Take a look at these headlines.
- WaPo: “At CPAC, Glenn Beck scolds the Republican Party.“
- MSNBC: “Beck criticizes Obama and the GOP.“
- The Atlantic: “Beck Thumps GOP, Puzzling Conservatives.”
- L.A. Times: “Glenn Beck to Republican Party: Repent.“
And on and on. If you only skimmed those headlines, you’d think that Beck went boldly into the belly of the beast, and had some kind of Sister Souljah moment.
Except Beck didn’t do that. He blew smoke up the CPAC audience’s white asses by simply reciting, verbatim, exactly the same tired spiel Republican leaders have been parroting nonstop since they lost control of Congress in 2006.
Here’s what Beck said.
“I voted Republican almost every time,” he said, and “I don’t even know what they stand for anymore. And they’ve got to realize that they have a problem: ‘Hello, my name is the Republican Party, and I’ve got a problem. I’m addicted to spending and big government.‘”
So Republicans are losing elections because they’re insufficiently conservative. Never heard that before!
If we’re going to spend money foolishly, and as stupidly as the Democrats, the voters are going to vote for the professional spenders, the Democrats. Not the amateur spenders, the Republicans.
The leaders asked the caucus why we thought we’d lost our majority. Was it the war in Iraq? About a third of the hands went up. Was it corruption? About a dozen hands. Was it that we’d lost our way on spending and the need for small government? The majority of hands went up … The American people came to believe that we’re the party of Big Government. That’s why they threw us out.
Senator John McCain of Arizona acknowledged Monday that his fellow Republicans “forgot who we were” in recent years by spending too much, and said that as president he would rely on low taxes, greater fiscal restraint and free trade to lift the nation’s economy.
In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear — our party got away from its principles. You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline and personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost your trust — and rightly so.
Ask yourself: is it possible to “scold” or “thump” someone when you’re lovingly reciting their talking points? Probably not.
On the other hand, Beck called progressivism a “cancer” on America which needs to be “eradicated.” So he pretty much bashed both sides equally.
[/Dana Milbank]





43 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Frist!
I can’t tell whether he’s simply a huckster or if he’s actually crazy.
They should have had Colbert as their keynote speaker.
This guy is beyond lame. He tried CNN before Fox and was a failure there also. I do my best to ignore and avoid this type of person and am seriously tired of people who supposedly feel the same feel the need to rub my nose in it. Not only do I have to avoid their broadcasts but other supposed to be “progressive” even if not liberal news media. Not many choices left. Amy Goodman is one and I have a tremendous amount of respect for Bill Moyer but that is about it, Zogby also. Snake oil is snake oil no matter who is selling it.
this GOP-approved messaging is akin to the DNC messaging: tell your base what you think they want to hear in order to get elected, then ignore all of your promises.
“Eradication” — where have we heard language like that before?
(Godwin, in single digits!)
Those aren’t mutually exclusive.
in GOPville, the toughest talk always comes from the biggest pussies.
Hmmm. I think Democrats mostly ignore or scold their base.
Glenn’s courageous message illustrates a clear difference between the political right and left, American-style.
The Right screw up royally, and hold a conference where they tell themselves they just need to lean more rightward. No one is surprised.
In a few years, the Democrats will be holding a similar conference to discuss how they screwed up–and you KNOW the theme will be, “We were just too Democratic. We’ve got to be less liberal, less progressive.” It’s a low self-esteem thing.
Bingo.
i seem to recall some pretty lofty promises by obam during the run up to the ’08 election (things like: no more torture, ending no-bid contracts, etc)
they “mostly ignore or scold their base” once in office.
But Obama didn’t run a “liberal base” campaign — he campaigned as a moderate/pragmatist.
That picture is clearly of him watching someone of color die from waterboarding.
I’ve caught Beck’s show a couple times over the past month-after never having seen it before. Definitely car wreck syndrome material.
I can’t tell whether he’s simply a huckster or if he’s actually crazy.
I think he might be both.
true…
Yes, with the hope and change tags hanging out there for the base to project its wishes on.
Even knowing that O was no progressive, I feel duped.
I received my DNC 2010 PRESIDENTIAL SURVEY today.
It deserves a post here. I really do think that if rewritten, it could be useful, but as written, it is just pathetic. Of the priorities you are supposed to rank, included are “DEAL WITH IRAN” “FIGHTING TERRORISM” “HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM” “WAR IN AFGHANISTAN”
I mean really WAR is a priority? I annotated it to be “ending the war” and gave it a rank, but many of these were just rank-stupidity. I want the prevention of terrorism, not FIGHTING it. I suppose the discourse here is a bit higher level than average, but I was surprised to get GOP talking points among my choices.
Anyway,
If anybody else gets it, I think it is worth a rewrite.
If FDL put out the survey, it would read very much differently.
What makes you more angry: a)Candidate Obama promising to fight any retroactive immunity and then voting for cloture or b) Promising to fight for a public option and then actively working to prevent it or c) Promising to end the influence of lobbyists, and then letting lobbyists write legislation.
etc.
the survey barely fits in the return envelope. Nice engineering.
have a nice day.
Glenn fucked up, though. This was his big chance to perform “The Christmas Sweater” to a packed house.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/12/04/becks-christmas-sweater-flops-in-major-cities-with-just-17-tickets-sold-in-new-york/
Meh. That brand was aimed at independents as much as liberals.
Have you seen his barking moments on KO?
Even knowing that O was no progressive, I feel duped.
Take a number. There are plenty of us in that line.
A year ago, I almost dared to believe that change was in the offing. Not anymore. On the other hand, Glenn Beck provides some excellent comedy entertainment. “progressivism a “cancer” on America which needs to be “eradicated.”
Nice, Glenn. Um…just one question, however: Is not the word “progress” sorta like embedded right there in the word “progressivism?” Just sayin’…
707.
Yup. I also liked it about a week back when Rachel took him apart and ended the segment by saying, “Back off.”
I’m not so sure that is accurate. Progressives represent the forces of change, conservatives respresent the status quo. Independents swing around between the two.
Hope and change was engineered for consumption by the base, IMO.
Good point, though “change” is the theme of every election after 8 years — especially after one of the most unpopular presidents in US history.
If Bush had left office extremely popular, those would not have been the words.
Heh. I almost added a note on my last post about GW being so unpopular that change was a natural choice.
Again, though…polls were running around 90% of D’s loathing W and believing the country was headed in the wrong direction. Independents polled much lower than that, IIRC.
Yes, GOP is and will lose “because they’re insufficiently conservative”.
A $708bn DoD budget and ruling the world by force under the guise of “patriotism” is neo-conservative – not a true conservative. Christians (not that all conservatives are – but by way of example) don’t kill millions in the name of the “National Security”.
Stop being “afraid” of the terror fear-mongering and stand-up for conservative values.
BTW – Benedict Beck is an Idiot on the payroll of his master.
disclosure – “The Doctor and the Judge 2012″
FWIW: Beck was lovingly featured in a Sunday Supplement (USA Weekend – San Jose Mercury News) yesterday – 10 things you didn’t know about Glenn Beck. Did you know he believes in Global Warming?
Puffery.
Yeah, I threw that up here for the guffaw factor, but I’m mystified how buffoons like Beck, O’Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, Palin (gawd, there’s so many) get paid big bucks to spew their horseshit all over the airwaves on a daily basis.
I know politics is a rough and tumble, smashmouth contact sport but when these haters’ policy “recommendations” get taken seriously, then real people feel real pain as a result. Though we laugh and call them clowns and hucksters, they actually do have blood on their hands.
Though we laugh and call them clowns and hucksters, they actually do have blood on their hands.
Agree completely. Same as for their bosses, all the way up the foodchain.
…hey, let’s just listen to Glen and the failed GOP, and go back to cut taxes/cut govt that we tried for the 3 decades of the Reagan/Bush era. In fact, let’s get ANOTHER big tax cut to the wealthiest as we did in 1981 and 2001.
I mean, that worked SO well to deliver trickle down prosperity. Almost nobody is unemployed now. And the banks and health insurers, heck – they POLICED THEMSELVES!!! Get government out of the WAY by golly!
…did you know most teabaggers think Hitler was a socialist?
…can you spell i-g-n-o-r-a-n-t? — saw a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth
I think the “Hitler is a socialist” meme began in the late 1960s or early 1970s when Pat Robertson began the 700 Club. I’m speaking off the top of my head & don’t have time for links (sorry), but I believe that was some rightwing think-tank approach to demonizing the left/progressives. And they’ve been using it quite successfully ever since. Go figure. Makes no sense to me, but that’s they way it rolls.
I don’t really “get” how so many rightwingers don’t see how “trickle down” simply doesn’t work, except that I *think* these fools somehow dupe themselves into believing that “just maybe” they’ll grab the big brass ring and start making gazillions of dollars, themselves, and so, yeah: I sure don’t wanna pay my fair share of taxes in that case.
Somehow they’ve been mezmerized into believing this bunk, when even those making in the up to a $1million/year are really not benefiting all that much from these tax cuts. It’s only when you get into the high millions or billions where it really becomes a big benefit.
Go figure. I can remember my parents worshipping Sainted Ronnie for cutting taxes, yet when I showed them my paycheck – with NO tax cuts – they still didn’t want to see it. What’s that saying?? They had eyes but didn’t see… they had ears but didn’t hear… ???
Has never ever made sense to me, but I see many rightists mezmerized by this b.s. And believe me, the ones I’m thinking of are very well educated and on other levels are very smart. It is consistently amazing to me how they’ve been brainwashed into voting against their better interests, but there you go: that’s how it is.
As for Clown Beck… he’s a huckster, a fool, a weird crazoid, who laughs all the way to his off-shore account. Again, why anyone would listen to this jerk is way beyond me, but believe me, rightists just love ‘em some Glenn … big time. I guess he tells them what they want to hear.
Emptywheel has a fresh cross-post up: Michael Hayden Lied to SSCI on April 12, 2007
But it’s low self-esteem that pays really well.
Chubby the Pig Eyed Cherub’s criticism of republicans at CPAC was the brilliant follow-through on O’Reilly’s accidentally great, made-up ad lib that Glenn Beck is everyman.
(Jon Stewart interview on the Duh-Factor.)
(chubby, pig eyes, blah blah…it isn’t ad hominem when I do it. It’s OCD, like straightening the fringe all day on all the throw rugs.)
Sources of reported news are unapologetically “ours” and “theirs” now, and getting ever-more so. Everybody reads and tv-watches the “information” that best reflects their/our own beliefs. People rarely even see or read the other side’s sources of news, facts, current affairs, or history anymore. Politics on the internet used to take place in real time chat rooms, and the chat rooms were filled with every viewpoint imaginable, from zen-placid, to tv-informed smartass, to clever, hilarious exchanges of partisan ridicule, to serious calls for violent revolt. Now the discussions take place as comments to blogs, and THEIR blogs don’t allow US in. The sides are closed to each other. Sure, our side permits the other side to comment, but their side doesn’t permit us, so no headon debate can take place. CNN is Faux News Lite for independents, MSNBC unabashedly shills for the Obama administration so that good Democrats, like Good Germans, will remember that what’s important is staying in the corral.
Each to his own choir means the discussion is over. Reality is whatever you think it is, The End.
Exactly. I sat there just helplessly giggling. It’s so open now! Step by step, leap by bound, and nobody calling it out except us people, not to them, but to one another.
I hear Obama getting thumped regularly on MSNBC. But I guess I take your point. We all hear only what we want to hear.
Why are we giving so much attention to CPAC here? Isn’t there a Democratic equivelent? Or is it that the party doesn’t really believe in anything anymore? (oh, I forgot)
Beck is a nut and is criminally insane. I don’t care about what a bunch of freaks at a fascist rally in DC have to say about anything. I wish they would disappear. If they hate America so much they should leave. Now.
Let’s ignore this bs, and ask people like Maddow, Matthews, Olberman, Williams, what they think this week in politics. Watching some nutcase bark like a dog, jump up and down, contort his face and scream about how much he wants to destroy the US government just isn’t my idea of entertainment. I don’t care. He’s irrelevant. Let’s ignore him/them. PLEASE.
As far as Beck goes, ignoring him is good advice. That being said, “If they hate America so much they should leave. Now.”…… That is the old “America, Love It or Leave It” theme. The pro Vietnam War bunch said the same thing in the 60′s. Do you really want to identify yourself with that mentality?
This tells all about CPAC if they are followers of Glen Beck.