Gene Lyons is fond of saying that the media follows what he calls “the Clinton Rules” when discussing anything pertaining to our forty-second president. As has been documented repeatedly over the years, the members of the press judge the Clintons by a much harsher set of standards than those they use for Republicans.
But really, the Clinton Rules don’t just apply to the Clintons and their associates, but to the entire Democratic Party; they are always judged by a higher, harsher standard than are Republicans. We’re reminded of this on a daily, sometimes hourly, basis — so much so that it takes something exceptionally blatant to stand out from the constant GOP/Media Complex drone.
Something like this piece by the NYT’s Mark Leibovitch:
Beyond all the hand-wringing about hyper-partisanship that accompanies every discussion here these days, a more subtle — and perhaps pertinent — reality hangs over the much-anticipated Blair House confab: Mr. Obama and Republican leaders on Capitol Hill appear to have no personal chemistry whatsoever.
[...]
Mr. Boehner and Mr. Obama have not held a single one-on-one meeting since Mr. Obama’s election, according to Mr. Boehner’s office. Representative Eric Cantor, the House Republican whip, has described Mr. Obama to colleagues as “thin-skinned” and quick to bring up Republican criticisms of him.
Oh, go gag a maggot, why don’t cha? Guess what? Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush — you remember him, the guy who finished out his term with approval ratings on a par with the plague? — treated both Republicans and Democrats like ashtrays. It took until the summer of 2006 before he could be bothered to take notice of either.
Remember, it was Bush and his brain Karl Rove that in late 2002 and early 2003 took advantage of the furor over Trent Lott’s remarks on Strom Thurmond to have him removed as Senate Majority Leader and replaced with Bill Frist, who was far more subservient to the Bush White House than was Lott — who though a Republican still insisted on this whole separation of powers thingy. That’s not the act of a president with a nice warm and fuzzy relationship with his Congressional counterparts.
(This was a furor, by the way, that happened only because some of the then-brand-new liberal bloggers like Atrios, who still remembered how the press helped Trent Lott and the GOP demagogue and smear Paul Wellstone’s memorial event five weeks earlier as it was happening, yet were expending far less time and energy on Lott’s Thurmond statements. Just as they hijacked Joe Lieberman’s Department of Homeland Security idea after first opposing it, Rove and Bush used the Lott-Thurmond hoo-ha to cow Senate and Congressional Republicans into submission. But I digress.)
So please, TradMed, stop it with the “ooh ooh Obama doesn’t play nice with Republicans” crapola. Bush treated Congressional and Senate Republicans far worse than Obama has so far.



41 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Good morning, everyone! Where’s the coffee?
Well, all this is true, pathetic but true, and what confuses me is why Americans seem almost wilfully oblivious to the truth. (Might it have something to do with the fact that it is they themselves who are culpable? So I set out to cross the country a few weeks ago and find out what’s goin on. I promised Firepups weeks ago I’d let them know how it was goin. So here we are:
http://roadblues-kitty.blogspot.com/
later, alligators
Anyone who watched the Summit would be lying to say Obama was not nice to the Repubs…he was meticulous about respecting McConnell’s choice of speakers, courteous to a fault (so, he tweeked McC on the campaign). His nice is in evidence. And he can put sentences together and speak the English language; that’s a courtesy to everyone.
sorry
http://roadblues-kitty.blogspot.com/
Good morning. Good job PW. The bias is sometimes astounding. During the HC Summit there was a DKos diary saying CNN kept cutting away when dems spoke. Can’t verify that, myself, but they said the Repubs would get 10 minutes of air time, then when the Dems responded they’d cut to a commercial.
Hold out your cup PW
I keep hoping the villagers take some time off from the Village. but not likely.
Yeah, here’s what I heard on Arkansas talk radio the day the ‘summit’ was to start and it gave me the creeps.
http://roadblues-kitty.blogspot.com/2010/02/trying-to-get-my-brain-around-sense-of.html
I watched the whole summit and this is not who I’d invite on my Sunday morning talking head show
What fun…thanks. I hope you’ll be reading Gail Collins’ When Things Changed….a read you can’t put down; it starts with the ’60s
I always thought BushCo was blackmailing members of Congress for votes. We never got the whole story about the CIA/Poker/Hooker parties. Makes for some compliant senators.
They don’t care about educating the public. Gregory’s hoping to get a juicy quote knocking Obama. Ratings and the corporate agenda rule.
I’m glad you (re)raised this issue. It boggles my mind Democrats have taken this lopsided treatment from the media yet have done next to nothing to restore some kind of rules to return some balance in reporting. Oh excuse me that would mean returning to those dark days of the biased liberal media and we can’t do anything that even suggests the “L” word now can we?
Thankfully there are serious folks out there, outside the beltway, trying to do something about it . (Present company included of course.)
http://blip.tv/file/3264793
KittyKitty: It’s because the media that’s most used by Americans — drive-time AM radio and the evening TV news — is so incredibly bad. And the print media isn’t much better. And the Cons have worked for decades to make it so.
Exactly! If only the rich progressives out there thirty years ago had started seriously funding progressive TV and radio stations the way the right-wingers bankrolled their media, we wouldn’t be in this mess. (And yes, they were warned years ago of what the righties were doing. But they didn’t care.)
Phoeniz Woman “So please, TradMed, stop it with the “ooh ooh Obama doesn’t play nice with Republicans” crapola. Bush treated Congressional and Senate Republicans far worse than Obama has so far.”
My simple equation for the way congress treated Clinton/ Bush/Cheney
Lies under oath having to do with blowjobs = impeachment
Lies about WMD’s in Iraq or an intelligence snowjob = hundreds of thousands dead, injured, millions displaced
Takes blowjobs to stir up our ocngress enough to hold a President accountable for lies. Hundreds of thousands dead based on a “pack of lies” makes our congress yawn. Says a great deal about our leaders and countries priorities.
The corporate media along with corporate Democrats and corporate Republicans in the corporate Congress and corporate White House bash each other bashing each other about who is favored most “in the press.”
Come on, what difference does this “double standard” make? It is the double standard with repsect to Wall Street and Main Street that is by far the more crucial concern.
Is the Clinton administration and the Obama adminstration [so far] supposed to be the poor souls the media picked on more than the Bushes? Is the Democratic Congress being picked on more?
Liberal idealists are so embedded in the Democrats R Us mentality they ever miss the forest for the trees.
Even now the “liberal” media [including Schultz, Olbermann and Maddow] are intent on beating to death the ususal suspects—the age old liberal narrative that the Republicans are the ones stopping health care reform. As though what Obama, Reid and Pelosi Inc. are pursuing is, in any way, shape or form, a true, progressive policy.
Idealism is not what will change this country. The class struggle will. No, not in a Marxist or socialist or revolutionary sense; but certainly not in the sense laid out by the romantics or the utopians who figure all that need be done is win over Washington with The Right Thing To Do.
The world doesn’t work that way. The world is about those with economic and political power and those with the folks marching in the streets trying to put that into perspective.
Or [sigh] once was.
so why is Ensign still in the Senate, sexual misconduct only applies to D’s, not R’s
I think I need more coffee, ’cause when I read your first sentence, I read forty-second president…har har. Maybe because we’ve read from the beginning that he just got into office and hasn’t had a chance yet.
And, also, to your #14, yes, yes and yes. Robert Parry has pointed this out too.
Did you see the sign some Canadian held up after the U.S. beat Canada in hockey “At least we have healthcare”.
Good Morning, Elliot. Just letting you know I’m doing my homework today so that I won’t be late again, tomorrow. *g*
Glad you noticed that too. It was either a commercial or Wolfie Blitzkrieg cutting off the response to get a GOP infomercial in. CNN and others most certainly have their orders from their corporate masters.
lol, looking forward to it
Yup. Lovely — and true!
By the way, here’s yet another example of the GOP/Media Complex in action:
And the article goes on in this vein, not once mentioning that David Bossie, the man behind this and other right-wing ideological stroke flicks, is about as trustworthy as fellow rightwingnut and dirty trickster Donald Segretti. Per Sourcewatch:
yeah, a classic
Not much said in the progressive blogosphere about Sibel Edmonds tetimonial having to do with Rep Jan Schakowsky’s alleged sexual misconduct that may have undermined national security. Not a mention in the MSM about Sibel’s allegations during her testimony on the MSM
No investigations into Scakowsky’s behavior.
I am really not interested in their personal lives. Only if they profit from a war that they voted for (Feinstein) or may undermine National security through their negotiations (Jane Harman, Schakowsky etc)
Got evidence? Unfounded smears aren’t very nice, whether done by the right or the left.
Its important to remember that 22% approval rating was achieved with the Media treating Bush like a God for 6 or 7 years. The Media built up Bush but in the end they lost their Cred and readers to us doing so.
That’s the main cause for hope in this scenario — the brainwashing isn’t perfect. But will we be able to create a mass media vigorous enough to step into the credibility vacuum they’ve left?
I’m no fan of the corporate media, but the Dems deserve bashing. Only this is the wrong kind. Republicans run as anti-union, tax cutting, pro war, billionaire loving, poor-hating jackasses. Dems run as pro-union, fair taxing, pro civil liberties, fair wage, pro education and science candidates. When they are elected, they govern as conservatives. Which in my book makes them deceitful, dishonest, lying scumbags. This is what they should be bashed for as well as Republicans and their anti-society behavior.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/9/22/784965/-Sibel-Edmonds:-Rep.-Jan-Schakowsky-lured-into-lesbian-affair-by-Turkish-agents
Leen said alleged sexual misconduct is Sibel Edmonds a credible witness would be my next question.
What do you think? Can we? This site is a great grass roots start. I tell everyone about our Lake. I tell seven friends and they tell seven friends, etc.
Look at Google finance pick NewsCorp (Fox New), Time Warner, the New York Times, Clear Channel (home of Rush and many Right wing Radio heads) then click their five year stock chart.
Traditional Media has a broken business model ironically right wing media by stopping Obama from going Left are killing themselves.
I think the brainwashing is being rejected by everyone who doesn’t watch the news but used to. We are superior to the news we are interactive. If I agree, disagree or just want to add my 2 cents to any news story I can we will never get as big as the MSM but pretty soon no smart person interested in politics won’t be reading us.
And by US I mean the Lefty Blogs. If I want Rage Propaganda, and the GOP’s latest Secret Obama Muslim, born in Kenya gossip. I’ll read the Righty Blogs.
But kids in High school or college researching current issue papers well since we link to our sources and try our best to get good sources we can get these kids good grades.
A kid using the Drudge Report as a source will likely get laughed at and/or a low grade.
Interesting the Hippies did it funny the Wallstreet guys like the NeoCons might be former hippies but its obvious they became Corporate GOPers or at best Blue Dogs.
They are not still Hippies why we would have regulated WallStreet.
I heard a report this week on the profile of the Millenials…(I do not usually like those tags, but the analysis was interesting) It was a view of liberal, very social conscious, very different from Boomer/GenXers. It was definitely a note of optimism about social interest and involvement.
Interesting I think they get their news from the Daily Show more than the news but what news are they watching? At what age do people start getting into regular blogs and political blogs like ours?
Haven’t been able to stomach even The News Hour for years.
How much am I willing to pay Jane or Arianna, to read and show the news to me ON THE TOOBZ while I make dinner? I think my dollar for that would return handsome dividends. What if the MSM actually had competition from the actual world even just on the TOOBZ.
It’s not if, it’s when. Could FDL get the resources to do it? Is Arianna thinking about it? I’ll pay for that!
Even 15 minutes to start.
I do not recall that was discussed. But they sounded very “with it”, had mostly supported Obama, somewhat disappointed, but still with him, etc. Just sounded so engaged and not very materialistic. I felt great hope…
I am just as pissed off with the media as the next lib. But Obama is supposedly smart. Like the rest of the Leadership. Perpetually acting like Charlie Brown is not the fault of the media – its the epic cowardice of the Dems. See yesterday’s “filibuster” of unemployment extensions.
Frankly, this answers the question about Edmonds for me FINALLY. If this is what she is saying behind closed doors, whether it is true or not, I can now understand why her allegations get no traction after all these years. Most reporters hearing this would run in the opposite direction. Covering something this sordid is toxic. If they wanted to cover it they would have to “soften” it for at lest the first reporting, and that is not possible with such allegations. And if it turned out to be false, well, then the reporter’s career is over. Edmonds is toxic.
As for the rest, yeah, they blame the left. That’s part of the drill. I heard a caller into Randi Rhodes’ show a couple of weeks ago claim that GWB was liberal. Yeah, that’s it, that was the problem. And the rightist media says the MSM is left but then they hire only righties!!!! Like Palin. If the media is all lefties then how did Palin get a nice fat contract. And Huckabee. And Beck. And Limbaugh.
I noticed CNN cutting away when the Dems were talking too. It was so obvious I was able to predict it based on the pattern then set early in the day. Disgusting. I thought CNN wasn’t quite that bad. You’d at least think a producer would have stepped in if it was “unintentional” but a producer probably set it up that way. They probably have an excuse, too: “the whole point of the day was to give the Republics a chance to participate.” Riiiight.