Blanche Lincoln’s fundraising, relative to primary challenger Bill Halter, is even worse than the numbers would indicate.
Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln’s campaign says she’s raised more than $1 million over the past three months for her re-election bid.
Lincoln’s campaign said Thursday that the incumbent senator has more than $4 million in the bank as she seeks a third term in office. Wednesday marked the deadline for first quarter contributions.
Lt. Gov. Bill Halter is Lincoln’s chief rival in the May 18 Democratic primary. Halter’s campaign said Wednesday night that he had raised more than $2 million since launching his bid March 1.
So Halter raised twice as much in a month as Lincoln did in three months. Of course, she had a cushion, and no primary challenger materialized until March 1. So she still has a healthy cash advantage for the last six weeks of the primary, although the independent expenditures from labor level the playing field.
Lincoln will return to center stage in Washington for that final six weeks. The Agriculture Committee has some control over the derivatives piece of financial regulation (there’s actually a reason for this; agriculture derivatives and swaps, in the form of commodity trading, is the oldest derivative market out there). So this crucial bit of the financial reform bill we’ll see heads over to the desk of… Blanche Lincoln, the chair of the committee. Guess what interests she’ll favor in creating those rules:
Committee Chairman Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) and ranking Republican Saxby Chambliss (Ga.) plan to shepherd a bipartisan bill through their committee soon after Congress returns from its two-week April recess. Lincoln said in a recent speech that she expects the legislation to be incorporated into a wide-ranging package, spearheaded by the Senate banking committee’s chairman, Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), aimed at revamping the nation’s financial regulatory system [...]
If Lincoln and Chambliss strike a workable bipartisan deal on derivatives — a goal that has eluded other lawmakers — it could help push Dodd’s legislation across the finish line. At the same time, some industry officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they continue to lobby lawmakers on the issue, said they expect that legislation headed up by Lincoln could be more favorable to the financial industry than the language currently in Dodd’s bill.
Quoted in the article, Lincoln said, “The swaps market will be regulated, but let me say this. I don’t believe in overreaching or regulation for regulation’s sake. We must be surgical with how we regulate.” “Surgical” in this case should read “taking a scalpel to everything but the profits of the banks.”
Lincoln’s probably on safer ground undermining the financial bill than the health care bill, simply because derivatives are so obscure to the public, and therefore easily spinnable. But if she takes a high-profile position basically on the side of the banks right at the height of her primary campaign, that provides a major opening for her opponent.




16 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Gee, I wonder where Blanche will find her campaign cash…
The literal meaning of cash cow.
“Lincoln Crushed in
CashRace with Halter;With any luck that will be the headline on election night. Can’t help but wondering if there will be any differnce between the two?
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is up: GOP Congressional Candidate Courts Tea Party with Anti-Government Rhetoric, Receives $200,000 Annually in Government Handouts
So please tell me again why Obama and other key Democrats are supporting Lincoln when she continues to stick it to us and goes with her own special interests and the Republicans?
Maybe cuz they know anyone to the left of Blanche will lose the general election?
Because they basically agree with her positions on the issues.
She polls at less than 35% in the general. Halter does better.
Lincoln isn’t going to mess up deriovative reform. Obama will get just what he wants as he did with HCR [hahahaha]and will with off shore drilling.
It would be interesting to see if Lincoln or her office could produce any specific examples of “regulating for the sake of regulating” that they believe exists in either the House or Senate bill …
All of the figures you refer to see themselves as an elite club playing ball with Wall Street and other powers, an insider’s club, and they all resent the party’s liberal/leftist/progressive base.
why is Lanche blinkin’?
Nominate the most Republican like candidate on the Democratic ticket (preferably somone who says they believe in everything the Republican party stands for but will just register as a Democrat while telling the world they are really a Republican.)
The Democratic Policymakers will be overjoyed. They will figure we can get the democratic base to vote for this person (as the base will vote for anyone if they say they are a democrat, makes no difference about principles) and the policymakers will figure they would get some Republicans to vote for the person, and lo and behold they do and the democrat wins which pushes the democratic agenda forward the policymakers will say.
Makes no difference that the democrat will vote as a Republican because that person will still have that Democratic name and the Democrats win. Yea.
I can only assume that Lincoln’s IQ is a number in the range of body temperature when I read something like this….
From the estimable Yves Smith, just yesterday:
Jamie Dimon Complains About Demonization of MegaBanks
And from Yves today: Guest Post: “We Are in a Cabal… Five or Six Players … Own the Regulatory Apparatus. Everybody Is Afraid to Regulate Them”
And might I simply add that CDS regulation appears to have ‘failed’ because Blanche Lincoln looks as naive and smitten with luv for the banksters as the Annette Funicello free-fall bobblehead in Beach Blanket Bingo. She should at least have the wit to insist on better PR, given the services she’s rendering these derivatives traders.
What a pathetic embarrassment.
cause obama is a RADICAL RIGHT WING RETHUGLICAN posing as a “Democrat”, duh.
(just look at the people he surrounds himself with: BERNANKE and GEITHNER are UNREPETENT “conservative” Rethuglicans, and Emanuel, Summers, (Rubin on line 3), Lieberman, Hillary, Orszag aren’t a LICK better.
Hillary pratically jumped out of her socks racing to APPROVE the Neo-Con, Wall St., cia INSTIGATED COUP in Honduras…. You know, the radical right-wing MILITARY DICTATORSHIP coup.
AS DID OBAMA and his ENTIRE damn White House.
(sigh)
Thanks.
The caps come off as shouting, and make this difficult to read.