Even before the BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, oil has been an issue in the race between Democrat Robin Carnahan and Republican Roy Blunt to replace the retiring Kit Bond in the US Senate.
The League of Conservation Voters has targeted Roy Blunt for defeat in his race to take over Kit Bond’s senate seat, running brutal ads against him (like the one embedded here) that started running last year. They also put together a website called Big Oil Blunt that lays out Roy’s pro-oil, pro-business, anti-clean energy record that earned him an A+ from the American Petroleum Institute.
When these ads were running last year, Blunt could afford to ignore it as treehuggers wasting their money, far ahead of any elections (primary or otherwise). Thanks to the fine work of BP, Transocean, and Halliburton, however, Blunt is backpedaling furiously to avoid being caught up in voter anger at the oil industry. In a new ad, Carnahan is highlighting Blunt’s ties to Big Oil and his willingness to help them at the expense of his Missouri constituents. From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch’s “Political Fix” blog, it’s clear that Blunt is worried:
Less than hour after Democratic Senate aspirant Robin Carnahan released a sharp-edged Web ad accusing Rep. Roy Blunt of seeing to the oil industry’s interests, Blunt announced this afternoon that he was sponsoring legislation that would dramatically increase companies’ liability.
Carnahan’s ad contends that Blunt’s recent remarks about the spill show that he wants “Missourians to pay for BP’s accident.” It’s based partly on Blunt’s assertion that the present liability cap ($75 million) would be the extent of BP’s exposure “unless there’s some criminal activity that no one is aware of.”
Blunt’s legislation, available just minutes ago, would cap liability of offshore facilities at clean-up costs plus $150 million or, as an alternative, tie liability to profits in a way that could saddle a big company with billions in costs.
Roy Blunt has been around. He’s been in the US House since 1996, representing the most conservative portion of Missouri (John Ashcroft’s southwestern corner of the state). He’s been in the leadership of the GOP caucus since 1998 when he was named chief deputy whip, served as Majority Whip under Tom Delay, and became the interim majority leader when Delay stepped aside in 2005. After the 2008 elections, Blunt stepped out of the leadership and focused on taking Kit Bond’s seat in the Senate.
Roy Blunt has been around, and he knows how elections are won and lost. He knows how to read the political winds, and he doesn’t like the sudden change in the political weather.
Knowing that he’s got that kind of political radar, it is beyond amusing to see how the fear of political failure can make him change the tune he’s been singing for years in less than an hour.
The Gulf Oil Spill is washing up on the Missouri Senate race, and no one is more terrified of that than Roy “Big Oil” Blunt.




31 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving soul…! ;-)
McClatchy is doing a great job…
Maybe he can latch onto Rand Paul’s hearse. That’s a sure-fire winner for Goopers these days.
Makes me wonder – is early blog coverage, challenging the low estimates, specifically the coverage here at FDL, going to be part of discovery in these lawsuits?
…. too funny…. ;-)))))
Whenever I see stories or see teevee pundits describe the Gulf disaster with words like “leaking” or “spilling” or “seeping” I feel they are misleading the public. The correct verb is “vomiting.”
No matter how two-left-footed the Dems are, the Republicans continue to seek safe harbor in the darndest places.
‘hearse’…! Nice one, Newt…! ;-)
FDL is certainly a treasure trove of ‘public statements’…! Hopefully, some alert paralegals and/or lawyers involved tap into it…! ;-)
I’m more than half serious. Look at McConnell – latches onto Paul on election night, and running for his life within 24 hours.
So Blount and company have to be looking for the flavor of the cycle to snuggle up against, and… POW!
Roy & Rand are a generation ahead of their time. Once the new curriculum in Tejas takes hold, these guys will seem like highly intellectual, even transformational, figures … compared to the populace.
And Paul has cancelled his Meet the Press appearance. Someone must have told him that he was not ready for prime time.
*heh* How’s that crow pie going down Mitch’s throat…? Them feathers are a real b*tch…! ;-)
Hey, Peterr – Rev. Jim Wallis on Hardball today, talking about stewardship. Nice to see.
‘The common good’ as a sound religious principle.
Excuse me while I pinch myself…to hear Wallis talk about the fact that some have taken ‘the Market’ as their God just brightens my week. (Am I on the right planet…?)
Exhaustion I believe was the deal…
Getting your hind-pockets blistered from every conceivable angle has to be tiring.
Hey, Mi Amigo…! My middle’un graduates from HS Tonite…! There’s a lull in the action now…! ;-)
wOOt !!!
Congrats to all of you, dood ! How’s da College-goer doing ?
What a great ad!!!!
She get’s her Masters soon…! She’s already enrolled in her Phd in Psych courses…! ;-)
*sniff* … they grow up so fast !
Yeah, it is.
And not to beat the drum too hard, but I swear the Jim Wallis interview on Hardball today is a tiny little paradigm shift; no shouting, no hystrionics.
It’s a tiny little shard of grace.
Jim White is upstairs!
“Very, Very, Modest” Impact? How About Twenty-four Miles of Dead Marsh, Mr. Hayward?
Yeah, I’m seeing the momentum shift toward the progressive side in politics. We’ve got to keep the momentum going, to November and beyond.
Great work, all you FireGods and friends !
Don’t they tho…? ;-)
Seems like yesterday I was just changing her diapers…! *g*
Dinner beckons … raises toast to the Tuttles !
Prost…! Aloha…! ;-)
Teddy Partridge is upstairs!
BP’s Made-Up Claims Make the Coast Guard and NOAA Look Incompetent
Dems winning senate seats in MO and KY sounds very good to me. Let’s get to work!
I just checked out the Carnahan campaign site. A progressive she is not. Sounds like she thinks the Pete Peterson Cat Food Commission is just what this country needs:
And then there is requisite nonsense about how all we need is more education for jobs that do not exist but somehow will be magically created once we all have college degrees:
Three quick thoughts:
(1) That quote from her site is talking about the budget, not social security (Peterson’s hobby horse).
(2) Have you looked at Roy Blunt’s site?
(3) Given a choice between Blunt and Carnahan (and as a Missourian, I’ll likely have that choice once the primaries are over), I’ll take Carnahan any day.
You are right – that statement is about the budget and I was wrong not to point that out. However, the people she listed (Kit Bond, McCain, Kent Conrad) are not politicians that I would call strong defenders of social spending.
On the plus side, if she is elected and actually does what she says she will, there is this:
It would be nice if she had some concrete ideas about how this might be done. For example, she could state that she would try to get Medicare Part D to negotiate the prices of bulk purchases of drugs or that she could propose raising the cap on FICA (possibly with a salary “island” exemption over and up to a certain amount) rather than cutting cost of living increases or actually reducing SS payments. I realize that, if elected, Carnahan could only do what Obama and Congressional leaders let her do. Still, it would be great if a politician did not take the safe way out and actually talked about real solutions. I believe that the political climate is different this year than in 2008 with voters even more worried about the availability of their social safety nets. An honest discussion of the status of these two programs (not scare tactics) along with a discussion of how their long-term viability could be improved would find an eager audience.
I find that I am very cynical about politicians and I might have misjudged Carnahan, but I am also writing as someone who was thrilled to see McCaskill get elected (even gave her a small donation). I do not doubt that Blunt would make a terrible senator but I am so disappointed to see people who seemed so good during their campaigns roll over once they get to Washington. If Carnahan wins, I hope she stands strong.