One of the big themes of the candidates and activists of the Republican Party of Minnesota, as it is for Republicans nationwide, is that they are gifted with boatloads of business sense and know how to run things. However, reality has a way of intruding on even the most expensively-repeated propaganda. Two cases in point: Tom Emmer and Tony Sutton.
Let’s start with Tom Emmer, the Republican candidate for Minnesota’s governorship, and Abe Sauer’s excellent takedown in The Awl:
His official bio states that Tom learned “the value of hard work and the every-day pressures” from his father’s lumber company. That company is a 100-year-old business founded by great-grandpa Emmer, “Emmer Brothers Lumber.” What the bio conveniently glosses over about Emmer Brothers Lumber (actually Emmer Brothers Company), is that it filed for bankruptcy protection in the mid-1980s. In the few press reports that even bother to mention that the business failed, Emmer is conveniently allowed to say the company had “gone upside down” and that his dad was “struggling.” “Bankruptcy protection” is a term that generally gives fiscal conservatives voting booth rictus.
Now, take note, Poli Sci 101 kids, here’s how a right-wing candidate who hangs his coat on his business experiences spins it when that business is a failed one: Take the fact that Emmer Bros. Co. was bought, post bankruptcy, by Forest City Trading Group and renamed Viking Forest Products, which kept his brother Jack on as an employee, and sum it up as so: “Today it’s known as Viking Forest Products, with Tom’s brother Jack continuing in the business.”
Presto, a failed business with a (maybe charitably employed) brother is now a continuing successful family business from which our candidate has learned “first hand the value of hard work and the every-day pressures faced by employers and the families who count on them.”
Also, Marquette National Bank sued Emmer Bros. Co. for fraudulently concealing assets during the course of the bankruptcy proceedings. But whatever.
But wait! There’s more!
One could say this kind of slavish dedication to the “free market” is a family tradition. The Emmer family empire once also consisted of Emmer Brothers Dairy in neighboring Wisconsin. “You can whip our cream, but you can’t beat our milk,” went the motto. One might say these Emmers loved the free market too much, finding themselves indicted in a 1950 anti-trust suit which charged the dairy “illegally combined and conspired with intent to restrain competition in the retail and wholesale price of fluid milk in Milwaukee county, and by such combination and conspiracy actually did restrain competition and fixed and controlled the price of such milk.”
For the tea party set accustomed to things written on small signs, that means “price fixing.” Raymond Emmer was specifically named in the charge. Busted, Emmer Bros. cashed in and sold for a small fortune to Golden Guernsey Dairy, which, surprise, was named in the indictment as an Emmer co-conspirator. In a now familiar story that would come to replay itself years later, one of the Emmer founder’s sons was retained at Golden Guernsey for years afterward.
So much for Mr. Emmer. Now we turn to Mr. Sutton:
A little over a year ago, the Minneapolis-St. Paul Business Journal announced that Baja Sol, whose CEO is Republican Party of Minnesota Chair Tony Sutton, was poised to expand, hugely and rapidly:
Baja Sol Restaurant Group is preparing to launch its fourth restaurant concept, the latest step in its rapid growth since its acquisition by a high-profile ownership group three years ago.
Inver Grove Heights-based Baja Sol will open its first Baja Joe’s Burgers, Tacos & Beer restaurant Sept. 7 in Columbus, Ohio, and is scouting for locations in the Twin Cities area. . . .
The Baja Joe’s rollout is part of Baja Sol’s plan to expand to about 30 restaurants by the end of 2009, double the number it had in January. In addition to the two Baja Joe’s concepts, the company also operates Baja Sol Tortilla Grill quick-service restaurants and Baja Sol Cantina full-service restaurants. . . .
. . .Baja Sol is targeting expansion within a nine-state area in the Midwest, but franchises are available in all 50 states. The company recently signed a franchisee in Chicago and is engaged in talks with prospective franchisees in California, Colorado, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey and Tennessee.
Here’s what actually happened:
• Only one Baja Sol restaurant opened in Chicago. A November 23, 2009 article in the Southtown Star chronicles the store’s demise on Oct. 24, 2009. That article also reported that Bridget Sutton, Baja Sol president and Tony’s wife, claimed that her company was hoping to re-open the restaurant and that “Five more Baja Sols are slated to open in and around Chicago in 2010.” Well, it’s now September of 2010 and the list of Baja Sol locations shows no restaurants that aren’t in Minnesota.
• Four Baja Sol Group restaurants were opened in Columbus, OH. At least three — the ones on Dublin-Granville Road, Noe-Bixby Road, and North Hamilton Road in Gahanna — are known to be closed. (The Noe-Bixby Road location had only been open four months, since September 7, 2009.) Calls placed to the fourth location, 1803 Olentangy River Road, using the phone number provided by Dex and that in an online listing, could not be completed.
Things aren’t going too well in Baja Sol’s home base of Minnesota, either: The Baja Sol restaurant on the first floor of the US Bank Building — the very location at which a protest led by Aztec dancers was held on June 19 of this year — was closed in late June, and the planned location at the old Don Pablo’s site in Minnetonka never got off the ground.
Sutton’s rise to Chair of the Republican Party of Minnesota in June 2009 was predicated on the notion that he is a sharp businessman. Typical of this conventional wisdom is the 2009 statement by former state auditor Patricia Anderson in support of Sutton’s bid for chair:
Combined with his impressive history of political management, Tony is the CEO of Baja Sol Restaurant Group, a fast-growing chain of restaurants. Under Tony’s leadership and in spite of the tough economy, Baja Sol continues to grow and now employs hundreds of people in multiple states. Tony knows the struggles facing small businesses and what its like to create good jobs during these challenging economic times. In short, Tony will bring business management experience that he, more than anyone, knows is sorely needed at the State Party.
Okay, so how is Sutton doing as a businessman? A Nexis-Lexis search produces several Experian reports about Baja Sol. Here’s a small sample of one from February:
PAYMENT TRENDS:
-DAYS PAST DUE-
BUSINESS BALANCE 1- 31- 61-
AS OF DBT $ CUR 30 60 90 91+
01/10 55 500 – 40% 24% – 36%
12/09 55 500 – 40% 24% – 36%
11/09 55 500 – 40% 24% – 36%
10/09 102 800 – – – 10% 90%
09/09 102 800 – – – 10% 90%
08/09 92 700 – – 10% 24% 66%PAYMENT HISTORY – QUARTERLY AVERAGES:
-DAYS PAST DUE-
BALANCE 1- 31- 61-
DBT $ CUR 30 60 90 91+
4TH-Q-09 56 500 1% 40% 24% – 37%
3RD-Q-09 99 800 – – 3% 14% 83%
2ND-Q-09 63 600 1% 22% 27% 18% 32%
1ST-Q-09 76 200 – 32% – – 68%
4TH-Q-08 105 100 – – – – 100%
The whole report is rather brutal reading. Suffice to say that, much like Tom Emmer, it looks like Tony Sutton couldn’t run a lemonade stand, much less a sizeable business — or a mid-line state.
(Sutton and Emmer pictures derived from two distinct and equally wonderful graphic stylings courtesy of Tild of Tildology.)




21 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
PW, the best of MN political reporting.
yet somehow these con artists get funding for their businesses, even though they’ve demonstrated all they know how to do is lose money
one wonders, who the hell is giving them money, knowing as a fact they will lose it
Molly Ivins used to say about w(orthless) that he was the only person she ever heard of that could lose money in oil in TX.
That running the country like a business has always been code for a hostile takeover.
A good friend, who just happens to be a very successful businessman, once told me that the story of business success in America is predicated on the fact that there tremendous rewards for success, and almost no price to pay for failure.
He explained that Americans are allowed to keep a very large part of their profits and write off losses, or file bankruptcy if they fail altogether, with no real lasting impact on their ability to start another business and try again.
Government on the other hand is nothing like business in that the object of the game is not to make a profit, but to deliver services, especially services that are not easy to deliver in a business-like environment.
To top it off, there are terrible consequences for failure in the public sector, and rewards of doing a job right are not often obvious.
Politicians who do things right are often rewarded by being voted out of office when fickle voters become enamored of the latest fresh face, or as in the case with Sutton, or Pawlenty, total frauds.
Good Morning, everyone!
A-yep.
You all of course remember Tom Emmer from his War on the Waitstaff earlier this summer.
That’s a good question. A friend in the banking biz perhaps? A friend in the SBA? In any case, after the first failure, any loan officer should have been wary of giving more money to the same people. Does anyone know how we might discover this information?
Good Morning,
Nice post PW and in your neighboring state Feingold’s likely Repub opponent, Ron (it’s only sunspots, not global warming) Johnson, Oshkosh businessman who is touting himself as a self-made multi-millionaire success, champion of privatization, hasn’t been saying much about which big-money plastics family he married into, nor the below private market interest rate government loans (IIRC $250 mil) that had absolutely no effect on his claimed credentials.
Right wingers don’t believe in “government” but need to be elected so they can sabotage government through malice and incompetence and then say, “see, government doesn’t work.”
With their credentials, Emmer and Sutton would make excellent war profiteers. One could provide overpriced milk and overpriced wood and the other could gouge the gubmint and the troops for tacos.
Aha! Not surprising, is it?
Is that KBR I hear knocking on their doors?
A nice fat government contract may be the only thing that can save Tony Sutton from himself, come to think of it.
What do we need private business for anyway? The government can supply whatever we need for cheaper. Just look at education, for instance. These businessmen failing over and over again should stay home and baby sit and let their wives work in government, where they can get something done. And Watt4Bob is right, when businesses fail and money goes down the tubes, keep those bankrupt businessmen shackled to their financial obligations forever.
It’s a complicated world isn’t it?
I eat at Suttons restaurants, the food is tasty and not too expensive, the employees are friendly, and almost exclusively Spanish-speaking immigrants.
The thing I would point out is that Sutton isn’t really in the restaurant business; he has his eye on building a franchise empire, which is something totally different.
Sutton’s actual business consists of talking others into the proposition that they too can be successful running one of his Baja Sol stores.
The trick is keeping his own stores looking prosperous and attractive long enough to lure franchisees.
From the description of how he treats his obligations to vendors, I’d say he is in danger of not achieving his goal.
One of my main questions for the republicans is how can you simultaneously whip up public resentment over illegal immigration and build business empires based on paying low wages to those immigrants?
Of course that’s a rhetorical question.
Your good friend is an idiot. There are literally thousands of examples of folks whose small businesses or farms have failed who NEVER get another chance to run another, who spend the rest of their lives fighting poverty and depression–even if they are ‘lucky’ enough to ward off suicide. I personally know folks who have never recovered from the recession of 1981-82.
Emmers famillies lumber business probabaly went bankrupt in the 1980′s because thats when the offshoring that reagan loved so much, and wich was the ceterpiece of the wage destruction movement, began in deadly ernest.
I would like to know what having business experience has to do with running a government?
It may be true that small business failures may result in lasting or life-long financial ruin or problems for the small business owner. However the same cannot be said for those who rise to the top of large corporations or, like Sutton, run ponzi scheme franchises.
In CA, witness the campaigns of E-Meg Whitman, who made it big with her online business empire, but that was mostly due to shady deals with Goldman Sachs that amount to insider trading. E-Meg has spent over $100million of her personal fortune running a campaign that makes no business sense. For ex, E-Meg wants to make criminal sentencing laws harsher than they are now and send more (poor) folks to jail. But E-Meg also wants to cut taxes, esp for the excessively wealthy. As it now stands, Gov Schwartzenegger is cutting jail sentences and letting inmates out of jail simply the state cannot afford to “house” and feed them anymore. What kind of sense does it make for Whitman to push for harsher criminal sentencing laws? Oooops, forgot, she’s in bed with the prison industry.
Yet Republics love E-Meg and tout her as this great “business person.” Well, I give her that. At least she did grow her business, even tho it was partly thru criminal methods, and it didn’t fail.
Then there’s Carly Fiorina running for Senator. Now here’s a case of someone who slept her way to the top and, like W, ran a couple of businesses into the ground (Lucent, HP), yet kept getting “bigger” and better paying jobs. That remains life’s little mystery to me, but it’s common in the big corporations for incompetents, like Fiorina, who offshore jobs and lay off thousands of US workers, to get amply rewarded when the Board finally fires her incompetent butt. But Fiorina walked away with millions for her very short tenure with HP.
Now Fiorina figures it’s her “right” to buy a Senate seat and get on the gov’t dole via a nice-paying Senate job with only the best, most high quality benefits for life. Socialist, much?
Yet I’m constantly hearing Rethugs praising Fiorina for her vast, great “business” experience, as if what she did to Lucent and HP are praise-worthy and somehow connote that Fiorina will do even better as a Senator. WTF?? I lost a bundle on my HP stocks due to Fiorina. Why would I want to hire her to be my Senator??? Makes no sense.
Once again, Fiorina wants to cut taxes for the obscenely wealthy, so I guess Rethugs who are that wealthy will be inclined to vote for her just because. UGH
when you suck at running a business, you can hide your incompetence by blaming the government
then you become a member of the government and prove that government ws to blame, not you
it’s a cycle designed to deflect blame from stupid people
That’s what Nick Espinosa and the fine folks at SEIU Local 26 want to know.