Archbishop Desmond Tutu had a powerful op-ed yesterday in the Washington Post. Just reading it made me sit up a little straighter — this is how pastors are supposed to speak:
Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people are part of so many families. They are part of the human family. They are part of God’s family. And of course they are part of the African family. But a wave of hate is spreading across my beloved continent. People are again being denied their fundamental rights and freedoms. Men have been falsely charged and imprisoned in Senegal, and health services for these men and their community have suffered. In Malawi, men have been jailed and humiliated for expressing their partnerships with other men. Just this month, mobs in Mtwapa Township, Kenya, attacked men they suspected of being gay. Kenyan religious leaders, I am ashamed to say, threatened an HIV clinic there for providing counseling services to all members of that community, because the clerics wanted gay men excluded.
Uganda’s parliament is debating legislation that would make homosexuality punishable by life imprisonment, and more discriminatory legislation has been debated in Rwanda and Burundi.
He grieves over what is being done, grieves again because it is being done in God’s name, and names the way things ought to be.
What hit me most, though, is that while the headline on Tutu’s piece is “In Africa, a Step Backward on Human Rights,” so much of what he says resonates with the situation here in the United States:
Hate has no place in the house of God. No one should be excluded from our love, our compassion or our concern because of race or gender, faith or ethnicity — or because of their sexual orientation. Nor should anyone be excluded from health care on any of these grounds.
Amen. And yet the Defense of Marriage Act combined with the Stupakian logic about money will mean that a same-sex married couple in Iowa will not be allowed to purchase a family health insurance policy in Iowa with a federal subsidy.
Again from the Archbishop:
That this pandering to intolerance is being done by politicians looking for scapegoats for their failures is not surprising. But it is a great wrong. An even larger offense is that it is being done in the name of God. Show me where Christ said “Love thy fellow man, except for the gay ones.” Gay people, too, are made in my God’s image. I would never worship a homophobic God.
And again I say Amen. And yet, if you didn’t know Tutu was talking about Africa, it sure sounds like too many American politicians and religious leaders. “A wave of hate . . . pandering to intolerance . . . looking for scapegoats . . . ” This is precisely what Prop 8 was about, precisely how Roman Catholic leaders like Cardinal George and their colleagues among the Latter Day Saints justify the political pressure they exert, and precisely why Glenn Beck wants them to push harder.
Once more from Archbishop Tutu:
The wave of hate must stop. Politicians who profit from exploiting this hate, from fanning it, must not be tempted by this easy way to profit from fear and misunderstanding. And my fellow clerics, of all faiths, must stand up for the principles of universal dignity and fellowship. Exclusion is never the way forward on our shared paths to freedom and justice.
Amen, amen, and again I say amen. I, too, am a cleric who has been standing up like this, though without a Nobel Peace Prize to my name, I and others like me don’t get nearly the attention. But make no mistake: we are here.
If only there was an American Nobel Peace Prize laureate who could speak like this on behalf of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered people. If only there was an American Nobel Peace Prize laureate who could speak like this against the pandering, the intolerance, the fear, and the exploitation.
Oh, wait — there is.
Maybe I should have said “If only there were two.”
Photograph courtesy In My Name/Roger Friedman




20 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
If only…
Shouldn’t we be hearing something about closing arguments on Prop H8 pretty soon?
Peter…You make me proud.
TX had that kind of sodomy law //Uganda, and a case went up to the Supreme Court…Ms. Harriet Miers of course did not want to see the change.
Have they ever heard of “live & let live?”
There’s a hearing in Walker’s courtroom on Tuesday morning about some of the ongoing motions and objections regarding discovery — this time about the defendants getting memos and other internal documents from the anti-Prop 8 political organizations.
Until these things get settled, they’re not going to schedule closing arguments. But it’s possible that if Tuesday’s hearing wraps up the arguments about discovery issues, Walker may make announce a date for the closing arguments.
We will see.
Thanks.
And as to your last question, I think they’ve heard it and dismiss it as the work of the devil.
Of course it resonates.
That American President is also a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
There is a lot to think about in this piece. But thinking is hard, and it is a lot easier to rely on someone else to do that thinking.
That American President is also a
Nobel PeaceBiggest Sell Out Evah Prize winner.Yes — that stands in stark contrast to the other American Nobel Peace Prize laureate’s comments (quoted in the last link in the post):
If only there were two.
Thanks so much for bringing this here, Peterr.
“Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.” ~Denis Diderot, Dithyrambe sur la fête des rois
There is, in those few words, a Great Truth: Royalty and Religion serve no useful purpose that could not be better served by common sense alone. Still, Royalty and Religion persist. Why is that?
Left ya one at PUAC. Now lessee if I’m clever enough to have linked to the comment.
It worked. I’ll be a monkey’s uncle.
If these “Ugandan Statesmen” are allowed to speak at the National Flying Spaghetti Monster Breakfast, and our Nobel-Winning Waffle Chef is there too, doing the New American Kumbayaa with the soaring-est of rhetoric I’ll be putting scopolamine patches behind each ear and a large supply of Barf Bags in every pocket.
Peterr, I have shared this post widely. Thanks so much for it. We can’t get enough of people who speak of love…I think our world suffers every time a hateful message is broadcast.
The most alarming, dispiriting, and depressing situation in these awful times is that so many people have rejected the Golden Rule as a quaint and impractical rule to live by and have replaced it with its shadow, do unto others before they do unto you. The result is a set of destructive beliefs such as greed is good; manipulation, deceptive practices, and outright lying to get what you want is a virtue and not a vice; the poor have chosen to be poor so they deserve to be ripped off and kept poor; smart and responsible people maximize short-term profits without regard to human cost; our planet and all of its life forms, including people, are resources available for exploitation; and endless war is an appropriate and acceptable method to get what you want.
I am dismayed but not surprised that in such a climate of suspicion, judgment, and hate the majority of people refuse to accept homosexuality and are unwilling to accord all people equal rights, privileges, and immunities under law.
Of course, members of the clergy should preach the Golden Rule, but each individual has a duty to practice it every day in all matters and relationships, whether personal or business.
Hmmm… Just like the Geneva Conventions, no? I’m glad I’m probably in the final decade of my life and I don’t have to see too much more of where the world is headed. And I’m also profoundly grateful that I’m childless. I don’t know how I could explain to a child what we are leaving them…
Maybe it’s just because as I started reading this article I was interrupted by some crazy woman who was selling her religion door to door, but I just have no patience for people who use religion as a way of excusing the prejudices that are clearly counter to known evidence. It frosts me to no end that because I don’t believe in the gods these folks proffer to me on my doorstep, that I’m somehow automatically a less moral person than they. That’s another prejudice that clearly doesn’t fit with the evidence.
I didn’t quote it in the post above (trying to respect “fair use” and all), but Tutu has a few things to say to those who reject scientific evidence in order to justify prejudice. Do click through to read the whole thing.
This one?
To me, that’s the difference between a thinking person and a non-thinking person. The former can change his mind when faced with contrary evidence. The latter ends up finding someone who will tell him what he wants to hear.
Thank you Peter, this is among your best contributions here.
So few Christians standing up to the Xtians, it gives this lesbian heathen hope when even one does.