Back during the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama liked to talk of the inflection point facing this nation in large terms: the economic challenges facing the country as we rescued the banksters from their foolishness, the tipping point on climate change, the damage Cheney’s unitary executive fantasies did to our nation’s place in the world, and our country’s increasing lack of competitiveness because our nation squanders so much money on health care. Obama’s administration still speaks in terms of inflection points–both in grand terms and more self-serving political ones. But on none of these issues has Obama implemented the bold solutions demanded by the challenges facing us and on most, Obama’s Administration has hastened the embrace of policies that threaten our way of life.
Meanwhile, we at FDL–to the extent you can generalize about the diverse work we do–have been pushing to respond to the same challenges with the seriousness the moment requires. As Obama put backroom deals ahead of saving money on healthcare delivery, Jon Walker pushed for the public option and drug reimportation. As the Senate threatens to gut real derivatives legislation, David Dayen has prevented the Senate from whitewashing what it was doing (and Jane pushed for a Bill Halter challenge to help pressure the Senate to do the right thing). As Democrats in DC repeatedly refused to help banksters in a way that might also help struggling homeowners, Cynthia Kouril and masaccio contributed their real expertise to advocate for homeowners getting screwed. And a number of us continue to fight for rule of law even as most of DC gets bored with the idea.
We fight this fight because the stakes are so high, because the time we live in is so challenging. Obama was right: this is an inflection point, a real turning point in our nation’s history. And we need to continue to fight for progressive solutions to our problems. But we can’t continue to do so without your help. We need to raise at least $50,000 by the end of the month to keep fighting for progressive solutions to the challenges we face.
Click here to donate $20, $50 or more to keep FDL strong.
Last year, a bunch of you donated money to support the work I do. That money has supported–and continues to support–my work on accountability and rule of law. At a time when some folks in DC wanted me to work for them on completely different issues, for example, your support allowed me to instead spend over six weeks wading through OPR documents to expose key details about our torture regime. Your support allowed me to get research materials and travel to do research. Your support allowed me to continue to focus on topics–like torture and wiretapping–that I wouldn’t have had the time to research otherwise.
Now, I’m asking for your donation of $20, $50–or whatever you can afford–to support our larger FDL effort: our fight for real financial reform, for improvements to the health care bill, to save social security, for a real climate change bill, for some sanity in our Afghan policy. Your support will go to keep the servers running, the editors preparing content, the moderators ensuring the vitality of our ongoing conversation. Your support will go to ensure that our many talented posters will have a place to contribute their work. Your support will help Jane keep this special place running.
We’re at a turning point. We’re fighting those who want to turn our country into a corporatist security state. We’re fighting those within the Democratic party that place paying off campaign donors ahead of the good of the country. They’ve got a lot more people and an unbelievable amount of money and the ability to dry up institutional funding to enforce their policies. What we’ve got to combat those forces is you: an unbelievable community of smart, passionate people, some of whom have the wherewithal to support this effort financially. If you’re one of those who can, please donate $20, $50, or more to keep the efforts of FDL strong.



45 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Thanks so much for this, Marcy.
Right now I’m looking at posts by Paul Krugman, Brad DeLong and even Pete Peterson’s Fiscal Times raking Alan Simpson and the Catfood Commission over the coals because of the Alex Lawson interview that FDL livestreamed on the front page, and then put up on Youtube.
As Holly Yeager at CJR said, nobody else was covering this, and the silence on this issue in from all quarters has been profound. Marcy’s work is another example of things we cover when nobody else will, for fear of pissing off those in power.
If these things are valuable to you, we need your support. Almost all of the money goes directly to pay our superb staff of writers, moderators, editors and tech people so they can continue to do the work that they do. And it’s only a fraction of what they are all worth.
Thanks as always for everyone’s support. We have a truly great community and we want to be able to continue to be here for you.
Simpson is a contemptible jerk. He probably thinks old people should just go away – of course, he doesn’t think of himself as old, ugly and nuts.
Thanks, EW, for this great post. It’s always nice to look back and see the things FDL has accomplished and look forward to see what we might do in the future. Great work, Pups.
There’s no place like Lake. There’s no place like Lake. There’s no place like Lake…
I (unemployed for a year) gave the $20 I could on Friday and hope regulars and newbies alike will also contribute what they can.
What’s better than this? What higher use of the web have you ever seen?
Bingo. Majorities in both the house and the senate, a whole shitload of goodwill and political capital coming into office and (so far) zippo. Sad…
Some of the TradMed’s best stories over the past few years — the coverage of the Judy Miller and Scooter Libby trials, the revelation that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times in a single month (and, not surprisingly for those who understand that torture is worse than useless as an interrogation method, didn’t give us anything usable) — have come, often uncredited, from FDL and Marcy herself.
This is something for folks to keep in mind the next time some expense-account-laden Villager whines about bloggers being parasites on the backs of Big Media.
Thanks everyone
Damn librul media… heh
torture will only result in someone saying what ever they think will get the torture to stop. Normally that is just worthless lies crafted to fit what ever they think the torturer is after.
I have big questions about voter registration.
I think the two party system is … not good. I also believe that the false dichotomy hurts true progress. These have been detailed here, at length. I was registered independent and voted for Gore. I then changed my registration to Democratic Party in anticipation of participating in the Primary, but Kerry was nominated before PA got a chance to chime in (as I recall). I was looking forward to the last presidential race and voted for Obama. Of course, I unsubscribed from his mailings after the FISA vote, but whatever.
I continue to be registered as a Democrat and thus got to vote for Sestak over Specter.
Both parties push the line that “you have to vote for us, or the other scary party will win and do scary things. So Send Money!” This clearly worked for Obama and recruited the Anti-Bush, anybody-but-bush crowds. For me, this will not work again. (Except in the anybody but Arlen campaign.)
I am excited about the idea that FDL will foment for change outside the D tent, or within, as the situations reveal themselves.
My question to Ms. Hamsher and Ms. Wheeler is — What of voter registrations? Is it more helpful to have registered independent voters? Or is it more helpful to participate in Democratic Party primaries. And where does FDL see itself pushing candidates? D, or I?
I am thinking of going back to the registered I.
Thanks for all you do.
cc
Marcy,
$25.00 coming by snail mail. I do not do any ordering or banking on-line.
Too old and do not trust that my communication cannot be intercepted.
This saying keeps rattling around in my mind and I know it is not original but here goes:
We the people
United we stand
To proclaim Progressivism
Throughout the land.
Computer challenged,
Until I changed progressivism to capital letter P, it was as I wanted it…
We the people
United we stand
To proclaim Progressivism
Throughout the land…
Hope that fixed it. Sorry for the double post.
I’m in.
Thanks EW and Jane and Jon and everyone here…
I don’t know what we would do without you.
WRT registration, it really depends on the state. Some states have crossover voting which can be useful. Others have additional parties which usually vote Dem but form a powerful progressive block w/in the left block.
At this point, BP has morphed into a version of JabbaTheHutt, oil majors style — green, yellow, and farting and belching ‘stinky pr flowers’. Goldman Sachs is UberJabba, a little more grey and a lot fatter and lazier and more arrogant. And Lanny Davis and his Ferenghi brethren are the suppliants and servants of our highly leveraged, greedy Jabbas.
I am so weary of economically stupid policies that enable oligarchs, in an era that is so complex no single mind can track it all — not even the smartest CEO — that I could just scream.
I’ll get on this before the end of the month. And gladly.
Once upon a time, I put a paltry sum into stocks for a tiny company that later morphed into an innovator in voice mail. I bought the stock knowing almost nothing about the company, but simply because I’d had dinner with an employee who struck me as incredibly smart. I always figure smart people with integrity are the best investments. Needless to say, that small group of employees and that company later had quite an impact on the larger world.
FDL is the kind of ‘investment’ that as near as I can tell, Wall Street and the Jabbas who flounder there have lost the capacity to recognize. So I guess it’s a prime investment opportunity for us ‘small people’ ;-))
Thank you Marcy.
I thought of you and Scottish Haggis in the booth.
I will send some money, the point of your post.
As many have said, the disappointment of getting Bush era policies promoted by a Democratic President that promised very progressive changes — was devastating to my Democratic Party allegiance. I mean that literally. Like so many others, I am looking for another banner to follow. Changing registration is not as important as voting, but they go hand in hand with primaries.
May I humbly suggest that the electoral parts of the site/articles mention primaries, special elections, registration deadlines and other information about when to vote. And feel free to endorse somebody in as many races as you can, primaries for governor, e.g. Even when I try to get information on a candidate it seldom veers away from jobs, families, and other buzzwords.
Thanks again.
Thanks AppleCanyon and Hmmmm; if even those of us who are really financially strapped can chip in, one can only hope those more fortunate do too. Without FDL, sources of insight and information on the web would be truly minimized.
By the way, as FDL’s name gets out there, more quality people who are looking for a place to speak out and share their expertise are coming here to do so. Rick Steiner is one of the latest examples.
This is what you support when you support FDL, and we can’t thank you enough for making this all possible.
Thank you!
Thanks Hmmm.
I think this is premature. Seems to me it will be the mirror-image of what the tea baggers are doing to the Republican party, and as such, will negate much of the possibilities being presented with the weakening of the Republican party by the tea baggers. I qualify that with believing what is being proposed will be much better organized than anything the TBs will do and perhaps more effective. Still, I look at the name-calling, etc. I have seen on FDL, and it seems far too many only want to find fault; far too many who no matter what the President does, find a way of finding fault.
Having been a target for two years on the internet, I know a lot about what it is like to have any and every statement twisted. I am not so sure, Jane, that you will not find those most rabid turning their knives on you a year from now. Doesn’t mean I won’t contribute; I will. But I have major, major reservations about what is being proposed.
You used a lot of pronouns in your comment. Could you be more specific about what you think is being proposed?
“WASHINGTON — A White House spokesman mocked BP’s chief executive Monday for attending a luxury yacht race despite the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, but then defended President Barack Obama’s own weekend golf game.”
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hfQ62qTEIbRH__q_rUMpzykNDtkQ
phred
I don’t know if this is kosher, but I am doing it anyway. This is a cut and past from my comments on David’s column yesterday. I think it addresses your question. OK cut and paste:
Whereas I would agree with Hightower (latest Hightower Lowdown) that a majority of people in the country are populists rather than corporatists, and that most corporatists are not true conservatives. Neither is this group liberal or progressive. They serve themselves via their corporate strength. However, many populists are also conservatives and many others, especially the uneducated and undereducated find the Republican rant against government and taxation appealing. Given these competing beliefs and interests, how can one go about governing in any efficient and precise manner? The fact is, you can’t; if you muddle through and achieved part of what you planned, you have done well. The idea that somehow if the President had been bolder, things would be going much better seems to be a consistent theme amongst FDL contributors. Clearly the President has made mistakes (taking too long to understand the Republicans were open to bipartisanship being one), but it seems to me he is learning. I think had he taken the bold moves everyone on here seems so frustrated he hasn’t, I believe would have further alienated the independents, and continued to galvanize and energize the Republican base. Make no mistake about it; the next presidential election will be determined by the independents.
The President is frequently criticized as being a corporatist. I believe this is simply wrong. It seems to me, the fact that the President has had to consider the interests of corporate America as necessary part of the political calculus has been taken to mean he is a corporatist. No, it means he is a politician engaging in politics. That is the nature of the beast.
Does that mean I think it unwise to continue to put leftward-populist pressure on him? Not at all. It does mean that I think all of the nastiness and name-calling directed toward Obama is at best, misinformed; at worst solipsistic.
Thanks aardvark, I appreciate the follow up. I’m not not sure what specific proposal you are wary of though.
As I understand this fundraising drive it is to pay the folks who work here at the Lake. It is not funding a specific political action, which is why I’m confused by your use of the term proposal.
I’m not trying to be thick, I’m just trying to understand what your specific concern is.
OK, this may be my mistake and I need to go back and read more carefully. Seemed to me what was being proposed was a populist entity split-off from support of the Obama administration. If it is only a fund-raiser to maintain FDLs viability, that is altogether different.
Comes down to who you trust, and what you believe.
I know what I believe and I know why I believe what I believe. The problem is indeed, who to trust. In my opinion, I have read an awful lot of irrational, and irrationally venomous posts on FDL.
Thanks for all you do, both Marcy & Jane. [And everyone behind the scenes.]
I previously suggested:
a) not giving “stuff” [like for Father's Day], but instead making a contribution to FDL in the recipient’s honor; and
b) not giving to the “big name” organizations, almost every one of which inhabits the Veal Pen, but instead giving to FDL, for results on a cleaner environment, protection of women’s rights, abolition of DADT, and many other issues.
If anyone hasn’t thought of this, I hope you’ll now do it.
Finally, I managed to get a comment posted on Krugman’s column related to “don’t stop government spending now.” Krugman can make some good points, but he’s so thick [e.g., "let's have a Value Added Tax," rather than "let's increase taxes on the rich."] Unfortunately by the time I thought to make this latter point, the comments had closed. [It's hard when you get up @ 6 am, click on the NYT site, and comments have already been shut down.]
Anyway: http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/06/21/opinion/21krugman.html?permid=271#comment271
I found my way to FDL as a result of seeing Jane on MSNBC during the HCR debate. Even as my family stumbles along, surviving on 1/2 pay since I got laid off in February, I have found $10 here or $20 there to support FDL various candidates and causes championed here.
Are there really fewer than 600 people in the entire country that are willing to support FDL?
If that is what you see here, I doubt your view of it will change. I can hold your hand if you like.
Tp, your being an [Edited by Moderator. No names] and you know it. It is exactly this sort of crap I am talking about. Makes it difficult, from an intellectual standpoint to now take anything you say seriously.
Irrational and venomous posts? Or commenters? Genuinely curious which you’re seeing.
Well, have a nice day then.
Thanks aardvark now I understand. I do think this is just an operations fundraiser.
President Obama – A Critique:
He spent far too much time on Health Care for such a mediocre result (Romneycare). He could have used reconcilliation at any time!
He said he didn’t like dumb wars and then he doubled-down on a dumb war (Afghanistan).
Financial Regulation is not going to end To Big To Fail and is setting up the next bailout.
There is a giant gusher of oil in the Gulf of Mexico and in his big speech he seem to calling on the power of prayer to plug it.
President Obama – I am offering brilliant, free political advice today. If you are interested in re-election, you need to focus like a lazer on the fact that you are presiding over a jobLESS recovery. You need a massive jobs program that invests in the country’s future.
Remember The Pickens Plan. Replace Pickens with Obama.
•Create MILLIONS of new jobs by building out the capacity to generate up to 22 percent of our electricity from wind. And adding to that with additional solar generation capacity
•Building a 21st century backbone electrical transmission grid
•Providing incentives for homeowners and the owners of commercial buildings to upgrade their insulation and other energy saving options
•Using America’s natural gas to replace imported oil as a transportation fuel in addition to its other uses in power generation, chemicals, etc.
Bottom line, Barack! Lately, what you’ve been peddling, people ain’t buying. I believe people will get behind you if you really have THEIR interests at heart.
Thanks to everyone here at FDL. At the moment, you guys are the only ones I am willing to give money to, and that includes candidates. I’m going to make my donation now.
Also, Marcy, at first I misread your headline as “an infection point in history” – which is actually an equally appropriate description of these times. *g*
“WASHINGTON – A BP spokesman mocked President Barack Obama for playing a weekend golf game despite the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, but then defended BP’s chief executive for attending a luxury yacht race.”
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hfQ62qTEIbRH__q_rUMpzykNDtkQ
I can’t get behind Barack ever again; my trust – which was shaky to begin with – is all gone. Fool me once, etc. Unfortunately, Barack is a corporatist through and through.
“Providing incentives for homeowners and the owners of commercial buildings to upgrade their insulation and other energy saving options.”
My wife and I have made a couple of energy saving investments in our home but have yet to be able to use any of the existing tax incentives. In one case the credit was equal to the difference in price between the base window and an optional feature that we did not want but that was required to be eligible for the credit. It matters not that the difference in energy efficiency between the existing window and the base window was much greater than the difference between the base window and the one with the option.
It may be illuminating that the adjacent thread discussing Sarah Palin’s views on lying has more comments than this one.
That’s just sad.
I would think that the fact that one has to have taxable income in order to benefit from tax incentives would be putting a crimp in those programs these days, as well.
Blowing off steam. She is a cartoon spectacular.
“… one has to have taxable income …”
Exactly.
Appreciate the offer of holding my hand but I am beginning to see my way more clearly.
Good to hear, aardvark. A little time spent thinking about what one stands for does wonders I find.
: )