
America has a Credulity Crisis. It’s not that we have too little of it, it’s that we have way too much, and a credulity glut is the last thing a democracy needs.
It’s demoralizing to watch those in power or in pursuit of power lie so easily and persuasively (“death panels,” “Obama was born in Kenya.”) But liars have always had it easy. Mark Twain said, “A lie can make it halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” Today, we might say Truth is devalued, delayed and being groped by a the TSA while Lie, exempt from the full body scan, is flown first class ’round and ’round the world.
Only in such a circumstance can the U.S. Transportation Safety Administration’s ugly assault upon two glories of American democracy – freedom of movement and personal privacy – be believed as necessary to “protect our freedom.”
Then again, “there’s a sucker born every minute.” That phrase is so popular that P.T. Barnum, who probably never said it, nonetheless thanked the rival that accused him of it. A healthy half-dozen other American confidence men get credit for it, too. There’s evidence that the phrase arose from some source during a controversy between Barnum and a rival over whose circus had the authentic 10-foot tall, petrified man known as the Cardiff Giant. Only a sucker, it seems, would fall for a fake one.
Oh how we Americans want to believe. The trouble is, political freedom – and existential freedom, too – depend upon open, creative and intelligent interaction with the environment. “Think again” is good advice. A little incredulity goes a long way.
Delusion and illusion are deadly, for individuals and society. Making them more dangerous, we are quite often our own private suckers. Thinking and discernment require assumptions, mental habits, metaphor, prediction, memory and language with all its limitations. Often, we’re not as open, creative and intelligent as we think we are, even when we’re thinking about freedom. We need skepticism, open-mindedness and incredulity to set us right.
Jesus figured this out. “You will know them by their fruits,” Jesus said of false prophets (Matthew 7:16). In other words, forget gossip, spin, beguiling tales or your own knee-jerk reactions: “Think again.” When Socrates said (in Plato’s Apology) that he knew nothing, he was stepping away from all his assumptions, habits, metaphors, etc. that could make of his judgments something less than truthful. The advice is precisely that given centuries later by American philosopher William James and his heirs.
Buddha was even more explicit. In the Kalamasutra, Buddha said:
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it.
Do not believe in anything because it is spoken and rumored by many.
Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books.
Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.
Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations.
But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.
We ought to make cable networks crawl that advice across the bottom of the screen 24 hours a day. The Buddha’s charter of free inquiry ought to be a public service announcement repeated every 15 minutes on talk radio. Newspapers ought to print it daily.
Sucker-hunters like Roger Ailes, Karl Rove, and Sarah Palin will always be with us. We don’t have to reward them like we do, however. The Credulity Crisis won’t go away until Americans begin living up to the expectations of the Framers, who knew democracy depended upon, well, what Buddha said.
When we believe in a Cardiff Giant, we become like him: immobilized, petrified humans incapable of freedom.
Access to information is clearly not enough. We need to renew our commitment to critical thinking, in public school and beyond. I know plenty of adults who need to be taught the skills. It should be embodied in all of our work. It should be required of the media and its importance reported by the media.
Many don’t agree about this because it threatens them. During a right-wing attack on reading skills two years ago, Republican Texas Board of Education member David Bradley said:
This critical thinking stuff is gobbledygook.
Bradley’s phrase fairly drowns one in a whirlpool of doublespeak. If Bradley and others wanted to erase gobbledygook, they’d come to praise critical thinking, not bury it.



72 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Is he talking about everyone in the Republican Party??? Probably not but little does he know that is how “They” really Look. all their positions are gobbledygook designed to keep pushing the wealth of the nation to the very few at the top.gobbledygook gobbledygook gobbledygook I saw they are all just gobbledygook.
Great piece, Glenn!
But, I can’t do anything about it right now – I have to decide what color to dye my hair – My erection has lasted longer than 4 hours, so I need to see my doctor – Backstabbers on Parade, season umpteen, starts tonight on the TV box – and my elected spinmeisters imply that I should let them do the thinking.
Yea, and they aren’t just just up for gobble, gobble day either!
Thank you! Excellent work, and I will do my part by forwarding this.
Karen
I make DVDs of certain documentaries and spread them around to folks that I am able to talk-up. Try “Zeitgeist” on for size…
Blue. Die your hair blue.
Instead of calling the doctor, just think about…well, not John Boehner. Maybe Joe Lieberman. Holistic cure for your problem.
Instead of the newest “you’re out” shows, find an old Mister Rogers repeat where everyone is in.
Never, ever, let someone else do your thinking for you. As the philosopher Gilles Deleuze said, “If you’re trapped in the dream of the other, you’re fucked.”
Two aspirin. Call anytime. And, thanks for much for your compliment, Sabre-Toothed Critter.
Thanks so much, karenjj2!
But they are turkeys. Good post, Glenn, but this stuff drives me crazy. I know why people lie about politics but I don’t get why they lie about science and global warming etc. They seem to think that the polio vaccine and other wonders just appeared. Makes no sense to me.
Nicely done, Glenn. But isn’t the purpose of education to make everyone just another brick in the wall?
IMO the most important understanding Barnum, Limbaugh and Clones have in common is that the people first and foremost want/need to be entertained. Facts are hard. Entertainment is what you get to do once school is over.
They lie about science and global warming for the same reasons they lie about politics.
Personal interest. Greed. Whatever you want to label it.
I can’t believe folks didn’t summarily remove David Bradley from the Board of Education with a statement like that. Do constituents have a pulse?
Great quotes from this Buddha person. Probably an awesome debater. David Bradley wouldn’t have had one slime chance in that presence.
Once some on the right have identified global warming as a trait of “them,” their “us” makes it mandatory that they reject the trait, whatever it’s truth in reality. We see this pattern in the habit of personalization. Believing in global warming would, they think, enhance Al Gore’s authority, and that they can’t abide. So, we have the personal attacks on Al Gore. Or Jeremiah Wright.
And, as you note, they have narrow their thinking so, for instance, the success of the polio vaccine doesn’t spring to their minds at all.
Indeed, that TX BoE is a prime example of the element that can’t tolerate the liberally biased facts, they contradict everything that bunch believes.
I’m appalled by how thoroughly the former news reports have turned into another form of entertainment. My only consolation is that it turns ever more of the thinking public to the internets.
I have never made but one prayer to God,a very short one: ‘O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.’, and he granted it. ~Voltaire
“Tear down that wall!”
Brick-making is, very specifically and publicly, the goal of the Right in education. It’s why they insist phonics over whole language learning. The latter teaches context and critical thinking. The former teaches obedience by rote (not that phonics doesn’t have it’s place).
It’s also demoralizing to watch those in power or in pursuit of power fail so completely at responding to such easy and persuasive lies – more so for me.
The fear of those who claim the giant exists can produce the same response.
I have been spending more time of late reminding myself of the times when people pushed back against the self-serving lies (it is important to remember the reasons for the dishonesty – too many leave the political project unmentioned). Today it is the Populists – I wonder how well known that history is in places like Texas where the Alliance was strongest, and whether that history resonates at all with people today.
To paraphrase H. Rap Brown, anti-intellectualism is as American as apple pie.
Great quote!
You don’t get it. He’s probably a hero among his constituents because he’s on the side of those who want to pay lower taxes! I once lived in an affluent area, the Main Line outside of Philly. Comments like Bradley’s were the common discourse when it came time to approve the budget of the school district.
You’re speaking of the Farmers Alliance, I guess, and I don’t know that the honest resistance to authority represented there is much remembered. Today’s rightist populists aren’t, in my opinion, populists at all. It’s their absolute deference to authority — albeit a very specific in-group authority from their point of view — that marks the difference.
Excellent post. I’ve been thinking lately that the best long term progressive and/or socialist feedback loop we can create is to pursue absolute commitment to critical thinking skills in schools and society at large. Critical Thinking should be one of the pillars of the society we are striving for.
Educating to and about critical thinking in and of itself should be an absolute.
Oh so he’s just an Alan Simpson from Beaumont?
Credulity Crisis? I should say! When you can’t believe in the integrity of the voting on “Dancing with the Stars,” what can you believe in? Is nothing sacred?
Alas, as Captain Renault said, “Round up the usual suspects.”
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/11/19/5495782-how-the-dancing-vote-was-hacked?gt1=43001
Alan Simpsons are everywhere that the R party has control of the debate.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Glenn W. Smith and the FDL Patriots:
Another great Sunday sermon Citizen Smith but I would offer that the most damaging lies are those long since told and now buried by the lies of current circumstances. The greatest of these today are the lies told about Afghanistan and Iraq in 2008-09 (we will be “out” by 2012…”Watch me”) and the rationalization that “circumstances have changed” and we won’t be out before 2014. The original lies and their current proginy have clarified the progressive goals and objectives for the next two years, which is to say that ending the wars in the middle east is the only way that social and economic change can occur. Ending the wars demads that we make Obama one term president and that progressives become the majority of elected cadre of Democrats in 2013. It matters not who is President if there is a clearly defined anti-fascist, anti-war, progressive political party. If you call yourself progressive then you will get your ass together with your neighbors and friends and ORGANIZE…we must make the 1968 Democratic National Convention look like a Victorian tea party (show those corporate shills what an insurgency really means).
There is no other issue from this moment forward other than ending the wars…it has always been about ending the wars.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, NO ONE IS GUNNA FIGHT THIS ONE FOR YOU ANYMORE!!
Right-wingers would deny health care to those who get hooked on phonics.
You guess correctly (Goodwyn is excellent on this issue).
I think you are right – there is a good deal of populist rhetoric on the right these days used to justify deference to authority, which is the opposite of populism. I suspect that a genuine populism is the best way to combat such faux populism. And the relevance of the Farmers Alliance and the Populist Movement is powerful today – as Matt Stoller’s recent piece on A Debtcropper Society highlights. I suspect that history would prove useful for making sense of our plight even if it is new for most.
Dennis Kucinich thinks so as well.
In the 60′s after many accusations of being a socialist, Sen. Yarborough adopted the Populist label. He did it honor, too, having been a huge contributor to national prosperity with the Cold War G.I. Bill of rights that extended educational benefits to Vietnam war veterans. He’d be fervently denying the right to claiming populism to today’s teabaggage.
one_outer, you are absolutely right. Interesting to note that John Dewey pinned his hopes for democracy on just this, and his entire theory of education is built around it — one reason the Right attacks him and his theory.
So, there really all formidable opponents to our point of view. To them, it threatens authority, and they are all about authority and obedience. Without them, in their view, the universe will fall apart.
I’d missed Matt’s piece on debtcroppers. Thanks so much for that link — just gave it the briefest of scans and would recommend it to everyone here.
Memories of the Farmers Alliance, by the way, is one reason I have employed the term “prairie humanism” for the kind of empathetic, intellectually vibrant, human-centered, forward looking populism I’d like to see. Another reason is that many people — even many “heartland” conservatives — truly to hold more to empathy and health curiosity close to home. They are some of Lakoff’s “biconceptuals.”
Wow, I think I’m a Buddhist and I never even knew it.
Nice post, and a great quote.
Thanks Ruth. That is interesting – and funny, given that the original Populists were accused of being socialists from the beginning. One wonders how the Demoractic Party would have fared with Yarborough in that seat rather than Bentson.
Norske, where have you been of late?
You mean I’m not s’posed to defer to authority and accept permanent warfare as just natural? I mean, it’s all these poor other people that are fighting and everything, and I don’t even know those citizens maimed and killed. Sheesh, you set a high bar. ;)
Authentic Buddhists never do know it! The label leaves with the breaths….
I would add that this personalization leads back to a warped concept of religion, Protestant religion in particular. Anything scientific is viewed as a personal attack against their concept of religion.
Many years ago, Creationists asked things like “If evolution is real then where’s the missing link?”. The missing link was discovered, as were many other missing links, so now Creationists need a new argument. I’m seeing two: the “Fossils are lies of the Devil” argument, and the “Intelligent Design aka Creation Science” argument.
Climate Science deniers used to ask things like “If global warming is real, then how come we don’t see it in the fossil record?” Now that the fossil record and ice cores are readily available to support Climate Science, the argument has changed to “If global warming is real, how come it snowed last winter?”
Any science is viewed as being supportive of Evolution, and therefore is supportive of abortion, and therefore must be denied. To me, the right-wing seems to have conflated it all into a big incoherent glob. Throwing truth at the glob does nothing. The truth will be chewed, intentionally misrepresented, twisted around, until a bizarre untruth is regurgitated and repeated.
This reminds me of a SCOTUS case a number of years ago where IIRC a Tennessee parent was suing the local school over something her child was being asked to read. I forget what the actual case and context were but one thing the parent said has stayed with me all these years, as an example of what should not be the case.
The quote was “We must put bounds upon our childrens’ imaginations”
I can’t think of anything more limiting and troubling
And that’s a very tough road. America is stuck in a text-messaging, Facebooking, “whatever, dude” combination of being self-absorbed yet apathetic at the same time. It’s tough to break through that, but we must. Maybe a first step could be teaching objective analysis. Critical thinking skills — examine things from all angles, find flaws in your own points of view, pretend you are your opponent, etc — may not be possible for some people.
I agree, although I believe there are minds to be changed among the climate-deniers et al. For one thing, I think many of them are miserable, emotionally unhappy. Their worldview is narrow and stifling. Many simply don’t fit, but they remain because of fear, timidity. So, we have to throw the truth at those who might, just might, accept it, turn their heads, blink, step outside their current confinement.
To us neither the irrational belief or its justification makes much sense. One reason for this is its primary purpose is maintaining the authority of the worldview itself — not advancing knowledge, enhancing hopes for survival. A lie is really not a lie to those who hold strictly to the worldview. Instead it is a moral act of worldview foundation repair.
I think the real reason the Chinese government– or any government– fears them is because they think and the core of their philosophy is critical thinking and debate but without throwing out compassion. Check out the work of this young man that strikes at the heart of the issue: What About Me – Mipham
I discard the meme that memes must be discarded! :)
Bentsen took it away in the primary because of el Senador’s Civil rights vote. Without him in that seat, it could have been even more of a squeaker… or worse. Which is why I really seethe to hear wingnuts claiming they were instrumental in establishing equal rights.
mzchief, that’s a terrific video. Thanks for the link. Anybody else happens upon this thread, watch it!
And I had forgotten about the idea of prairie humanism – which is unfortunate, because I like it for precisely those reasons.
Well, it remains way underdeveloped, and I don’t return to it often enough that folks would remember. Appreciate any more thoughts — today, later or anytime — you have about these ideas.
Yes, we do need to keep trying to reach the reachable. And truth is still the best tool for the job.
Some of the comments talked about deference to authority, and/or the need for it, and I think that is a great point. Attempts to address the Credulity Crisis, by speaking truth to power, are seen as defiance against authority. And maybe they are; but, the reaction to truth-tellers has not been to reevaluate the status quo or to incorporate truth into the debate. Instead, the reaction has been to defer to authority, venomously, and using the same lies that caused the Credulity Crisis in the first place.
Here’s a great follow-on: The 10% Advantage – Sakyong Mipham. Isn’t that practical?
If that speaks to you there’s much more.
Frank Schaeffer was formerly one of the “best-known evangelical leaders in the U.S.” He has stated, “One reason the Republicans won on Tuesday is because many of their supporters have already given up on this world and are waiting for the next.” Note – quote from November 2nd.
Frank Schaeffer further states, “Feeding the paranoid delusions of people on the fringe of the fringe contributes to a dangerous climate that may provoke violence in a few individuals. It’s also one of the big reasons that the nutty fringe is now the “center.” If you believe the Bible is literal and true and that this is the “End” then the crazies look sane and the sane look crazy. Welcome to the new congress. And convincing folks that Armageddon is on the way, and all we can do is wait, pray, and protect our families from the chaos (or from the first black president) that will be the “prelude” to the “Return of Christ,” is perhaps not the best recipe for political, economic, or personal stability, let alone social cohesion. Glenn Beck cashes in on this when he sells gold on TV and survivalist gear. But this End Times cult may also not be the best philosophy on which to build American foreign policy! The momentum toward what amounts to a whole subculture seceding from the union (in order to await “The End”) is irrevocably prying loose a chunk of the American population from both sanity and their fellow citizens. Enter the “new” Tea Party candidates.”
Frank Schaeffer’s blog with more detail
If you believe “the end is near”, you may not feel the need for an education or to truly use your critical thinking skills.
Spot on.
while praising prairie humanism I don’t think we can forget the tension between the prairie progressives and the liberal power elite intellectuals (and corporatists) of the Northeast. that I think saps the vigor of both segments of the left. Personally I find myself more sympathetic to some elements in the Tea Party movement.
An aside I find interesting. Resentment coupled with the obsession to prove the elite critics wrong stirred the prairie. I had thought my resentment of class which I have battled all my life came from the Dust Bowl experience. Today I find in Bess Streeter Aldrich the Rim of the Prairie, 1927;
Comments I have heard from Asian visitors to the US include their observations about the lack of self-esteem among so many Americans. I think this has got to play into the dynamic you are pointing out. As for the truth-telling, I’ll never stop as it’s the bedrock of sanity.
I think a better line is between populists and elitists. Glenn is not suggesting that this sort of real populism only exists on the prairie, only that it manifests itself in a particular way there. Putting too heavy an emphasis on a geographic, rather than ideological split, risks replacing illumination for tribalism. That said, it is important to address the role of elite (anti-populist) progressives.
As I intimated, I have struggled with just that most of my life and must know so do many others, some less successfully. But that is one of the chasms that must close.
In Texas? The majority there probably cheered him on.
My daughter, who lives in Humble TX and is a conservation biologist, testified before the TX State Board of Ed 2-3 years against the idea of teaching Creationism alongside evolutionary science as a valid theory
of how the earth came to be. (By definition Creationism isn’t even a theory, it’s a religious belief.) and she was denied her full time to talk because one of the TX Board of Ed members chose to interrupt a lot of her time – a fixed slot regardless of interruptions. That is who you are delaing with here.
Ironically both my daughter and I are practicing Christians who just happen to believe that you do wrong to put the Creator of the vast Universe in such a limited box of understanding as the literal interpretation of the creation stories as found in the Book of Genesis – they are Myths* embraced by a people with no understanding of science who wanted to explain how the world came to be.
* “Myth” does not mean fairy tale, BTW. A myth is an attempt to explain something that reflects a deeper truth but that is not quite understandable with the facts in hand, through the use of metaphor.
What’s the lie about Obama’s “death panels”?…you don’t think insurance companies (whom Obama is forcing us on whether we want to or not) decides who lives and dies?
Critical thinking has always been an enemy of the tyrants. Hitler is reported to have once said the only thing the German people need to know about geography is that Berlin in their capital.
Even today we are treated to th e hubris and arrogance of orthodox Christianity, as in the Catholics church, finally instructing the ignorant masses that they now may use condoms during sex, if their intention is pure (according not to science but their moral instructors. No need for critical thinking and best decision making.
But I refer back to my original observation. People first want entertainment, whether it’s dressing up in fancy robes and slinging incense or playing shameless racist messages to a curt tune, or a wink and a “you betcha.”
Health insurance companies have been “death panels” for decades now. Hence, the need for legislation in which you can’t be turned down from obtaining policies due to “pre-existing conditions”. It says SO MUCH about our society that such legislation is even needed in the first place.
I haven’t read his books. Should have, I suppose. Thanks for the links. Really. Thanks!
This is brilliant, Glenn. Thank you.
The folks who are claiming they are religious aren’t. This is a political movement and it should be outed as such. These folks trade in a lot of snake oil for their own selfish gain. As folks start to see they are crooked as a dog’s hind leg willing to sell out their mothers and everyone else, these people can’t hold on to their positions of influence in the community. Why should you concede to them?
It is far easier “to go with the flow” and be entertained than to actually “think” through any issue. As mzchief stated above, “Comments I have heard from Asian visitors to the US include their observations about the lack of self-esteem among so many Americans.” Once we became a country of “consumers” instead of individuals with emotions and compassion for others, many people once again began “following” the authoritarian “leaders” whom they believe are more intelligent than they are.
You are welcome. Much of this is now on YouTube and streaming video available for free on the Internet besides the book form. All folks have to do now is turn the dial and tune in. It’s awesome.
I have to agree. Some weaknesses with the term might be its rural reference and, maybe, it’s too available for misuse as nostalgia.
The tension among various parties on the left is complex. I mean, northeastern liberalism was (and in some pockets still is) very communitarian, very inclusive, egalitarian even. But modernist and post-modernist liberalism — at least among its technocratic leaders — is paternalistic and elitist.
Big damn subject to tackle. I love visiting Harvard mostly ’cause William James taught there and so did Stanley Cavell (and overlooking the fact that a great American philosopher, Henry Bugbee, was denied tenure on snobbish grounds). But I have to chuckle at it’s common brand name use (almost like “Coke” for cola) for the pinnacle of education, which it certainly is not, not in the broad, necessary sense of what education should be.
I only mention this to point out how complex it all is. The assumed superiority of technocratic northeastern liberalism — which itself does have some very fine characteristics — is built into our very language.
You’re welcome, Becca. Thanks for stopping by.
The TSA is a complete social control mechanism built around that very point. Now we can have physical and psychological violation mainstreamed into the fabric of our lives (if Mark Fiore does a piece on this, it will be a doozy)!
Complex and I continue to find many perspectives from which to view it all.
In my own research of the migrations to the prairies I find it ironic that many, perhaps most, of these folks share the same New England ancestors, their religions and humanist values; while developing degrees of disdain for each other. I wonder at the impact of shifting relationships with the land.
As always Glenn, good discussion..
TalkingStick, have you read Daniel Elazar on migration patterns to and within the U.S. and the “political cultures” that traveled along with the folk? His “political culture theory” is often dismissed by rational-actor empiricists because it is, admittedly, rather impressionistic. However, his work predicts outcomes in, for instance, state welfare reform etc. I hope you come back by the thread, because I think you would really like it.
Thanks so much Glenn. As you see I have come back by. No I have not read the Elazar book nor much to do with the politics. My work began with the family history thing and I have not only a volume of our contemporaneous correspondence I began to gather more on the other families and all the interconnections. So my historical knowledge is more personal, through the eyes of the emigrees and I supposes still too small to consider other than anecdotal.
But I have a sense of some of the patterns that seem to fit.
They lie about science in pursuit of ideology and, more importantly, tribalism. If someone with a completely different belief system than yours espouses certain ideas, these ideas MUST be wrong. Lets you feel safe inside your cocoon, not having to actually come to grips with frightening possibilities.
Much of his work is online. Here’s an intro:
http://academic.regis.edu/jriley/421elazar.htm
Here’s an index to some online papers.
http://www.jcpa.org/djeindex.htm
I have to say that your historical knowledge based on the personal has great relevance — maybe you should think of a book or some way of presenting what you have learned.
What I have published is a book primarily transcriptions of my family letters and a brief bio of my gr grandmother’s uncle(a Union Col who rescued her and sibs from reconstruction Texas.and many other adventures) I do have a bit of personal commentary. They span the mid 19th to mid 20th. Century. They were literate and interested in all of what was going on in the world. Mostly they were farmers.
There is considerable political commentary, critique of Polk, build up to the Civil War. One prophetic by Orenus Hart following the Whig convention and compromises with the Southerners.
But mostly they are just families hoping make a living and live virtuous lives. There are letters about the discovery of oil and letters from the gold fields of California and the vast middle of the country.
Here is a link to a review.
If I am to do another it probably would best be in a personal memoir form. In fact there are days I think I should. As Barbara Lee said on an interview when confronted with the small Democratic caucus remaining “We will be the keepers of the dream.”
If you want to continue the correspondence my email is talkingstick at gamountains dot net