Washington, D.C. – In a surprise press conference this afternoon, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs announced the creation of a new regulatory agency, the Business Protection Agency, that will provide much-needed oversight of the federal government’s many abusive and out-of-control regulatory agencies.
A series of news stories this week have highlighted the business community’s growing sense of frustration with a White House and Democratic establishment which is often indifferent to their needs:
- The Washington Post mentions that the coal industry “blamed [Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV)] for not reining in the EPA” in its story about the Massey mine explosion’s political ramifications.
- Reuters reports on JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s complaint that the banking industry doesn’t have enough influence, and how “there were areas where the banks lacked possibilities to demonstrate their arguments to politicians and supply them with the right facts.”
- Politico describes the business community’s fears that Obama’s recess appointments of Craig Becker and Mark Pearce pose a mortal threat to their traditional way of life.
Faced with this level of fear and uncertainty, President Obama reacted with characteristic decisiveness, pushing his aides to work nights and weekends to quickly devise a regulatory solution that would prevent agencies from preying on defenseless corporations.
“President Obama recognizes that just because corporations cannot vote, that does not mean they should not have a voice,” said Gibbs. “The President has a long history of commitment to the rights of the disenfranchised and the downtrodden, and he could not stand idly by while unaccountable agency barons used their power and influence to take advantage of our most vulnerable persons. The government must speak for those who cannot speak for themselves, and stand up for those who cannot stand up for themselves, especially when they don’t have mouths or feet.”
A United States Chamber Of Commerce spokesman expressed cautious optimism about the new agency: “This is a good first step towards bringing the regulators under control, but the proof is in the pudding. Will the BPA have enough funding to be effective? Will it have enough inspectors to police all the agencies on a regular basis? What kind of loopholes can these agencies exploit? What kind of enforcement mechanisms are there? Until we know the answers to these questions, we can’t say whether this is true reform or just election-year grandstanding.”
The next step will be what is expected to be a bruising Senate approval process. Republican leaders have already pledged to filibuster what they are calling “yet another overreaching liberal big government socialist power grab of socialism,” and Democratic caucus members Ben Nelson and Joseph Lieberman are demanding significant compromises in the new agency’s scope, as well as several submarine bases and a pony.




107 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
But what does Susan Collins think?
Nice
Is it to be Cabinet Level or lower?
Any names being floated to head it I wonder. Pete Peterson may have all the required skills me thinks
Tom Donohue would also be a natural.
Eli, I swear you do this just to confuse me.
It’s hard to tell the snark from the reality anymore.
*G*
Yeah, It’s HuffPo, But It’s A Good Read And On Topic.
Eli, ya worry me sohn, ya flat out worry me . . . . ;-)
Thanks for the read . . . *G*
I hear it will be within the Treasury Department — but independent from it.
I assume that the agency will be bi-partisan? s/
Of COURSE not!!
Purely heterosexual white men, for sure!
None of that LGBT stuff for OUR regulators!
Crap, you just reminded me that I was planning to put something in there about how Obama is shielded from the corporations’ pain by his anti-business inner circle of Geithner, Summers, Rahm, and Rubin.
It’s hard to tell the snark from the reality anymore.
yep – I ran it through my snarkometer, and it blew the damned thing up…
heya eli !
heya jayt !
Not to mention that the timing is VERY suspicious.
We can’t agree on financial reform, but we get help for downtrodden corporations? Wow.
ELI!
You nut!
KELLY!
Good to see ya!
The Supreme Court just gave corporations the green light to use their vast amounts of wealth to buy all the power and influence they want in Washington. So what makes Obama thinks that our corporations are so damn weak and defenseless that we need to create a new regulatory agency to prevent regulator vultures from eating them alive? If Obama isn’t an Orwellian bullshitter, I don’t know who is!
I shouldn’t be surprised, but I honestly, not exaggerating, thought this had to be a joke! Holy Shit!
The government must speak for those who cannot speak for themselves, and stand up for those who cannot stand up for themselves, especially when they don’t have mouths or feet.
Are we headed toward, like, socialism here?
Glad to see this thread, and hilariously, Quo Vadis, a very campy 50′s film about Nero (HAH!)is on Turner Classic Movies right now.
Fiddle!
I laugh through tears.
Well, I think if you look up the definition of socialism, you will find that it says “Anything Obama does”.
The banks don’t have enough influence. Right. And banking execs clearly don’t have enough drug tests.
Hi, Eli!
Hi, Ron!
Don’t you wish we lived in their fantasy world where the agencies have all the power and *they’re* the ones who are the helpless victims?
Finally O does something worthwhile!
Dude, I thought it was April 1 for a sec, and then I thought it must be a carryover from a 420 thread-except these people have gone right through into serious hallucinogens. Had to be true.
Great one, Eli.
Here’s my 420 explanation of how this agency came into being:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye3ecDYxOkg (h/t @GottaLaff on Twitter)
Regulatory agencies with too much power! Ha! This slays me. The next thing you know you will write a story about the muckrakers at a local news paper calling out conservatives for lying and misrepresenting facts.
Or a major national newspaper assigning a special editor to follow the news of the wingnuts. That would be CRAZY!
Breaking: Obama names Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to head the infant agency, citing his brilliance and fortitude.
Other members of the short-list with similar attributes were Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Kentucky) and former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kansas).
That’s President Susan Collins!
OTOH, since regulators have so little power, perhaps it is better to have a regulator who favors biz.
While the name for the new commission is currently unknown, several highly placed staffers on the Hill have suggested “Invisible Hand.”
And when you go to work for them you can tell your friends.
“I got an Invisible hand job!”
LOL!
Wait, it’s not April 1.
I’ve googled this up, no sign of Robert Gibbs Presser today, or this new agency.
Eli-you wouldn’t!!! Would you?
*G*
RonD, I was wondering if I had 4/1/10 repeating, also.
Aren’t they all?
“I had my first interview, but they’re still trying to get a feel for me.”
well of course this will work!
this is the one solution that will fix everything!
I kinda figured that “yet another overreaching liberal big government socialist power grab of socialism” would be a giveaway…
:-)
I am so used to our fake progressive/liberal president – at least Hillary was a real liberal/progressive – albeit only center left and not as left as I am.
I was ready to accept the thing at face value and was just curious about how he did the creation without legislation!
Great snark! – thanks for the laugh and smile!
Spocko@31 wins the innertoobz tonite!!!
Brilliant!!!!
And how do you feel for them?
Good evening Eli!
Yeah, I’ll admit there was suspicion about the agency, although you started off fairly close to reality . .
*G*
You win the innertoobz, too, tonite.
Still fingering that out.
Evening, egreg!
Gotta be tough for him to wrap his hands around it.
The sad thing is that it could have been true…
Why not?
The mouth sez it all.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
Oh, it’s A Modest Proposal.
It could still be true. I’m forcing myself to read Paul Street’s book on O, which is depressing beyond imagination. Even though I know it all already, it is difficult to read. Eli is spot on what O would do.
U iz all depraved sex kittehs! Meow!
I don’t know why anyone would be surprised. Obama put one man in charge of making sure his DOJ didn’t run off the reservation, and that man is not a lawyer.
I don’t there’s ANY one in here deprived of sex.
Sex with kittehs is NOT a topic I’m familiar with, though.
Also.
*G*
Whass for dinner . . . .
Thank you for reading so we don’t have to!!
Book report?
Hilarious graphic.
Here.
Good call, I saw it, smiled. But it was overlooked for how good it IS, due to the post content.
That Eli . . . . *rollseyes*
Here’s the FDL book salon.
Officer Krupke! Weeee!
Thanks! Probably not a great fit, but I was stumped and I’ve always loved that one.
THAT was a catch . . . yer on yer A Game tonite, Ecahn . . . *G*
Wow, that was revealing. I’d missed it, of course.
Thanks!
You betcha. Still the best take on Romeo & Juliet since R&J.
I have a great true story on R&J. I was dating a man in our early 50s. He was a Yale Law graduate who had grown up in a small town near Thousand Islands in NYS. He had never been to a ballet, so I treated him to a Saddler Wells or some other European performance of Prokofiev’s R&J at Lincoln Center. We arrived at the theater and I volunteered to brief him in advance of the beginning of the performance. I started by asserting that, of course, he knew the R&J story line (figuring our pre-performance conversation would involve matters concerning translating spoken drama into music & dance). He said: No I don’t. The relationship didn’t last long.
A friend of mine worked for the Invisible Hand Agency. Worked there until he had a couple of stokes.
Nope. Musta listened to it a bajillion times in the 33rpm record days. Burned into my lizard brain.
I guess Alvin Ailey, Twyla Tharp and the like woulda been out of the question, too . . .
How could he not know that story? Lotsa big rocks in his life?
PS, I’m still scratching my head to come up with the winning name the Pot Campaign. In 20 minutes.
You’re so clever, I hope you’re going to be there. Even if you don’t indulge.
When you’re a Jet you… stay… a… Jet.
The Looney Left will be appeased by the appointment of bleeding heart ultra-liberal wacko nut case Senator Evan Bayh to the committee. He’s got a new set of kneepads and he’s ready to engage his esteemed friend and colleague, the noble gentleman farmer, Senator Grassley in a slow and comfortable discourse.
It really is the best take; Euro Opera houses perform it usually as an operetta, not the usual theater venues.
And what about that man? Sheesh, even belch can quote some Shakespeare, but he usually, purposefully butchers it to make me laugh. The last time was a couple years ago, after watching some Beavis and Butthead he would holler around the house “Wherefore art thou, Holio?”
All the way! Hi ya, Rat.
Barack Obama is so slimy in the face of financial crimes that brought the world economy to it’s knees he is giving the banksters even more cover! Please pass the barf bags. He is better than Benedict Arnold.
I know shut up get back in line and keep moving.
Hi-hi-hi, demi!
Yaaiiieee!!!!
Lordie…my sonny boy was studying R&J last year and when we were on a camping trip, he performed the beginning, what’s it called? Two houses…etc with a Sean Connery accent. It was after dinner and we had a fire going and I’d had a few and I was rolling on the ground.
Gawd, I love that kid.
Mademoiselle Juliet video starring Alizee. It has dancing and singing and Juliet!
(First part of English lyrics)
Mademoiselle Juliet has
Her Romeo in the Alpha
From Verona to Rome she runs
A pretty syndrome called love
Shakespeare plays with his muse
The heroine thinks he abuses
She climbs quickly to the towers
The great writer likes playing tricks on her
Quo Vadis
General Marcus Vinicius meets Lygia and falls in love with her.
Hell, I did too! Deborah Kerr was dynamite to a budding teenage boy!
Sean Connery Accent? HILARIOUS!
I asked. His HS class had 20 students (I studied R&J in a big public HS) in a very under-served education town and he never ran into it in college. All that is perfectly possible. But to NEVER come into contact with the story in the 3 decades plus post-undergraduate, for someone who was not only exposed to highly educated peeps in college and law school and practicing law in Manhattan, and not realize it was a classic that he had to know about, is what boggled my mind. Granted it was also pre-internet, but still.
No ideas on Pot Campaign. Sorry.
Probably just what the Bard intended.
Belch just made me LOL!
I think it would be hard to top MW’s “Yes We Cannabis.”
I’ll get over it.
We’ll see. :)
That belch is quite something. If I’m getting a wee bit too dragqueenish in public, his best put down is “Et tu, Fifi?”
I can’t help but laugh!
In my opinion all Shakespeare sounds better with some sort of UK accent. I remember the movie Much Ado about Nothing. Keanu Reeves. ARGHHHH.
But of course Emma Thompson made up for it. Denzel Washington wasn’t bad, but he was no Kenneth Branagh.
Is this new agency modeled on a working idea someone else has done like the French they tend to understand how to make government work cheaper for people their healthcare and cable tv, cell phone etc rates seem proof of that.
Sounds like you have a keeper (ambiguity intended). :-)
There was a movie of gang warfare on the R&J theme in the 1990s. (I googled it but it would take awhile to determine if I got the right hit so no link.) Think it was Brazilian. It was a violent movie that made me very uncomfortable, especially since my late husband had lived in Brazil for many years and I was aware of the violence in the Rio favellas. It was probably the BEST take on R&J because it portrayed the true gang warfare that Shakespeare tapped into, but has been sanitized by the centuries, in its true violence.
Well COME ON… Anybody would be better than Keanu. Paging Hervé Villechaize… What? He’s Dead? Really?
Still better than Keanu.
He is very funny – you’d like him. I wish he would frikking blog here.
Kenneth doesn’t do it for me. But, I’m weird, ya know.
I still remember the Zefferelli, 1968 version. I was in high school, so, of course, it was Very Romantic.
Ah, but you can channel him without consequence if he never ‘appears’ for himself.
My daughter was in high school and was going through a big Leo DiCaprio faze when I took her to see that version.
I think the new agency could be called “Strokin’” or maybe teh Congress is just stoked over it.
Good one. I don’t know about internal campaigns here but if it gets to a bill? How about;
National Security Drug Regulation Program.
(Under the “Clear Skies” concept)
You increase the national security
1) Less importing of marijuana from other countries. We can start EXPORTING it. Hello trade surplus!
2) Resources can leave the marijuana drug wars and go to fight terrorists
3) The Republican’s like anything to do with national security this will totally confuse them.
Drug Regulation
1) You are taking it out of the illegal and putting it into legal, where it can be taxed and regulated.
2) The regulation word is hated in the business community but loved in the law enforcement community.
That might be the one.
Maybe we can lure him in someday.
Buy American.
That’s true.
Jane Hamsher is upstairs!
Late Nite FDL 4/20: Name That Pot Campaign Contest!
I wish this wasn’t the part that made me laugh loudest:
President Obama reacted with characteristic decisiveness …
Bingo, on all accounts.
Magical, brutal, and wonderous.
High school for me, too.
Well, this makes perfect sense.
We need a Business Protection Agency to counterbalance the Consumer Protection Agency, because as we all know during the Bush/Cheney years (and now the Obama years) businesses (like Halliburton, Goldman Sachs, etal.) were underrepresented while consumers (and coal miners) were overrepresented, with federal regulators crushing businesses right and left while letting consumers (and coal miners) get away with murder.
Now, this is post-partisan bipartisanship we can all believe in. I wonder what the corporate sponsors of the Teabaggers will think, and will the Teabaggers rally behind their corporate sponsors in lock-step or will they get lock-jaw? Corporations Uber Alles!!!!
Eli, this is freakin’ funny stuff.