In those days a decree went out from Emperor Augustus . . .
This is where the Christmas story in the gospel of Luke begins: with The Powers That Be. They do what TPTBs always do — they issue commands, decrees, and orders. They wave their arms, they sign their names, they affix their seals, and they send forth their minions to do their bidding and enforce their will.
[Joseph] went [to Bethlehem] to be registered with Mary, to whom he was engaged and who was expecting a child. While they were there, the time came for her to deliver her child. And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in bands of cloth, and laid him in a manger, because their was no room for them in the inn.
In that region there were shepherds living in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night . . .
That’s what ordinary folks do: they obey TPTBs and go about their ordinary lives. Babies are born, and sheep are watched carefully. While TPTBs have their palaces, their mansions, and their wealth, the ordinary folks have . . . less. Some live in the fields, while others seek temporary shelter in barns and stables.
This contrast is, for me, what lies at the heart of Christmas. It is at the heart of the story of Jesus, who spent his life pointing out this contrast and also pointing out the ways in which this is not the way people were meant to live. On the one hand, he healed the sick, fed the hungry, welcomed outcasts, comforted the grieving, and embraced the stranger and foreigner, and on the other hand he challenged TPTBs, both civil and religious. In his parables and his way of life, he gave the world a vision of life-giving partnerships — with God, with each other, and with all of creation — that overturns the self-centered, death-dealing ways of TPTBs.
Popular culture’s vision of Christmas generally misses the challenging nature of the story of Christmas. It’s much nicer and safer to sing simple platitudes of peace on earth before turning to the celebration of acquiring more and more stuff and seeking a higher spot on the pyramid of power. But from time to time, there are glimpses of Christmas that challenge the passions in our society to make distinctions between people, to judge one’s worth by the size of one’s pile of stuff, and to raise up the rich at the expense of the poor.
Aaron Sorkin and Rick Cleveland of The West Wing got it right, with the award-winning episode entitled “In Excelsis Deo” that first appeared on December 15, 1999. In one of the story lines, Toby Ziegler, the White House Communications Director, used the president’s name without permission to pull some strings for a project of his own. You can watch the YouTube of last 4:43 of the episode here which includes this exchange between Toby and the president as Toby is summoned to President Bartlet’s presence for a dressing down:
- Bartlet: Hi.
- Toby: Yes sir.
- Bartlet: How’re you doing?
- Toby: I’m fine. Thank you sir.
- Bartlet: Apparently, I’ve arranged for an honor guard for somebody.
- Toby: Yes, sir. I’m sorry.
- Bartlet: No no. Just tell me, is there anything else I’ve arranged for? We’re still in NATO right?
- Toby: Yes, sir.
- Bartlet: What’s going on?
- Toby: A homeless man died last night; a Korean War veteran, who was wearing a coat that I gave to the Goodwill. It had my card in it.
- Bartlet: Toby, you’re not responsible for …
- Toby: An hour and twenty minutes for the ambulance to get there. A Lance Corporal, United States Marine Corps, Second of the Seventh. The guy got better treatment at Panmunjom.
- Bartlet: Toby, if we start pulling strings like this, you don’t think every homeless veteran would come out of the woodwork?
- Toby: I can only hope, sir.
Amen.
The powerful nature of the end of this episode comes not from the words exchanged by the characters, but from the non-verbal acting, the editing, and the directing. The last 2:15 has no spoken dialogue at all, but alternates between scenes of the White House holiday festivities and the burial at Arlington National Cemetery. It cuts back and forth from the lines of singers in the White House to the lines of Marines at Arlington, from the row of mourners at the grave to the row of staffers at the White House. Over it all, we hear (and occasionally see) a children’s choir singing “Little Drummer Boy,” not to honor TPTBs, whether in the Bartlet White House or in ancient Rome, but to honor that baby in the ancient stable and the vision of life-giving partnerships that he proclaimed.
One of the names ascribed to Jesus is “Emmanuel” which means “God with us.” Whether Sorkin and Cleveland intended this or not, I don’t know, but I am always struck by the final spoken words of this episode. They echo the sense of God’s partnership and companionship with the world, embodied in the birth in a stable that is at the heart of Christmas. The words are spoken by the President’s secretary, Delores Landingham: “Toby, I’d like to come along.”
I’d like to come along.
For Christians, that’s essentially what God said to the world at Christmas. For others, the story of Christmas may simply be a nice fable. Whether we share a common understanding of this story or not, I pray that we can share a vision of a mutual partnership that raises up the lowly, that feeds the hungry, that embraces the stranger, that welcomes the outcast, and that works for peace.
Glory to God in the highest, indeed.





19 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
triangulation (forbidden word) Heh!
For all the apparent triangulating and things that the “Bartlett White House” did, they also seemed to understand that thing called Presidential Leadership.
Too bad sometimes that we can’t live in the fantasyland and let this be the TV show. Of course, it would be cancelled after the first 13 weeks
Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays
Tend your garden and love one another
I love this!
We’re expected to conform to the ruling class!
I’ve been slammed shamelessly for complaining about the GOP/Obama compromise including a payroll tax holiday.
Recent comments from the compromising left have reminded of the “love it or leave it” saying of the 60′s and 70′s.
Glory to whom?
Thank you, Peterr, for this lovely, lovely Christmas Day sermon.
(PS – I’d like to come along, too.)
Thank you Peterr.
My father was a Methodist minister. He died last spring, but as I read your piece, I could hear his voice once again. Thank you for that : )
I’d like to come along, too : )
Thank you. The radical nature of the message of Jesus was not lost on me. If you look at his words (authentic ones, not the ones put in his mouth) he talks a lot about helping the poor, hungry and sick. I’m always surprises how some on the right can ignore all those words and actions to focus on the Old Testament because that is where the judgemental passages are.
They also love “angry Jesus” but they neglect to focus what he was mad about.
Thank you for this timely reminder of what this season is supposed to be! May all people of the planet join together to form a peaceful circle which leaves no one alone and uncared for, no one hungry or homeless and a healthy dose of humility for those who profess to be our leaders! We can ALL come along:)…Peace be with you!
You all are quite welcome.
And spocko, you nailed it with regard to the TheoCons.
Peace to you, as you remember your dad.
“…he gave the world a vision of life-giving partnerships — with God, with each other, and with all of creation — that overturns the self-centered, death-dealing ways of TPTBs.”
In keeping with this idea, I’d like to add:
(Matthew 19:21) – Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
(Luke 12:33) – “Sell your possessions and give to the poor. Provide purses for yourselves that will not wear out, a treasure in heaven that will not be exhausted, where no thief comes near and no moth destroys.”
(Matthew 19:22) – “When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.”
Material treasures versus spiritual treasures, a recurring theme throughout the teachings of Jesus. Temporal versus eternal. This world versus Heaven. What we value the most over what we value the least, or not at all. Or what we value the most over whom (God or others) we value the least, or not at all, often not even giving them a first thought, let alone a second thought, or third. What is our mind focused on, obsessing over: accumulating worldly wealth and property or finding the Heaven that Jesus kept referring to? Accepting the ego version of “heaven on earth” or finding the “other” Heaven, the place of undying love, eternal peace, limitless joy, light, Oneness…with the access portal being in our own Mind, based on what we “treasure”?
Whew, what a choice. And many of the wealthy have already made their choice, while trying to rationalize their choice by claiming that God is “blessing” them with great wealth (if the wealthy are of one religion or another). Conversely, if they adopt this attitude, then (in their minds) the poor (or less wealthy) must be being “cursed” by God, not blessed, punished by God, not rewarded as they believe they have been rewarded. It’s an ego trap, for both the “wealthy” and the “poor.” Jesus was trying to break this vicious, circular trap, this victim cycle, for the “wealthy” view themselves as much “victims” as the “poor” do, with either the “wealthy” bemoaning that “enough” is “never enough,” while the “poor” bemoan the lack of “enough” at all. Jesus, on the other hand, offered an alternative, as all spiritual masters do; an alternative that solves all problems, that supplies all seeming lack, that makes Heaven and earth One, so neither the temporarily “wealthy” nor temporarily “poor” are impoverished anymore.
So, Merry Christmas to all and goodwill to all men, women and children…for with the birth of Christ, the Resurrection of one and all is nigh.
(Note: to better understand what Jesus was teaching, please read A Course in Miracles..or not. What I like about a Course in Miracles is that it doesn’t preach, it just discusses, it doesn’t force, it just suggests, laying out the “choice” we all must make in our own mind, right here, right now, versus the “choice” that religions all seem to say we must make. To understand this distinction, you’d have to read A Course in Miracles, my Christmas present to you. Peace).
“You will always have the poor with you.” He said, as his feet were bathed in expensive spikenard oils.
Sanctimonious garbage.
Regarding Christianity’s relation to TPTB, Paul, Romans 13, says, “Submit to the governing authorities …. for they have no power except what comes from God.” Jesus’ own reaction to Pilate in John’s version of the Passion is of a similar piece.
In the second century, Christians like Justin Martyr wrote emperors saying that Christianity was just a harmless philosophy.
Yet, Jesus, if he did exist, most likely was a rebel, though the writers try to hide it.
That is also in the book as you adroitly pointed out. The call for killing disobedient children and heretics, prostituting your daughters and polygamy are found in Dueteronomy. Before Jesus, yes. But Jesus brought the threat of hell and eternal damnation.
Ive always thought that the (often forced) introduction Of Christianity into northern,western Europe was analogous to introducing an invasive, non native biological species. The native polythetistic belief systems of the Northern Europeans were well suited to their culture and geography, and had served thier purposes for thousands of years before the arival of the near eastern mystery cult, Christianity.
Muuch later — thanks Peterr – one of my very favorite West Wings ever.
Bless you Peterr; terrific “sermon” indeed. I so appreciate you.
Grace and peace in Christ,
Amen, Peterr.
Thanks for the Christmas blessing.
Happy Birthday Prince of Peace!
Thanks. I just went to my library of CD’s and watch the episode again. Surely a powerful message and one of the best episodes.
I appreciated the reminder to review the important work presented here to remind me again and again.