reagan committed adultry, too, but hey: let’s ignore that inconvenient truth whilst rushing to tsk-tsk dreadful Democrats who did that.
provencial, my father, bless his soul, like many other men of the time worked for the WPA. It helped him and my mother make ends meet.
We have a multitude of bridges, roads, etc., that need work right here, right now. Perhaps if we had some form of WPA today, men and women would find jobs and dignity.
Just a thought… Now go back to reading your Reagan comic book.
Not sure if this is true, but I have read that Nancy was with child when Ronnie married her. Just to set the record straight on adultery and all.
I also felt that Reagan was already slipping even when he was first elected POTUS, although my Reagan-worshipping family nearly disowned me when I suggested it at the time.
I doubt that Nancy ran much of anything, other than trying to get “Daddy” to “act” like the POTUS and not fall asleep at critical junctures. I believe she played that role, but frankly, it was the Overlords who were the real power behind the POTUS back then. Just my opinion, of course.
We have nothing to fear but fear itself. – FDR
We have everything to fear, be afraid be very afraid. – Conservatives
Conservatives need a hero, even a manufactured one, a dim bulb in the early stages of dementia. I give you Ronald Reagan.
Anyone see the HBO doc on Reagan last night? Eugene Jarecki, of “Why We Fight” fame, produced it.
There’s also some pretty good evidence that Nancy was all hot ‘n bothered when Frankie-boy Sinatra used to visit the White House. You know: when “Daddy” was napping, and Nancy got it on with the Mafia’s songster ‘n all. Of course, IOKIYAR, doncha know???
Good call, esp about Scott Peck and his very worthwhile book, People of the Lie. Can highly recommend for many reasons, including the one you mention.
We also know that W Bush (at least) was a dry-drunk (if, in fact, he was ever really “dry”), which is not much better than being a practising alcoholic bc W never really did the “homework” to really understand and overcome his addictions, addictive tendencies and dysfunctionality. It really showed with W. I think Reagan was a good enough “actor” to be able to mask some of his dysfunctionalities better than W did.
Thanks, BT, for the info, which is basically that Reagan, like so many other conservatives, is all about himself. Reagan got HIS, EFF the rest of the country, esp those nasty dirty poor people… and so on…
Rightwing hypocrisy and selling out go hand in hand, per usual.
No but this is what I came across:
(excerpt from “Eugene Jarecki’s ‘Reagan’ Documentary Debuts on HBO Tonight” by Christopher Campbell, Feb. 7, 2011, 7:20PM ; with embedded video)
Looks interesting complete with the skillful use of audio from Darth Cheney.
You know, I can sympathize with Reagan. I willed myself out of poverty, too. It worked like this: my father was poor, my mother had to quit her job as soon as she got married, because in the 1930s that is how things worked. My dad probably made $15 a week. I remember his salary being someting like $25 a week (take-home) in the late 40s or early 50s. So we weren’t dirt poor, just poor. No car, no house insurance, no vacations. But chickens in the back yard for eggs and meat.
So how did I rise from poverty? The first way was going to a well-funded school district. We had a federal base, and that made us an ‘impacted area’, which meant that the school district got funds from the Federal Government in lieu of (and a lot more than) property taxes. We had theater, we had music, two of my friends went on to be professional musicians in the nation’s top symphony orchestras; another friend was anchor man for ABC back in the day. And those who didn’t go to college all did well.
So what else? A fellowship to a top-ranked liberal arts college; work and study, out of school with only about $5,000 or so of debt (that would be about $l5,000 today. Then a NDEA federal fellowship to Yale; five years at a truly princely sum. And yes, I got drafted in between, but turned down for bad eye-sight. The millions came later, working in a public university, saving, and being lucky.
Now I am probably brighter than the average bear, but I am not so bright that I could have willed myself into all this. It was mostly government programmes. And I think that is the way it was for most people in my class who came up from the bottom. I could have willed all I wanted? If you don’t have a job, or a slot in a good educational institution no amount of will is going to do you any good.
Hitler was very big on will, and we saw how that turned out. He tried to will victory in Stalingrad.
Cocaine (ubiquitous use at that time for a *whole* bunch of people) on top of that for Bush Jr. Good thing they have the best health care on the planet as they need it with those medical and psychological histories. Wouldn’t it be great that the rest of us have the same fabulous care?
My story is *somewhat* similar to yours, and I also rose up bc of govt programs & funding, excellent *public* education that got much more funding than public education does now (plus we had smaller class sizes), tertiary education costs were, proportionate to the cost of living, much much lower than they are now, no-interest govt loans + grants to attend college and grad school (which I mostly paid myself and worked all through all of my degrees), etc.
And yeah, let me also add that I happen to be *caucasion,* and I fully grant that the color of my skin has made things easier for me than minorities in similar positions. Those who say otherwise are full of it, esp those who are a “certain age.”
Yes, right after I posted it, I regretted that I did not make the headline of this post, “John Fund on Reagan’s Triumph of Will.”
I can almost believe the “will” part, as, IMO, Ronnie had neither talent, character, nor brains. He made a pretty good front man, doing what his h/a/n/d/l/e/r/s/ advisors told him to do.
No doubt, the Reagan family were amoung the 5% on relief that Harry Hopkins admitted should not be on it. /s
“Address at WPA Luncheon,” Harry L. Hopkins Papers, Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
http://web.mit.edu/course/21/21h.102/www/Primary%20source%20collections/The%20New%20Deal/Hopkins,%20Speech%20on%20federal%20relief.htm
It’s futile to point out the truth and the lies of the Reagan years because he long ago was benighted as the Republican version of Mother Teresa. I can hear the chiseling of his likeness on Mt. Rushmore now.
What galls me is the pro-death stance taken by Republicans when it comes to stem cell research which offers help for all sorts of debilitating conditions such as Alzheimer’s (which Reagan suffered from) to paraplegics who could might be able to live full and productive lives. Even Nancy Reagan supports this valuable research.
Unfortunately, we are stuck with at least two more years of assaults against the American people while the Koch brothers-funded Tea Party/Republicans are putting their main focus and energy, not on helping millions of jobless Americans, but on hot button wedge issues such as abortion restrictions and mandatory prayer (my prayer, not yours) in public school classrooms.
Did any of us expect anything different? The next big question: are voters really so stupid and clueless that they will return these same incompetents back into office in 2012 and will we end up putting a rigid, incoherent, appallingly ignorant individual like Sarah Palin in the White House? I ask this question in total seriousness.
Reagan got on his knees to get out of Dixon, Illinois and it was not for prayer.
“Triumph of the Shill.”