Annoying, impossible to eradicate and embarrassing to have in our American home, Karl Rove is a bedbug.
The New York Times is reporting this morning that Rove is back in charge of the Republican campaign war machine. Everyone thinks that “master strategists” – as the Times called Rove – earn such a title by mastering campaign strategy. Actually, what they do is stay out of races that can’t be won and put themselves in charge of races that are already won.
If you picked 50 consultants of all stripes and gave them a test, they’d all give the same answers. There are just not that many moving parts in politics. Strategically, it’s easier than checkers. It’s certainly not chess.
The successful consultants, however, do have something the also-rans don’t: the leverage of power. Usually it’s big money or, say, the vengeful Bush family and it’s army of ruthless operatives. They have the stroke to enforce discipline up and down the ranks. (I don’t mean this as an endorsement of top-down organization; bottom-up/top down would be more resilient, durable and democratic — we just haven’t seen it yet in contemporary politics.)
So, as we meditate today on what awful things we did in previous lifetimes to deserve the presence of a Rove in this one, we should keep a close eye on the secrets of his success: pick only winnable races; don’t get involved unless you have the power of a dictator; toss all scruples aside.
A realist’s view of the authentic sources of Rove’s masterbategery might make his bites a little less itchy. My good friends Wayne Slater and James Moore, who wrote the best book on Rove, Bush’s Brain, disagree with me about this. They think he’s a genius; I think he’s an opportunistic bedbug who hides in the cuffs of the lowest common denominator until he finds just the right environment.
Speaking of bugs, did it really take genius to bug his own office back in 1986 and then sucker the press into writing that his candidate’s opponent had done it? That was a work of shameless deception on a par with a carnival barker’s promise of a live two-headed baby inside his smoky tent. It’s not like Rove discovered the equivalence of mass and energy.
Inflation, however, is the key to American celebrity. Hell, Davy Crockett sold the colorful lies about his abilities with more originality than Rove. But Americans care little about the truth behind a celebrity’s claims. If we did, there’d be no Sarah Palin. For that matter, there’d have been no George W. Bush.
Celebrity inflation, however, is as dangerous as it’s economic counterpart. Our values are worth less and sooner or later the phony bubbles pop. Part of President Obama’s problem is that when we got inside the tent the promised magic was missing. Since we thought he would single-handedly restore civil society and return the nation if not the world to the path toward democracy, Obama’s deflation was inevitable.
The Roves of the world avoid that fate by picking tests they can’t fail to pass. They only take electives, you might say.
Now, it’s going to be argued that the 2000 election was not such an easy test. It should have been, but it wasn’t. A political party has the advantage in the national election that follows the other party’s eight years of power. Nonetheless, Rove failed it. Bush lost the election only to have the decision of voters reversed by a Supreme Court beholding to Bush the Elder.
That points us back to the other key of consultant success: the power to enforce one’s will. And that Rove has. Give today’s freshmen statehouse consultant the ability to give or withhold millions or billions of dollars from candidates and they will be geniuses too.
After the 2000 election and in places where Democrats have a tough time winning, there was a common plaint on the left: “Where’s our Karl Rove?” We were asking the genie the wrong question, and like in all those old jokes, the genie turned the tables on us.
We should have been asking for help in creating a public opinion environment that favored progressive victories. We should have demanded that our wealthy contributors take the long view for once and invest in the kind of communications infrastructure and third-party advocacy structure Republicans built and used patiently for thirty years. So effective was it that a run-of-the-mill if ruthless operative could ride it to millennial success and be credited with Oz-like powers.
We didn’t look behind the curtain, though. Out of some screwy allegiance to celebrity culture, we’re in the habit of pretending there is no curtain. Dorothy and her friends did ask the wizard the right questions. They wanted a heart, a brain, courage. They wanted a home.
It turned out they had to give those gifts to themselves.



57 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Ewwwww. But thanks. There is the right wing genius, that as long as they can find operatives who have no pride, they will be able to ride on the lowest impulses of voters – and that’s brought them back to power every time.
The same simple question as always. Why aren’t Rove, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith, Yoo and the rest serving prison sentences for war crimes?
Fantastic analogy: bedbugs are exceedingly difficult to get rid of, but you’re unlikely to have a problem with them to begin with if you keep your premises clean.
Personally, I lump all “strategists”, Dem or Repub, into the bedbug category.
You might call it the genius of immorality, which, in the West, has always been darkly captivating.
Great post, Glenn. I was thinking more in terms of cockroaches – they spread disease, only work in the dark, and hide from the light. But bedbugs are really hard to get rid of so you may be right.
Good Morning, Glenn
John Shelby Spong had an interesting summary of the religions right’s affect on polictics, from Carter through Bush. There’s a youtube interview on his facebook site. I’ve been told that he’s seen as a heretic by many. I think his whole take on religion is wonderful.
Just another perspective on how we got here. I won’t tell you what he says, but if you’re interested, you can have a peek.
It’s to be expected that the professionalization of political engagement (the rise of consultants) led to a distance between the folk and political decision-making. So, it’s not so much the character of all the consultants but the structure of politics they’ve built, grow up in and work in.
Which is why I conclude a piece on Rove with the observation that we have to give the important political gifts to ourselves, meaning, no more passive political consumerism. Not an original thought, and one reason there even is an FDL community. Just used Rove to remake the point.
Cockroaches, yea. I guess I used bedbugs because they’re in the news again like Rove. We need some real political DDT.
’cause we just had to “move on.” That genteel thinking will be rewarded when the reich wing takes over at least the House in November and begins the long slog of meaningless investigations into the evil the democratically elected president and congress thrust upon the poor, innocent white folk.
Too gruesome to contemplate – vote as though your way of life depended on it.
I would like an honest answer from BO on that subject. His look forward attitude is bunk!
Nice Sunday post Glenn.
Cockroach is the first bug that came to mind, also. I owe you the beverage of your choice.
There’s something dangerous, or at least fatalistic, about using poisonous substances on poisonous critters.
and pardon the aside, but;
Actually, I had great good fortune when I accidentally encountered bedbugs, staying in a rather nice motel outside St. Louis. A noisy departure woke me in the wee hours, after I’d had trouble getting to sleep so had been up, with lights on, for most of the night – so I rose to find a couple of the noisome critters just crawling out of the pillow. By the best of luck, I was in travel planning involving quite a distance, and had only brought in a carryall of clothes for the next day, which I hung up instead of putting anywhere the bugs might have found. In short, I was able to avoid any but passing contact, and showered mightily, throwing away the nightshirt I slept in. No further bedbuggery appeared.
You are so right about poisonous substances/poisonous critters. An arms race ensues.
You are certainly right – there could be a Democratic Rove, who could turn the spigot of big money on and off, but not a democratic (i.e. progressive) Rove.
The better question, one you have been asking for a long time, is how to use the resources we have – people, energy, and moral values rooted in the best American traditions, to counteract the power of money. History shows these things can beat big money, yet that lesson seems continually forgotten.
Cockroaches don’t suck blood.
With Rove involved we know that it will get very dirty and that the Dems will curl up in a corner and whimper. Where are our advocates? Where is someone who will pound on the table and stop the Dem nonsense?
In Baum’s carefully crafted political parable, The Wizard of Oz, the roaring lion is a symbol of the Populist’s champion, William Jennings Bryan, most famous for his stirring Cross of Gold speech until his unfortunate participation in the Scopes Trial.
The Populist/Progressive flaw in 1900 is the same as today.
On a serendipitious note, I’m reading a book right now called Sinister Pig, from the French’s term porc sinistre regarding the boss pig in the sty, the one that would guard the trough and attack any animal that tried to steal a bite. Does that describe Rove?
Powerful question stated simply, David. I think the answers are complex and essential to get right. But first, one of the barriers. Our continued atomization and isolation from one another.
I’m working on a piece about the role music has played in liberation movements like Civil Rights. Defining popular music broadly, it was once a participatory “social lubricant,” as Elijah Wald says, but has become a “way of creating a personal soundtrack” (iPods).
Could we sing a contemporary “We Shall Overcome” or “Wade in the Waters” with one another and mean it today? We can, I think, but we’ve lost a little taste and talent for it. We have to restore that. And that will take more than celebrity concerts as fundraisers.
Thanks for this, oldgold.
Excellent post, Glenn. Thank you.
Rove is politically expedient and morally vacuous.
A better Dem-progressive communication system would have tracked him more smartly, and with better snark and wittier jibes, years ago.
The GOP built a phenomenal communication system, in alliance with the Christian right. IMVHO, it’s the political equivalent of all the toxic CDOs on Wall Street: prosperity Gospel in political form.
It’s imploding.
I could be sad about it all, but frankly I see nothing but opportunity for saner, more ethical voices. People are desperate for honesty, guts, and courage IMVHO.
Rove can’t offer any of that, nor can his party.
Of course, IMNSVHO, Karl Rove is a hybrid – stink bug/cockaroach
Rove may be more like a Sinister Pig Whisperer who knows how to turn a sow’s ear into silk noose.
Splendid ;-))
I think that Howard Dean has said the Dem just need ‘more guts’.
I happen to agree with him.
Rats, my last comment was for you, demi. Just hit comment instead of reply.
Atomization and isolation are indeed key, as is a lack of trust and too much disgust. Elite political tactics, whether intended or not, often serve to encourage these unfortunate tendencies. And too often our responses are simply to rage, which does not help. Anger has its place, but a politics of anger alone cannot be progressive.
I am looking forward to your piece on the role of music – I have been trying to learn some of the old union songs for precisely the same reason.
P.S. –
That is why I try to share my Pandora stations!
I think there’s a lot to what you say. It may not be imploding just yet, but it is swelling and shrinking again like a cartoon gasbag.
“Actually, what they do is stay out of races that can’t be won and put themselves in charge of races that are already won.”
And get media friends like George Will and others, to repeat over and over again that rove is a “master” of political fates. Remember, we learned from The Bellman, “what I tell you three times is true”.
http://www.literature.org/authors/carroll-lewis/the-hunting-of-the-snark/chapter-01.html
a favorite;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR6SMAJQW8Y
Joe Hill
Rove is simply WYSIWYG type of guy. A Republican.
He is a fat, flaccid little man with man-titties. He is a dough-boy, a “D” listee as a male, he overcompensates by screwing the American people. He is disgusting. He is foul. He is simply, a Republican; a pig that wants more than his fair share of the pie. He is a Republican. WYSIWYG.
Great endeavor, learning those songs. Maybe as important — maybe more important — than the songs themselves is the social milieu which helped us want to sing them together. You can’t listen to a revolution, you have to sing it. A rather obvious metaphor, that. In any case, it may be likely that the urge for human connection will reemerge naturally from our headphoned selves, which is just not a natural condition.
Karl deceives people. This is his only trick, and it is nothing close to genius.
I’m seeing it that way, as well; I think that it’s really ripe for implosion.
If the best they can offer are that walking cartoon Boehner (this week, in shirt sleeves, whoo-hoo!), and the ambitious-but-rather daft Cantor, that party is in deep trouble.
And on the Senate side: DeMint, Inhofe, Sessions, et al. Are you kidding me?!
The GOP came out of PR, back in the Nixon era, as near as I can tell. (I’ve not read “Nixonland”, so I don’t have that documented background to call on, but I think that they come out of PR, rather than governance.) They rode on Ike’s coattails for two generations, and now they’re a walking dead man.
The oil companies and health insurance monopolies need them, and the filibuster rule in the Senate makes it **appear** that they have power they really don’t.
For all the smacking around that BO gets at FDL (some of it justified, IMVHO), when he walked into that Health Care Summit with the GOP so-called leadership last winter, he mopped the floor with those 3-rate thinkers. Apart from the Dem Senators, who were more knowledgeable (but too polite to laugh out loud at the GOP nonsense), BO methodically exposed most of their arguments as total crap.
I figure the current GOP is just the political coutiers that Big Oil, Big HealthCos, and Big Defense need in order to keep the curtain over the Wizard. The wizard ain’t Rove, not by a long shot; he’s just opportunistic enough to make it look that way.
The GOP is deader than a doorknob.
The filibuster is the fiction that makes it appear to be a functioning party.
Just my four cents…
On a tangential topic, small sample, Ulster county D volunteer sent an email to 100 Ds who have shown up at one event or another, asking for electioneer volunteers to phone bank, GOTV, etc. According to next, begging, email, he got ONE response. ’nuff said? BTW, it’s a closely divided county with one of the formerly librul (now Veal Penner) as U.S. rep, Hinchey.
I meant to reiterate: there is nothing but opportunity for progressives.
My private analysis: the GOP has no real grasp of public goods.
Therefore, they have no economic arguments that can address the problems of resource depletion, which is the key issue of our time.
The sooner their death is publicly apparent, the better.
The fact that the Dems aren’t making sure the GOP is completely electorally repudiated this year makes me absolutely disgusted.
Oh, this is perfect.
Our survival’s literally at stake and the sociopaths are playing a little sport. Guess Karl is yearning to redeem himself and revive his sleaze
if not for the kicks and giggles alone.
It’s sickening. A big fucking game for both sides.
Horrible, depraved people; every last one of ‘em.
Joan is always great! But I liked her Woodstock version.
Solidarity Forever (IWW theme song)
I haven’t read thoroughly all in this thread but jump in to add my two cents as to what births and nourishes these scoundrels. It is the people’s love for a great story and celebrity. They have outdone the liberals for years.lifting much of their story from the Saturday afternoon Western movies. Though the fiction writer Rand deserves some credit I think to what attracts the ordinary people the most is the Western Cowboy motif. I have yet to meet a man, and few women, who do not get misty-eyed over cowboys.
Ellis Island and open arms to the misbegotten hasn’t for years made a good story. No self-respecting cowboy would ever find himself “misbegotten.”
God! I love Joan Baez. Thanks.
I like Joan today also, as much because the last I checked she hasn’t been botoxed. As Jane Fonda said we will forget the authenticity of age if we forget what it looks like.
Ask and ye shall receive.
She was at the Little Fox a few years ago attending a gig and we saw her in the bar. She Does look very good, well maybe not as good as at Woodstock but very good. I have always followed her and her music since the 50′s.
Why thank you SD! I do have the blue ray version of the original Woodstock movie… Sure brings back memories, Woodstock was my welcome home from the Army celebration after being out of the country for 2 years…
“And the banks are made of marble…” “…down at the polling place…” We sang those righteous songs in the face of direct immoral danger. The consequences of this creeping corporatist and pseudo-christian fascism are not yet real to too many of us. The power of empathy has waned among us, dimmed by the mass media and national myths of hypocrisy. Without empathy the songs become entertainment not the breath of life. The distinct moral and physical danger to our way of life that these republican heretics pose is disguised under veneers of congeniality and downright idiocy, too difficult to take seriously without the imagination of feeling.
Heh I had to read about it in Stars and Stripes.
Don’t bother yourselves over the likes of Karl Rove, Dick Armey, and Newt Gingrich. These old GOPer dinosaurs are living on borrowed time.
Tea Party Patriots are supporting new leadership … like Gary Johnson.
Amazing. Those songs are a aural memory; you have to sing those songs full throat to get the words right…)missguotes in my phases in above post.)
The Dems are in a constant dilemma. Living a lie is exhausting.
They’re always walking the line. They serve their corporate masters behind closed doors while making populist promises year after year. Notice that some how, some way, they’re never able to get any piece of populist legislation passed? Sometimes fails by one vote, but it always fails.
Bush got it all with far less Republicans and nothing near a 60 vote Senate majority. I guess Bush put a spell on all those Dems that voted for all his shit all the time, eh?
The Dems have convictions alright. They’re the same convictions as Republicans. They just lie to us every single day.
They’re beneath contempt.
Top down “organization” versus bottom up “aggregation” is the ideological dividing line between authoritarian, right wing/intentionalist methods versus progressive/functionalist methods.
Bottom-up vs top down is a crucial topic to understand because the former works (with some limitations) and the latter inevitability proves deficient for the non-elites.
Organizational style is an imperative of implementation and defines the architecture of the competing political systems — Dems are self-organizing and depend on the functions of the constituency whereas the Republicans are ideological and hierarchical. In that sense, the Roves of the right always seek to dictate by creating a filter of acceptability which even Democrats are forced to address.
By crafting these absolutes as “issues” the conservative framer’s prerogative is to extol “virtue” and undermine the legitimacy of the opposition. A little innuendo goes a long way for those who peddle moral dictates whether they apply or not.
Ironically, the right has now substituted intractable opposition for management, and histrionic posturing for leadership as an answer to the resurgence of the left. Unfortunately, this administration has embraced the framings of the indignant right and ignored the groundswell of frustration amongst progressives .
What that tells me is that this administration is not tolerant of bottom-up dynamics but prefers the facility of executive control. This is not the hallmark of a progressive administration.
The steady-state mode of democracy is chaos. The failure of ideology is anarchy. When we have a failed ideological regime such as our extra-constitutional executive sovereigns who deem their directives to be above reproach, the choice becomes clear — restore chaos or face anarchy.
Top down (organized) anarchy of right wing intransigence will never succeed in the face of unrestrained left wing chaos. Chaos is superior to anarchy in the political arena, and is a potent force against the repression brought by zealots of either political persuasion.
I would much prefer the soothing white noise of chaos to the cascading cacophony of anarchy.
There’s wisdom in this. A lot of the GOP’s advantage has to do with their advantage in TV news, I think. Even when they say stuff that’s utterly daft, they tend to be taken seriously. OTOH, suggest that, say, economic stimulus works better than quantitative easing in an environment where there is little quantity left to ease would be treated as nonsense by far too many TV news organizations.
Influencing, and owning, such information outlets should have been a goal since the Reaganauts proved how effective it was.
Look, I admire your intelligence(and I can almost understand what you’re driving at),but — HEAR ME NOW –could we please speak in slightly less esoteric terms?
I love coming to FDL and I know I’m just one low-middle-class cleaning lady/caregiver who has all of 78 college credits to nowhere, but there are alot of people like me out here.
You really need to speak less “intellectually” if you want to get anywhere as a third party.Please.I don’t know how else to ask.
Yep. I like cowboys and snake oil better. :-)
You’ve been watching Sharktopus with EmptyWheel, haven’t you?
These’ll work if it’s just stickers, bugs, snakes … Note the pointy toe.
Speaking out helps keep the peace…!
I’m sorry I’m late to this thread. One thing that we all complain about is the inability of anyone who has your vision to embrace and hire someone who is a fighter and or effective.
I was naive to think someone would come to me and say, “I like your work, please work for us.”. Why? Because developing and identifying talent is not their job. They see that it is conflicting with their ability to make money from clients.