
photo: Willie Pipkin
I’m partial to the desert mountains of West Texas, but on my frequent visits out here I’m always surprised – and touched – by the strong spirit of friendship and community that marks the place.
“Friendship holds political communities together,” said Aristotle, and he was on to something. American political culture has deteriorated as the various perils of modernity weakened the role of friendship in our political life. It’s a weighty, complicated topic. I just don’t want to be friendly with Glenn Beck.
It seems appropriate to kick off the New Year with a reminder that “concord” – the word Aristotle used – is instrumental to a community’s pursuit of justice. The loss of some sense of reciprocity and mutual concern for others is a dangerous consequence of a political culture lost in myths of hyper-individuality and zero-sum thinking in which one’s gains seem to depend upon the losses of others.
Out here for a West Texas New Years with large groups of friends from all over America, I find a common understanding of our absolute dependence upon one another. And this is a place our myths tell is a veritable source of the absolutely independent rugged individualist.
There are some rugged folks, and they understand that concord doesn’t mean conformity. But by God if your truck breaks down, they’re there to help you, and they expect the same in return.
Every year some of my friends and I give a small, New Years Eve, country concert on the front porch of the old Stillwell Store not far from the Rio Grande and Big Bend National Park. Ranch folk come from all over. The Stillwell family puts out a nice spread of food. We hale from very different worlds, but those differences disappear on this day because we’re all here for one reason: a shared moment of concord.
Look at the picture above. This old cyberpoke is taking advantage of the wireless on the patio the Marathon Motel (you might have seen it Wim Wenders 1984 film, Paris, Texas). He was sittin’ there at his computer when we checked in earlier in the week.
It’s a cool picture (taken by Austin guitarist Willie Pipkin), and it tells us something. The possibilities for connection among us are nearly infinite, even though it sometimes seems like the web adds a bit of fragmentation, isolation and loss of real-world community.
We tend to gather on the web with those we’re pretty sure will agree with us, and we lose (if it’s all we do) the wordless, emotional lessons of connections with strangers, with different others who, say, do work a mountain ranch while we race around our cities.
Aristotle said true friendship transcended simple utilitarian relations, making justice possible and the political community stronger. And that’s another danger of distant internet connections: it often seems to come with a utilitarian end in mind. We need to take this action, make this point, cause this political consequence.
But these downsides and dangers are outweighed, I think, by the magnified possibilities of authentic connection – and even concord. But it will take an effort, maybe a special effort, to bring such a spirit to the digital world.
By the way, the thin gruel of what’s called “bipartisanship” shouldn’t be mistaken for authentic friendship. Real friendship requires moral steadfastness and honesty. I may not win the argument, but if I’m to be a friend to others, the least they should expect is sincerity and moral courage.



35 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
“Real friendship requires moral steadfastness and honesty. I may not win the argument, but if I’m to be a friend to others, the least they should expect is sincerity and moral courage.”
amen…
Truth. Thanks, Glenn. Happy New Year.
The “concord” mindset is the first principle of communism. And of all religious thinking. The Golden Rule, if you will. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” That rule and the 10 Commandments are all that is necessary for the smooth running of any society. Peace
Think the Golden Rule is sufficient. Don’t need 10 commandments, which are all redundant of the GR, except the ones involving God, which don’t have anything to do with how you treat humans.
Happy New Year Glenn. My oh my you bring me up short in my disdain for the masses of Tea Partyers who enforld me. Every now and then I pause to be grateful for this community where you can’t sit on the side of the road more than 15minutes before a couple of guys in a pickup show up and help, often fix the problem. And you don’t dare get sick unless your table is large enough for all the food that comes in. 3 meats, 5 casseroles, innumerable salads etc.
I have been the grateful recipient more than once. The most striking, running my car into a center medium late one evening on the way home from chemo, bald as a baby’s ass. Sure enough Levi and Harry in their pickup were there in 30 seconds. I got a lot of preaching hugs and a tire change.
These are such good people. And I rely on them, just as they rely on the big gummit they so abhor.
Harmonia (in the roman she was “concordia”) was pushing for war with Thebes as I recall – we Greeks were complex folks :-)
Aristotle posited that the citizens of the state are all concerned with their own – the state’s – interests and living conditions – but only if they were good men. Indeed good men of the state have “accord” with one another because the have the same broad goals and outlook – differing only in details.
Now the question is – who are the good men, and who are the bad men, in out current state? :-)
We won’t go into who are the best of the good men – the noble men – who give up material possessions to further the interests of concordia – even dying for the state.
Thanks Glenn.
I have to say, one of thing that has helped me is Facebook. It has allowed me to re-connect with a lot of friends and family from my small hometown in Kentucky and folks I have worked with over the years. Even though there are a lot of areas where I don’t agree politically with some of the folks, we’re still friends, whether from childhood or work sites and that does mean a lot.
Without the “God” element it’s really not workable. One needs to defer to some nebulas ethereal authority greater than man or some human person will try to assume the God role on earth. That’s a historical fact. Peace
The bad men are those who never know vulnerability and fear want.
Marx tried to explain who the good and bad men were. So did John Lennon. Peace
The next great step in civilization with be when man realizes there is no need for competing gods.
The good man and woman have a duality of nature. The sacred feminine. Amenhotep IV and the Christ are two examples. Peace
When we know we must rely on each other and not the supernatural is when concord sets in.
I don’t disagree. But it sure is entertaining to ponder in scientific terms how many years it will take for the universe (Milky Way) to expand to the point of cooling. Then how long it will take the universe to contract into a ball before it explodes once more to begin the entire process all over again. Peace
I respectfully disagree. The concept of an “ethereal being” is an excuse for bad behavior. One needs to be responsible to others, not God, for ones own behavior, and ensure one is in concord with these others; instead of the theater of asking for forgiveness from God for being nasty to others once a week.
I believe the necessity for a supreme being a chimera.
The Buddhists have no such concept and are much more peaceful than the monotheistic religions.
The monotheistic religions appear to delight in worshiping their god on their holy day and then acting directly against these concepts for the remainder of the week.
The monotheistic religion all agree there is only one god, which by definition means they are all worshiping the same god. And then they fight over property while claiming to fight about the proper way to worship that same god.
Concord might possibly begin if we stayed out of other people’s business. We will never have any sort of peace if the rightwing continues to push its religious beliefs on the rest of us. I’m not interested in their “hate the other.” We are facing some cruel times because of the selfish desire to dominate others. We might also need to not start wars just because we feel like it.
Ah, YES! If you have your spirit in the right place, all is good. You can take the spirit to mean an ethereal God, or Man’s own inner drive.
Just don’t tell me that I’mma going to hell cause I don’t think like you do.
Glenn, very nice post to start the New Year. The best to you and yours for the coming year and beyond.
We have a systemic problem of psychologically impaired people. These people feel that their worth is bound in power, control, and greed.
They don’t feel that men are equal. They feel that they are raised up by what they have and can control.
Under the definitions (rules) we are all going to hell. If one believes in an afterlife.
Which, if I recall my divinity lessons, was not once mentioned by Christ.
We come this way but once, and should strive to leave it better than we found it. Unfortunately, given the current illiberality, I don’t believe we will leave the world a better place for our children.
Crippled by money at birth?
Happy New Year Glenn. Great post and yes friendship is a two way street. Just like hugs ya gotta give one ta get one!!
█▀█░██░█▀█░█▀░██
█░█░█■░█▀█░█░░█➨
█▀▀░█▄░█░█░█▄░█▄
&
╔╗
║║╔═╦╦╦═╗
║╚╣║║║║╩╣
╚═╩═╩═╩═╝
I have told this story before, so pardon me if you have heard it already.
I took my share of Art History at universities, but one thing I learned when I went to the British National Museum in London had never been mentioned.
It was my first trip to the other side of the pond, and there I was amidst all the booty of the empire on which the sun never set.
I walked through the pantheons of Greek and Roman sculpture, and then I wandered into the sculptures of the eastern cultures. It suddenly struck me.
All of the Western heads, eyes open. All of the Eastern heads, eyes closed.
Take from that what you will.
Thank you, Glenn, for your ever insightful prose, and happy music to you and your many.
Exactly! The Holy Books have been rewritten, and butchered to meet a ruling elites point of view throughout history. The words past down, and copied by Scribes have been forever laden with propaganda. Kings, Religious Leaders, and those trying to do the State harm or control have managed to use a moral guide to living into some use of control.
Thanks for sharing that. I had never thought of it before. I posted an Art Saturday diary yesterday and was intriqued by the medieval manuscript art. The ones that peaked my interest so much were the pieces done for the King’s Treasurer’s prayer book.
Guess who held those manuscripts and allowed the NY Metropolitan to show them? A Mr. Robert Lehman. That’s right, the banking family had their hands on this precious art pertaining to all the King’s money.
Gotta disagree. There’s no evidence that atheists are treat fellow humans any worse than those who believe in god. And religion has always had warz.
Buddhists believe that everything in the universe is composed of an energy force. Mayhaps string/membrane theory will prove them right.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Genn W. Smith:
Havin’ spent almost two years in Texas, 14 months of which in southwest Texas and eastern New Mexico, my feelings about Texas may be sumed up as follows: “There is nuthin’ wrong with Texas that a good covering dose of DDT and a nuclear accident wouldn’t take care of.” I exclude Austin from this descriptive judgement because Austin is not Texas but a romantic fantasy out of the mind of Max Brand and the strange grey myth of the west. Austin is in fact, to me, what you experience in your visits to West Texas.
As a soldier, I experienced the narrow minded, bigoted, fear-driven social psychology of Texas, what the indigenous populations of Native Americans and Mexicans and all other people of color, education or intelligence experience from this rotting cesspool of dead legends and self-delusioned fantasy. And, as a soldier, I experienced that fantastic irony of the hatred of the federal military and the soldiers of that military that are the single foundation of the entire economy and justification for the existance of that part of America south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
So I am glad that you have discovered some pockets of civility and uncorrupted fantasy outside of Austin and I wish you well…but for me, I have no desire to ever return to hell, I would sooner go back to Viet Nam at least there is a real culture and history there that we didn’t succeed in destroying completely.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, THIS WAR HAS BEEN GOIN’ ON IN TEXAS SINCE THE BEGINNING!!
Science and reality is enough to enchant and enrhrall us. And Peace to you Ymhotep.
Very nice, Glenn. I’d love to visit there myself, and that spirit is also out in SE Oregon, in the high desert. Here on Portland at times as well, but much less so than when I moved here in 2963.
But I have a bit of a problem. Cyber cowpoke at a lap top in 1980?
The mind boggles! What was I thinking in 1980?
Ahem…1963, 1963!
We are all going to hell; there is no one in heaven. It’s in the logic.
Western religions are ubiquitous. And each one claims to be the authentic one. If you want to go to heaven, this is the one. The rest are going to hell. Now, inasmuch that you can only belong to one religion, and all the religions have members, it follows that everybody is going to hell and no one is going to heaven.
not really – even the Roman Catholic Church has adopted – or at least allowed discussion of – the idea that “all are saved only through Christ” can mean others are saved via other paths that Christ established including other religions and even non-religious thought patterns.
Fundies do say that XYZ is the only interpretation and all others lead to hell – but then Paul said that every man is his own priest.
As to eCAHNomics’ observation that some that believe do evil, while others that do not believe do good, without getting into a body count, I suggest that religion can be an aid to doing good, and that rejecting religion does not guarantee not doing evil, or even make not doing evil more likely. Chris Hitchens disagrees of course but has not yet stated a logical reason as to why he disagrees – just assertions (gotta love his assertion that all the religious all through history fight against women and their rights – misses a bit of history, but the fellow is sick and still doing the “squared” debates, God Bless him) but then assertions are where this type of discussion usually ends up.
Good points. The Cathars certainly did not subjugate women. Maybe Hitch, like others, is selective about history.
Gods are nothing more than imaginary companions, in the case of religion imaginary wise fathers. The human race needs to grow up and realize it is us and stop testing imaginary parental limits.