Senator Dianne Feinstein’s press office kindly returned my phone query the other day about her response to the revelations in the new Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) report, “Experiments in Torture: Evidence of Human Subject Research and Experimentation in the ‘Enhanced’ Interrogation Program” (PDF). Sen. Feinstein’s response indicated that the Senate Intelligence Committee would examine PHR’s findings.
PHR’s investigation showed that doctors and psychologists involved in the Bush Administration’s CIA “enhanced interrogation” torture program apparently used high-value detainees as guinea pigs in experiments to determine how they could refine the torture techniques to get by the law. Of course, they were assisted in this by the lawyers of the Office of Legal Counsel, John Yoo and Jay Bybee, and later Steven Bradbury. Then, in 2006, the Bush Administration had Congress rewrite the War Crimes Act to soften the restrictions against “biological experimentation.” I’ve been following this story actively (see here and here).
I was especially curious to see what, if anything, Sen. Feinstein had to say, because she is the chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. As Jason Leopold reported in April, the Committee has begun an investigation into the torture and detention policies surrounding the high-value detainees, particularly the treatment of Abu Zubaydah, who “the Bush administration wrongly claimed was one of the planners of 9/11 and a top al-Qaeda operative.” Zubaydah was famously the subject of the second August 2002 OLC Bybee memo approving the use of torture techniques like waterboarding, sleep deprivation, putting insects in a confinement box, stress positions and other techniques meant to break down the mind and body of prisoners.
This was the e-mail response from Sen. Feinstein’s office (emphasis added): . . .
“The Senate Intelligence Committee is conducting a review of the CIA detention and interrogation program,” Senator Feinstein said. “This review includes both the use of CIA medical personnel in administering coercive interrogation techniques and the effects of prolonged detention on the individuals in CIA custody. This is the most detailed and comprehensive review of the CIA detention and interrogation program ever conducted. The findings of the new report from Physicians for Human Rights will be considered in our review, and I will have further comment on this when the report is completed.”
This is promising news for those of us–and I believe that constitutes the majority of the country–who wish to see justice done about torture and other crimes, like illegal human experimentation and unethical research, conducted by officials and medical professionals on behalf of the United States government.
I know there are many people who are pessimistic about the government seriously investigating these crimes. I have had my own doubts. Certainly, President Barack Obama has made it clear that he wants to “move forward,” and has not been favorably disposed toward an investigation of the crimes of the Bush years. Others have noted that Obama himself has now become the beneficiary of executive immunity for what can only be classified as illegal actions above and beyond the law. Glenn Greenwald put it well in a column on Tuesday, noting that Obama has “engaged in extreme measures to carry out that imperial, Orwellian dictate by shielding those crimes from investigation, review, adjudication and accountability”:
All of that would be bad enough if his generous immunity were being applied across the board. But it isn’t. Numerous incidents now demonstrate that as high-level Bush lawbreakers are vested with presidential immunity, low-level whistle blowers who exposed serious wrongdoing and allowed citizens some minimal glimpse into what our government does are being persecuted by the Obama administration with a vengeance. Yesterday it was revealed by Wired that the Army intelligence officer analyst who reportedly leaked the Apache helicopter attack video to Wikileaks–and thus enabled Americans to see what we are really doing in Iraq and other countries which we occupy and attack–has been arrested….
A failure of the movement for accountability for torture will only embolden those sectors of the government that seek carte blanche in their efforts to subordinate the entire nation to endless militarism, the better to fill the pocketbooks of the industries and academic think tanks that staff the effort, not to mention the many medals and military careers that rest upon such an enterprise. Even more, like a parasite that lives upon a host and then takes over the living body of its victim, the torturers and would-be Mengeles will feel they have free rein for the most diabolical adventures in evil.
It doesn’t have to be that way, and I don’t believe it will be that way. In the end, this is not a torturing country. This is not a nation that believes in turning vulnerable, imprisoned human beings into lab rats for CIA or DoD bullies. This nation was founded on something else, on the Bill of Rights, on Enlightenment ideals that eschewed torture and inhumane treatment of prisoners, and believed in equality under the law. There were huge contradictions from the beginning–slavery, the extermination policy toward Native Americans, limitations on women’s rights–and it has been and continues to be a struggle to realize the ideals with which this country was founded.
If torture and inhumane, illegal experimentation and research are allowed to flourish, without punishment, without an accounting for what has been and evidently still is being done, then we can kiss this country goodbye, and the glorious experiment must pass on to other hands.
I ask Senator Feinstein and her colleagues on the Senate Intelligence Committee to be cognizant of that. I believe that public hearings and a full, open, transparent investigation, with full subpoena power, followed by a criminal investigation, are required. With the news from Senator Feinstein’s office, and the “New York Times” editorial yesterday calling for investigations, we have a good beginning. As for PHR, it’s expected to file imminently, along with other prominent individuals and organizations, a complaint with the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). It will ask for an OHRP investigation of the CIA’s Office of Medical Services, whose medical professionals were intimately involved in the monitoring and research activities related to the torture interrogations.
We all know we have a steep hill to climb to bring about real accountability and expose the full extent of the torture program. But then, the fight for equality and liberty never came easily, and in the end, that’s what this is all about. Torture and war crimes like illegal human experimentation obliterate the meaningfulness of such ideals. We know what’s at stake here, and so do they. The battle is enjoined joined.
For more on PHR’s report, and the latest news about what is happening with its campaign, see the website phrtorturepapers.org.



35 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
I’m sorry a Senate Intel Committee investigation?
What nonsense.
Where the hell is the White House. “No one is above the law.” Then we get that we need to look forward not backwards. Thank God they didn’t do anything serious like kill someone. Oops. That’s right, it’s alleged that they DID kill some one.
I voted for President Obama. I contributed to has campaign.
I certainly won’t be voting for whomever the Republicans put up and I sure as heck won’t be voting for him to be re-elected.
BTW. I also served in the AF from ’67 to ’71 because this country STOOD for something.
I now hang my head in disgust.
This whole thing just scares me that my country is doing this. Sounds just like Dr. Mengele
I admire your optimism and idealism, Jeff, but I don’t see how Obama can hold Bush accountable when he himself is committing many of the same crimes. You can’t be Eliot Ness when you’re acting like Al Capone.
In any case, Jeff, can we be sure that this is not one of the crimes of Bush administration that Obama is continuing? At the end of this Jason Leopold piece there’s this vague but disturbing graph:
Jeff, am I mistaken or has DiFi’s review of the CIA detention and interrogation program been going on for some time now? Is this the same review that was touted about this time a year ago as due out by the end of the year? What happened to it? I believe her argument that “this is the most detailed and comprehensive review of the CIA detention and interrogation program ever conducted” is somewhat circular, since it appears the review will never end.
I share your outrage, but don’t agree there’s much evidence here for optimism. I applaud your efforts nonetheless.
David,
While I agree with you that Obama has continued many of Bush’s policies (another reason to not vote for him again), to the best of our knowledge he has not continued the torture program. Holding Bush, etc. accountable for this is another story.
AND having the DOJ get involved in defending John Yoo only makes the insult worse.
Not if you know DiFi. Her team will ‘examine’ and ‘investigate’ and ‘review’ only as long as they need to to let this fall off the radar. Then sometime down the road she will point to her ‘report’ proudly as proof of something, but it won’t mean jack (think “Blanche and finance reform”).
I think you’re strictly correct, that Obama has not continued the systematic torture that Bush oversaw between 2002 and 2006.
That said, he is currently denying judicial review to detainees and overseeing a secret prison in Bagram where we have good reason to believe that torture occurred. He has also continued the rendition program whereby torture is outsourced (and he’s increased drone attacks and summary executions of terrorist suspects.)
To hold Bush accountable would be to set a precedent that could come back to haunt him.
wow, – then, let’s reelect her! •-]
Well, except that she’s calling for an international investigation on the flotilla massacre too.
I think she’s very deliberate and even slow sometimes, but I don’t think she’s a liar.
And now a broad coalition of human rights groups is filing a formal complaint with HHS.
kabuki.
And by not investigating these illegal activities, Obama himself is breaking laws and violating the conventions on torture, which makes him also guilty of illegal activies.
And I don’t expect Feinstein to actually do anything other than study the situation, and maybe put out a report some year, probably in the fall of 2012.
That would be because Obama himself is continuing the same crimes. Perhaps he realizes that any “official” finding of war crimes will mean that by default he will have to be impeached.
While I couldn’t wait to vote for him in 2008 I was so excited by his candidacy, I would soooooooo love to see him impeached for the same crimes that W and the Dick committed. Although it would have to include W and the Dick being convicted also. Too.
Imagine THAT perp walk. *g*
While I appreciate this informative, well-written, and impassioned post I believe it to be naive in the extreme. Senator Di is part of the problem. I don’t feel she can be part of the cure without implicating herself. Personally, I would like to see an independent prosecutor with a sterling track record and no federal affiliation be offered the job of investigating what many of us believe to be war crimes. Such a prosecutor would be given an ample budget, open-ended time frame, and subpoena power. My candidate for this job is Vincent Bugliosi, former District Attorney for Los Angeles County.
T’would be fun to watch!!
With respect, you forgot to ask for a pony. :)
How about a guy named Fitzgerald?
Response to all:
Let’s be clear. The torture issue was dead in the water already. Obama and Congress are part of the problem. The response to the OPR report proved it. Until PHR came along with their report on the illegal experimentation, nothing new was happening. Now we are getting some response. And it is our job to pull all the levers and keep on pulling.
Feinstein is responding to some sort of pressure, or there’d be no need to make the effort to even respond. It’s our job to make sure that this does not drop to the bottom. To throw up one’s hands with righteous despair is no strategy, it is adaptation to despair.
“I admire your optimism and idealism, Jeff, but I don’t see how Obama can hold Bush accountable when he himself is committing many of the same crimes. You can’t be Eliot Ness when you’re acting like Al Capone.”
No one appreciates more than I the issue of current abuses by this administration. But this is a contradiction we must leverage to increase the pressure. I believe that it will take a mighty battle to get anything like the accountability we need. I don’t believe the SSCI will solve our problems. But if we can’t recognize when we are making even a little progress, the we won’t be able to move forward, only decry our impotency. I certainly won’t be letting Obama off the hook. Dud you read the whole article?
Jeff,
One of my senators, Russ Feingold is a member of Senate Select Intelligence Committee. I will write to him, calling for public hearings and a full, open, transparent investigation.
Keep up the pressure.
The next revelation will be that it has continued under President Obama.
Thanks, Jeff.
The PHR findings *do* represent a new opening. It’s not about torture, which as an issue is *dead.* It’s about medical experimentation which is a whole new (you will excuse the expression) kettle of fish. Anyone who cares, like say a Feingold, can take this up as a *new* issue. They can say “well, we didn’t know about this when we were turning a blind eye to all of that and this is just beyond accepting.” To accept this is to move to a new level of depravity. It is worth pushing hard for awareness of this “new” information.
By not holding bush and Cheney responsible, Obama is also committing a crime. The US is obligated under the Convention Against Torture Treaty and American law to investigate and prosecute these crimes. Obama in refusing to do this becomes complicit.
Worth remembering at this point, no matter how many times someone says it, that the average time to prosecution of a major figure for war crimes or crimes against humanity is 22 years. It’s never time to give up, and this looks like yet another tiny step in the right direction. Thanks for your article, and I’m with you on keeping up the fight.
I didn’t mean to imply you were letting Obama of the hook. And I agree, we keep to fighting for accountability, however long the odds — there’s simply other option — but sometimes I need to air my pessimism.
Jeff,
I will try to share your optimism on this, although I’m not an intrinsically optimistic person, nor have recent events in this country given me much reason for being so.
Is there anything that individual activists on this issue can do to help nudge things in the right direction?
Finally, and you’re going to hate me for being schoolmarmish, the battle is “joined,” not “enjoined,” which means “prohibited” or “forbidden” — a political Freudian slip?
I invite readers to visit the website of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee in order to sign online their letter to Eric Holder asking him to honor the law and our treaty pledges and initiate an investigation into the charges of illegal human experimentation.
Dear Attorney General Holder:
We are deeply concerned about grave abuses of the rule of law, as well as the Justice Department’s continuing abdication of our nation’s commitments under international law to investigate crimes against humanity and bring the perpetrators to justice.
Thanks, ondelette (and reader, and loo hoo, too).
Re the average time to prosecution, I wouldn’t draw too many inferences from that. There have been only a limited number of such prosecutions, and the differences between cultures where such prosecutions took place is great (that being a statistical confound). The variance is what we might look for. For instance, the prosecution of the Greek torturers from the period of the colonel’s junta (1967-1974) happened almost immediately (from our point of view) after the fall of the regime. Unfortunately, the prosecutions petered out after not too long. But it’s our chance to make history, and while I definitely look back to understand the circumstances and outcome of the fight for justice for such crimes, I don’t rule anything out, but look to the dynamics of the moment.
To paraphrase you know who, we don’t just want to interpret history, we want to make it.
Thanks for the comment and the support, however. I certainly agree with the substance of your message.
Thanks for the correction. See the comment above re something we can do, i.e., at BORDC’s website.
No, I don’t think it was a Freudian slip… this time ;-)
Rules for Drone Wars: Six Questions for [United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions] Philip Alston; Scott Horton; 6/9/10
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/06/hbc-90007190
The whole discussion is well worth reading.
Thanks, good link. Yes, very much worth reading.
To: Jeff Kaye
I find your Blog’s content very educational and informative and I thank you for your concern on Human Rights. Please check out the following link and provide me your feedback and opinion on the use of new coercive interrogation techniques.
The link is at http://deepakadk.blogspot.com/2009/11/other-side-of-bhutan.html which is a journal of a Nepali journalist. Repressive regimes employ torture and experimentation on prisoners to extract information at any cost whether it be via physical or mental means. Repressive regimes will pursue and utilize covert methods and attempt to cover violation of Human Rights abuses. Unfortunately, US covert agencies are pursuing similar techniques which can be plausibly denied and of course these agencies will deny it; but the truth has a way of surfacing. I sometimes wonder, if these ruthless and rogue agencies consider what will happen to our soldiers, if they are captured by the enemy; who may reciprocate with the same inhuman techniques.
Your points are very well taken, and I thank you for the very interesting link. I read the book review, and yes, it is certainly plausible. The CIA-KUBARK type of mind control techniques are well-known, and have spread around the world. It is likely the Bhutanese government got this training from the CIA itself, or via their Indian patrons. But, whether this person were actually a victim of such torture is not something that can be assessed from a distance. It is similar to other stories, and the description of the after-effects of such torture is consistent with the known effects and other testimony about the sequelae of mind control torture.
I have psychologically examined over thirty torture victims. Others have examined many, many more over the years. My own experience shows about a 10% rate of falsifying such stories among victims, consistent with other estimates in the literature for this type of injury. Even in those cases, however, I couldn’t be completely sure their story was false, and such judgments are made on a probabilistic basis, using one’s best clinical judgment, and whatever psychological tools available at the time. Of course, when there is physical evidence of torture, the percentages may be expected to change.
H.P. Albarelli Jr has a chilling piece at truthout [6/10/10] called:
The Strange Story of Sally Hartman
Coalition Files Office of Human Research Protections Complaint: Investigate CIA Research; Stephen Soldz; 6/10/10