It’s odd that while the “respectable” corporate media entities are falling all over themselves to give coverage to Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and the Koch-funded Tea Party Nation, absolutely no non-local press seems to be going towards the rally in Detroit, held by actual civil rights activists (i.e., non-Kochtopus-funded), on the same day. Unless you live in or near Detroit, this is probably the first you’ve heard of it.
I guess this is what happens when you don’t have rich conservative elites like the Koch brothers funding your movement and schmoozing up their corporate brethren and cistern in the media. Check this out, from the February 2009 issue of Playboy:
[CBNC correspondent Rick] Santelli’s “rant” last-week calling for a “Chicago Tea Party” to protest President Obama’s plans to help distressed American homeowners rapidly spread across the blogosphere and shot right up into White House spokesman Robert Gibbs’ craw, whose smackdown during a press conference was later characterized by Santelli as “a threat” from the White House. A nationwide “tea party” grassroots Internet protest movement has sprung up seemingly spontaneously, all inspired by Santelli, with rallies planned today in cities from coast to coast to protest against Obama’s economic policies.
What hasn’t been reported until now is evidence linking Santelli’s “tea party” rant with some very familiar names in the Republican rightwing machine, from PR operatives who specialize in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns (called “astroturfing”) to bigwig politicians and notorious billionaire funders. As veteran Russia reporters, both of us spent years watching the Kremlin use fake grassroots movements to influence and control the political landscape. To us, the uncanny speed and direction the movement took and the players involved in promoting it had a strangely forced quality to it. If it seemed scripted, that’s because it was.
What we discovered is that Santelli’s “rant” was not at all spontaneous as his alleged fans claim, but rather it was a carefully-planned trigger for the anti-Obama campaign. In PR terms, his February 19th call for a “Chicago Tea Party” was the launch event of a carefully organized and sophisticated PR campaign, one in which Santelli served as a frontman, using the CNBC airwaves for publicity, for the some of the craziest and sleaziest rightwing oligarch clans this country has ever produced. Namely, the Koch family, the multibilllionaire owners of the largest private corporation in America, and funders of scores of rightwing thinktanks and advocacy groups, from the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine to FreedomWorks. The scion of the Koch family, Fred Koch, was a co-founder of the notorious extremist-rightwing John Birch Society.
As you read this, Big Business is pouring tens of millions of dollars into their media machines in order to destroy just about every economic campaign promise Obama has made, as reported recently in the Wall Street Journal. At stake isn’t the little guy’s fight against big government, as Santelli and his bot-supporters claim, but rather the “upper 2 percent”’s war to protect their wealth from the Obama Adminstration’s economic plans. When this Santelli “grassroots” campaign is peeled open, what’s revealed is a glimpse of what is ahead and what is bound to be a hallmark of his presidency.
Ah, but it gets worse from there:
Within hours of Santelli’s rant, a website called ChicagoTeaParty.com sprang to life. Essentially inactive until that day, it now featured a YouTube video of Santelli’s “tea party” rant and billed itself as the official home of the Chicago Tea Party. The domain was registered in August, 2008 by Zack Christenson, a dweeby Twitter Republican and producer for a popular Chicago rightwing radio host Milt Rosenberg—a familiar name to Obama campaign people. Last August, Rosenberg, who looks like Martin Short’s Irving Cohen character, caused an outcry when he interviewed Stanley Kurtz, the conservative writer who first “exposed” a personal link between Obama and former Weather Undergound leader Bill Ayers. As a result of Rosenberg’s radio interview, the Ayers story was given a major push through the Republican media echo chamber, culminating in Sarah Palin’s accusation that Obama was “palling around with terrorists.” That Rosenberg’s producer owns the “chicagoteaparty.com” site is already weird—but what’s even stranger is that he first bought the domain last August, right around the time of Rosenburg’s launch of the “Obama is a terrorist” campaign. It’s as if they held this “Chicago tea party” campaign in reserve, like a sleeper-site. Which is exactly what it was.
ChicagoTeaParty.com was just one part of a larger network of Republican sleeper-cell-blogs set up over the course of the past few months, all of them tied to a shady rightwing advocacy group coincidentally named the “Sam Adams Alliance,” whose backers have until now been kept hidden from public. Cached google records that we discovered show that the Sam Adams Alliance took pains to scrub its deep links to the Koch family money as well as the fake-grassroots “tea party” protests going on today. All of these roads ultimately lead back to a more notorious rightwing advocacy group, FreedomWorks, a powerful PR organization headed by former Republican House Majority leader Dick Armey and funded by Koch money.
On the same day as Santelli’s rant, February 19, another site called Officialchicagoteaparty.com went live. This site was registered to Eric Odom, who turned out to be a veteran Republican new media operative specializing in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns. Last summer, Odom organized a twitter-led campaign centered around DontGo.com to pressure Congress and Nancy Pelosi to pass the offshore oil drilling bill, something that would greatly benefit Koch Industries, a major player in oil and gas. Now, six months later, Odom’s DontGo movement was resurrected to play a central role in promoting the “tea party” movement.
Funny how the “respectable” press must continually promote race-baiting dingbats like Glenn Beck and the Koch-backed Astroturf that is the Tea Party wing of the GOP — while comparatively all but ignoring the richer-than-God paleoconservative oil barons funding the whole shebang. To paraphrase Blue Texan, it’s the best “grass roots” protest that a billionaire’s money can buy.



37 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Good Morning, everyone!
Now you know who the Teabaggers’ puppeteers happen to be.
Morning PW – Kochtopus is a good name for those creeps
By the way:
The thing is, the researchers didn’t need to bow to the Cons and TPers whining at them. As Lee Atwater told us nearly thirty years ago, the basis of the modern Republican Party is in fact that alliance between Corporate America and powerful bigots known as “the Southern Strategy”, where cutting taxes for the rich is sold as a way to hurt black people without any telltale words like the N-bomb passing anyone’s lips.
They (the rich and powerful) thought that they could ride Hitler’s coat tails to power, too.
It’s been out there awhile, but the mainstream press has been too busy freaking out over manufactured right-wing-launched bullshit to care, much less cover it. Hmmmmm — could it be because most media moguls are themselves right-wingers far more interested in increasing their own power and fortunes than anything having to with the common good?
Coming soon to a theatre near you: James Bond 007 in Kochtopussy!
Nah. Surely that’s just a coincidence.
Hmmmmm!
seen on my twitter feed this week:
Why wont media cover the 34% in favor of Single Payer as they do 20% in favor of Tea Party ? ’tis puzzlement
Mornin’ P-dub and Firedogs
EGGGGZACKTLY!
But of course the corporate media doesn’t like anything they see as a threat to corporate dominance of American lives. And their employees know full well that conservatives sign their paychecks. Upton Sinclair’s Law is in full effect here.
I haven’t even read the Mayer article yet (and that it was Mayer is just a sweet cherry on top) but knowing how they so value stealth and anonymity it was soooo satisfying to see their names and works plastered everywhere this week.
ok, everywhere but TradMed, satisfying nonetheless to think of all that agita at Koch Industries
I can’t recall if it was Ian Welsh or somebody at The Agonist, but a regular blogger I read said long ago that the Dems ignored the Tea Baggers at their peril. And I agreed then as I do now that they represent a threat not to Republicans, but to Dems. Conventional thinking says they dilute the Republicans by reducing their base. I think time has shown they attract the radical right and the Dems are blind if they they think their own “Big Tent” doesn’t contain a high number of them. None of this is a surprise. The other thing they do is make activists out of sideline-sitters. A substantial number of the Tea Party have nothing but time on their hands and can be seen at rallies while everybody else is at work during the week.
I work in a state-government job. I am here to tell you that Tea Party sentiments run strong in in the management circles of state-employed people—middle to upper-middle management. No, they don’t like the idea of endless budget cuts that make their lives livevs as managers miserable; however, they are highly sympathetic to TP hatred of political “interference” or intrusion into their lives generally (as they see it)–the “Leave me Alone” sentiment. And it is these people who make a career of surviving each successive political trend and shift in leadership. They obviously think they will be better served by anyone but Obama and they think the TP movement has legs.
one more thing . . .
Papa Koch taught his boys to spread it around
I’m glad the koch brothers are getting some of the attention that needs to be given however this information has been around a long time, tom hartmann has been ranting about them for years, I did a piece not too long ago
I really wish even more is made out of what they have done to our country
“But of course the corporate media doesn’t like anything they see as a threat to corporate dominance of American lives. And their employees know full well that conservatives sign their paychecks. Upton Sinclair’s Law is in full effect here.”
The protection of due process rights under the color of law for corporations has been protected in a rouse of a first amendment ruling tantamount to the Dred Scott decision. The intent of “free speech” was to foster political debate on public policy, not to use money to buy amplifiers and stifle debate. When Scott was found to be “property,” it protected the institution of slavery. Robert’s decision equating money to free expression of political thought, gives to corporations and unconstitutional protection, inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. So a system now exist where corporations can now undermine life and liberty as segregationist usurped the rights of Americans in segregationist states. Corporations with all the money and power to manipulate reason to protect corporate bottom line “profit” at the expense of life and liberty, under the guise of corporation’s states rights. The ultimate moral hazard is imposed on a society when life itself has a premium placed on it as sure as Scott was considered property! Protect corporations who enjoy leveraged monopolies while buying law is as dysfunctional as protecting the slave owners interest! Corporate Sodomy….. lets count the ways????
Good article on the Kochtopus in the current issue of the New Yorker:
Covert Operations
The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama.
by Jane Mayer
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer#ixzz0xumy0q3c
That’s the whole thing. Being rich and powerful does not make you less likely to be a bigot. In fact, considering how the Cons (and make no mistake, the TPers are movement Republicans — that was established a while back) worship Ayn Rand, who teaches them to think that anyone who isn’t rich is a “parasite” worthy only of extermination, they are probably more likely to be bigoted than the rest of us.
Yup. And it’s getting zero attention in the media that most non-blog-readers use every day: Evening TV news or drive-time radio.
“Today, the voices of average Americans are being drowned out by lobbyists and special interests,” it said. “But you can do something about it.” The pitch made no mention of its corporate funders. The White House has expressed frustration that such sponsors have largely eluded public notice. David Axelrod, Obama’s senior adviser, said, “What they don’t say is that, in part, this is a grassroots citizens’ movement brought to you by a bunch of oil billionaires.”
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer#ixzz0xuoddgv2
Perceptions are never the realities in the war of words…..
The prize is the brain-washed mind and money that is earned….
Yup. Promote the “pro-business” DINOs.
Unfortunate TP-ers fail to see their servitude to and manipulation by corporations. A myopic distrust of government which fails to recognize the fact that corporations own government and buy law, is suicidal. The intent of the Roberts decision perpetuates what Jefferson and Madison attempted to control; the undue influence of corporate money on the politician decision making process as being a moral hazard and real threat the the rights of Americans. Both founders where correct in their fears. The problem is TP-ers need to reread and actually learn American history, not the revisionist type of history offered by billionaires who appeal to otherwise legitimate fears of people while selling them garbage!!!
The closing paragraph in the New Yorker piece:
“The Kochs have long depended on the public’s not knowing all the details about them. They have been content to operate what David Koch has called “the largest company that you’ve never heard of.” But with the growing prominence of the Tea Party, and with increased awareness of the Kochs’ ties to the movement, the brothers may find it harder to deflect scrutiny. Recently, President Obama took aim at the Kochs’ political network. Speaking at a Democratic National Committee fund-raiser, in Austin, he warned supporters that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in the Citizens United case—which struck down laws prohibiting direct corporate spending on campaigns—had made it even easier for big companies to hide behind “groups with harmless-sounding names like Americans for Prosperity.” Obama said, “They don’t have to say who, exactly, Americans for Prosperity are. You don’t know if it’s a foreign-controlled corporation”—or even, he added, “a big oil company.”
Obama came close to pulling back the curtain on the Kochtopus.
Is this a story for the Maddow show?
Gosh, has George Soros and his billions deserted the left?
The Mayer article is terrific. A must read!
It’s nothing but GOP-terra. Fascists GOP-Terra. I’m so sick of it all and so glad the curtain is being pulled back. We have all tried our best to make that famous American dream happen. We’ve followed their yellow brick/golden road only to find out that the Land of Oz is controlled by a faked out Meanie! There is no happy ending for us while our media is Goebbel’s owned and operated. Thank you, PW for the posting!
The New Yorker story by Jane Mayer is very good but the Fresh Air interview with her and Terry Gross may be even better. Check it out.
Why is it that the left is so desperately afraid of Glenn Beck, Fox News and Sean Hannity? Why is that? Because they have way higher ratings than those nut jobs on MSNBC? or do they just make sense to normal working Americans?
We need to go after the Koch’s brands — it’s what they fear most, that their consumer brands (Brawny paper towels, Dixie cups, Stainmaster carpets are some Jane Mayer names) get linked to their radical views.
I’m afraid because their propaganda is concentrated on dividing Americans rather than providing discussions of ways to help America get back to work building a strong, independent economy that many of us enjoyed growing up.
It’s complicated. The Becks and Tea Baggers are stand-ins and stalking horses for the Bitter Minority, all those illiterate, abused, and envious omniphobes who are “so desperately afraid of” “the left”, or liberal thinking.
Why are TV ratings important? Well, is anything more important in US culture than TV and what’s on? Most Americans watch TV more than they do anything else except breathe.
Stupid people are constantly horrified and disgusted from what they see on TV. Tsk! Tsk! Look at that! Look! Look at what they’re doing to our morals. LOOK!
‘Liberal’ came to mean what it means because the word was derived from the word for ‘book’. The notion of ‘liberty’ comes to us the same way. We can understand abstract terms sometimes by contrasting them to their antonyms, or opposite meanings. The opposite of ‘liberty’ is ‘enslavement’. What’s the opposite of ‘liberal’? Probably ‘ignorant’. Probably ‘illiterate’. Frightened, horrified, brutal, nasty, and short.
Haven’t read the Mayer piece (I’m still on last week’s NYer). I might have posted to firedoglake recently that we haven’t seen anything from Jane Mayer or Seymour Hersh in a long while – implying that some hair-raising reporting is imminent.
Also, George Mason University, a public institution, can be criticized for hosting the Kochtopus funded Mercatus Center for deregulation propaganda.
And the Smithsonian Institute can be criticized for their Kochtopus funded production obfuscating the climate change issue.
How vulnerable is Georgia Pacific to a general boycott?
Restoring Honor while disrespecting our country’s flag (click through to the next photo for even worse….)
I was furious yesteday listening to The Diane Rehm Show’s Friday domestic news round-up: The MCMers* on her program went on and on about the Tea Party, what it might mean that Sarah Palin’s endorsed challenger of Murkowski so far has more votes than Murkowski, on and and on.
And not one mention, even briefly, by any of them of Jane Maryer’s article. Sometimes Diane Rehm will make them at least comment on something not being smothered by MCM attention, but she did not mention Jane Mayer and her big piece in The New Yorker either.
But she will probably have Mayer on to discuss the article, but not have her on as part of a panel of commenters. It’s much easier to do a one-off with the author, sound very open to the ideas, but then never have them mentioned after that. Makes it more efficient in pushing something unpleasing to the MCM and the Masters of the Universe right down the Memory Hole. Then, occasionally, a caller may bring it up, but the MCMers will manage to avoid actually addressing the issue of the Kochtopus on our national discourse and how our nation is being run.
Especially the running of the middle class right down into the lower economic class….
BTW, I gather it’s not easy to find out what products are part of the Koch empire, but, fer sure, no Bounty for this disgruntled citizen consumer.
*MCMers — Members of the Maintream Corporate Media
In 2006, KochHeads Rahm Emanuel and Bruce Reed wrote:
Obama’s Chief of Staff FALSELY frames Lakoff and framing in general. Words and frames ARE how we reason. He fails to mention (lying by omission) the critical difference between false and truthful framing. Framing is a tool that can be used for either good or bad. Through lies and deception, Republicans use false framing to distort people’s perceptions of reality away from the truth. As progressives, we can use framing and facts to bring our fellow citizens’ perception of reality closer to the truth. That’s the difference Emanuel would prefer we not know.
Rahm and Bruce are DLCers. So who’s on the DLC’s executive council? You guessed it, the Koch brothers! The very people spending millions of dollars to tear down the Obama administration. Now, who took the crazy pill here? Think how reassuring it is to know that Rahm is the guy whispering into our president’s ear on a daily basis.
http://www.americablog.com/2010/08/koch-industries-gave-funding-to-dlc-and.html
The DLC is a cancer on the Democratic party that has metastasized itself into the White House.
- Tom
Rahm is not simply whispering in Obama’s ear.
The WH Chief of Staff controls what, and who, the president sees. Except for his own family, no one can get through the curtain the CoS only can draw aside.