Homeowners have found leverage against foreclosures in the questionable legality of MERS, the Mortgage Electronic Registration System. That won’t do. Banks want homeowners to feel helpless. People who know how to enforce their legal rights aren’t helpless enough. So, banks are telling Congress to stomp on the legal rights of human persons and States and Counties. They are spending millions lobbying Congress to pass a statute legalizing MERS retroactively, sanctioning the abuses it has perpetrated against the property laws of the fifty states. The Washington Post reports it this way:
The companies have opened wide their wallets for lobbying and are flying top executives to Washington for one-on-one meetings with lawmakers. They are holding briefings for key staffers, including an event last week that drew more than 60 aides. And they are blanketing Congress with white papers, memos and other documents that lay out their arguments.
Who are these aides, and who are their Senators and Representatives? The Post doesn’t say. You can bet these aides got a fair and balanced presentation from the lobbyists who suddenly are the only available experts on securitization and the real property laws of every State. And you can bet these 60 people don’t attend briefings from Elizabeth Warren or Adam Levitin. How can such people give them lovely jobs in a few years?
The Post doesn’t explain the legislative procedure for tucking the MERS Whitewash bill into some statute without identifying the miserable excuse for a human person who would do such a thing to please his Corporate Person masters.
You’d think the human persons who screwed up this badly would be a tiny bit embarrassed, but that is not how things work in the nation’s capital. . . . [cont'd.] Here’s R.K. Arnold, the head of Merscorp, which owns MERS:
The MERS database “is a powerful tool that can be harnessed by the Congress and the industry to improve the mortgage finance system,” R.K. Arnold, Merscorp chief executive, told members of the Senate banking committee this week.
This is repulsive. Arnold admits his system was created to skirt centuries-old state laws. He knows that the entire system of securitized mortgages is fouled up and may cause enormous losses to investors in RMBSs, like pension plans and mutual funds and your Church and college endowments. MERS brags that its system cost states and counties at least a billion dollars in unpaid recording fees, and suits have been filed to recover those losses.
No problem. Mr. Arnold instructs a respectful panel of Congressionals: clean up after us, make us retroactively legal and stop those pesky law and order types from suing us. And by the way, privatize a perfectly functional system, and funnel that money into private hands instead of states and cities and counties.
This is one of those ugly parts of the American system that leave a taste of vomit. Secret laws, secret sponsors, secret aides, secrets everywhere, and damage to human persons to protect the wallets of Corporate Persons and their Human Overlords.
But, as DDay points out, it was nice of Washington Post reporters Ariana Eunjun Cha and Brady Dennis to provide the point of view of the Banks.




36 Comments










Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Perhaps they could enact a law along these lines.
Then a few human-friendly attorneys will present to a court a bunch of the absurd violations of centuries-old real property presumptions, practices, statutes and decisions.
Enforcement of the law will then be stayed all the way to US Sup Ct., where even the authoritarian majority will throw up their hands and say the law is impossibly constitutionally vague.
Bankers: yer moove…
The Post lost its stature when it began using the Fiscal Times as a source, ignoring its ownership by “Sneaky Pete” Peterson.
The states should sue and get their billions in lost fee.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fiscal_Times
This would be even worse than retroactive Telecom immunity and would set off a war between Congress and the states over the unpaid fees, interest, and penalties.
Worse, it wouldn’t solve the problem of determining who holds the mortgage and who’s entitled to receive the payments.
Worse, it legitimizes massive bankster fraud and theft of homes from millions of families.
It should be political suicide to vote for retroactive immunity, but with the ever compliant and dishonest media, who knows what will happen as Congress and the President bend over backwards to cover-up and protect the insolvent criminal banks.
The founder of the Blackstone group seems to want SS money kind of makes you wonder what shape his hedge fund is in if he is so desperate for old people’s cash.
Many hedgefunds bought the banks debt I wonder if Blackstone bought a bunch of this paper.
This is why you are one of my favorite authors on FDL.
Well, we know that Obama’s opposed to retroactive legislation. He promised he’d filibuster the retro-legalization of FISA abuses, and we know how that turned out.
Making crimes legal retroactively seems itself to be illegal to my mind but I’m not a lawyer.
and don’t forget law enforcement, it’s a great tool for that also
so said Mr. R. K. Arnold (President and CEO Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) in yesterday’s hearing.
Damn the torpedoes. Full speed ahead. Corps must be protected at all costs.
O is interested in looking ahead only if that protects PTB. He’s one of the most immoral prez we’ve had in a long long time. Even W was a tad less hypocritical in his pursuit of power & $$. (Haves & have-mores comes to mind.)
hey massacio, I seem to keep missing you with this question;
when a person is served with a foreclosure, what is to stop them from serving themselves with the same papers to demonstrate to the courts how unreliable they are?
Congress, we are watching you. We will know who signs on with this evil idea.
How will Congress compensate states for lost fees? Sure they can protect MERS from criminal penalties but what about fees?
The states are broke I don’t expect them to ignore cash.
You cannot legally file foreclosure on yourself. There is no agreement for you to pay yourself for a home.
I might think of having a family member or friend do it then.
the purpose is to prove how worthless the banks claim is
You can file suit against the foreclosers though if they are in the wrong.
I would have thought those objections would have been enough to stop this nonsense, but in Corporate America (naming rights available, how about CitiUS?) who knows?
Perris, banks can lie to Judges, but you had better not.
You can go for defamation of character and ruin of credit score, etc. However, they must prove that you have not paid your mortgage and that they have the true ownership of your mortgage.
Exactly! Let the judge know you wish to file for damages at the same time.
acccording to masaccio, that may not be the case, that they may simply “affirm” their ownership of the loan, at least that’s what they try to do in the foreclosure
I am saying a person or their agent/personal corporation can do exactly the same thing
just to prove the point
you can set it up so it is not a lie;
you can take out a loan from a friend by promisory, they don’t even have to give you the money if you don’t claim against their claim
then you are not lying, nor are they, they have a legitimate foreclosure against your house
Human people can’t mess with courts. Judges have no sense of humor and they can send you to jail for contempt. It’s a bad idea to screw around in courts, and it won’t help.
Getting depressed with MERS legalization being done in the dark of night (I agree it must be done – just like no check return – just photocopy retain was made law – but I do not like the process) and the coming vote that Reid is going to allow on Senate Bill S 510 Food Safety Modernization Act that makes the U.S. government the new authority over the public’s right to grow, trade and transport any foods with the power to regulate the tomato plants in your backyard, granting them the power to arrest and imprison people selling cucumbers at farmer’s markets, making criminals of those that transport organic produce, all to please the WTO and Codex Alimentarius so as to make corporations like Monsanto a monopoly over seeds.
All food production (yes, even food produced in your own garden) will be under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security, with power to arrest any backyard food producer as a felon (a “smuggler”) for merely growing lettuce and selling it at a local farmer’s market.
There was a time when we did not sell out our US Sovereignty by ceding to the authority of the World Trade Organization.
Now Obama wants to have trade agreements without Bill Clinton’s attempts at job and human needs (granted Bill’s 2 modifications of NAFTA were hard to inforce given WTO rules). Time to pull out of the WTO is well past.
I just heard Reid had scheduled a vote on S510- I hope my source is wrong.
There is a lot to be said for not following politics and focusing on the years we have left with smiles at the wonder of life and quiet payer and meditation.
Perris, the bankers have been claiming ownership in the courts. The problem is they are just now being slowed down because they can’t prove they own the mortgage note.
I am a out of work real estate paralegal. Please take it from me, ohhhhh
and Masaccio. You can’t play around with a judge. He will turn on you like a wild boar.
No, they don’t have a legitmate foreclosure against your house. All they have is a lein. It is not the same thing.
Perris, you seriously don’t want to go down that road. If you have your friend do that, they may be jailed for fraud. Plus, without the correct paperwork and recordings against the property in the courthouse real estate records it is all mute.
I think I get it peasantparty
Finding out who’s holding the mortgage is damned near impossible.
When I went to law school, now many years ago, we learned that real estate transactions, i.e. sales of real estate and mortgages, were the quintessentially “local” type of actions that were bound up with local venues even. Anyway, no way could they be interstate commerce. If Congress cannot regulate sales of firearms or rape and abuse of women, how can it regulate real estate mortgage filing requirements? Any Congressional act in this respect has to preempt state law and I cannot see this happening. But then maybe I’m just old fashioned.
MERS was a scheme designed with RICO statutes in mind. Christopher Peterson’s new report, in draft form should make it pretty clear.
It is about crime, tax evasion and control fraud. Those are the little parts. Treason, sedition, the active overthrow of a country that has already been accomplished with bank rule, perhaps. To destroy a nation purposefully is after all one of those big crimes.
There are tens of thousands of felonies waiting for you ladies and gentlemen. Many of us will not rest until you are banished. If you aren’t killed by the people you have destroyed, and protected by your puppets in DC, you will come back to harm us again because you are sociopathic killers.
There is a wall, there is a time for lining people up against it. It is what happens when there is no government of the people and the people have chosen it is time for something new. The government will not shoot it’s own, and it can’t bring our armed forces back to try to order them to do it’s work for them. Our troops are Americans, they would resist. Perhaps that is why such a great percentage of our troops capable of walking for more than a mile for a beer at the PX are conveniently “out of town” since the coup of 2001.
I hope you all begin to understand this is the last fight? The ultimate question of democracy? Life, the universe and everything? Am I being dramatic? I used to think so. Not any longer.
Sorry I did not have the time to debunk the food safety bill fear when I posted.
Turns out that the Food Safety Bill is the same one introduced in 2009 – with the same fears – that was debunked by Snopes.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/organic.asp