Giant finance companies like Citibank and Sallie Mae made a lot of money securitizing student loans into asset backed securities. When that market dried up, Congress was frightened into believing that students wouldn’t be able to continue their educations and that colleges and universities would be in grave peril.
The obvious solution to that problem was to increase direct federal loans. But that wouldn’t help the big finance companies. Instead of doing something sensible, it continued its practice of bailing out corporations and passed the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act (ECASLA). That bill salvaged the old private student loan business model of companies like Sallie Mae.
One of the programs set up under ECASLA was the “Participation Program”. Sallie Mae sets up a pool of government backed student loans. The Department of Education lends the pool the face amount of the loans, charging interest at the commercial paper rate plus .5%. By September 30, 2010, Sallie Mae must either buy the student loans back from the pools at face value and repay the Department; or sell the loans to the Department at a price equal to the sum of a) face amount of the loan plus b) accrued interest plus c) a 1% origination fee which Sallie Mae paid at the outset of the transaction plus d) $75.
The Department also created a Purchase Program under which loans made after May 1, 2008 could be sold to the Department for the same price.
Sallie Mae took advantage of both programs. Here’s how they describe it in the 2010 10-K, p. F-53:
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $9.0 billion of advances outstanding under the Participation Program. Through December 31, 2009, the Company has sold to ED approximately $18.5 billion face amount of loans as part of the Purchase Program. Outstanding debt of $18.5 billion was paid down related to the Participation Program in connection with these loan sales. These loan sales resulted in a $284 million gain. The settlement of the fourth quarter sale of loans out of the Participation Program included repaying the debt by delivering the related loans to ED in a non-cash transaction and receipt of cash from ED for $484 million, representing the reimbursement of a of one-percent payment made to ED plus a $75 fee per loan.
Even by the standards of financial reporting, that’s opaque. Let’s just say that somehow they made a huge pile of money off taxpayers.
The Participation Program works just like the HICA deal described here. Sallie Mae borrows the money on a very short term basis to make government-guaranteed loans to students. It sells the loans into an asset trust, which in turn sells a participation to the government. The participation money is used to pay for the loans from Sallie Mae. Sallie Mae uses that money to repay the very short term loan. The government charges the asset trust interest at a rate equal to the sum of the commercial paper rate plus .5%. A subsidized student loan made after July 1, 2009, bears interest at 5.6%. The commercial paper rate is about .32%, so in this example a $10,000 loan made September 1, 2009 and sold to the government on September 30, 2010, gives Sallie Mae a gross profit of $591.
Sallie Mae had $9 billion in the participation program at 12/31/09. We can get a rough guess at the amount of money Sallie Mae made by using the $10,000 example above. If all of Sallie Mae’s loans were like that, it looks like a government gift to Sallie Mae in the range of $532 million. As commenter Hoofin points out, the government could have loaned the money to students at that concessionary rate and saved ordinary people millions. It’s a perfect demonstration of the commitment of Congress to bailing out companies, not people.
Oh, and Pulaski Technical College in North Little Rock, AR? Delaware Tech? Money that could have gone to your students in Pell Grants will be used to stuff the bottom line of Sallie Mae unless you and your students call Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor and Tom Carper and insist that they support Students Not Banks, by voting for SAFRA. We have the tools to help you help yourself, right here.




16 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
sorry ot breaking
The examiner in charge of investigating the bankruptcy of venerable Wall Street investment house Lehman Brothers, the most expensive bankruptcy in U.S. history, said in a report publicly released Thursday that senior officials failed to disclose key practices, opening them up to legal claims, and that JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup contributed to the firm’s collapse. In addition, the report concludes that the firm’s auditor, Ernst & Young, failed to meet “professional standards.”
The exhaustive report was unsealed today by Judge James M. Peck, who said the report reads “like a best-seller.”
The examiner, Anton Valukas, also found that parties have claims to pursue against JPMorgan Chase and Citibank in connection with their behavior regarding the modification of agreements with Lehman and their increasing collateral demands in Lehman’s final days. These demands had a “direct impact” on Lehman’s diminishing liquidity — its cash on hand — which was a prime reason behind the firm’s demise.
Thank you for your efforts in trying to penetrate the impenetrable (aka the 10-k reports)
Hmm, so they passed something that helped private profits rather the people??
Shocker there.
Assholes.
O/T. High School in Mississippi cancels prom rather than allow an 18 year old woman (legally an adult) to bring a female date.
Gotta hand it those right wingers. They do know how to get their message out. I imagine the entire rest of the school will now be upset at these two girls for ruining their prom, instilling more hatred for folks that are “different.”
Assholes.
JHFC, this whole country is full of assholes.
Hey congress,
Just say thanks, but no thanks to banks and tanks.
It would be great if you wrote a diary about that case.
Great idea.
Nicely done. The securitization is not the source of funds for student loans. That comes from the US Government, by virtue of its guarantee of principal, costs and interests. Hell, a loan shark would lend to his competitor when the debt is backed by Uncle Sam, especially if his other, um, business methods and terms of trade are given a free pass.
No, the securitization is the source of outsized profits for what ought to be a taxpayer financed program run at cost as an investment in the quality of America’s future.
Why do both Republicans and Democrats insist on running this already expensive but worthwhile program as if it were a defense contract, thereby needlessly escalating its costs and foreshortening the program’s purpose and reach?
“Chinese Banks Have Plenty of Room to Expand” ( http://fora.tv/2009/12/08/Chinese_Banks_Have_Plenty_of_Room_to_Expand#fullprogram ) — Jing Ulrich, Managing Director, Chairman, China Equities and Commodities – J.P. Morgan – tells all!
“Hongda Harry Wu’s Laogai-The Chinese Gulag is a detailed account of the Chinese communist prison system, a system that has had two functions: to “reeducate” those imprisoned into new socialist men and to provide the state with cheap labor for industrial production and development.” from “The Outlook for China, Human Rights and the Laogai Gulag” ( http://www.fff.org/freedom/0193d.asp )
Son of a Shanghai bankclerk, “Harry Wu will reveal the truths behind China’s slave-labor camp system and its linkage to the political system it serves, a system stripped of individual rights and the Rule of Law.” ( http://www.fff.org/freedom/0193d.asp )
See the Virtual Museum at http://www.laogaimuseum.org
And there’s more to come: we haven’t gotten to ED Conduits and TALF.
The correct link to “The Outlook for China, Human Rights and the Laogai Gulag” is http://www.independent.org/events/transcript.asp?eventID=58 .
Spam at #8.
“I couldn’t figure out why I was having trouble getting dates…” :P
That’s just stupid…proms today include all kinds of alternative arrangements.
Groups of girls will reserve tables and go without male escorts. It takes a lot of pressure off to “get a man” before the prom, for starters. It also keeps couples from timing their breakup before/after the Big Event, etc etc. The point is to go have fun.
More self righteous people Forcing “Their” Morals on the rest of us.. Where The Fuck is separation of church and state??
Sick Puppies every one of them..
OT Flashback– “Gimme Shelter: Are Firms Using Their Name To Sell Questionable Tax Shelters? ( http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/16/60minutes/main578497.shtml )
x2