Oh, for the love of all that is holy…

But attempts to portray the tea partiers as a surly mob have the contrived feel of a political strategy.

Except, of course, when the surly mob descends upon Capitol Hill led by the likes of Michelle Bachmann. In that case, it is a totally vitriol-free grassroots movement aimed at protecting kittens and puppies.

That Potatoe picture is abolutely hilarious!

: )

All at once, a powerful and energetic counterweight to the Democratic establishment would become a splinter group, destroying the unified opposition it has helped to create. A potential electoral majority on the threshold of victory would become two minority factions almost certain to share in defeat, and a movement inspired to stop the big-government agenda would suddenly become its tool.

Teabaggers:Dan Quayle
F’ing Retards:Rahm Emanual

“Don’t believe your lying eyes” is the message at the heart of so much GOP propaganda…

Too bad that conversation didn’t actually happen. At least it would be some explanation of Hiatt’s wankery.

As Democratic operatives view it, the most “unhealthy” aspect of the tea party is that candidates with its support are winning, and many more are likely to win this fall.

ZOMG – nobody told him about Dee Dee Scozzafava!

My eyes lie compulsively. Sarah Palin is one smart chick.

A potential electoral majority on the threshold of victory would become two minority factions

Sorry Dan the Tea Baggers are Ron Paul’s and Sarah’s people but they are also the GOP’s most motivated base of voters.

Republicans will gain mightily from a growing discontent with the administration, which has disappointed the independent voters who made the difference for Barack Obama in 2008.

They are not independent voters Dan show me any numbers to back up that even 5% of the Tea Baggers are people who voted for Obama? Or voted Green, Socialist, Commie, whatever.
The vast majority of Tea Baggers voted GOP or they staid home on election day why McCain and Sarah were not Right enough for them. Dan the Democrats were never going to get those voters.

Actually (taking “Quayle’s” argument seriously for a moment, which I actually don’t) there is no evidence that without Perot he and Poppy would have been re-elected. The Perot vote was an anti-incumbency vote as much as a anti-deficit, anti-tax vote. But it takes a very special kind of Cerberus Chairman not to see anti-incumbency staring himself in the face.

Thanks, Swopa, please bring us more insights into the “newsroom” at the WaPo0. It’s got to be a hilarious place lately: Charles Lane, Richard Cohen, Charles Krauthammer, BillKristolnacht: so many mentors for the young up-and-comers like Ezra Klein and Dave Weigel.

That is why she is bff with buk buk bachmann.

Palin/Bachmann 2012!!!

What a victory for womens’ rights.

Teabaggers may not all be R, but that doesn’t mean that they are even remotely moderate. Many are probably “I” or “L”. Dan Quayle thinks that the reader will assume the teabaggers who are not “R” are automatically “D”. That’s how dumb Dan Quayle is.

And don’t you think it’s a Cerberus “tea”-up to help Mittens? Isn’t Mittens supposed to be the next MBA/Business preznit for these guys?

buk buk bachmann. Heh heh.

Republicans will gain mightily from a growing discontent with the administration, which has disappointed the independent voters who made the difference for Barack Obama in 2008.

To the surprise of millions of their supporters, they plowed ahead with federal control over health care and new spending financed by a decade of trillion-dollar deficits.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/01/AR2010040102181_pf.html

Dan did you not notice Obama campaigned on a Public Option for Healthcare. When the Majority of people voted for him they knew what they were getting. Healthcare was a big issue in the campaign Dan it would have been hard to miss Obama’s position on that!

Create a public option health plan for a new National Health Insurance Exchange.
“The exchange will require that all the plans offered are at least as generous as the new public plan and meet the same standards for quality and efficiency.”</blockquote

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/518/create-public-option-health-plan-new-national-heal/

One can easily argue that everytime Obama has broken a campaign promise he has gone to the Right to please You Dan and thats why his polls have dropped.

trillion-dollar deficits.

Again Dan had Obama not tried to please you and ended the war we would be in better shape on the National Debt. Perhaps you are Mad Dan that Cerberus your old hedgefund lost 2 billion dollars on Chrysler?
Tell me how would a Republican fix the National Debt and wage two wars at the same time? This I gotta hear!

On “my first day in office, I would give the military a new mission: ending this war”.

Sources: New York Times Op-Ed column, July 14, 200

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/promise/125/direct-military-leaders-to-end-war-in-iraq/

http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/01/bankruptcy-cerberus-chrysler-business-autos-cerberus.html

One can easily argue that everytime Obama has broken a campaign promise he has gone to the Right to please You Dan and thats why his polls have dropped.

and

Again Dan had Obama not tried to please you and ended the war we would be in better shape on the National Debt. Perhaps you are Mad Dan that Cerberus your old hedgefund lost 2 billion dollars on Chrysler?
Tell me how would a Republican fix the National Debt and wage two wars at the same time? This I gotta hear!

on my 15 should not be in quotes those are my words sorry.

Agreed still I doubt that they voted for Obama or any Dem. I admit maybe they voted Independent or Libertarian but they are not the margin that put Obama over the top.

As if teabaggers are out in the streets because of their shock (shock!) that Obama decided to do some kind of health reform after clearly promising to leave healthcare alone.

Now if DQ wants to argue that teabaggers are against any kind of government run social services, I would be more inclined to take him seriously. A little truth goes a long way with me.

Not even in Bizarro Cheney world could anyone seriously argue that teabaggers are O constituents.

Unfortunately, just then Fred Hiatt walked in for a cup of coffee, overhearing the suggestion. And he thought they were serious.

Sadly enough Dan though a lying and stupid weasel is no better or worse than Rush, Glen, Sarah, Newt, George Will, the NeoCons Darth etc. Dan was just a man ahead of his time the first stage of the GOP deevolution.

Not even in Bizarro Cheney world

Fred Hiatt and Dan Quayle are beyond Cheney.

Mr Potato Haid wood be ok two, he.

“Who’s Dan Quayle?” asked one of the younger staffers.

“The 1980s prototype for Sarah Palin,” another answered. “Young, supposedly irresistible good looks, and dumber than the day is long.”

“Seriously? How dumb was he?” asked the younger staffer.

“Bill Kristol was considered his ‘brain’.”

A long pause. “Holy crap! I guess you’re right.”

And they have the nerve to mock Quayle and Palin when they don’t know who Dan Quayle is?

Still pales in comparison to Dana Perino, Bush’s last press secretary, who confessed she’d never heard of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Still my all-time favorite Quaylism:

“A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls.”

You just can’t make this shit up…