
Pouting Baby doesn't understand why Creepy Clarence is allowed to lie. (photo courtesy of Jim White)
Pouting Baby is talking to us again. - JW
Remember when I talked about Mrs. Ginni T (Mrs. Gin and T?) and the mean phone call she made to Professor Hill? Well, I think Common Bob should be sure to check his answering machine for the next few days, because he could get the next mean phone call from her. Common Bob and his friends found out that Mrs. Ginni T’s husband, Creepy Clarence, has been lying about Mrs. Ginni T’s money. So Creepy Clarence had to change some papers:
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas amended 20 years worth of financial disclosure forms today after a liberal watchdog group questioned the omission of his wife’s place of employment.
/snip/
Thomas amended the reports today noting that his wife, Virginia Thomas, drew income from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank where she worked from 1998 to 2003. Thomas also noted that she worked at Hillsdale College for three months in 2008.
None of Thomas’ forms, covering activities through Dec. 31, 2009, mention his wife’s work at Liberty Central, a conservative political education group she co-founded in January 2009 in part to energize Tea Party activists.
But the group did not officially launch until May 2010, which will only be covered during in the next disclosure period.
Creepy Clarence said he made the mistake because he didn’t understand the instructions:
Justice Thomas said that in his annual financial disclosure statements over the last six years, the employment of his wife, Virginia Thomas, was “inadvertently omitted due to a misunderstanding of the filing instructions.”
Common Bob and his friends don’t believe Creepy Clarence:
“Justice Thomas sits on the highest court of the land, is called upon daily to understand and interpret the most complicated legal issues of our day and makes decisions that affect millions,” said Common Cause President Bob Edgar. “It is hard to see how he could have misunderstood the simple directions of a federal disclosure form. We find his excuse is implausible.”
And before that, Common Bob and his friends wrote a nice letter to Mr. Banana Holder saying that Creepy Clarence and Tony Vaffanculo should not vote in important decisions affecting Mrs. Ginni T’s friends, because her friends have paid for nice vacations for Creepy Clarence and Tony Vaffanculo.
The sad thing is that Creepy Clarence lied about Mrs. Ginni T’s money for six years (that’s even longer than the four years it has been since he asked a question) and yet he won’t get in any real trouble for lying (my Mommy would punish me if I lied):
Deborah L. Rhode, a law professor at Stanford University who specializes in judicial ethics, said the recent episodes could do some harm to Justice Thomas’s reputation. But she added that it was unlikely to have any lasting impact on him or on the disclosure requirements that give justices wide leeway to decide whether they have a financial conflict in hearing a case.
Professor Rhode noted, for instance, that it was still unknown who contributed a total of $550,000 to Liberty Central, the conservative legal group that Mrs. Thomas founded in 2009 in opposition to President Obama’s policies. The amended disclosures filed by Justice Thomas, which do not include income in 2010, do not mention Liberty Central, and no regulation requires the group or the Thomases to disclose the source of the group’s financial support. Mrs. Thomas left the group in the fall.
I don’t understand why Creepy Clarence is allowed to lie about Mrs. Ginni T’s money. His job is all about people telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. He must think that part doesn’t apply to him when he expects it of the other people in his special room.
Anyway, I think Common Bob can expect that phone call from Mrs. Ginni T just as soon as she finds where Creepy Clarence hid the gin.



88 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
It’s because it’s okay if you’re a Republican but it’s not okay if you’re a pouting baby.
Hi Margaret!
You are almost certainly right.
ignorance of the law is no excuse…and lord knows slappy Thomas is teh ignorant….perp walk em
Pouting Baby, unfair!
About keeping their papers in order, Clarence ‘The Dong’ Thomas, and that greasy twerp Tim ‘TurboTax’ Geithner are peas in a pod.
…Alright, perhaps ‘unfair’ is hasty.
But, but, he’s a Supreme Court Justice! He is the law (at least according to his buds at the Federalist Society…)
wonder what Wesley Snipes thinks of his bro
agreed
Newt! Maybe Pouting Baby will have to talk about Mr. G’s spot in our economic mess one of these days.
Jim & Pouting Baby!
Pouting Baby has not yet learned that it is always OK if you are a Republican.
Hi Jim. Sure seems that way. Pouting babies and dirty fucking hippies can’t get away with telling the truth but Republicans can lie like Tom DeLay’s rug all day long.
“Deborah L. Rhode, a law professor at Stanford University who specializes in judicial ethics, said the recent episodes could do some harm to Justice Thomas’s reputation.”
Unless you define his reputation as being a hypocritical, mendacious thug in which case he just helped his cause. Clarence ‘Laws are for little people” Thomas is the scummiest Supreme I have ever seen.
Hiya, Doc. Pouting Baby will probably really get confused if the Republicans and Tea Partiers keep fighting with each other.
Why, yes, I believe you’ve described his reputation quite well. Although I’d be sure to throw in the sexist part, too.
What else can we expect? He lied about sexual harassment when he was going through confirmation hearings. Oh wait, this is before he dropped one of the biggest race cards in the history of politics…”high-tech lynching”..we can’t expect anything else from him.
So what’s the point in having rules if people can just break them whenever they feel like it? That confuses me as much as pouting baby.
Personally, I’ going to buy popcorn. Haven’t had this much fun in decades.
True enough Jim. Thomas is a true multitasker of graft and evil.
You make a very good point. He did get his job by lying.
Clarence Thomas should be in prison, he said, channeling Teddy Partridge.
You misunderstand. The rules are there to control the little people and DFHs. LOTU like Thomas or the banksters can do whatever they want.
Welcome to FireDogLake, Dominic!
Along with Scalia and probably Roberts.
This ought to please Pouting baby. I know it pleases me. I think both of us would say “About fucking time”.
That had to be the dumbest idea ever to come out of the Bush administration and that, my friends, is saying something.
Maybe he’d start asking some questions there.
But those disclosure rules only apply to the elites, so what’s the point? If somebody breaks those rules, s/he is going to be elite and therefore untouchable. Seems pretty pointless to me.
But Pouting Baby learned his colors looking at all the bright charts about it in airports.
But yes, that really did rank very high on the dumb index.
Clarence Thomas should be in prison she said channeling Margaret Horrall.
Well at least somebody found it useful.
Long Dong Silver’s Journey into Night
Don’t forget the 4th member of the Apocalypse, Alito.
Smoke and mirrors. Whatever you do, do not look behind the curtain.
Hey, ho. Silver away!
Or something like that.
Sure, why shouldn’t Thomas and Fat Tony share a cell? They’ve already shared every opinion issued since they took the bench.
Not likely, especially given the current Republican majority in the House, but…
http://www.congress.org/news/2010/03/12/can_supreme_court_justices_be_impeached
I think they forgot to put the curtain up Doc….
Be sure to click the link for Tony Vaffanculo. Then if you have any questions, check Urban Dictionary.
Yeah, that’s probably not on anyone’s table, but it is fun to dream.
While he is certainly deserving of impeachment, I am not sure his offense rise to the level of criminal misconduct. Thomas and Scalia definitely and Roberts probably are guilty of corruption in office (basically taking bribes), which is criminal.
Hey, if CT doesn’t misunderestimate reporting requirements, perhaps he’s not schmart enuf to be on teh SC.
But we knew that all along.
I just saw a show on Nat Geo about Son Doong cave in Vietnam. Now I have to add it to the places I need to visit before I die.
SCOTUS justices openly speak at fundraising events and people yawn. We are so fucked.
I’m sure he’ll speak up from the bench and impress us with his intelligence any decade now.
Maybe we should have Fat Tony Vaffanculo explain the requirements to him. Thomas seems to understand him just fine.
You got that right.
Well that is only natural as they share half a brain between them. They bought on sale, used. Used to belong to a guy named Abby Normal.
and why has it TAKEN SO LONG for yhis info to come out??
And the Koch gang is getting together next week, I think. Wonder if Creepy Clarence and Tony Vaffanculo will be there in person or if they have to watch by closed circuit from a tropical vacation spot?
And get paid for it. Bribery, pure and simple.
A very good question.
“Are you telling me that I put an abnormal brain into a six-foot-six, fifty-four-inch wide gorilla?!?!”
707
No…correction Margaret…
the dumbest thing to come out of the Bush administration is Dubya’s ‘soul’ brother Obama!
How long do you think Sotomayor or Kagan would be around if they had lied on an official disclosure form?
I hope that former Senator Danforth is breaking out in rashes over his ardent support of this unintelligent man.
Yep. That fits my definition of bribery.
Oops!!
My mistake…neither one of them have souls…just some dark evil mass in the middle of their chests.
I spent a lot of time listening to the confirmation hearings for him. There are a lot of people who still owe us some big explanations for him getting confirmed.
+its convenient the dems no longer have the majority to impeach his ass….just sayin…12 year old info
Can you imagine the chill he got with his morning paper, the day Ginny’s vodka-phone story broke?
Boils, shingles, and lesions.
Very convenient. Now they don’t have to make up excuses. And I thought Republicans were good at being the victim. Are there enough crosses in DC for every lawmaker to have one to bear?
And the fleas of a thousand camels in his armpits.
Perianal abscesses.
Jim…
with all due respect my friend, we do not get explanations…we get the lies, deceptions, and wankerey,…and then the stick across our backs and the tape across our mouths…
after all we ARE the god damn serfs!
They both need to stay out of the public eye – permanently. They are felons even though nothing will ever be done about it.
Well, we just have to give him some time. Obviously, some catch on to grifting faster than others.
Serfs up!
The only thing that Dems can im-peach is ‘ice cream’
…worthless and spineless the whole lot of them, along with their Repub asswipes!
Serfs FED UP!!!
More than a mere appearance of “impropriety?”
http://blog.reidreport.com/2010/10/clarence-thomas-wife-the-tea-party-and-citizens-united/
“Let’s go serfin’ now, everybody’s learning how, come on a safari with meeeeee…”
Heh. On Twitter from @CommonCause:
Oh Baby, when you leave the nest for the big $$$, will you remember us?
Nice!
Has a SC justice ever been impeached? And didn’t Al Capone go to prison for income tax evasion.
When the FBI rounded up a bunch of organized crime people last week, they should’ve concentrated on Washington, they’re far more dangerous.
Sam Chase, but acquitted. A very long time ago.
Beat me to it. Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Chase
Wow, signed the Declaration. News to me.
What a cut-up he must have been.
Time for me to toddle off. All thise young minds are waiting to be corrupted again tomorrow. Take care all.
Good night, folks. Thanks for a fun evening.
Remember to always check that soda can before drinking…
*heh* Impeached for his ‘Partisan Views’…! Scalia, Alito, and Thomas fill the bill…! ;-)
oh my
Billionaire ruled unfit to stand trial due to drug addiction
By David Edwards
Thursday, January 27th, 2011 — 12:24 pm
Stumble This! 373
Share 5diggs
digg
Financier and cricket mogul Sir Allen Stanford was unfit to stand trial on charges of running a $7-billion fraud and needs treatment for a drug addiction, a US judge ruled.
Stanford’s trial had been due to begin this week but was postponed indefinitely until he could be considered fit to prepare his defense.
The financier has pleaded not guilty to 21 counts of fraud, money laundering and obstruction. He faces up to 375 years in jail if convicted.
“The court finds Stanford is incompetent to stand trial at this time based on his apparent impaired ability to rationally assist his attorneys in preparing his defense,” US District Judge David Hittner wrote in his ruling in Houston, Texas
Aloha, Doc. D and Jim…!
The PTB don’t want to see Stanford take the stand…! He knows where too many skeletons are buried…!
It used to be
Now it’s
CTuttle is upstairs!
Late, Late Night FDL: F**kin’ Perfect
Abe Fortas had to resign because of “financial improprieties.”
Loved it Mr. White!
*G*
I’m an old women and over the years both in the military and out I worked for 29 various ministers, priests and rabbis. The one theme I came away with is that the rules, laws, standard operating procedures etc do not apply to conservatives, just other people. They do whatever they want and what is in their best interest because if they want it it must be right but don’t you try it. So, this whole mind set doesn’t belong just to politicians but to things like the length of lunch hours, tennis during office hours, days off, and I can go on and on. I think they are hard wired to think that way. Doesn’t justify what Thomas and wife have done but I’m not the least bit surprised.