I’m aware that Richard Lugar spends his days in Washington and I don’t. I’m aware he has more access to his Senate colleagues, particularly in the Republican caucus. But I still think I’ll end up more right than him about this:
Sen. Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, predicted Friday that a “large majority” of members in his party will back a key nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia and that it will be ratified.
So far, Lugar (Ind.) has been the only Senate Republican to back the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which was negotiated in the spring but has yet to be ratified by the Senate. The Indiana Republican predicted that the treaty pass his committee in mid-September and will come up for a vote in the lame-duck session after the November elections.
“In fairness to the Republicans in the Senate, I think a majority in fact do favor the treaty nominally and will eventually vote for the treaty,” he said in an interview on C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” program that will air Sunday. If it is brought up, “a large number of Republicans will be in favor of the treaty, but not all of them,” he said.
President Obama has urged the Senate to ratify the treaty for months, but it has been stalled in the Senate due to Republican doubts over the agreement.
What planet is Lugar on? Currently, Republicans would rather lose Russian nuclear base inspections than ratify this treaty, and they’re using it to gain leverage for pork-barrel spending on nuclear weapons “modernization,” which has basically nothing to do with this treaty. If it wasn’t that, they’d hold it hostage for maintaining Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, or more sanctions on Iran, or giving the “state of Jesus” statehood, or any of a thousand other ideas.
This is a case where Lugar and a disciplined Democratic caucus can’t get this done; treaties require 67 Senate votes for ratification. I’m not seeing eight helpful Republicans out there.
Lugar pronounced himself “hopeful” that the treaty won’t become a political football. So, a wish and a pony. Frankly, a political football – this time, based on the expiration of inspections and the threat of rogue actors obtaining nuclear material – is probably the only way this gets passed at all.




15 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Forgive my levity….”What the world needs now is love….” Yep. Maybe he knows something really not out there yet.
Lugar makes 60 votes, no? And 59 D votes, 1 R vote is “bipartisan”.
Oops, missed the treaty requirement. So Lugar needs to bring in 7 other republican votes:
McCain, Snowe, Collins, Hatch. 3 more… Grassley, Brownback, Brown.
Doesn’t Lugar saying that he hope it doesn’t become a political football, make it a political football?
I know, duh…
Gregg, Voinovich, Hutchinson are also possibles.
Lugar wanted to be President he wants a Legacy old men dream of doing something that will be remembered in the future lets not be to hard on him. Its a nice dream and I support it.
I do agree this won’t get any GOP votes. but can it get enough Dem votes to pass?
Just the words Russia still has Nukes makes GOP Arms Manufacturer lobbyists drool. If Luger gets his way those lobbyist fear they might have to get an honest job.
Requires 67 votes.
Lugar has a legacy – Nunn-Lugar Act. Richard Lugar does some good work when he’s not under party discipline. The Fresh Act would have improved farm policy, maybe not as much as we hope, but a marked improvement from the status quo ante.
Won’t happen.
Your count is good…Thanks
Lugar & the Prez must be sippin’ from the same bottle.
Lugar can hope. McConnell won’t allow it. The GOP leadership has one goal-destroy the opposition even if what’s on the table is a huge benefit to the country.
But there are a number of retiring R Senators. They don’t have a huge downside to defying McConnell. McCain can be all mavericky. 68-70 votes seems possible to me.
Hope you’re right. Be nice if this thing got ratified. Some good news for a change.
And if they’re going to ratify this, then ratify it. No need for the Democrats to give in and let them add in an extension to DADT, or any other bullshit. If the Republicans want to block this treaty as is, shame on them. If the Democrats give in and add anything to it, then shame on them. If you run a political party and you can’t turn the opposition obstruction of getting rid of nuclear weapons into a political gain, then you don’t deserve to remain a political party, IMO.
No additions, ratify this thing as is or make the Republicans own it’s failure. What’s wrong with that picture??? But if I had to bet I’d bet they’re already working on what piece of bullshit the Democrats can add to this in order to get to 67. Wonder who gets thrown under the bus over this??? Sure is getting crowded under this thing.
Lugar is always a statesman until he suddenly remembers he is a Republican.